Irrigating poplar energy crops with landfill leachate negatively affects soil micro- and meso-fauna

International Journal of Phytoremediation

Volumn 13, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 845-858

  Coyle, David R ^a,d   Zalesny, Jill A ^b,c   Zalesny Jr , Ronald S ^c   Wiese, Adam H ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES   (United States)

^c Institute for Applied Ecosystem Studies   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Insects; Nematodes; Phytotechnologies; Populus; Waste management; Wastewater reuse

Indexed keywords

FERTILIZER; WATER;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ASPEN; BIODIVERSITY; BIOMASS; BIOREMEDIATION; ECOSYSTEM; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; INSECT; IRRIGATION (AGRICULTURE); METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; NEMATODE; PARASITOLOGY; PLANT ROOT; RECYCLING; SOIL; SOIL POLLUTANT; TIME; UNITED STATES; WASTE DISPOSAL; WATER POLLUTANT;

AGRICULTURAL IRRIGATION; ANIMALS; BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; BIODIVERSITY; BIOMASS; ECOSYSTEM; FERTILIZERS; INSECTS; NEMATODA; PLANT ROOTS; POPULUS; RECYCLING; REFUSE DISPOSAL; SOIL; SOIL POLLUTANTS; TIME FACTORS; WATER; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL; WISCONSIN;

HEXAPODA; NEMATODA; POPULUS;

