In Delicate Balance: Stem Cells and Spinal Cord Injury Advocacy

Stem Cell Reviews and Reports

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 657-663

  Parke, Sara ^a   Illes, Judy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); CODING; ECONOMICS; ETHICS; HUMAN; INTERNET; LEGAL ASPECT; MEDICAL TOURISM; POLICY; SPINAL CORD INJURY; STANDARD; STEM CELL; STEM CELL RESEARCH; STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION;

CLINICAL CODING; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; HUMANS; INTERNET; MEDICAL TOURISM; POLICY; SPINAL CORD INJURIES; STEM CELL RESEARCH; STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION; STEM CELLS;

EID: 79960315261     PISSN: 15508943     EISSN: 15586804     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12015-010-9211-9     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Keirstead, H., et al. (2005). Human embryonic stem cell-derived oligodendrocyte progenitor cell transplants remyelinate and restore locomotion after spinal cord injury. J. Neuroscience, 25, 4694-4705.
2. International Campaign for Cures of spinal cord injury Paralysis, "General Information" January 2010. http://www. campaignforcure. org/iccp/index. php?option=com_content& task=view& id=13& Itemid=28.
3. Tetzlaff, W., et al. (2010). A systematic review of cellular transplantation therapies for spinal cord injury. Journal of Neurotrauma, 27, 1-72.
4. Alper, J. (2009). Geron gets green light for human trial of ES cell-derived product. Nature Biotechnology March, 27(3), 213-214.
5. Geron Corporation. (2009). News Release: Geron and FDA Reach Agreement on Clinical Hold. October 2009. http://www. geron. com/media/pressview. aspx?id=1195.
6. Lima, C., et al. (2006). Olfactory mucosa autografts in human spinal cord injury: a pilot clinical study. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 29(3), 191-203. discussion 204-6.
7. Lima, C., et al. (2010). Olfactory mucosal autografts and rehabilitation for chronic traumatic spinal cord injury. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 24(1), 10-22.
8. Caulfield, T., et al. (2009). International stem cell environments: a world of difference. Nature Reports Stem Cells. Online April 2009; 10. 1038/stemcells. 2009. 61.
9. Murdoch, C. E., & Scott, C. T. (2010). Stem cell tourism and the power of hope. The American Journal of Bioethics, 10(5), 16-23.
10. DiTunno, P., et al. (2008). Who wants to walk? Preferences for recovery after SCI: a longitudinal and cross-sectional study. Spinal Cord, 46, 500-506.
11. Hammell, K. W. (2007). Quality of life after spinal cord injury: a meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Spinal Cord, 45, 124-139.
12. Kilgore, K. L., et al. (2001). Neuroprosthesis consumer's forum: consumer priorities for research directions. Journal of Rehabilitation R& D, 38(6), 665-660.
13. Estores, I. (2003). The consumer's perspective and the professional literature: what do persons with Spinal Cord Injury want? J. Rehab. Res. Dev., 40(1), 93-98.
14. Furlan, J., & Fehlings, M. (2006). A web-based review on traumatic spinal cord injury comparing the "citation classics" with the consumers' perspectives. Journal of Neurotrauma, 23(2), 156-169.
15. Downey, R., & Geransar, R. (2008). Stem cell research, publics' and stakeholders' views. Health and Law Review, 16(2), 69-85.
16. Petch, T. (2004). Content Analysis of Selected Health Information Websites. Action for Heath in Association with Simon Fraser University; pp 1-79.
17. Goodman et al. (2008). Computer and internet use by persons after traumatic spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89, 1492-1498.
18. Noble, M. (2005). Ethics in the trenched: a multifaceted analysis of the stem cell debate. Stem Cell Reviews, 1, 345-376.
19. Lindvall, O., & Hyun, I. (2009). Medical innovation versus stem cell tourism. Science, 324(5935), 1664-5.
20. Racine, E., et al. (2007). Internet marketing of neuroproducts: new practices and healthcare policy challenges. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 16, 181-194.
21. Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: assessment and reporting of inter-coder reliability. Human Communication Research, 48(4), 587-604.
22. Radin, P. (2006). "To me, it's my life": medical communication, trust and activism in cyberspace. Social Science & Medicine, 62, 591-601.
23. Kovic, I., Lulic, I., & Brumini, G. (2008). Examining the medical blogosphere: an online survey of medical bloggers. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 10(3), e28.
24. Kim, S. (2009). Content analysis of cancer blog posts. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 97(4), 260-6.
25. Illes, et al. Stem cell clinical trials for spinal cord injury: readiness, reluctance, redefinition, in preparation.
26. Reimer, J., Borgelt, E., & Illes, J. (2010). In pursuit of "informed hope" in the stem cell discourse. The American Journal of Bioethics, 10(5), 31-32.
27. Orive, et al. (2003). Controversies over stem cell research. Trends in Biotechnology, 21(3), 109-112.
28. Illes, J., Lau, P. W., & Giacino, J. T. (2008). Viewpoint: neuroimaging, impaired states of consciousness, and public outreach. Nature Clinical Practice. Neurology, 4(10), 542-3.
29. Smolinsky, M. (2008). Brain imaging. Neurology, 4(4), 11.