Vision restoration after brain and retina damage: The "residual vision activation theory"

Progress in Brain Research

Volumn 192, Issue , 2011, Pages 199-262

  Sabel, Bernhard A ^a   Henrich Noack, Petra ^a   Fedorov, Anton ^a   Gall, Carolin ^a  

^a OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Current stimulation; Plasticity; Rehabilitation; Restoration; Training; Vision

Indexed keywords

PLACEBO;

ALTERNATING CURRENT; AMBLYOPIA; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; BLINDNESS; BOOK; BRAIN DAMAGE; BRAIN NERVE CELL; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); CONGENITAL BLINDNESS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); CORTICAL SYNCHRONIZATION; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; ELECTROSTIMULATION THERAPY; EYE MOVEMENT; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; GLAUCOMA; HEMISPHERE; HUMAN; LEARNING; LONG TERM DEPRESSION; LONG TERM POTENTIATION; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NERVOUS SYSTEM INJURY; NONHUMAN; NONINVASIVE ELECTRICAL BRAIN CURRENT STIMULATION; OPTIC CHIASM; OPTIC NERVE INJURY; OPTIC NEURITIS; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RESIDUAL VISION ACTIVATION THEORY; RETINA INJURY; RETINA MACULA AGE RELATED DEGENERATION; STROKE; SYNAPSE; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION; THEORY; TRAINING; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; VISION; VISUAL EXPERIENCE; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; VISUAL HALLUCINATION; VISUAL LEARNING; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 79960238196     PISSN: 00796123     EISSN: 18757855     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53355-5.00013-0     Document Type: Chapter

References (322)

1. Aiello L.P. Targeting intraocular neovascularization and edema-One drop at a time. The New England Journal of Medicine 2008, 359:967-969.
2. Antal A., Artl S., Nitsche M.A., Chadaide Z., Paulus W. Higher variability of phosphene thresholds in migraineurs than in controls: A consecutive transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Cephalalgia 2006, 26:865-870.
3. Antal A., Boros K., Poreisz C., Chaieb L., Terney D., Paulus W. Comparatively weak after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on cortical excitability in humans. Brain Stimulation 2008, 1:97-105.
4. Antal A., Kincses T.Z., Nitsche M.A., Paulus W. Modulation of moving phosphene thresholds by transcranial direct current stimulation of V1 in human. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41:1802-1807.
5. Aoyagi A., Saito H., Abe K., Nishiyama N. Early impairment and late recovery of synaptic transmission in the rat dentate gyrus following transient forebrain ischemia in vivo. Brain Research 1998, 799:130-137.
6. Azzopardi P., Cowey A. Motion discrimination in cortically blind patients. Brain 2001, 24:30-46.
7. Bahrami B., Lavie N., Rees G. Attentional load modulates responses of human primary visual cortex to invisible stimuli. Current Biology 2007, 17:509-513.
8. Bak M., Girvin J.P., Hambrecht F.T., Kufta C.V., Loeb G.E., Schmidt E.M. Visual sensations produced by intracortical microstimulation of the human occipital cortex. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 1990, 28:257-259.
9. Baker C.I., Dilks D.D., Peli E., Kanwisher N.G. Reorganization of visual processing in macular degeneration: Replication and clues about the role of foveal loss. Vision Research 2008, 48:1910-1919.
10. Baker C.I., Peli E., Knouf N., Kanwisher N.G. Reorganization of visual processing in macular degeneration. The Journal of Neuroscience 2005, 25:614-618.
11. Balliett R., Blood K.M., Bach-y-Rita P. Visual field rehabilitation in the cortically blind?. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1985, 48:1113-1124.
12. Barbur J.L., Watson J.D.G., Frackowiak R.S.J., Zeki S. Conscious visual perception without V1. Brain 1993, 116:1293-1302.
13. Bartley S.H., Ball R.J. Effects of intermittent photic input on brightness, hue, saturation, visual acuity, and stereopsis. American Journal of Optometry and Archives of American Academy of Optometry 1969, 46:315-318.
14. Baumann T.P., Spear P.D. Role of supersylvian visual area in behavioral recovery from effects of visual cortex damage in cats. Brain Research 1977, 138:445-468.
15. Baumgarten P. Hemiopie nach Erkrankung der occipitalen Hirnrinde. Centralblatt für die Medicinischen Wissenschaften 1878, 16:369-371.
16. Beard B.L., Levi D.M., Reich L.N. Perceptual learning in parafoveal vision. Vision Research 1995, 27:953-965.
17. Bechtereva N.P., Bondartchuk A.N., Gretchin V.B., Iliukhina V.A., Kambarova D.K., Matveev Y.K., et al. Structural-functional organization of the human brain and the pathophysiology of the Parkinsonian type hyperkineses. Confinia Neurologica 1972, 34:14-17.
18. Bechtereva N.P., Shandurina A.N., Khilko V.A., Lyskov E.B., Matveev Y.K., Panin A.V., et al. Clinical and physiological basis for a new method underlying rehabilitation of the damaged visual nerve function by direct electric stimulation. International Journal of Psychophysiology 1985, 2:257-272.
19. Benowitz L.I., Yin Y. Combinatorial treatments for promoting axon regeneration in the CNS: Strategies for overcoming inhibitory signals and activating neurons' intrinsic growth state. Developmental Neurobiology 2007, 67:1148-1165.
20. Benowitz L., Yin Y. Rewiring the injured CNS: Lessons from the optic nerve. Experimental Neurology 2008, 209:389-398.
21. Benson P.J., Guo K., Blakemore C. Direction discrimination of moving gratings and plaids and coherence in dot displays without primary visual cortex (V1). The European Journal of Neuroscience 1998, 10:3767-3772.
22. Bergsma D.P., Van der Wildt G.J. Properties of the regained visual field after visual detection training of hemianopsia patients. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 2008, 26:365-375.
23. Bergsma D.P., van der Wildt G. Visual training of cerebral blindness patients gradually enlarges the visual field. The British Journal of Ophthalmology 2010, 94:88-96.
24. Bliss T.V., Lomo T. Long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the anaesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path. The Journal of Physiology 1973, 232:331-356.
25. Bouwmeester L., Heutnik J., Lucas C. The effect of visual training for patients with visual field defects due to brain damage: A systematic review. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2007, 78:555-564.
26. Brindley G.S., Donaldson P.E.K., Falconer M.A., Rushton D.N. The extent of the region of occipital cortex that when stimulated gives phosphenes fixed in the visual field. Journal of Physiology, London 1972, 225:57P-58P.
27. Brindley G.S., Lewin W.S. The sensations produced by electrical stimulation of the visual cortex. The Journal of Physiology 1968, 96:479-493.
28. Brindley G.S., Rushton D.N. Observations on the representation of the visual field on the human occipital cortex. Functional electrical stimulation: Applications in neural prostheses 1977, 261-276. Marcel Dekker, New York. F.T. Hambrecht, J.B. Reswick (Eds.).
