Cross-domain analogies as relating derived relations among two separate relational networks

Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

Volumn 95, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 369-385

  Ruiz, Francisco J ^a   Luciano, Carmen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALMERÍA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Analogical relations; Derived stimulus relations; Matching to sample; Relational frame theory; Relational network

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONDITIONING; DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTELLIGENCE; INTELLIGENCE TEST; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; STUDENT; UNIVERSITY;

ADOLESCENT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTELLIGENCE; INTELLIGENCE TESTS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; STUDENTS; UNIVERSITIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79960258124     PISSN: 00225002     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2011.95-369     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Barnes, D., Hegarty, N., & Smeets, P. M. (1997). Relating equivalence relations to equivalence relations: A relational framing model of complex human functioning. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 14, 1-27.
2. Barnes-Holmes, D., Hayes, S. C., Dymond, S., & O'Hora, D. (2001). Multiple stimulus relations and the transformation of stimulus functions. In S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B. Roche (Eds.), Relational Frame Theory. A post-skinnerian account of human language and cognition (pp. 51-71). New York: Kluwer Academic.
3. Barnes-Holmes, D., Regan, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Commins, S., Walsh, D., Stewart, I., & ...Dymond, S. (2005). Relating derived relations as a model of analogical reasoning: reaction times and event-related potentials. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 84, 35-451.
4. Bassok, M., & Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Interdomain transfer between isomorphic topics in algebra and physics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 153-166.
5. Bennett, G. K., Seashore, H. G., & Wesman, A. G. (1997). Test de Aptitudes Diferenciales Versión 5 [Spanish adaptation of the original Differential Aptitude Tests Manual (5th ed.). The Psychological Corporation: New York, 1974)]. Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
6. Blanchette, I., & Dunbar, K. (2001). Analogy use in naturalistic settings: the influence of audience, emotion, and goals. Memory & Cognition, 29, 730-755.
7. Carpentier, F., Smeets, P. M., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2002). Matching functionally same relations: Implications for equivalence-equivalence as a model for analogical reasoning. The Psychological Record, 52, 351-370.
8. Carpentier, F., Smeets, P. M., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2003). Equivalence-equivalence as model of analogy: Further analysis. The Psychological Record, 53, 349-371.
9. Carpentier, F., Smeets, P. M., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Stewart, I. (2004). Matching derived functionally-same stimulus relations: equivalence-equivalence and classical analogies. The Psychological Record, 54, 255-273.
10. Costello, F. J., & Keane, M. T. (2000). Efficient creativity: constraint-guided conceptual combination. Cognitive Science, 24, 299-349.
11. Dunbar, K., & Blanchette, I. (2001). The in vivo/in vitro approach to cognition: the case of analogy. Trends in Cognitive Science, 5, 34-339.
12. Duncker, K. (1945). On problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 58, (whole No. 270).
13. Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155-170.
14. Gentner, D. (2003). Why we're so smart. In D. Gentner, & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 195-235). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 306-355.
16. Goswami, U., & Brown, A. L. (1990). Higher order structure and relational reasoning. Contrasting analogical and thematic relations. Cognition, 36, 207-226.
17. Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (Eds.) (2001), Relational Frame Theory. A post-skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Kluwer Academic.
18. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. An experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford.
19. Hesse, M. (1966). Models and analogies in science. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.
20. Hesse, F. W., & Klecha, D. (1990). Use of analogies in problem solving. Computers in Human Behavior, 6, 115-129.
21. Holyoak, K. J. (1985). The pragmatics of analogical transfer. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 19, pp. 59-87). New York: Academic Press.
22. Holyoak, K. J. (2005). Analogy. In K. J. Holyoak, & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 117-142). New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1989). Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction. Cognitive Science, 13, 295-355.
24. Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1995). Mental leaps. Analogy in creative thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Keane, M. T. (1987). On retrieving analogues when solving problems. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 29-41.
26. Kowrousky, F., & Rennes, P. (2000). D-70. Test de Dominós [Dominoes Test]. Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
27. Levinson, P. J., & Carpentier, R. L. (1974). An analysis of analogical reasoning in children. Child Development, 45, 857-861.
28. Lipkens, R. (1992). Analogical reasoning as arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nevada, Reno.
29. Lipkens, R., & Hayes, S. C. (2009). Producing and recognizing analogical relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1, 105-126.
30. Luciano, C., Valdivia-Salas, S., Berens, N. S., Rodríguez, M., Mañas, I., & Ruiz, F. J. (2009). Acquiring the earliest relational operants. Coordination, difference, opposition, comparison, and hierarchy. In R. A. Rehfeldt, & Y. Barnes-Holmes (Eds.), Derived Relational Responding. Applications for learners with autism and other developmental disabilities (pp. 149-170). Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.
31. Luo, Q., Perry, C., Peng, D., Jin, Z., Xu, D., Ding, G., & Xu, S. (2003). The neural substrate of analogical reasoning: An fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 527-534.
32. Pérez, V. J., & García, A. (2008). Aprendizaje sin refuerzo explícito en discriminaciones condicionales con estímulos complejos [Learning without explicit reinforcement in conditional discriminations with complex stimuli]. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 41, 59-68.
33. Polya, G. (1971). How to solve it: a new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34. Sidman, M., & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5-22.
35. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
36. Spearman, C. E. (1923). The nature of intelligence and the principles of cognition. London: MacMillan.
37. Sternberg, R. J. (1977). Component processes in analogical reasoning. Psychological Review, 84, 353-378.
38. Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Successful intelligence. New York: Plume.
39. Sternberg, R. J., & Nigro, G. (1980). Developmental patterns in the solution of verbal analogies. Child Development, 51, 27-38.
40. Stewart, I., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2004). Relational Frame Theory and analogical reasoning: empirical investigations. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 4, 241-262.
41. Stewart, I., Barnes-Holmes, D., Hayes, S. C., & Lipkens, R. (2001). Relations among relations: analogies, metaphors, and stories. In S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B. Roche (Eds.), Relational Frame Theory. A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition (pp. 73-86). New York: Kluwer Academic.
42. Stewart, I., Barnes-Holmes, D., Roche, B., & Smeets, P. M. (2002). A functional-analytic model of analogy: a relational frame analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 375-396.
43. Stewart, I., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Weil, T. (2009). Training analogical reasoning as relational responding. In R. A. Rehfeldt, & Y. Barnes-Holmes (Eds.), Derived relational responding. Applications for learners with autism and other devolopmental disabilities (pp. 257-280). akland, CA: New Harbinger.
44. Terrace, H. S. (1963). Discrimination learning with and without errors. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 1-27.
45. Törneke, N. (2010). Learning RFT. An introduction to Relational Frame Theory and its clinical implications. Oakland, CA: New arbinger.