Comparison between tonopachy and other tonometric and pachymetric devices

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 88, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 843-849

  Lee, Yong Gi ^a   Kim, Ji Hyun ^a   Kim, Na Rae ^a,b   Kim, Chan Yun ^a   Lee, Eun Suk ^a,c  

^a Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Inha University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

^c Seran Eye Center   (South Korea)

Author keywords

central corneal thickness; Goldmann applanation tonometer; intraocular pressure; Pentacam; Tonopachy; ultrasound pachymetry

Indexed keywords

CENTRAL CORNEAL THICKNESS; GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETER; INTRA OCULAR PRESSURE; PENTACAM; TONOPACHY; ULTRASOUND PACHYMETRY;

CORRELATION METHODS; ULTRASONICS;

OPTICAL VARIABLES MEASUREMENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORNEA; ECHOGRAPHY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CORNEA; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TONOMETRY, OCULAR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79960355414     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31821896f1     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Kim SW, Byun YJ, Kim EK, Kim TI. Central corneal thickness measurements in unoperated eyes and eyes after PRK for myopia using Pentacam, Orbscan II, and ultrasonic pachymetry. J Refract Surg 2007;23:888-94.
2. Herndon LW, Choudhri SA, Cox T, Damji KF, Shields MB, Allingham RR. Central corneal thickness in normal, glaucomatous, and ocular hypertensive eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 1997;115:1137-41. (Pubitemid 27387949)
3. Kniestedt C, Lin S, Choe J, Bostrom A, Nee M, Stamper RL. Clinical comparison of contour and applanation tonometry and their relationship to pachymetry. Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:1532-7. (Pubitemid 41626689)
4. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, Johnson CA, Keltner JL, Miller JP, Parrish RK, II, Wilson MR, Kass MA. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: Baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:714-20. (Pubitemid 34620349)
5. Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, Hyman L, Hussein M. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: Results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120: 1268-79. (Pubitemid 36105431)
6. TM NT-530P Brochure. Gamagori, Japan: Nidek; 2009.
7. Konstantopoulos A, Hossain P, Anderson DF. Recent advances in ophthalmic anterior segment imaging: A new era for ophthalmic diagnosis? Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91:551-7. (Pubitemid 46623694)
8. Swartz T, Marten L, Wang M. Measuring the cornea: The latest developments in corneal topography. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2007;18: 325-33. (Pubitemid 46955300)
9. Phelps CD, Phelps GK. Measurement of intraocular pressure: A study of its reproducibility. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol 1976;198:39-43.
10. Nunnally JC. Psychometric Theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
11. Shih CY, Graff Zivin JS, Trokel SL, Tsai JC. Clinical significance of central corneal thickness in the management of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:1270-5. (Pubitemid 39180846)
12. Al-Mezaine HS, Al-Amro SA, Kangave D, Sadaawy A, Wehaib TA, Al-Obeidan S. Comparison between central corneal thickness measurements by oculus pentacam and ultrasonic pachymetry. Int Ophthalmol 2008;28:333-8.
13. Amano S, Honda N, Amano Y, Yamagami S, Miyai T, Samejima T, Ogata M, Miyata K. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by rotating Scheimpflug camera, ultrasonic pachymetry, and scanning-slit corneal topography. Ophthalmology 2006;113: 937-41. (Pubitemid 43795239)
14. Barkana Y, Gerber Y, Elbaz U, Schwartz S, Ken-Dror G, Avni I, Zadok D. Central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam Scheimpflug system, optical low-coherence reflectometry pachymeter, and ultrasound pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:1729-35. (Pubitemid 41503429)
15. Fujioka M, Nakamura M, Tatsumi Y, Kusuhara A, Maeda H, Negi A. Comparison of Pentacam Scheimpflug camera with ultrasound pachymetry and noncontact specular microscopy in measuring central corneal thickness. Curr Eye Res 2007;32:89-94. (Pubitemid 46328423)
16. Li Y, Shekhar R, Huang D. Corneal pachymetry mapping with highspeed optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 2006;113: 792-9.
17. Miranda MA, Radhakrishnan H, O'Donnell C. Repeatability of corneal thickness measured using an Oculus Pentacam. Optom Vis Sci 2009;86:266-72.
18. O'Donnell C, Maldonado-Codina C. Agreement and repeatability of central thickness measurement in normal corneas using ultrasound pachymetry and the OCULUS Pentacam. Cornea 2005;24:920-4. (Pubitemid 41688522)
19. Prospero Ponce CM, Rocha KM, Smith SD, Krueger RR. Central and peripheral corneal thickness measured with optical coherence tomography, Scheimpflug imaging, and ultrasound pachymetry in normal, keratoconus-suspect, and post-laser in situ keratomileusis eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009;35:1055-62.
20. Miglior S, Albe E, Guareschi M, Mandelli G, Gomarasca S, Orzalesi N. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the evaluation of ultrasonic pachymetry measurements of central corneal thickness. Br J Ophthalmol 2004;88:174-7. (Pubitemid 38142079)
21. de Sanctis U, Missolungi A, Mutani B, Richiardi L, Grignolo FM. Reproducibility and repeatability of central corneal thickness measurement in keratoconus using the rotating Scheimpflug camera and ultrasound pachymetry. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;144:712-8.
22. Wu LL, Suzuki Y, Ideta R, Araie M. Central corneal thickness of normal tension glaucoma patients in Japan. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2000; 44:643-7.
23. Haley SM, Ni P, Coster WJ, Black-Schaffer R, Siebens H, Tao W. Agreement in functional assessment: Graphic approaches to displaying respondent effects. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2006;85:747-55. (Pubitemid 44272706)
24. Forbes M, Pico G Jr, Grolman B. A noncontact applanation tonometer. Description and clinical evaluation. Arch Ophthalmol 1974;91: 134-40.
25. Popovich KS, Shields MB. A comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the XPERT noncontact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma 1997;6:44-6. (Pubitemid 27136310)
26. Shields MB. The non-contact tonometer. Its value and limitations. Surv Ophthalmol 1980;24:211-9. (Pubitemid 10161236)
27. Babalola OE, Kehinde AV, Iloegbunam AC, Akinbinu T, Moghalu C, Onuoha I. A comparison of the Goldmann applanation and noncontact (Keeler Pulsair EasyEye) tonometers and the effect of central corneal thickness in indigenous African eyes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2009;29:182-8.
28. Jorge J, Fernandes P, Queiros A, Ribeiro P, Garces C, Gonzalez- Meijome JM. Comparison of the IOPen and iCare rebound tonometers with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2010;30:108-12.
29. Carrim ZI, Lavy TE. Goldmann tonometry versus the Tono-Pen XL for intraocular pressure measurement: An evaluation of the potential impact on clinical decision making in glaucoma. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2009;29:648-51.
30. Hsu SY, Sheu MM, Hsu AH, Wu KY, Yeh JI, Tien JN, Tsai RK. Comparisons of intraocular pressure measurements: Goldmann applanation tonometry, noncontact tonometry, Tono-Pen tonometry, and dynamic contour tonometry. Eye (Lond) 2009;23:1582-8.