29. Brodtmann A., Puce A., Darby D., Donnan G. Serial functional imaging poststroke reveals visual cortex reorganization. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2009, 23:150-159.
30. Calford M.B., Chino Y.M., Das A., Eysel U.T., Gilbert C.D., Heinen S.J., et al. Neuroscience: Rewiring the adult brain. Nature 2005, 438:E3-E4.
31. Calford M.B., Wang C., Taglianetti V., Waleszczyk W.J., Burke W., Dreher B. Plasticity in adult cat visual cortex (area 17) following circumscribed monocular lesions of all retinal layers. Journal of Physiology, London 2000, 524:587-602.
32. Calford M.B., Wright L.L., Metha A.B., Taglianetti V. Topographic plasticity in primary visual cortex is mediated by local corticocortical connections. The Journal of Neuroscience 2003, 23:6434-6442.
33. Chaieb L., Antal A., Paulus W. Gender-specific modulation of short-term neuroplasticity in the visual cortex induced by transcranial direct current stimulation. Visual Neuroscience 2008, 25:77-81.
34. Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Aging Trends, No. 2, March 2004.
35. Chibisova A.N., Fedorov A.B., Fedorov N.A. Neurophysiological characteristics of compensation-recovery processes in the brain during rehabilitation of the neurosensory impairment of the visual and acoustic systems. Fiziologiia Cheloveka 2001, 27:14-21.
36. Chino Y.M., Smith E.G., Kaas J.H., Sasaki Y., Cheng H. Receptive field properties of deafferented visual cortical neurons after topographic map reorganization in adult cats. The Journal of Neuroscience 1995, 15:2417-2433.
37. Chokron S., Perez C., Obadia M., Gaudry I., Laloum L., Gout O. From blindsight to sight: Cognitive rehabilitation of visual field defects. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 2008, 26:305-320.
38. Chow K.L. Visual discrimination after extensive ablation of optic tract and visual cortex in cats. Brain Research 1968, 9:363-366.
39. Chow K.L., Stewart D.L. Reversal of structural and functional effects of long-term visual deprivation in cats. Experimental Neurology 1972, 34:409-433.
40. Cohen S.Y., Lamarque F., Saucet J.C., Provent P., Langram C., LeGargasson J.F. Filling-in phenomenon in patients with age-related macular degeneration: Differences regarding uni- or bilaterality of central scotoma. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2003, 241:785-791.
41. Cole S.R., Beck R.W., Moke P.S., Gal R.L., Long D.T. The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire: Experience of the ONTT. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2000, 41:1017-1021.
42. Cooke S.F., Bear M.F. Visual experience induces long-term potentiation in the primary visual cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30:16304-16313.
43. Corbetta M., Kincade M.J., Lewis C., Snyder A.Z., Sapir A. Neural basis and recovery of spatial attention deficits in spatial neglect. Nature Neuroscience 2005, 8:1603-1610.
44. Cowey A. Perimetric study of field defects in monkeys after cortical and retinal ablations. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1967, 19:232-245.
45. Cowey A., Stoerig P. The neurobiology of blindsight. Trends in Neurosciences 1991, 14:140-145.
46. Cowey A., Stoerig P. Blindsight in monkeys. Nature 1995, 373:247-249.
47. Darian-Smith C., Gilbert C.D. Axonal sprouting accompanies functional reorganization in adult cat striate cortex. Nature 1994, 368:737-740.
48. Darian-Smith C., Gilbert C.D. Topographic reorganization in the striate cortex of the adult cat and monkey is cortically mediated. The Journal of Neuroscience 1995, 15:1631-1647.
49. Das A., Gilbert C.D. Long-range horizontal connections and their role in cortical reorganization revealed by optical recording of cat primary visual cortex. Nature 1995, 375:780-784.
50. Das A., Huxlin K.R. New approaches to visual rehabilitation for cortical blindness: Outcomes and putative mechanisms. The Neuroscientist 2010, 16:374-387.
51. De Weerd P., Sprague J.M., Raiguel S., Vandenbussche E., Orban G.A. Effects of visual cortex lesions on orientation discrimination of illusory contours in the cat. The European Journal of Neuroscience 1993, 5:1695-1710.
52. De Weerd P., Sprague J.M., Vandenbussche E., Orban G.A. Two stages in visual texture segregation: A lesion study in the cat. The Journal of Neuroscience 1994, 14:929-948.
53. Di Stefano M., Gargini C. Recovery of the nasal field loss in esotropic cats after section of the optic chiasm. Neuroreport 1995, 6:1341-1346.
54. Dilks D.D., Baker C.I., Peli E., Kanwisher N. Reorganization of visual processing in macular degeneration is not specific to the "preferred retinal locus" The Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 29:2768-2773.
55. Dilks D.D., Serences J.T., Rosenau B.J., Yantis S., McCloskey M. Human adult cortical reorganization and consequent visual distortion. The Journal of Neuroscience 2007, 27:9585-9594.
56. Dobelle W.H., Mladejovsky M.G., Evans J.R., Roberts T.S., Girvin J.P. 'Braille' reading by a blind volunteer by visual cortex stimulation. Nature 1976, 259:111-112.
57. Dobelle W.H., Mladejovsky M.G., Girvin J.P. Artificial vision for the blind: Electrical stimulation of visual cortex offers hope for a functional prosthesis. Science 1974, 183:440-444.
58. Dohle C.I., Eysel U.T., Mittmann T. Spatial distribution of long-term potentiation in the surround of visual cortex lesions in vitro. Experimental Brain Research 2009, 199:423-433.
59. Dreher B., Burke W., Calford M.B. Cortical plasticity revealed by circumscribed retinal lesions or artificial scotomas. Progress in Brain Research 2001, 134:217-246.
60. Dürsteler M.R., Wurtz R.H., Newsome W.T. Directional pursuit deficits following lesions of the foveal representations within the superior temporal sulcus of the macaque monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology 1987, 57:1262-1287.
61. Duvdevani R., Rosner M., Belkin M., Sautter J., Sabel B.A., Schwartz M. Graded crush of the tat optic nerve as a brain injury model: Combining electrophysiological and behavioral outcome. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 1990, 2:31-38.
62. El Mallah M.K., Chakravarthy U., Hart P.M. Amblyopia: Is visual loss permanent?. The British Journal of Ophthalmology 2000, 84:952-956.
63. Eriksen C.W., Rohrbaugh J.W. Some factors determining efficiency of selective attention. The American Journal of Psychology 1970, 83:330-342.
64. Eysel U.T. Perilesional cortical dysfunction and reorganization. Advances in Neurology 1997, 73:(195-206. H.-J. Freund, B.A. Sabel, O.W. Witte (Eds.).
65. Eysel U.T., Grüsser O.-J. Increased transneuronal excitation of the cat lateral geniculate nucleus after acute deafferentation. Brain Research 1978, 158:107-128.
66. Eysel U.T., Schweigart G., Mittmann T., Eyding D., Qu Y., Vandesande F., et al. Reorganization in the visual cortex after retinal and cortical damage. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 1999, 15:153-164.
