Mathematics education: Teaching and learning opportunities in blended learning

Teaching Mathematics Online: Emergent Technologies and Methodologies

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 60-89

  Albano, Giovannina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALERNO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960232978     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60960-875-0.ch004     Document Type: Chapter

References (40)

1. Albano, G., & Ascione, R. (2008). E-learning and affective student's profile in mathematics. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 3, 6-13. ISSN: 1863-0383
2. Albano, G., D'Auria, B., & Salerno, S. (2003). A webMathematica application for mathematics learning. In Sloot, P. M. A. (Eds.), ICCS 2003, LNCS 2657 (pp. 754-763). doi:10.1007/3-540-44860-8_78
3. Albano, G., & Ferrari, P. L. (2008). Integrating technology and research in mathematics education: The case of e-learning. In Peñalvo, G. (Ed.), Advances in e-learning: Experiences and methodologies (pp. 132-148). Hershey, NY: Information Science Reference. doi:10.4018/978-1-59904-756-0.ch008
4. Albano, G., Gaeta, M., & Ritrovato, P. (2007). IWT: An innovative solution for AGS e-learning model. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 3(2/3), 209-224. doi:10.1504/IJKL.2007.015552
5. Artigue, M. (1992). Didactic engineering. In R. Douady & A. Mercier (Eds.), Research in didactique of mathematics: Selected papers (Special issue). Recherches en didactique des mathématiques, 12, 41-65.
6. Balacheff, N., & Sutherland, R. (1999). Didactical complexity of computational environments for the learning of mathematics. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 4, 1-26. doi:10.1023/A:1009882419704
7. Blume, G. W., & Heid, M. K. (Eds.). (2008). Research on technology and the teaching and learning of mathematics, vol. 1 & 2. Cases and perspective. NCTM, Information Age Publishing.
8. Bringslid, O. (2002). Mathematical e-learning using interactive mathematics on the Web. European Journal of Engineering Education, 27, 249-255. doi:10.1080/03043790210141564
9. Brown, L., Evans, J., Hannula, M., & Zan, R. (Eds.). (2006). Affect in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2).
10. Chevallard, Y. (1985). La transposition didactique. Du savoir savant au savoir enseigné. Grenoble, France: La Pensée Sauvage.
11. Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. Avon Books.
12. Descamps, S. X., Bass, H., Bolanos Evia, G., Seiler, R., & Seppala, M. (2006). E-learning mathematics. Panel promoted by the Spanish Conference of Mathematics' Deans. In Proceedings of International Conference of Mathematicians, Madrid, Spain, 2006. Retrieved February 18, 2010, from http://webalt.math.helsinki.fi/content/e16/e301/e787/eLearningMathematics_eng.pdf
13. Di Martino, P., & Zan, R. (2007). Attitude toward mathematics: Overcoming the positive/negative dichotomy. The Montana Math Enthusiast, 3, 157-168.
14. Duval, R. (1995). Sémiosis et pensée humaine. Peter Lang.
15. Engelbrecht, J., & Harding, A. (2005). Teaching undergraduate mathematics on the Internet. Part 2: attributes and possibilities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58, 253-276. doi:10.1007/s10649-005-6457-2
16. Faulin, J., Juan, A., Fonseca, P., Pla, L., & Rodriguez, S. (2009). Learning operations research online: Benefits, challenges and experiences. International Journal of Simulation and Process Modelling, 5(1), 42-53. doi:10.1504/IJSPM.2009.025826
17. Ferrari, P. L. (2004). Mathematical language and advanced mathematics;earning. In M. Johnsen Høines & F. A. Berit (Eds.), Proc. of the 28th Conf. of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (vol. 2, pp. 383-390). Bergen, Norway.
18. Gaeta, M., Orciuoli, F., & Ritrovato, P. (2009). Advanced ontology management system for personalised e-learning. Knowledge-Based Systems- Special Issue on AI and Blended Learning, 22, 292-301.
19. Guin, D., Ruthven, K., & Trouche, L. (Eds.). (2005). The didactical challenge of symbolic calculators: Turning a computational device into a mathematical instrument. Mathematics education library (Vol. 36). New York, NY: Springer.
20. Huertas, M., Juan, A., Serrat, C., Corcoles, C., & Steegmann, C. (2006). Math online education: State of the art, experiences and challenges. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Madrid, Spain, August 22-30, 2006, (pp. 578-579).
21. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Reform, Revolution and Paradigm Shifts in Mathematics Education, Johor Bahru, Malaysia, Nov 25-Dec 1, 2005, (pp. 238-243).
22. Juan, A., Huertas, M., Steegmann, C., Corcoles, C., & Serrat, C. (2008). Mathematical e-learning: State of the art and experiences at the Open University of Catalonia. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 39(4), 455-471. doi:10.1080/00207390701867497
23. Kahiigi, E. K., Ekenberg, L. Hansson, H., Tu-subira, F. F., & Danielson, M. (2008). Exploring the e-learning state of art. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 6(2), 77-88.
24. Laurillard, D. (1993). Rethinking university teaching: A framework for the effective use of educational technology. London, UK: Routledge.
25. Lee, Y. (2005). Integrating constructivism approaches in e-learning to enhance mathematical self-study.
26. Mariotti, A. (2002). The influence of technological advances on students' mathematics learning. In English, L. D. (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 695-723). Mahwah, NJ & London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27. Martinez, M. (2000). Designing learning objects to mass customize and personalize learning. In D.A. Wiley (Ed.), The instructional use of learning objects: Online version. Retrieved February 18, 2010, from http://reusability.org/read/chapters/martinez.doc
28. Mayes, T. (1995). Learning technology and Groundhog Day. In Strang, W., Simpson, V. B., & Slater, D. (Eds.), Hypermedia at work: Practice and theory in higher education. Canterbury, UK: University of Kent Press.
29. Miner, R., & Topping, P. (2001). Math on the Web: A status report - Focus: Distance learning.
30. NCTM The National Council of Teachers in Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards of school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
31. Rav, Y. (1999). Why do we prove theorems? Philosophia Mathematica, 7(3), 5-41.
32. Retrieved November 15, 2010, from http://www.dessci.com/en/reference/webmath/status
33. Rodriguez, G., & Villa, A. (2005). Can computers change the trends in mathematics learning? A Spanish overview. Plenary lecture at the 4th International Conference APLIMAT. Retrieved November 15, 2010, from the dmath.hibu.no/Rodrigez-De_la_VillaAplimath.pdf
34. Rodriguez Conde, M. J. (2008). Designing an online assessment in e-learning. In Peñalvo, G. (Ed.), Advances in e-learning: Experiences and methodologies (pp. 301-317). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
35. Salmon, G. (2002). E-tivities: The key to active only learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing Inc.
36. Sangwin, C. (2004). Assessing mathematics automatically using computer algebra and the Internet. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 23(1), 1-14. doi:10.1093/teamat/23.1.1
37. Schafersman, S. D. (1991). An introduction to critical thinking. Retrieved February 18, 2010, from http://www.freeinquiry.com/critical-thinking.html
38. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In Grouws, D. (Ed.), Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334-370). New York, NY: MacMillan.
39. Sfard, A. (2001). There is more to discourse than meets the ears: looking at thinking as communicating to learn more about mathematical learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46, 13-57. doi:10.1023/A:1014097416157
40. Wiley, D. A. (2000). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. In D. A. Wiley (Ed.), The instructional use of learning objects: Online version. Retrieved February 18, 2010, from http://reusability.org/read/chapters/wiley