EID: 79960357689     PISSN: 15226514     EISSN: 15497879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15226514.2011.552927     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Adão H, Alves AS, Patrício J, Neto JM, Costa MJ, Marques JC. 2009. Spatial distribution of subtidal Nematoda communities along the salinity gradient in southern European estuaries. Acta Oecologia. 25: 287-300.
2. Adl SM. 2008. Setting the tempo in land remediation: Short term and long term patterns in biodiversity recovery. Microbes Environ. 23: 13-19.
3. Chan YSG, Chu LM, Wong MH. 1997. Influence of landfill factors on plants and soil fauna-an ecological perspective. Environ Pollut. 97: 39-44.
4. Chen S, Polle A. 2010. Salinity tolerance of Populus. Plant Biol. 12: 317-333.
5. Chen G, Qin J, Shi D, Zhang Y, Ji W. 2009. Diversity of soil nematodes in areas polluted with heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Lanzhou, China. Environ Manage. 44: 163-172.
6. Coyle DR, Coleman MD. 2005. Forest production responses to irrigation and fertilization are not explained by shifts in allocation. Forest Ecology and Management. 208: 137-152.
7. Coyle DR, Mattson WJ, Raffa KF. 2008. Invasive root feeding insects in natural forest ecosystems of North America. In: Johnson SN, Murray PJ, editors. Root feeders: An ecosystem perspective. Oxfordshire (UK): CABI Press. p. 134-151.
8. Derraik JGB, Closs GP, Dickinson KJM, Sirvid P, Barratt BIP, Patrick BH. 2002. Arthropod morphospecies versus taxonomic species:Acase study with Araneae, Coleoptera, and Lepidoptera. Cons Biol. 16: 1015-1023.
9. Dickmann DI. 2001. An overview of the genus Populus. In: Dickmann DI, Isebrands JG, Eckenwalder JE, Richardson J, editors. Poplar culture in North America. Ottawa (ON): NRC Research Press, National Research Council of Canada. p. 1-42.
10. Eckenwalder JE. 1996. Systematics and evolution of Populus. In: Stettler RF, Bradshaw HD Jr, Heilman PE, Hinckley TM, editors. Biology of Populus and its implications for management and conservation. Ottawa (ON): NRC Research Press, National Research Council of Canada. p. 7-32.
11. Erdman JA, Christenson S. 2000. Elements in cottonwood trees as an indicator of ground water contaminated by landfill leachate. Ground Water Monitoring Remed. 20: 120-126.
12. Finnegan MM, Downes MJ, O'Regan M, Griffin CT. 1999. Effect of salt and temperature stresses on survival and infectivity of Heterorhabditis spp. IJs. Nemtology. 1: 69-78.
13. Gremion F, Chatzinotas A, Kaufmann K, Von Sigler W, Harms H. 2004. Impacts of heavy metal contamination and phytoremediation on a microbial community during a twelve-monthmicrocosm experiment. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 48: 273-283.
14. Hansen EA. 1981. Root length in young hybrid Populus plantations: Its implications for border width of research plots. For Sci. 27: 808-814.
15. Hasselgren K. 1998. Use of municipal waste products in energy forestry: Highlights from 15 years of experience. Biomass Bioenergy. 15: 71-74.
16. Isebrands JG, Karnosky DF. 2001. Environmental benefits of poplar culture. In: Dickmann DI, Isebrands JG, Eckenwalder JG, Richardson J, editors. Poplar culture in North America. Ottawa (ON): NRC Research Press, National Research Council of Canada. p. 207-218.
17. Johnston JM, Crossley DA Jr. 2002. Forest ecosystem recovery in the southeastern US: Soil ecology as an essential component of ecosystem management. For Ecol Manage. 155: 187-203.
18. Kjeldsen P, Barlaz MA, Rooker AP, Baun A, Ledin A, Christensen TH. 2002. Present and long-term composition of MSW landfill leachate: A review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 32: 297-336.
19. Licht LA, Isebrands JG. 2005. Linking phytoremediated pollutant removal to biomass economic opportunities. Biomass Bioenergy. 28: 203-218.
20. Makeschin F. 1994. Effects of energy forestry on soils. Biomass Bioenergy. 6: 63-79.
21. Migliorini M, Pigino G, Bianchi N, Bernini F, Leonzio C. 2004. The effects of heavy metal contamination on the soil arthropod community of a shooting range. Environ Pollut. 129: 331-340.
22. Mirck J, Isebrands JG, Verwijst T, Ledin S. 2005. Development of short-rotation willow coppice systems for environmental purposes in Sweden. Biomass Bioenergy. 28: 219-228.
23. Moens T, Vincx M. 2000. Temperature and salinity constraints on the life cycle of two brackish-water nematode species. J Exp Marine Biol Ecol. 243: 115-135.
24. Nahmani J, Lavelle P. 2002. Effects of heavy metal pollution on soil macrofauna in a grassland of Northern France. Eur J Soil Biol. 38: 297-300.