67. Fabre-Thorpe M., Levesque F., Buser P. Preservation of pointing accuracy toward moving targets after extensive visual cortical ablations in cats. Cortex 1994, 30:585-601.
68. Fahle M. Perceptual learning: Gain without pain?. Nature Neuroscience 2002, 5:923-924.
69. Fahle M. Perceptual learning: Specificity versus generalization. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2005, 15:154-160.
70. Fahle M., Poggio T. Perceptual learning 2002, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
71. Fahle M., Skrandies W. An electrophysiological correlate of learning in motion perception. German Journal of Ophthalmology 1994, 3:427-432.
72. Fedorov A.B., Chibisova A.M., Tchibissova J.M. Impulse modulating therapeutic electrical stimulation (IMTES) increases visual field size in patients with optic nerve lesions. International Congress Series 2005, 1282:525-529.
73. Fedorov A.B., Jobke S., Chibisova A.N., Chibisova J.M., Gall C., Sabel B.A. Restoration of vision: non-invasive current stimulation enhances brain synchronization after optic nerve damage - a retrospective observational study with 446 patients. World Ophthalmology Congress, Berlin, Germany, June 2010, 5-9.
74. Felleman D.J., Van Essen D.C. Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cerebral Cortex 1991, 1:1-47.
75. Fendrich R., Wessinger C.M., Gazzaniga M.S. Residual vision in a scotoma: Implications for blindsight. Science 1992, 258:27.
76. Fendrich R., Wessinger C.M., Gazzaniga M.S. Sources of blindsight (technical comment). Science 1993, 261:494-495.
77. Fiorentini A., Berardi N. Perceptual learning specific for orientation and spatial frequency. Nature 1980, 287:43-44.
78. Fischman M.W., Meikle T.H. Visual intensity discrimination in cats after serial tectal and cortical lesions. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 1965, 59:193-201.
79. Foerster O. Beitrage zur Pathophysiologie der Sehbahn und der Sehsphare. Journal für Psychologie und Neurologie 1929, 39:435-463.
80. Franke G.H., Gall C. Quality of life-Methodology and clinical practice aspects with a focus on ocular medicine. Ophthalmologe 2008, 105:727-734.
81. Fronius M., Cirina L., Cordey A., Ohrloff C. Visual improvement during psychophysical training in an adult amblyopic eye following visual loss in the contralateral eye. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2005, 243:278-280.
82. Fronius M., Cirina L., Kuhli C., Cordey A., Ohrloff C. Training the adult amblyopic eye with 'perceptual learning' after vision loss in the non-amblyopic eye. Strabismus 2006, 14:75-79.
83. Fujikado T., Morimoto T., Matsushita K., Shimojo H., Okawa Y., Tano Y. Effect of transcorneal electrical stimulation in patients with nonarteritic ischemic optic neuropathy or traumatic optic neuropathy. Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology 2006, 50:266-273.
84. Galambos R., Norton T.T., Frommer G.P. Optic tract lesions sparing pattern vision in cats. Experimental Neurology 1967, 18:8-25.
85. Gall C., Franke G.H., Sabel B.A. Vision-related quality of life in first stroke patients with homonymous visual field defects. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2010, 88:33.
86. Gall C., Fedorov A.B., Ernst L., Borrmann A., Sabel B.A. Repetitive transorbital alternating current stimulation (rtACS) in optic neuropathy-Single case study. NeuroRehabilitation 2010, 27:335-341.
87. Gall C., Wagenbreth C., Sgorzaly S., Sabel B.A. Parafoveal vision impairments and their influence on reading performance and self-evaluated reading abilities. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2010, 248:863-875.
88. Gall C., Lucklum J., Sabel B.A., Franke G.H. Vision- and health-related quality of life in patients with visual field loss after postchiasmatic lesions. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2009, 50:2765-2776.
89. Gall C., Mueller I., Kaufmann C., Franke G.H., Sabel B.A. Visual field defects after cerebral lesions from the subject's perspective: Health- and vision-related quality of life assessed by SF-36 and NEI-VFQ. Der Nervenarzt 2008, 79:185-194.
90. Gall C., Schmidt S., Brandt S., Fedorov A.B., Sabel B.A. Non-invasive alternating current stimulation impoves subjective visual functioning in optic neuropathy. Neuroscience 2011, Washington, 12.11.-16.11.2011.
91. Ganz L., Fitch M. The effect of visual deprivation on perceptual behavior. Experimental Neurology 1968, 22:638-660.
92. Giannikopoulos D.V., Eysel U.T. Dynamics and specificity of cortical map reorganization after retinal lesions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2006, 103:10805-10810.
93. Gibson E. Principles of perceptual learning and development 1969, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.
94. Gilbert C.D. Adult cortical dynamics. Physiological Reviews 1998, 78:467-485.
95. Gilbert C.D., Sigman M., Crist R.E. The neural basis of perceptual learning. Neuron 2001, 31:681-697.
96. Gilbert C.D., Wiesel T.N. Receptive field dynamics in adult primary visual cortex. Nature 1992, 356:150-152.
97. Gothe J., Brandt S.A., Irlbacher K., Röricht S., Sabel B.A., Meyer B.U. Changes in visual cortex excitability in blind subjects as demonstrated by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain 2002, 125:479-490.
98. Greenstein V.C., Santos R.A., Tsang S.H., Smith R.T., Barile G.R., Seiple W. Preferred retinal locus in macular disease: Characteristics and clinical implications. Retina 2008, 28:1234-1240.
99. Greenwald M.J., Parks M.M. Treatment of amblyopia. Clinical ophthalmology 1999, Vol. 1. Harper and Row, Hagerstown.
100. Gudlin J. Objective and subjective effects of systematic visual stimulation in glaucoma patients 2008, Zugl.: Magdeburg Univ., Fak. für Naturwiss., Dissertation, 2008.
101. Gudlin J., Mueller I., Thanos S., Sabel B.A. Computer based vision restoration therapy in glaucoma patients: A small open pilot study. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 2008, 26:403-412.
102. Guenther T., Mueller I., Preuss M., Kruse R., Sabel B.A. Treatment outcome prediction model of visual field recovery using Self-Organizing-Maps. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 2009, 56:572-581.
103. He Z.J., Loop M.S. Luminance sensitivity recovers quickly in monocularly deprived cats. Vision Research 1991, 31:1633-1637.
104. Heiduschka P., Thanos S. Restoration of the retinofugal pathway. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research 2000, 19:577-606.
105. Heinen S.J., Skavenski A.A. Recovery of visual responses in foveal V1 neurons following bilateral foveal lesions in adult monkey. Experimental Brain Research 1991, 83:670-674.
106. Held R., Hein A. Movement-produced stimulation in the development of visually guided behaviour. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 1963, 56:872-876.
107. Henrich-Noack P., Gorkin A.G., Krautwald K., Pforte C., Schröder U.H., Reymann K.G. Tetanus-induced re-activation of evoked spiking in the post-ischemic dentate gyrus. Neuroscience 2005, 133:571-581.
