The political order in the Arctic: Power structures, regimes and influence

Polar Record

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 165-176

  Wegge, Njord ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TROMSØ   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEGEMONY; INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS; POLITICAL CONFLICT; POLITICAL POWER; STAKEHOLDER;

ARCTIC;

EID: 79960363463     PISSN: 00322474     EISSN: 14753057     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0032247410000331     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Adler, E., and M. Barnett. 1998. Security communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Arctic Council. 1996. Declaration on the establishment of the Arctic Council, by the representatives of the Arctic states. 19 September 1996. Ottawa: Arctic Council.
3. AMAP (Arctic Monitoring Assessment Programme). 2009. Arctic boundaries. URL: http://www.amap.no/ (accessed 12 May 2009).
4. AMSA (Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment). 2009. Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment Report 2009. Arctic Council.
5. Baev, P.K. 2009. Troublemaking and risk-taking: the north in Russian military activities. In: Rowe, E.W. (editor). Russia and the north. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
6. Barma, N., E. Ratner, and S. Weber. 2007. A world without the west. The National Interest 90 (July/August 2007) 23-30.
7. Blunden, M. 2009. The new problem of Arctic stability. Survival 51(5): 121-142.
8. Borgerson, S.G. 2008. Arctic meltdown; The economic and security implications of global warming. Foreign Affairs 87(2): 63-77.
9. Borgerson, S.G. 2009. The national interest and the law of the sea. New York: Council on Foreign Relations (Council Special Report 46 (May 2009)).
10. Brooks, S.G., and W.C. Wohlforth. 2005. Hard times for soft balancing. International Security 30(1): 72-108.
11. Bull, H. 1995. The anarchical society. A study of order in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press (2nd edition).
12. Carr, E. 2001. The twenty years' crisis, 1919-1939. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
13. Corell, H. 2009. The Arctic: an opportunity to cooperate and demonstrate statesmanship. Journal of Transnational Law 42: 1065-1079.
14. Cox, R.W. 2001. Approaches to world order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Deutsch, K.W., and J.D. Singer. 1964. Multipolar power systems and international stability. World Politics 16(3): 390-406.
16. Doyle, M.W. 1986. Liberalism and world politics. American Political Science Review 80(4): 1151-1169.
17. Elster, J. 1989. The cement of society. A study of social order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. EU. High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy and the European Commission. 2008. Climate change and international security. Btussels: The European Council. URL: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms- data/docs/pressdata/en/reports/99387.pdf
19. EU. Commission. 2008. The European Union and the Arctic region. Brussels: The European Commission. URL: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms-data/ docs/pressdata/en/reports/99387.pdf.
20. EU. Council. 2009. Council conclusions on Arctic issues. 2985th Foreign Affairs Council meeting. Brussels, 8 December 2009. URL: http://www.consilium. europa.eu/uedocs/cms-data/docs/pressdata/en/reports/99387.pdf
21. EU. Parliament. 2008. European parliament resolution on Arctic governance, 9 October 2008. Brussels: European Parliament P6-TA(2008)0474
22. Evans, G., and J. Newnham. 1998. Dictionary of international relations. London: Penguin Books.
23. Gilpin, R. 1975. U.S. power and the multinational corporation. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
24. Gilpin, R. 1989. War and change in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Graff, J. 2007. Who owns the Arctic? Fight for the top of the world. Time Magazine October 170(14): 28 (1 October 2007). URL: http://www.time.com/time/ world/article/0,8599,1663445-1,00.html).
26. Haas, E.B. 1980. Why collaborate? Issue-linkage and international regimes. World Politics 32(3): 357-405.
27. Handel, M. 1990. Weak states in the international system. New York: Frank Cass (2nd edition).
28. Harrington, C. 2008. Eying up the new Arctic: competition in the Arctic circle. Jane's Defence Weekly 3 (23 January 2008): 22-27.
29. Heininen, L., and H. Nicol. 2007. The importance of northern dimension foreign policies in the geopolitics of the circumpolar north. Geopolitics 12: 133-165. (Pubitemid 46039394)
30. Hoel, A.H. 2009. The high north legal-political regime In: Holtsmark, S.G., and B.A. Smith-Windsor. Security prospects in the high north: geostrategic thaw or freeze? Rome: NATO Defence College (Forum paper 7): 10.
31. Holtsmark, S.G., and B.A. Smith-Windsor. 2009. Introduction. In: Holtsmark, S.G., and B.A. Smith-Windsor Security prospects in the high north: geostrategic thaw or freeze? Rome: NATO Defence College (Forum paper 7).
32. Howard, R. 2009. The Arctic gold rush. London: Continuum.
