A comparison of static, adaptive, and adaptable menus

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 89-96

  Findlater, Leah ^a   McGrenere, Joanna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Adaptable interfaces; Adaptive interfaces; Customization; Interaction techniques; Menu design; User study

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER OPERATING SYSTEMS; CONTROLLABILITY; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GRAPHICS; PROGRAM PROCESSORS; SPREADSHEETS;

ADAPTABLE INTERFACES; ADAPTIVE INTERFACES; CUSTOMIZATION; INTERACTION TECHNIQUES; MENU DESIGN; USER STUDY;

GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES;

EID: 4544268870     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/985692.985704     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Greenberg, S. The computer user as toolsmith: The use, reuse, and organization of computer-based tools. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1993).
2. Greenberg, S., and Wirten, I. Adaptive personalized interfaces: A question of viability. Behaviour and Information Technology, 4(1) (1985), 31-45.
3. Horvitz, E. Principles of Mixed-Initiative User Interfaces. Proc. CHI '99, (1999), 159-166.
4. Hsi, I., and Potts, C. Studying the evolution and enhancement of software features. Proc. Int'l Conference on Software Maintenance, (2000), 143-151.
5. Jameson, A., and Schwarzkopf, E. Pros and cons of controllability: An empirical study. Proc. Adaptive Hypermedia 2002, (2002), 193-202.
6. Kaufman, L., and Weed, B. Too much of a good thing? Identifying and resolving bloat in the user interface: A CHI 98 workshop. SIGCHI Bulletin, 30(4), (1998), 46-47.
7. Landauer, T. Chapter 9: Behavioral research methods in human-computer interaction. In M. G. Helander, T. K. Landauer and P. V. Prabhu (Eds.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction (2nd ed., pp. 203-227). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V (1997).
8. Linton, F., Joy, D., Schaefer, P., and Charron, A. OWL: A recommender system for organization-wide learning. Educational Technology & Society, 3(1), (2000).
9. Mackay, W. E. Triggers and barriers to customizing software. Proc. CHI'91, (1991), 153-160.
10. McGrenere, J., Baecker, R. M., and Booth, K. S. An evaluation of a multiple interface design solution for bloated software. Proc. CHI2002, CHI Letters, 4(1), 163-170.
11. McGrenere, J., and Moore, G. Are we all in the same "bloat"? Proc. GI 2000, (2000), 187-196.
12. Microsoft Office 2000 Products Enhancements Guide. http://www.microsoft. com/Office/evaluation/ofcpeg.htm. Retrieved December 10, 2003.
13. Norman, D. The invisible computer. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (1998).
14. Sears, A., and Shneiderman, B. (1994). Split menus: effectively using selection frequency to organize menus. ACM TOCHI, 1(1), 27-51.
15. Shneiderman, B., and Maes, P. Direct manipulation vs. interface agents: Excerpts from debates at IUI97 and CHI 97. Interactions, 4(6), (1997), 42-61.
16. Thomas, C., and Krogsoeter, M. An adaptive environment for the user interface of excel. Proc. IUI '93, (1993), 123-130.
17. Warren, J. Cost/benefit based adaptive dialog: Case study using empirical medical practice norms and intelligent split menus. Proc. IEEE AUIC 2001, (2001), 100-107.
18. th Int'l Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (2003).