Challenges in developing user-adaptive intelligent user interfaces

Proceedings ABIS 2009 - 17th Workshop on Adaptivity and User Modeling in Interactive Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 6-10

  Hartmann, Melanie ^a  

^a DARMSTADT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVITY; DESIGN CHALLENGES; DESIGN PRINCIPLES; INTELLIGENT USER INTERFACES; USER-ADAPTIVE;

USER INTERFACES;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EID: 79960321332     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. [Apple, 2008] Apple. Apple human interface guidelines, 2008.
2. [Bellotti and Edwards, 2001] Victoria Bellotti and Keith Edwards. Intelligibility and accountability: human considerations in context-aware systems. Human-Computer Interaction, 16(2):193-212, 2001. (Pubitemid 34216585)
3. [Cook and Kay, 1994] R. Cook and J. Kay. The justified user model: a viewable, explained user model. In 4-th International Conference on User Modeling, Hyannis, MA, pages 145-150, 1994.
4. [Cypher, 1991] Allen Cypher. EAGER: programming repetitive tasks by example. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Reaching through technology, pages 33-39, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 1991. ACM.
5. [Dey and Newberger, 2009] Anind K. Dey and Alan Newberger. Support for context-aware intelligibility and control. In Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 859- 868, Boston, MA, USA, 2009. ACM.
6. [Findlater and McGrenere, 2004] Leah Findlater and Joanna McGrenere. A comparison of static, adaptive, and adaptable menus. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 89-96, Vienna, Austria, 2004. ACM.
7. [Findlater and McGrenere, 2008a] Leah Findlater and Joanna McGrenere. Comprehensive user evaluation of adaptive graphical user interfaces. In Usable AI, 2008.
8. [Findlater and McGrenere, 2008b] Leah Findlater and Joanna McGrenere. Impact of screen size on performance, awareness, and user satisfaction with adaptive graphical user interfaces. In Proceeding of the twentysixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 1247-1256, Florence, Italy, 2008. ACM.
9. [Gajos et al., 2006] Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Mary Czerwinski, Desney S. Tan, and Daniel S. Weld. Exploring the design space for adaptive graphical user interfaces. In Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces, pages 201-208, Venezia, Italy, 2006. ACM. (Pubitemid 46600842)
10. [Gajos et al., 2008] Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Katherine Everitt, Desney S. Tan, Mary Czerwinski, and Daniel S. Weld. Predictability and accuracy in adaptive user interfaces. In Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 1271-1274, Florence, Italy, 2008. ACM.
11. [Glass et al., 2008] Alyssa Glass, Deborah L. McGuinness, and Michael Wolverton. Toward establishing trust in adaptive agents. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, pages 227-236, Gran Canaria, Spain, 2008. ACM.
12. [Greenberg and Witten, 1985] Saul Greenberg and Ian H. Witten. Adaptive personalized interfaces-A question of viability. Behaviour & Information Technology, 4(1):31, 1985.
13. [Hartmann et al., 2009] Melanie Hartmann, Daniel Schreiber, and Max Mühlhäuser. Providing Context- Aware interaction support. In Proceedings of Engineering Interactive Computing Systems (EICS), page to appear. ACM, 2009.
14. [Horvitz, 1999] Eric Horvitz. Principles of mixedinitiative user interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: the CHI is the limit, pages 159-166, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 1999. ACM.
15. [Höök et al., 1996] Kristina Höök, Jussi Karlgren, Annika Wærn, Nils Dahlbäck, Carl Jansson, Klas Karlgren, and Benot Lemaire. A glass box approach to adaptive hypermedia. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 6(2):157-184, July 1996. (Pubitemid 126716210)
16. [Höök, 2000] K. Höök. Steps to take before intelligent user interfaces become real. Journal of Interacting with Computers, 12(4):409?426, February 2000. (Pubitemid 30562059)
17. [Jameson and Schwarzkopf, 2002] Anthony Jameson and Eric Schwarzkopf. Pros and cons of controllability: An empirical study. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems, pages 193-202. Springer- Verlag, 2002.
18. [Jameson, 2007] Anthony Jameson. Adaptive interfaces and agents. In Julie A. Jacko and Andrew Sears, editors, The human-computer interaction handbook: fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications, pages 305-330. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 2007.
19. [Kay, 2001] Judy Kay. Learner control. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 11(1-2):111-127, 2001. (Pubitemid 32409027)
20. [Kozierok and Maes, 1993] Robyn Kozierok and Pattie Maes. A learning interface agent for scheduling meetings. In IUI '93: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, page 81?88, New York, NY, USA, 1993. ACM.
21. [Langley and Fehling, 1996] Pat Langley and Michael Fehling. The Experimental Study of Adaptive User Interfaces. 1996.
22. [Leetiernan et al., 2001] Scott Leetiernan, Edward Cutrell, Mary Czerwinski, and Hunter Hoffman. Effective notification systems depend on user trust. 2001.
23. [Maes, 1994] PattieMaes. Agents that reduce work and information overload. Commun. ACM, 37(7):30-40, 1994.
24. [Maybury and Wahlster, 1998] Mark T. Maybury and WolfgangWahlster, editors. Readings in intelligent user interfaces. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 1998.
25. [McGrenere et al., 2002] Joanna McGrenere, Ronald M. Baecker, and Kellogg S. Booth. An evaluation of a multiple interface design solution for bloated software. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Changing our world, changing ourselves, pages 164-170, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, 2002. ACM.
26. [Mitchell and Shneiderman, 1989] J. Mitchell and B. Shneiderman. Dynamic versus static menus: an exploratory comparison. SIGCHI Bull., 20(4):33-37, 1989.
27. [Myers, 2007] Brad A. Myers. A user acceptance equation for intelligent assistants. In AAAI 2007 Spring Symposium on Interaction Challenges for Intelligent Assistants, 2007.
28. [Norman, 1994] Donald A. Norman. How might people interact with agents. Commun. ACM, 37(7):68-71, 1994.
29. [Oppermann and Simm, 1994] Reinhard Oppermann and Helmut Simm. Adaptability: user-initiated individualization, pages 14-66. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1994.
30. [Orwant, 1994] Jon Orwant. Heterogeneous learning in the doppelgänger user modeling system. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4(2):107-130, June 1994.
31. [Sears and Shneiderman, 1994] Andrew Sears and Ben Shneiderman. Split menus: effectively using selection frequency to organize menus. ACM Trans. Comput.- Hum. Interact., 1(1):27-51, 1994.
32. [Shneiderman and Maes, 1997] Ben Shneiderman and Pattie Maes. Direct manipulation vs. interface agents. interactions, 4(6):42-61, 1997.
33. [Shneiderman, 1997] Ben Shneiderman. Direct manipulation for comprehensible, predictable and controllable user interfaces. In IUI '97: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, pages 33-39, New York, NY, USA, 1997. ACM.
34. [Tsandilas and m. c. Schraefel, 2005] Theophanis Tsandilas and m. c. Schraefel. An empirical assessment of adaptation techniques. In CHI '05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pages 2009-2012, Portland, OR, USA, 2005. ACM.
35. [Wexelblat and Maes, 1997] Alan Wexelblat and Pattie Maes. Issues for software agent UI. Unpublished Manuscript, 1997.