108. Henriksson L., Raninen A., Näsänen R., Hyvärinen L., Vanni S. Training-induced cortical representation of a hemianopic hemifield. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2007, 78:74-81.
109. Hess R.F., Field D., Watt R.J. The puzzle of amblyopia. Vision: Coding and efficiency 1990, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. C. Blakemore (Ed.).
110. Hirsch J.A., Gilbert C.D. Synaptic physiology of horizontal connections in the cat's visual cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience 1991, 11:1800-1809.
111. Ho Y.C., Cheze A., Sitoh Y.Y., Petersen E.T., Goh K.Y., Gjedde A., et al. Residual neurovascular function and retinotopy in a case of hemianopia. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2009, 38:827-831.
112. Holmes G. Disturbances of visual orientation. The British Journal of Ophthalmology 1918, 2:449-506.
113. Hubel D.H., Wiesel T.N. The period of susceptibility to the physiological effects of unilateral eye closure in kittens. The Journal of Physiology 1970, 206:419-436.
114. Huemmeke M., Eysel U.T., Mittmann T. Lesion-induced enhancement of LTP in rat visual cortex is mediated by NMDA receptors containing the NR2B subunit. The Journal of Physiology 2004, 559:875-882.
115. Humphrey N.K. What the frog's eye tells the monkey's brain. Brain, Behavior and Evolution 1970, 3:324-337.
116. Humphrey N.K. Vision in a monkey without striate cortex: A case study. Perception 1974, 3:241-255.
117. Huxlin K.R. Perceptual plasticity in damaged adult visual systems. Vision Research 2008, 48:2154-2166.
118. Huxlin K.R., Martin T., Kelly K., Riley M., Friedman D.I., Burgin W.S., et al. Perceptual relearning of complex visual motion after V1 damage in humans. The Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 29:3981-3991.
119. Huxlin K.R., Pasternak T. Training-induced recovery of visual motion perception after extrastriate cortical damage in the adult cat. Cerebral Cortex 2004, 14:81-90.
120. Hyvärinen L., Raninen A.N., Näsänen R.E. Vision rehabilitation in homonymous hemianopia. Neuro-Ophthalmology 2002, 27:97-102.
121. Imbrosci B., Eysel U.T., Mittmann T. Metaplasticity of horizontal connections in the vicinity of laser lesions in rat visual cortex. The Journal of Physiology 2010, 588:4695-4703.
122. Inomata K., Shinoda K., Ohde H., Tsunoda K., Hanazono G., Kimura I., et al. Transcorneal electrical stimulation of retina to treat longstanding retinal artery occlusion. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2007, 245:1773-1780.
123. Ito M., Gilbert C.D. Attention modulates contextual influences in the primary visual cortex of alert monkeys. Neuron 1999, 22:593-604.
124. Jacobson S.G., Eames R.A., McDonald W.I. Optic nerve fibre lesions in adult cats: Pattern of recovery of spatial vision. Experimental Brain Research 1979, 36:491-508.
125. Jacobson S.G., McDonald W.I., Perry P.A. Pattern of recovery of spatial vision after pre-geniculate nerve fibre lesions in adults cats. The Journal of Physiology 1977, 269:25P-26P.
126. Jobke S., Kasten E., Sabel B.A. Vision restoration through extrastriate stimulation in patients with visual field defects-A double-blind and randomized experimental study. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2009, 23:246-555.
127. Julkunen L., Tenovuo O., Jääskeläinen S.K., Hämäläinen H. Rehabilitation of chronic post-stroke visual field defect with computer-assisted training: A clinical and neurophysiological study. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 2003, 21:19-28.
128. Julkunen L., Tenovuo O., Vorobyev V., Hiltunen J., Teräs M., Jääskeläinen S.K., et al. Functional brain imaging, clinical and neurophysiological outcome of visual rehabilitation in a chronic stroke patient. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 2006, 24:123-132.
129. Jung C.S., Bruce B., Newman N.J., Biousse V. Visual function in anterior ischemic optic neuropathy: Effect of Vision Restoration Therapy-A pilot study. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 2008, 268:145-149.
130. Kaas J.H., Krubitzer L.A., Chino Y.M., Langston A.L., Polley E.H., Blair N. Reorganization of retinotopic cortical maps in adult mammals after lesions of the retina. Science 1990, 248:229-231.
131. Karmarker U.R., Dan Y. Experience-dependent plasticity in adult visual cortex. Neuron 2006, 52:577-585.
132. Karni A., Sagi D. Where practice makes perfect in texture discrimination: Evidence for primary visual cortex plasticity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1991, 88:4966-4970.
133. Kasten E., Bunzenthal U., Müller-Oehring E.M., Mueller I., Sabel B.A. Vision restoration does not benefit from costimulation: A pilot study. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2007, 29:569-584.
134. Kasten E., Bunzenthal U., Sabel B.A. Visual field recovery after vision restoration therapy (VRT) is independent of eye movements: An eye tracker study. Behavioural Brain Research 2006, 175:18-26.
135. Kasten E., Guenther T., Sabel B.A. Inverse stimuli in perimetric performance reveal larger visual field defects: Implications for vision restoration. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 2008, 26:355-364.
136. Kasten E., Müller-Oehring E., Sabel B.A. Stability of visual field enlargements following computer-based restitution training-Results of a follow-up. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2001, 23:297-305.
137. Kasten E., Sabel B.A. Visual field enlargement after computer training in brain-damaged patients with homonymous deficits: An open pilot trial. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 1995, 8:113-127.
138. Kasten E., Wuest S., Sabel B.A. Variability of stimulus detection, form discrimination, and color recognition with suprathreshold campimetry in brain damaged patients. Neuroophthalmology 1998, 20:161-176.
139. Kasten E., Wüst S., Behrens-Baumann W., Sabel B.A. Computer-based training for the treatment of partial blindness. Natural Medicines 1998, 4:1083-1087.
140. Kasten E., Wüst S., Sabel B.A. Residual vision in transition zones in patients with cerebral blindness. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1998, 20:581-598.
141. Keck T., Mrsic-Flogel T.D., Vaz Afonso M., Eysel U.T., Bonhoeffer T., Hübener M. Massive restructuring of neuronal circuits during functional reorganization of adult visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience 2008, 11:1162-1167.
142. Keller J., Strasburger H., Cerutti D.T., Sabel B.A. Automated assessment of the visual contrast sensitivity in the hooded rat. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2000, 97:103-110.
143. Kerkhoff G., Münßinger U., Eberle-Strauss G., Stögerer E. Rehabilitation of hemianopic alexia in patients with postgeniculate visual field disorders. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 1992, 2:21-42.
144. Kerkhoff G., Münßinger U., Haaf E., Eberle-Strauss G., Stögerer E. Rehabilitation of homonymous scotomata in patients with postgeniculate damage of the visual system: Saccadic compensation training. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 1992, 4:245-254.
145. Kerkhoff G., Münßinger U., Meier E.K. Neurovisual rehabilitation in cerebral blindness. Archives of Neurology 1994, 51:474-481.
