Exploring the design space for adaptive graphical user interfaces

Proceedings of the Workshop on Advanced Visual Interfaces

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages 201-208

  Gajos, Krzysztof Z ^a,b   Czerwinski, Mary ^a   Tan, Desney S ^a   Weld, Daniel S ^b  

^a MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive interfaces; User study

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE INTERFACES; USER STUDY;

COMPUTER SCIENCE; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES;

EID: 34247123559     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1133265.1133306     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Bunt, A., Conati, C., and McGrenere, J. What role can adaptive support play in an adaptable system? In IUI'04, 117-124.
2. Findlater, L., and McGrenere, J. A comparison of static, adaptive, and adaptable menus. In CHI'04.
3. Gajos, K., Christianson, D., Hoffmann, R., Snaked, T., Henning, K., Long, J.J., and Weld, D.S. Fast and robust interface generation for ubiquitous applications. In Ubicomp'05. Springer, 2005.
4. Greenberg, S. and Witten, I.H. Adaptive personalized interfaces: A question of viability. Behaviour and Information Technology. 4(1) pp 31-45. 1985.
5. Jameson, A. and Schwarzkopf, E. Pros and Cons of Controllability: An Empirical Study. In Proc. Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems. Springer-Verlag, London, 193-202. 2002.
6. Lee, J.D. and K. A. See. Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance. Human Factors. 46(1). pp. 50-80. 2004.
7. Mackay, W.E. Patterns of Sharing Customizable Software. In CSCW '90: ACM. 1990.
8. McGrenere, J., Baecker, R. M., and Booth, K. S. An evaluation of a multiple interface design solution for bloated software. In CHI '02. ACM Press.
9. Mitchell, J. and Shneiderman, B. Dynamic versus static menus: an exploratory comparison. SIGCHI Bull. 20, 4 (Apr. 1989), 33-37.
10. Oppermann, R. and Simm, H. Adaptability: User-Initiated Individualization. In Adaptive User Support: Ergonomic Design of Manually and Automatically Adaptable Software. R. Oppermann (ed). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1994, 54-63
11. Sears, A. and Shneiderman, B. Split menus: effectively using selection frequency to organize menus. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 1, 1 (Mar. 1994), 27-51.
12. Tiernan, S.L., Cutrell, E., Czerwinski, M., and Hoffman, H. Effective Notification Systems Depend on User Trust. INTERACT'02. Tokyo, pp. 684-685.
13. Tsandilas, T. and schraefel, m. c. An empirical assessment of adaptation techniques. In CHI '05 Extended Abstracts. ACM Press. 2009-2012.
14. Warren, J. 2001. Cost/benefit based adaptive dialog: case study using empirical medical practice norms and intelligent split menus. Proc. IEEE AUIC'01, 100-107