Gender differences in moral sensitivity: A meta-analysis

Ethics and Behavior

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 263-282

  You, Di ^a   Maeda, Yukiko ^b   Bebeau, Muriel J ^c  

^a ALVERNIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Gender differences; Meta analysis; Moral sensitivity

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960360518     PISSN: 10508422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10508422.2011.585591     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Aadland, E. (1993). Sosiaali-ja terveydenhoitoalan etiikka [Social-and Health Care Ethics]. Helsinki, Finland: Otava.
2. Bebeau, M. J. (2002). The Defining Issues Test and the Four Component Model: Contributions to professional education. Journal of Moral Education, 31, 271-295.
3. Bebeau, M. J., & Brabeck, M. M. (1987). Integrating care and justice issues in professional moral education: A gender perspective. Journal of Moral Education, 16, 189-202.
4. Blasi, A. (1994). Moral identity: Its role in moral functioning. In B. Puka (Ed.), Fundamental research in moral development (pp. 168-179). New York, NY: Garland.
5. Borenstein, M. (2009). Effect sizes for continuous data. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 221-235). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
6. Brabeck, M. M. (1989). Who cares? Theory, research and educational implications of the ethic of care. New York, NY: Praeger.
7. Clarkeburn, H. (2002). A test for ethical sensitivity in science. Journal of Moral Education, 31, 439-453.
8. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: Academic Press.
9. Fedeles, M. (2004). The Teachers' Concerns Questionnaire: The development and validation of a measure of high school teachers' moral sensitivity. Dissertation Abstracts International, 65(08). (UMI No. NQ93117)
10. Flower, J. T. (1992). A comparative study of how psychologist gender relates to moral sensitivity. Dissertation Abstracts International, 53(05). (UMI No. 9220255)
11. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Harding, S. S. (1993). Moral sensitivity of training directors in counseling education, counseling psychology, and clinical psychology training programs. Dissertation Abstracts International, 54(02). (UMI No. 9317062)
13. Hedges, L. V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass's estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6, 107-128.
14. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical model of meta-analysis. New York, NY: Academic Press.
15. Higgins, J., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysis. British Medical Journal, 327, 557-560.
16. Hunter, R. A. (1997). Assessing moral sensitivity in business personnel. Dissertation Abstracts International, 58(10). (UMI No. 9812137)
17. Jaffee, S., & Hyde, J. S. (2000). Gender differences in moral orientation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 703-726.
18. Keenan, M. J. (2000). Individual differences in ascription of responsibility and mental health graduate students' moral sensitivity. Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(09). (UMI No. 9985504)
19. Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347-480). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
20. Lindsey, R. T. (1986). Differences in moral sensitivity based on varying levels of counseling training and experience (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Denver, Denver, Colorado.
21. Lipsey, M. W. (2009). Indentifying interesting variables and analysis opportunities. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 147-158). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
22. Longenecker, J. G., McKinney, J. A., & Moore, C. W. (1989). Ethics in small business. Journal of Small Business Management, 27, 27-31.
23. Lutzen, K., Evertzon, M., & Nordin, C. (1997). Moral sensitivity in psychiatric practice. Nursing Ethics, 4, 472-482.
24. Lutzen, K., Johansson, A., & Nordstrom, G. (2000). Moral sensitivity: Some differences between nurses and physicians. Nursing Ethics, 7, 520-530.
25. Maher, M. J. (2004). An investigation of teacher candidate ethical identity. Dissertation Abstracts International, 66(1). (UMI No. 3162460)
26. McNeel, S. P., & Frederickson, J. (1999). Understanding difficult situations: The College Moral Sensitivity Test (CMoST). St. Paul, MN: Bethel College.
27. Myyry, L., & Helkama, K. (2002). The role of value priorities and professional ethics training in moral sensitivity. Journal of Moral Education, 31(1), 35-51.
28. Owhoso, V. (2002). Mitigating gender-specific superior ethical sensitivity when assessing likelihood of fraud risk. Journal of Managerial Issues, 14, 360-374.
29. Ozdogan, F. B., & Eser, Z. (2007). Ethical sensitivity of college students in a developing country: Do demographic factors matter? Journal of Teaching in International Business, 19(1), 83-99.
30. Patterson, D. (2001). Causal effects of regulatory organizational and personal factors on ethical sensitivity. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(2), 123-160.
31. Rest, J. R. (1979). Defining Issues Test. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
32. Rest, J. R. (1982). Morality. In P. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael's manual of child psychology, fourth edition, Volume on cognitive development (J. Flavell & E. Markman, Vol. Eds., pp. 556-629). New York, NY: Wiley.
33. Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1986). Meta-analytic procedures for combining studies with multiple effect sizes. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 400-406.
34. Savickas, P. R. (1987). Measure of moral sensitivity: Construction of an objective measure of moral development (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
35. Shaub, M. K. (1989). An empirical examination of the determinants of auditor's ethical sensitivity (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Texas Technology University, Lubbock, Texas.
36. Thoma, S. J. (1986). Estimating gender differences in the comprehension and preference of moral issues. Developmental Review, 6, 165-180.
37. Thoma, S. J. (1994). Moral judgments and moral action. In J. R. Rest & D. Narvaez (Eds.), Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics (pp. 199-213). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Tirri, K., & Nokelainen, P. (2007). Comparison of academically average and gifted students' self-rated ethical sensitivity. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(6), 587-601.
39. Ural, T. (2001). Pazarlama yoneticilerinin etiksel yargilamalari ve davranissal niyetlerini aciklayan degerleme dinamikleri uzerine bir arastirma. Journal of Faculty of Business, 2(2), 75-100.
40. Waithe, M. E. (1989). Twenty-three hundred years of women philosophers: Toward a gender undifferentiated moral theory. In M. M. Brabeck (Ed.), Who cares? Theory, research and educational implications of the ethic of care (pp. 3-18). New York, NY: Praeger.
41. Walker, L. J. (1984). Sex differences in the development of moral reasoning: A critical review. Child Development, 55, 671-691.
42. Walker, L. J. (2006). Gender and morality. In M. Killen & J. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral psychology (pp. 93-115). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Wilson, D. B. (2009). Systematic coding. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 159-176). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
44. You, D. (2007). Interrelationships and gender differences among components of morality for dental students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 68(10). (UMI No. 3285668)
45. You, D., & Bebeau, M. J. (2005, November). Moral sensitivity: A review. Paper presented at the 31st Annual Conference of the Association of Moral Education, Cambridge, MA