146. Kerkhoff G., Schindler I. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen restorativer Trainingsmethoden bei prä- und postchiasmatischen Skotomen. Zeitschrift für Neuropsychologie 2000, 11:82-85.
147. Kolarow R., Brigadski T., Lessmann V. Postsynaptic secretion of BDNF and NT-3 from hippocampal neurons depends on calcium calmodulin kinase II signaling and proceeds via delayed fusion pore opening. The Journal of Neuroscience 2007, 27:10350-10364.
148. Kölmel H.W. Complex visual hallucinations in the hemianopic field. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1985, 48:29-38.
149. Kölmel H.W. Visual illusions and hallucinations. Baillere's Clinical Neurology 1993, 2:243-264.
150. Korsholm K., Madsen K.H., Frederiksen J.L., Rowe J.B., Lund T.E. Cortical neuroplasticity in patients recovering from acute optic neuritis. Neuroimage 2008, 42:836-844.
151. Korsholm K., Madsen K.H., Frederiksen J.L., Skimminge A., Lund T.E. Recovery from optic neuritis: An ROI-based analysis of LGN and visual cortical areas. Brain 2007, 130:1244-1253.
152. Kreutz M.R., Böckers T.M., Bockmann J., Seidenbecher C., Kracht B., Vorwerk C.K., et al. Splicing of the retinal NR1 receptor is altered after optic nerve injury: The preferential expression of the NR1-b isoforms is crucial for retinal ganglion cell survival. The Journal of Neuroscience 1998, 18:8278-8291.
153. Kuhn R. The speed of cerebral circulation. The New England Journal of Medicine 1962, 267:689-695.
154. Lane A.R., Smith D.T., Ellison A., Schenk T. Visual exploration training is no better than attention training for treating hemianopia. Brain 2010, 133:1717-1728.
155. Lashley K. The mechanisms of vision XVI. The function of small remnants of the visual cortex. The Journal of Comparative Neurology 1939, 70:45-67.
156. Levi D.M., Carkeet A. Amblyopia: A consequence of abnormal visual development. Early visual development, normal and abnormal 1993, 391-407. Oxford University Press, Oxford, NY. K. Simons (Ed.).
157. Levi D.M., Polat U. Neural plasticity in adults with amblyopia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1996, 93:6830-6834.
158. Levi D.M., Polat U., Hu Y.S. Improvement in Vernier acuity in adults with amblyopia. Practice makes better. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 1997, 38:1493-1510.
159. Levin N., Orloy T., Dotan S., Zohary E. Normal and abnormal fMRI activation patterns in the visual cortex after recovery from optic neuritis. Neuroimage 2006, 33:1161-1168.
160. Li W., Piech V., Gilbert C.D. Perceptual learning and top-down influences in primary visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience 2004, 7:651-657.
161. Li R.W., Young K.G., Hoenig P., Levi D.M. Perceptual learning improves visual performance in juvenile amblyopia. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2005, 46:3161-3168.
162. Liu T., Cheung S.H., Schuchard R., Glielmi C., Hu X., He S., et al. Incomplete cortical reorganization in macular degeneration. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2010, 51:6826-6834.
163. Lorber B., Berry M., Logan A. Different factors promote axonal regeneration of adult rat retinal ganglion cells after lens injury and intravitreal peripheral nerve grafting. Journal of Neuroscience Research 2008, 86:894-903.
164. Maire-Lepoivre E., Przybyskawski J., Gary-Bobo E. Visual field in dark-reared cats after an extended period of recovery. Behavioural Brain Research 1988, 28:245-251.
165. Malis L.I., Kruger L. Multiple response and excitability of cat's visual cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 1956, 19:172-186.
166. Mangun G.R., Hillyard S.A. The spatial allocation of visual attention as indexed by event-related brain potentials. Human Factors 1987, 29:195-211.
167. Marshall R.S., Ferrera J.J., Barnes A., Xian Z., O'Brian K.A., Chmayssani M., et al. Brain activity associated with stimulation therapy of the visual borderzone in hemianopic stroke patients. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2008, 22:136-144.
168. Marshall R.S., Chmayssani M., O'Brian K.A., Handy C., Greenstein V.C. Visual field expansion after visual restoration therapy. Clin Rehabil 2010, 24:1027-1035.
169. Martinez A., Anllo-Vento L., Sereno M.I., Frank L.R., Buxton R.B., Dubowitz D.J., et al. Involvement of striate and extrastriate visual cortical areas in spatial attention. Nature Neuroscience 1999, 2:364-369.
170. McManus J.N., Ullman S., Gilbert C.D. A computational model of perceptual fill-in following retinal degeneration. Journal of Neurophysiology 2008, 99:2086-2100.
171. Mendola J.D., Conner I.P., Sharma S., Bahekar A., Lemieux S. fMRI measures of perceptual filling-in in the human visual cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2006, 18:363-375.
172. Milleret C., Buser P. Receptive field sizes and responsiveness to light in area 18 of the adult cat after chiasmotomy. Postoperative evolution; role of visual experience. Experimental Brain Research 1984, 57:73-81.
173. Mitchell D.E., Murphy K.M., Kaye M.G. The permanence of the visual recovery that follows reverse occlusion of monocularly deprived kittens. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 1984, 25:908-917.
174. Mizobe K., Polat U., Pettet M.W., Kasamatsu T. Facilitation and suppression of single striate-cell activity by spatially discrete pattern stimuli presented beyond the receptive field. Visual Neuroscience 2001, 18:377-391.
175. Mohler C.W., Wurtz R.H. Role of striate cortex and superior colliculus in visual guidance of saccadic eye movements in monkeys. Journal of Neurophysiology 1977, 40:74-94.
176. Moore T., Rodman H.R., Repp A.B., Gross C.G., Mezrich R.S. Greater residual vision in monkeys after striate cortex damage in infancy. Journal of Neurophysiology 1996, 76:3928-3933.
177. Mueller I., Gall C., Kasten E., Sabel B.A. Long-term learning of visual functions in patients after brain damage. Behavioural Brain Research 2008, 191:32-42.
178. Mueller I., Mast H., Sabel B.A. Recovery of visual function after brain injury: A large-sample study using Vision Restoration Therapy. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 2007, 25:563-572.
179. Mueller I., Poggel D.A., Kenkel S., Kasten E., Sabel B.A. Vision Restoration Therapy (VRT) after brain damage: Subjective improvements of activities of daily life and their relationship to visual field enlargements. Visual Impairment Research 2003, 5:157-178.
180. Mueller I., Sabel B.A., Kasten E. Comparison of early and late rehabilitation of stroke and cerebral trauma patients with visual field defects. Der Nervenarzt 2006, 77:694-701.
181. Murakami I., Komatsu H., Kinoshita M. Perceptual filling-in at the scotoma following a monocular retinal lesion in the monkey. Visual Neuroscience 1997, 14:89-101.
182. Nakayama K., Mackeben M. Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention. Vision Research 1989, 29:1631-1647.