25. Nahmani J, Lavelle P, Rossi J-P. 2006. Does changing the taxonomical resolution alter the value of the soil macroinvertebrates as bioindicators of metal pollution? Soil Biol Biochem. 38: 385-396.
26. Nkem JN, Virginia RA, Barrett JE, Wall DH, Li G. 2006. Salt tolerance and survival thresholds for two species of Antarctic soil nematodes. Polar Biol. 29: 643-651.
27. Oliver I, Beattie AJ. 1996. Designing a cost-effective invertebrate survey: A test of methods for rapid assessment of biodiversity. Ecol Appl. 6: 594-607.
28. Parmelee RW, Eherenfelt JG, Tate RL III. 1993. Effects of pine roots on microorganisms, fauna, and nitrogen availability in two soil horizons of a coniferous forest spodosol. Biol Fertil Soils. 15: 113-119.
29. Postma-Blaauw MW, de Goede RGM, Bloem J, Faber JH, Brussaard L. 2010. Soil biota community structure and abundance under agricultural intensification and extensification. Ecology. 91: 460-473.
30. Prins AH, Nell HW, Klinkhamer PGL. 1992. Size-dependent root herbivory on Cynoglossum officinale. Oikos. 65: 409-413.
31. Rajora OM, Zsuffa L. 1990. Allozyme divergence and evolutionary relationships among Populus deltoides, P. nigra, and P. maximowiczii. Genome. 33: 44-49.
32. Sánchez-Moreno S, Camargo JA, Navas A. 2006. Ecotoxological assessment of the impact of residual heavymetals on soil nematodes in the Guadiamar River Basin (Southern Spain). Environ Monit Assess. 116: 245-262.
33. Shao Y, Zhang W, Shen J, Zhou L, Xia H, Shu W, Ferris H, Fu S. 2008. Nematodes as indicators of soil recovery in tailings of a lead/zinc mine. Soil Biol Biochem. 40: 2040-2046.
34. Shrive SC, McBride RA, Gordon AM. 1994. Photosynthetic and growth responses of two broad-leaf tree species to irrigation with municipal landfill leachate. J Environ Qual. 23: 534-542.
35. Thurston GS, Ni Y, Kaya HK. 1994. Influence of salinity on survival and infectivity of entomopathogenic nematodes. J Nematol. 26: 345-351.
36. Vangronsveld J, Herzig R, Weyens N, Boulet J, Adriaenssen K, Ruttens A, Thewys T, Vassilev A, Meers E, Nehvevajova E, Van Der Lelie D, Mench M. 2009. Phytoremediation of contaminated soils and groundwater: Lessons from the field. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 16: 765-794.
37. Vickerman DB, Trumble JT, George GN, Pickering IJ, Nichol H. 2004. Selenium biotransformations in an insect ecosystem: Effects of insects on phytoremediation. Environ Sci Technol. 38: 3581-3586.
38. Viglierchio DR, Schmitt RV. 1983. On the methodology of nematode extraction from field samples: comparison of methods for soil extraction. Journal of Nematology. 15: 438-444.
39. Zalesny JA, Zalesny RS Jr, Wiese AH, Hall RB. 2007a. Choosing tree genotypes for phytoremediation of landfill leachate using phyto-recurrent selection. Int J Phytoremed. 9: 513-530.
40. Zalesny JA, Zalesny RS Jr, Coyle DR, Hall RB. 2007b. Growth and biomass of Populus irrigated with landfill leachate. For Ecol Manage. 248: 143-152.
41. Zalesny JA, Zalesny RS Jr, Wiese AH, Sexton B, Hall RB. 2008a. Sodium and chloride accumulation in leaf, woody, and root tissue of Populus after irrigation with landfill leachate. Environ Poll. 155: 72-80.
42. Zalesny JA, Zalesny RS Jr, Wiese AH, Sexton BT, Hall RB. 2008b. Uptake of macro-and micronutrients into leaf, woody, and root tissue of Populus after irrigation with landfill leachate. J Sust For. 27: 303-327.
43. Zalesny JA, Zalesny RS Jr, Coyle DR, Hall RB, Bauer EO. 2009a. Clonal variation in morphology of Populus root systems following irrigation with landfill leachate or water during two years of establishment. BioEnergy Res. 2: 134-143.
44. Zalesny RS Jr, Zalesny JA. 2009. Selecting Populus with different adventitious root types for environmental benefits, fiber, and energy. In: Niemi K, Scagel C, editors. Adventitious root formation of forest trees and horticultural plants-from genes to applications. Kerala (India): Research Signpost. p. 359-384.
45. Zalesny RS Jr, Wiese AH, Bauer EO, Riemenschneider DE. 2006. Sapflow of hybrid poplar (Populus nigra L. P. maximowiczii A. Henry 'NM6') during phytoremediation of landfill leachate. Biomass Bioenergy. 30: 784-793.
46. Zalesny RS Jr, Hall RB, Zalesny JA, McMahon BG, Berguson WE, Stanosz GR. 2009b. Biomass and genotype environment interactions of Populus energy crops in the Midwestern United States. BioEnergy Res. 2: 106-122.
47. Zavitkovski J. 1981. Small plots with unplanted plot border can distort data in biomass production studies. Can J For Res. 11: 9-12.