Knowledge, skills, competencies: A model for mathematics e-learning

Communications in Computer and Information Science

Volumn 177 CCIS, Issue , 2011, Pages 214-225

  Albano, Giovannina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALERNO   (Italy)

Author keywords

competence; competency; e learning; knowledge; mathematics learning; skill

Indexed keywords

COMPETENCE; COMPETENCY; KNOWLEDGE; MATHEMATICS LEARNING; SKILL;

E-LEARNING; EDUCATION COMPUTING; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; STUDENTS; TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT; USER INTERFACES; WORLD WIDE WEB;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EID: 79960245377     PISSN: 18650929     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-22383-9_18     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. OECD: Learning for tomorrow's world. First results from PISA 2003 (2004), from the World Wide Web, http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/1/60/34002216.pdf (retrieved January 28, 2011)
2. Weinert, F.: Concept of competence: a conceptual clarification. In: Rychen, D., Salgenik, L. (eds.) Defining and Electing Key Competencies. Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, Seattle (2001)
3. D'Amore, B.: La complessità dell'educazione e della costruzione dei saperi. Riforma e didattica 4, 35-40 (2000)
4. Godino, J.: Competencia y comprensión matemática: ¿Qué son y cómo se consiguen? Uno. 29, 9-19 (2002)
5. Niss, M.: Mathematical competencies and the learning of mathematics: The Danish KOM project. In: Gagatsis, A., Papastavridis, S. (eds.) 3rd Mediterranean Conference on Mathematical Education, January 3-5, pp. 115-124. Hellenic Mathematical Society, Athens (2003)
6. Niss, M.: The Danish KOM project and possible consequences for teacher education. Cuadernos de Investigacion y Formacion en Education Matematica 6(9), 13-24 (2011)
7. Zan, R.: A metacognitive intervention in Mathematics at University level. International Journal Math. Educ. Sci. Technol. 31, 1 (2000)
8. Skemp, R.: Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching 77, 20-26 (1976)
9. OECD: PISA 2009 Assessment Framework - Key Competencies in Reading, Mathematics and Science, from the World Wide Web, http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/ 11/40/44455820.pdf (retrieved January 28, 2011)
10. Duval, R.: The Cognitive Analysis of Problems of Comprehension in the Learning of Mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics 61(1), 103-131 (2006)
11. Ferrari, P.L.: Abstraction in mathematics. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 358, 1225-1230 (2003)
12. Brousseau, G.: Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics. Kluwer Academics Publisher, Dordrecht (1997)
13. Wiley, D.A.: Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. In: Wiley, D.A. (ed.) The Instructional Use of Learning Objects: Online Version (2000), from the World Wide Web http://reusability.org/read/chapters/wiley (retrieved February 18, 2010)
14. Albano, G.: Mathematics education: teaching and learning opportunities in blended learning. In: Juan, A., Huertas, A., Trenholm, S., Steegmann, C. (eds.) Teaching Mathematics Online: Emergent Technologies and Methodologies (in press, 2011)
15. Albano, G., Gaeta, M., Ritrovato, P.: IWT: an innovative solution for AGS e-Learning model. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning 3(2/3), 209-224 (2007)
16. Gaeta, M., Orciuoli, F., Ritrovato, P.: Advanced Ontology Management System for Personalised e-Learning. Knowledge-Based Systems - Special Issue on AI and Blended Learning 22, 292-301 (2009)
17. Arzarello, F., Robutti, O.: Matematica. La Scuola, Brescia (2002)
18. Albano, G., Ferrari, P.L.: Integrating technology and research in mathematics education: the case of e-learning. In: Peñalvo, G. (ed.) Advances in E-Learning: Experiences and Methodologies, pp. 132-148 (2008)