183. Nelles G., de Greiff A., Pscherer A., Forsting M., Gerhard H., Esser J., et al. Cortical activation in hemianopia after stroke. Neuroscience Letters 2007, 426:34-38.
184. Nelles G., Pscherer A., de Greiff A., Gerhard H., Forsting M., Esser J., et al. Eye-movement training-induced changes of visual field representation in patients with post-stroke hemianopia. Journal of Neurology 2010, 257:1832-1840.
185. Nelles G., Widman G., de Greiff A., Meistrowitz A., Dimitrova A., Weber J., et al. Brain representation of hemifield stimulation in poststroke visual field defects. Stroke 2002, 33:1286-1293.
186. Newsome W.T., Wurtz R.H., Dürsteler M.R., Mikami A. Punctate chemical lesions of striate cortex in macaque monkeys: Effects on visually guided saccades. Experimental Brain Research 1985, 58:392-399.
187. Nilsson U.L., Frennesson C., Nilsson S.E. Location and stability of a newly established eccentric retinal locus suitable for reading, achieved through training of patients with a dense central scotoma. Optometry and Vision Science 1998, 75:873-878.
188. Nilsson U.L., Frennesson C., Nilsson S.E. Patients with AMD and a large absolute central scotoma can be trained successfully to use eccentric viewing, as demonstrated in a scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Vision Research 2003, 43:1777-1787.
189. Noppeney U. The effects of visual deprivation on functional and structural organization of the human brain. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2007, 31:1169-1180.
190. Ostrovsky Y., Andalman A., Sinha P. Vision following extended congenital blindness. Psychological Science 2006, 17:1009-1014.
191. Ostrovsky Y., Meyers E., Ganesh S., Mathur U., Sinha P. Visual parsing after recovery from blindness. Psychological Science 2009, 20:1484-1491.
192. Palagina G., Eysel U.T., Jancke D. Strengthening of lateral activation in adult rat visual cortex after retinal lesions captured with voltage-sensitive dye imaging in vivo. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2009, 106:8743-8747.
193. Pambakian A.L., Currie J., Kennard C. Rehabilitation strategies for patients with homonymous visual field defects. Journal of Neuroophthalmology 2005, 25:136-142.
194. Pambakian A.L., Kennard C. Can visual function be restored in patients with homonymous hemianopia?. The British Journal of Ophthalmology 1997, 81:324-328.
195. Papageorgiou E., Hardiess G., Schaeffel F., Wiethoelter H., Karnath H.O., Mallot H., et al. Assessment of vision-related quality of life in subjects with homonymous visual field defects. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2007, 245:1749-1758.
196. Paramei G.V., Sabel B.A. Contour integration deficits on the intact side of the visual field in hemianopic patients. Behavioural Brain Research 2008, 188:109-124.
197. Park H.J., Jeong S.O., Kim E.Y., Kim J.I., Park H., Oh M.K., et al. Reorganization of neural circuits in the blind on diffusion direction analysis. Neuroreport 2007, 18:1757-1760.
198. Pasik T., Pasik P. Extrageniculostriate vision in the monkey. IV. Critical structures for light vs. no-light discrimination. Brain Research 1973, 56:165-182.
199. Pavlidis M., Stupp T., Naskar R., Cengiz C., Thanos S. Retinal ganglion cells resistant to advanced glaucoma: A post mortem study of human retinas with the carbocyanine dye DiI. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2003, 44:5196-5205.
200. Payne B.R., Lomber S.G., MacNeil M.A., Cornwell P. Evidence for greater sight in blindsight following damage of primary visual cortex early in life. Neuropsychologia 1996, 34:741-774.
201. Poggel D.A., Kasten E., Müller-Oehring E.M., Bunzenthal U., Sabel B.A. Improving residual vision by attentional cueing in patients with brain lesions. Brain Research 2006, 1097:142-148.
202. Poggel D.A., Kasten E., Müller-Oehring E.M., Sabel B.A., Brandt S.A. Unusual spontaneous and training induced visual field recovery in a patient with a gunshot lesion. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2001, 70:236-239.
203. Poggel D.A., Kasten E., Sabel B.A. Attentional cueing improves vision restoration therapy in patients with visual field loss. Neurology 2004, 63:2069-2076.
204. Poggel D.A., Mueller I., Kasten E., Bunzenthal U., Sabel B.A. Subjective and objective outcome measures of computer-based vision restoration training. NeuroRehabilitation 2010, 27:173-187.
205. Poggel D.A., Mueller I., Kasten E., Sabel B.A. Multifactorial predictors and outcome variables of vision restoration training in patients with post-geniculate visual field loss. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 2008, 26:321-339.
206. Poggel D.A., Müller-Oehring E.M., Gothe J., Kenkel S., Kasten E., Sabel B.A. Visual hallucinations during spontaneous and training-induced visual field recovery. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:2598-2607.
207. Polat U. Functional architecture of long-range perceptual interactions. Spatial Vision 1999, 12:143-162.
208. Polat U. Restoration of underdeveloped cortical functions: Evidence from treatment of adult amblyopia. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 2008, 26:413-424.
209. Polat U., Ma-Naim T., Belkin M., Sagi D. Improving vision in adult amblyopia by perceptual learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2004, 101:6692-6697.
210. Polat U., Ma-Naim T., Spierer A. Treatment of children with amblyopia by perceptual learning. Vision Research 2009, 49:2599-2603.
211. Polat U., Sagi D. Spatial interactions in human vision: From near to far via experience-dependent cascades of connections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1994, 91:1206-1209.
212. Polat U., Sagi D. Temporal asymmetry of collinear lateral interactions. Vision Research 2006, 46:953-960.
213. Polat U., Sagi D., Norcia A.M. Abnormal long-range spatial interactions in amblyopia. Vision Research 1997, 37:737-744.
214. Pollen D.A. Responses of single neurons to electrical stimulation of the surface of the visual cortex. Brain, Behavior and Evolution 1977, 14:67-86.
215. Pöppel E., Held R., Frost D. Residual visual function after brain wounds involving the central visual pathways in man. Nature 1973, 243:295-296.
216. Pöppel E., Richards W. Light sensitivity in cortical scotomata contralateral to small islands of blindness. Experimental Brain Research 1974, 21:125-130.
217. Poppelreuter W. Die psychischen Schädigungen durch Kopfschuss im Kriege 1914-1916. Bd. I. Die Störungen der niederen und höheren Sehleistungen durch Verletzungen des Okzipitalhirns 1917, L. Voss, Leipzig.
218. Posner M.I. Orienting of attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1980, 32:3-25.
219. Prieto-Diaz J.S.-D.C. Strabismus 2000, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston. 4th ed.
220. Prilloff S., Henrich-Noack P., Kropf S., Sabel B.A. Experience-dependent plasticity and vision restoration in rats after optic nerve crush. Journal of Neurotrauma 2010, 27:2295-2307.
