In pursuit of "Informed hope" in the stem cell discourse

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 31-32

  Reimer, Joanne ^a   Borgelt, Emily ^a   Illes, Judy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; ETHICS; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; JUVENILE; MEDICAL TOURISM; NOTE; PARENT; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; COMMUNICATION; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MARKETING OF HEALTH SERVICES; MEDICAL TOURISM; MINORS; PARENTS; PHYSICIAN'S ROLE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION;

EID: 77952495911     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265161003754072     Document Type: Note

References (14)

1. Abma, T. 2005. Patient participation in health research: Research with and for people with spinal cord injuries. Qualitative Health Research 15(10): 1310-1328.
2. Anderson, K. 2009. Consideration of user priorities when developing neural prosthetics. Journal of Neural Engineering 6: 1-3.
3. Anderson, K. 2004. Targeting recovery: Priorities of the spinal cordinjured population. Journal of Neurotrauma 21(10): 1371-1383.
4. Chalmers, I. 2004. Well informed uncertainties about the effects of treatments. British Medical Journal 328: 475-476.
5. Downey, R., and R. Geransar. 2008. Stem cell research, publics and stakeholder views. Health Law Review 16(2): 69-85.
6. Estores, I. 2003. The consumer's perspective and the professional literature: What do persons with spinal cord injury want? Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 40(4)(suppl. 1): 93-98.
7. Furlan, J., and M. Fehlings. 2006. A Web-based review on traumatic spinal cord injury comparing the "citation classics" with the consumers' perspectives. Journal of Neurotrauma 23(2): 156-169.
8. Geron Corporation. 2010. hESC-derived therapies (GRNOPC1). Available at: http://www.geron.com/patients/clinicaltrials/hESC.aspx?style= print&(accessed March 1, 2010).
9. Hammell, K. 2007. Quality of life after spinal cord injury: A metasynthesis of qualitative findings. Spinal Cord 45: 124-139.
10. Murdoch, C. E., and C. T. Scott. 2010. Stem cell tourism and the power of hope. American Journal of Bioethics 10(5): 16-23.
11. Pousset, G., J. DeWilde, J. Verlooy, and L. Deliens. 2009. Attitudes of adolescent cancer survivors toward end-of-life decisions for minors. Pediatrics 124(6): 1142-1148.
12. Reimer, J., and J. Illes. 2009. Listening to the messages of patients and stakeholders: Where stem cell therapy, spinal cord injury and neuroethics meet. Annals of Neurosciences 16(4): 148-149.
13. Tewarie, R., A. Hurtado, R. Bartels, A. Grotenhuis, and M. Oudega. 2009. Stem cell based therapies for spinal cord injury. Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 32(2): 105-114.
14. Zarzeczny, A., and T. Caulfield. 2010. Stem cell tourism and doctors' duties to minors: A view from Canada. American Journal of Bioethics 10(5): 3-15.