33. Huebert, R. 2009. Cooperation or conflict in the Arctic. Seward Alaska: Center for Oceans Law and Policy (Presentation at the 33rd Center for Oceans Law and Policy conference: Changes in the Arctic environment and the law of the sea. 21 May 2009).
34. Hønneland, G., and O.S. Stokke. 2007. Introduction. In: Stokke, O.S., and G. Hønneland (editors). International cooperation and Arctic governance. Regime effectiveness and northern region building. New York: Routledge, New York:1-12.
35. Iceland. 2010. Gallup poll on EU membership. URL: http://www.si.is/media/ althjodlegt-samstarf/almenningur-2010-02.pdf (in Icelandic). URL: http://www.abcnyheter.no/nyheter/politikk/100323/kraftig-eu-motvind-i-island-og- norge (in Norwegian)
36. Ilulissat Declaration. 2008. Declaration by foreign ministers of Denmark, Norway, Russia, USA and Canada, 28 May 2008. Ilulissat, Greenland.
37. Jensen, Ø., and S.V. Rottem. 2009. The politics of security and international law in Norway's Arctic waters. Polar Record 46(236): 75-83.
38. Jervis, R. 1978. Cooperation under the security dilemma. World Politics 30(2): 176-214.
39. Kant, I. 1795. Perpetual peace. London: Swan Sonnenschein and Co.
40. Kaplan, R.D. 2009. The revenge of geography. Foreign Policy. May/June 2009: 96-105.
41. Keohane, R.O. 1980. The theory of hegemonic stability and changes. In: Holsti, O.R., M.S. Randolph, and A.L. George (editors): Change in the international system. Boulder: Westview Press: 131-162.
42. Keohane, R.O. 1984. After hegemony. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
43. Keohane, R.O. 1990. Multilateralism: An agenda for research. International Journal. 45(4): 731-764.
44. Kindleberger, C.P. 1973. The world in depression 1929-1939. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books Ltd
45. Koivurova, T., and D.L. Vanderzwaag. 2007. The Arctic Council at 10 years: retrospect and prospects. University of British Columbia Law Review 40(1): 121-194.
46. Koivurova, T., and E. Molenaar 2009. International governance and regulation of the marine Arctic. Overview and gap analysis. Oslo: WWF.
47. Krasner, S.D. 1976. State power and the structure of international trade. World Politics 28(3): 317-347.
48. Krasner, S.D. 1982. Structural causes and regime consequences: regimes as intervening variables. International Organization 36(2): 185-205.
49. Layne, C. 2009. The waning of US hegemony-myth or reality? A review essay. International Security 34(1): 147-172.
50. Levy, J.S. 1989. Domestic politics and War. In: Rotberg, R.I., and T.K. Rabb (editors). The origin and prevention of major wars. New York: Cambridge University Press.
51. Malnes, R. 2002. Etterord. Kant om krig og fred: fortolkning og kritikk [Epilogue. Kant on war and peace: Interpretation and criticism]. In: Kant, I. Den evige fred. En filosofisk plan [The perpetual peace. A philosophical plan]. Oslo: Aschehoug and Co.
52. Mastanduno, M. 1997. Preserving the unipolar moment. Realist theories and U.S. grand strategy after the Cold War. International Security, 21(4): 49-88. (Pubitemid 127064553)
53. Mearsheimer, J.J. 2001. The tragedy of great power politics. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
54. NRC (National Research Council). 2007. Polar icebreakers in a changing world. An assessment of US needs. Washington DC: The National Academic Press.
55. Oneal, J.R., and B. Russett 1999. The Kantianian peace. The pacific benefits of democracy, interdependence, and international organizations, 1885-1992. World Politics 52(October): 1-37. (Pubitemid 30083421)
56. Owen, J.M. 1994. How liberalism produces democratic peace. International Security 19(2): 87-125.
57. Pape, R.A. 2005. Soft balancing against the United States. International Security 30(1): 7-45.
58. Potts, T., and C. Schofield. 2008. Current legal developments in the Arctic. The International Journal of Marine and Costal Law 23: 151-176.
59. Schweller, R.L. 2004. Unanswered threats: a neoclassical realist theory of underbalancing. International Security 29(2): 159-201. (Pubitemid 39594084)
60. Small, M., and J.D. Singer. 1976. The war-proneness of democratic regimes, 1816-1965. Jerusalem Journal of International Relations I.
61. The Economist. 2008. The Economist Intelligence Unit's index of democracy 2008. London: The Economist Intelligence Unit.
62. Tromsø Declaration. 2009. Declaration. On the occasion of the sixth ministerial meeting of the Arctic Council, 29 April 2009. Tromsø: Arctic Council.
63. USA. 2009. National security/homeland security presidential directive on Arctic region policy. 9 January 2009: III c. URL: http://www.fas.org/irp/ offdocs/nspd/nspd-66.htm
64. Walt, S.M. 1987. The origins of alliances. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
65. Waltz, K. 1979. Theory of international politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
66. Wendt, A. 1992. Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics. International Organization 42(2): 391-425.
67. Young, O.R. 2009. Whither the Arctic? Conflict or cooperation in the circumpolar north. Polar Record 45(232): 73-82.