The eccentricity effect of inhibition of return is resistant to practice

Neuroscience Letters

Volumn 500, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 47-51

  Bao, Yan ^a,b   Sander, Tilmann ^c   Trahms, Lutz ^c   Pöppel, Ernst ^a,b   Lei, Quan ^a   Zhou, Bin ^b,d  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c PHYSIKALISCH TECHNISCHE BUNDESANSTALT   (Germany)

^d INSTITUTE OF PSYCHOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Attention; Inhibition of return; Practice; Stimulus eccentricity; Visual field

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; DISSOCIATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA FOVEA; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79960335252     PISSN: 03043940     EISSN: 18727972     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.06.003     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bao Y., Pöppel E. Two spatially separated attention systems in the visual field: evidence from inhibition of return. Cogn. Process. 2007, 8:37-44.
2. Bao Y., Zhou J., Fu L. Aging and the time course of inhibition of return in a static environment. Acta Neurobiol. Exp. 2004, 64:403-414.
3. Bell A.H., Fecteau J.H., Munoz D.P. Using auditory and visual stimuli to investigate the behavioral and neuronal consequences of reflexive covert orienting. J. Neurophysiol. 2004, 91:2172-2184.
4. Berlucchi G. Inhibition of return: a phenomenon in search of a mechanism and a better name. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 2006, 23:1065-1074.
5. Frost D., Pöppel E. Different programming modes of human saccadic eye movements as a function of stimulus eccentricity: indications of a functional subdivision of the visual field. Biol. Cybern. 1976, 23:39-48.
6. Hubel D.H., LeVay S., Wiesel T.N. Mode of termination of retinotectal fibers in macaque monkey: an autoradiographic study. Brain Res. 1975, 96:25-40.
7. Klein R.M. Inhibition of return. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2000, 4:138-147.
8. Lambert A., Hockey R. Peripheral visual changes and spatial attention. Acta Psychol. 1991, 76:149-163.
9. Langley L.K., Fuentes L.J., Vivas A.B., Saville A.L. Aging and temporal patterns of inhibition of return. J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 2007, 62:71-77.
10. Lepsien J., Pollmann S. Covert reorienting and inhibition of return: an event-related fMRI study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2002, 14:127-144.
11. Lupiánez J., Milan E.G., Tornay F.J., Madrid E., Tuleda P. Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes it does, but later. Percept. Psychophys. 1997, 59:1241-1254.
12. Lupiánez J., Weaver B., Tipper S.P., Madrid E. The effects of practice on cueing in detection and discrimination tasks. Psicologica 2001, 22:1-23.
13. Mayer A.R., Seidenberg R.M., Dorflinger J.M., Rao S.M. An event-related fMRI study of exogenous orienting: supporting evidence for the cortical basis of inhibition of return?. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2004, 16:1262-1271.
14. Mayer A.R., Harrington D.L., Stephen J., Adair J.C., Lee R.R. An event-related fMRI study of exogenous facilitation and inhibition of return in the auditory modality. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2007, 19:455-467.
15. McAuliffe J., Chasteen A.L., Pratt J. Object- and location-based inhibition of return in younger and older adults. Psychol. Aging 2006, 21:406-410.
16. Müller H.J., von Mühlenen A. Attentional tracking and inhibition of return in dynamic displays. Percept. Psychophys. 1996, 58:224-249.
17. Popovic Z., Sjöstrand J. Resolution, separation of retinal ganglion cells, and cortical magnification in humans. Vis. Res. 2001, 41:1313-1319.
18. Pöppel E., Harvey L.O. Light-difference threshold and subjective brightness in the periphery of the visual field. Psychol. Res. 1973, 36:145-161.
19. Pöppel E., von Cramon D., Backmund H. Eccentricity-specific dissociation of visual functions in patients with lesions of the central visual pathways. Nature 1975, 256:489-490.
20. Posner M.I., Cohen Y. Components of visual orienting. Attention and Performance X. Control of Language Processes 1984, 531-556. Erlbaum, Hillsdale. H. Bouma, D.G. Bouwhuis (Eds.).
21. Posner M.I., Rafal R.D., Choate L.S., Vaughan J. Inhibition of return: neural basis and function. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 1985, 2:211-228.
22. Pratt J., Abrams R.A. Inhibition of return in discrimination tasks. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1999, 25:229-242.
23. Pratt J., Castel A.D. Responding to feature or location: a re-examination of inhibition of return and facilitation of return. Vis. Res. 2001, 41:3903-3908.
24. Pratt J., McAuliffe J. Examining the effect of practice on inhibition of return in static displays. Percept. Psychophys. 1999, 61:756-765.
25. Sapir A., Soroker N., Berger A., Henik A. Inhibition of return in spatial attention: direct evidence for collicular generation. Nat. Neurosci. 1999, 2:1053-1054.
26. Snyder J.J., Chatterjee A. The frontal cortex and exogenous attentional orienting. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2006, 18:1913-1923.
27. Sumner P., Nachev P., Vora N., Husain M., Kennard C. Distinct cortical and collicular mechnisms of inhibition of return revealed with S cones stimuli. Curr. Biol. 2004, 14:2259-2263.
28. Tassinari G., Aglioti S., Chelazzi L., Peru A., Berlucchi G. Do peripheral non-informative cues induce early facilitation of target detection?. Vis. Res. 1994, 34:179-189.
29. Tipper S.P., Driver J., Weaver B. Object-centred inhibition of return of visual attention. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A. 1991, 43:289-298.
30. Vivas A.B., Humphreys G.W., Fuentes L.J. Inhibitory processing following damage to the parietal lobe. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41:1531-1540.
31. von Buren J.M. The Retinal Ganglion Cell Layer 1963, Thomas, Springfield.
32. Weaver B., Lupianez J., Watson F.L. The effects of practice on object-based, location-based, and static-display inhibition of return. Percept. Psychophys. 1998, 60:993-1003.
33. Welsh T.N., Elliott D., Anson J.G., Dhillon V., Weeks D.J., Lyons J.L., Chua R. Does Joe influence Fred's action? Inhibition of return across different nervous systems. Neurosci. Lett. 2005, 385:99-104.
34. Wilson M.E., Toyne M.J. Retino-tectal and cortical-tectal projections in macaca mulatta. Brain Res. 1970, 24:395-406.
35. Zhou B., Bao Y., Sander T., Trahms L., Pöppel E. Dissociation of summation and peak latencies in visual processing: an MEG study on stimulus eccentricity. Neurosci. Lett. 2010, 483:101-104.