221. Prilloff S., Noblejas M.I., Chedhomme V., Sabel B.A. Two faces of calcium activation after optic nerve trauma: Life or death of retinal ganglion cells in vivo depends on calcium dynamics. The European Journal of Neuroscience 2007, 25:3339-3346.
222. Ptito M., Fumal A., de Noordhout A.M., Schoenen J., Gjedde A., Kupers R. TMS of the occipital cortex induces tactile sensations in the fingers of blind Braille readers. Experimental Brain Research 2008, 184:193-200.
223. Ptito M., Kupers R. Cross-modal plasticity in early blindness. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience 2005, 4:479-488.
224. Radvay X., Duhoux S., Koenig-Supiot F., Vital-Durand F. Balance training and visual rehabilitation of age-related macular degeneration patients. Journal of Vestibular Research 2007, 17:183-193.
225. Raemaekers M., Bergsma D.P., van Wezel R.J., van der Wildt G.J., van den Berg A.V. Effects of vision restoration training on early visual cortex in patients with cerebral blindness investigated with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Neurophysiology 2011, 105:872-882.
226. Ramrattan R.S., Wolfs R.C.W., Panda-Jonas S., Jonas J.B., Bakker D., Pols H.A., et al. Prevalence and causes of visual field loss in the elderly and associations with impairment in daily functioning. Archives of Ophthalmology 2001, 119:1788-1794.
227. Raninen A., Vanni S., Hyvärinen L., Näsänen R. Temporal sensitivity in a hemianopic visual field can be improved by long-term training using flicker stimulation. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2007, 78:66-73.
228. Rausch M., Widdig W., Eysel U.T., Penner I.K., Tegenthoff M. Enhanced responsiveness of human extra visual areas to photic stimulation in patients with severely reduced vision. Experimental Brain Research 2000, 135:34-40.
229. Reinhard J., Schreiber A., Schiefer U., Kasten E., Sabel B.A., Kenkel S., et al. Does visual restitution training change absolute homonymous visual field defects? A fundus controlled study. The British Journal of Ophthalmology 2005, 89:30-35.
230. Riddoch G. Dissociation of visual perceptions due to occipital injuries with special reference to appreciation of movement. Brain 1917, 40:15-57.
231. Riesen A.H. Excessive arousal effects of stimulation after early sensory deprivation. Sensory deprivation 1961, 34-40. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. P. Solomon, P.E. Kubzansky, P.H. Leiderman, J. Mendalson, D. Wexler (Eds.).
232. Romano J.G., Schulz P., Kenkel S., Todd D.P. Visual field changes after a rehabilitation intervention: Vision restoration therapy. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 2008, 273:70-74.
233. Romei V., Brodbeck V., Michel C., Amedi A., Pascual-Leone A., Thut G. Spontaneous fluctuations in posterior alpha-band EEG activity reflect variability in excitability of human visual areas. Cerebral Cortex 2008, 18:2010-2018.
234. Romei V., Rihs T., Brodbeck V., Thut G. Resting electroencephalogram alpha-power over posterior sites indexes baseline visual cortex excitability. Neuroreport 2008, 19:203-208.
235. Roth T., Sokolov A.N., Messias A., Roth P., Weller M., Trauzettel-Klosinski S. Comparing explorative saccade and flicker training in hemianopia: A randomized controlled study. Neurology 2009, 72:324-331.
236. Rousseau V., Engelmann R., Sabel B.A. Restoration of vision III: Soma swelling dynamics predicts neuronal death or survival after optic nerve crush in vivo. Neuroreport 1999, 10:3387-3391.
237. Rousseau V., Sabel B.A. Restoration of vision IV: Compensatory soma size increase of retinal ganglion cells predicts recovery of vision after partial optic nerve crush. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 2001, 18:177-189.
238. Russ M.O., Cleff U., Lanfermann H., Schalnus R., Enzensberger W., Kleinschmidt A. Functional magnetic resonance imaging in acute unilateral optic neuritis. Journal of Neuroimaging 2002, 12:339-350.
239. Sabel B.A. Unrecognized potential of surviving neurons: Within-systems plasticity, recovery of function and the hypothesis of the minimal residual structure. The Neuroscientist 1997, 3:366-370.
240. Sabel B.A. Restoration of vision I: Neurobiological mechanisms of restoration and plasticity after brain damage-A review. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 1999, 15:177-200.
241. Sabel B.A., Fedorov A.B., Hermann C., Gall C. Restoration of vision. Non-invasive current stimulation for the treatment of visual field defects in optic neuropathy - a single-center prospective trial. World Ophthalmology Congress, Berlin, Germany 2010, June 5-9.
242. Sabel B.A., Kasten E. Restoration of vision by training of residual functions. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology 2000, 11:430-436.
243. Sabel B.A., Kasten E., Kreutz M.R. Recovery of vision after partial visual system injury as a model of post-lesion neuroplasticity. Advances in Neurology 1997, 73:251-276.
244. Sabel B.A., Kenkel S., Kasten E. Vision restoration therapy (VRT) efficacy as assessed by comparative perimetric analysis and subjective questionnaires. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 2004, 22:399-420.
245. Sabel B.A., Sautter J., Stoehr T., Siliprandi R.A. A behavioural model of excitotoxicity: Retinal degeneration, loss of vision, and subsequent recovery after intraocular NMDA administration in adult rats. Experimental Brain Research 1995, 106:93-105.
246. Sabel B.A., Trauzettel-Klosinski S. Improving vision in a patient with homonymous hemianopia. Journal of Neuroophthalmology 2005, 25:143-149.
247. Sadato N. How the blind "see" Braille: Lessons from functional magnetic resonance imaging. The Neuroscientist 2005, 11:577-582.
248. Sahraie A., MacLeod M.J., Trevethan C.T., Robson S.E., Olson J.A., Callaghan P., et al. Improved detection following Neuro-Eye Therapy in patients with post-geniculate brain damage. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 206:25-34.
249. Sahraie A., Trevethan C.T., MacLeod M.J., Murray A.D., Olson J.A., Weiskrantz L. Increased sensitivity after repeated stimulation of residual spatial channels in blindsight. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2006, 103:14971-14976.
250. Sakaguchi H., Fujikado T., Kanda H., Osanai M., Fang X.Y., Nakauchi K., et al. Electrical stimulation with a needle type electrode placed into the optic nerve in rabbit eyes. Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology 2004, 48:552-557.
251. Sakaguchi H., Kamei M., Fujikado T., Yonezawa E., Ozawa M., Cecilia-Gonzalez C., et al. Artificial vision by direct optic nerve electrode (AV-DONE) implantation in a blind patient with retinitis pigmentosa. Journal of Artificial Organs 2009, 12:206-209.
252. Sale A., De Pasquale R., Bonaccorsi J., Pietra G., Oliveri D., Berardi N., et al. Visual perceptual learning induces LTP in the visual cortex. Neuroscience 2010, 172:219-225.
253. Sale A., Maya Vetencourt J.F., Medini P., Cenni M.C., Baroncelli L., De Pasquale R., et al. Environmental enrichment in adulthood promotes amblyopia recovery through a reduction of intracortical inhibition. Nature Neuroscience 2007, 10:679-681.
254. Sanders M.D., Warrington E.K., Marshall J., Weiskrantz L. 'Blindsight': Vision in a field defect. Lancet 1974, 1:707-708.
255. Sautter J., Sabel B.A. Recovery of brightness discrimination in adult rats despite progressive loss of retrogradely labelled retinal ganglion cells after controlled optic nerve crush. The European Journal of Neuroscience 1993, 5:680-690.
256. Sautter J., Schwartz M., Duvdevani R., Sabel B.A. GM1 ganglioside treatment reduces visual deficits after graded crush of the rat optic nerve. Brain Research 1991, 565:23-33.
257. Schadow J., Dettler N., Paramei G.V., Lenz D., Fründ I., Sabel B.A., et al. Impairments of Gestalt perception in the intact hemifield of hemianopic patients are reflected in gamma-band EEG activity. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:556-568.
258. Schendel K., Robertson L.C. Reaching out to see: Arm position can attenuate human visual loss. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2004, 16:935-943.
259. Schmidt E.M., Bak M.J., Hambrecht F.T., Kufta C.V., Rourke D.K.O., Vallabhanath P. Feasibility of a visual prosthesis for the blind based on intracortical microstimulation of the visual cortex. Brain 1996, 119:507-522.
260. Schmielau F., Wong E.K. Recovery of visual fields in brain-lesioned patients by reaction perimetry treatment. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation 2007, 4:31.
261. Schmitt U., Sabel B.A. Basic fibroblast growth factor treatment protects from visual deficits but does not increase retinal ganglion cell survival following controlled optic nerve crush. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 1996, 10:61-68.
262. Schmitt U., Sabel B.A. MK-801 increases retinal ganglion cell death but reduces visual deficits after controlled optic nerve crush. Journal of Neurotrauma 1996, 13:791-800.
263. Schmitt U., Sabel B.A., Cross R., Samson F.E., Pazdernik T.L. Recovery of metabolic activity in retinofugal targets after traumatic optic nerve injury is independent of retinofugal input. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 1998, 13:153-161.
264. Schneider G.E. Two visual systems. Brain mechanisms for localization and discrimination are dissociated by tectal and cortical lesions. Science 1969, 163:895-902.
265. Schoenfeld M.A., Noesselt T., Poggel D., Tempelmann C., Hopf J.-M., Woldorff M.G., et al. Analysis of pathways mediating preserved vision after striate cortex lesions. Annals of Neurology 2002, 52:814-824.
266. Schuchard R.A., Fletcher D.C. Preferred retinal locus. A review with applications in low vision rehabilitation. Ophthalmology Clinics of North America 1994, 7:243-256.
267. Schumacher E.H., Jacko J.A., Primo S.A., Main K.L., Moloney K.P., Kinzel E.N., et al. Reorganization of visual processing is related to eccentric viewing in patients with macular degeneration. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 2008, 26:391-402.
268. Segraves M.A., Goldberg M.E., Deng S., Bruce C.J., Ungerleider L.G., Mishkin M. The role of striate cortex in the guidance of eye movement in the monkey. The Journal of Neuroscience 1987, 7:3040-3058.
269. Smirnakis S.M., Brewer A.A., Schmid M.C., Tolias A.S., Schüz A., Augath M., et al. Lack of long-term cortical reorganization after macaque retinal lesions. Nature 2005, 435:300-307.
270. Smith D.C., Holdefer R.N. Binocular competitive interactions and recovery of visual acuity in long-term monocularly deprived cats. Vision Research 1985, 25:1783-1794.
271. Sober A.J., Stark J.M., Yamasaki D.S., Lytton W.W. Receptive field changes after strokelike cortical ablation: A role for activation dynamics. Journal of Neurophysiology 1997, 78:3438-3443.
272. Somers D.C., Dale A.M., Seiffert A.E., Tootell R.B.H. Functional MRI reveals spatially specific attentional modulation in human primary visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1999, 96:1663-1668.
273. Spear P.D., Barbas H. Recovery of pattern discrimination ability in rats receiving serial or one-stage visual cortex lesions. Brain Research 1975, 94:337-346.
274. Spear P.D., Ganz L. Effects of visual cortex lesions following recovery from monocular deprivation in the cat. Experimental Brain Research 1975, 23:181-201.
275. Sprague J.M. Interaction of cortex and superior colliculus in mediation of visually guided behavior in the cat. Science 1966, 153:1544-1547.
276. Stein D.G., Weinberg D. Impairment and recovery of visual functions after bilateral lesions of superior colliculus. Physiology & Behavior 1978, 20:323-329.
277. Stoerig P. Sources of blindsight. Science 1993, 26:493-494.
278. Stoerig P. Blindsight, conscious vision, and the role of primary visual cortex. Progress in Brain Research 2006, 155:217-234.
279. Stoerig P. Functional rehabilitation of partial cortical blindness?. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 2008, 26:291-303.
280. Stoerig P., Cowey A. Blindsight in man and monkey. Brain 1997, 120:535-559.
281. Tan C.S., Sabel B.A. Dynamic changes in visual acuity as the pathophysiologic mechanism in Charles Bonnet syndrome (visual hallucinations). European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 2006, 256:62-63.
282. Tan C.S., Sabel B.A., Goh K.Y. Visual hallucinations during visual recovery after central retinal artery occlusion. Archives of Neurology 2006, 63:598-600.
283. Teuber H.-L. Effects of focal brain injury on human behavior. Nervous System 1975, 2:457-480.
284. Teuber H.-L., Battersby W.S., Bender M.B. Visual field defects after penetrating missile wounds of the brain 1960, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
285. Tieman S.B., Hirsch H.V. Removal of the more-experienced eye decreases visual field deficits in cats reared with unequal alternative monocular exposure. Brain Research 1983, 271:170-173.
286. Toosy A.T., Hickman S.J., Miszkiel K.A., Jones S.J., Plant G.T., Altmann D.R., et al. Adaptive cortical plasticity in higher visual areas after acute optic neuritis. Annals of Neurology 2005, 57:622-633.
287. Toosy A.T., Werring D.J., Bullmore E.T., Plant G.T., Barker G.J., Miller D.H., et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the cortical response to photic stimulation in humans following optic neuritis recovery. Neuroscience Letters 2002, 330:255-259.
288. Treisman A., Gelade G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology 1980, 12:97-136.
289. Urbaitis J.C., Meikle T.H., Relearning a dark-light discrimination by cats after cortical and collicular lesions. Experimental Neurology 1968, 20:295-311.
290. Van Essen D.C., Maunsell J.H.R. Two-dimensional maps of the cerebral cortex. The Journal of Comparative Neurology 1980, 191:255-281.
291. Van Hoff-van Duin J. Development of visuomotor behavior in normal and dark-reared cats. Brain Research 1976, 104:233-241.
292. Von Monakow C.V. Die Lokalisation in der Großhirnrinde und der Abbau der Funktion durch kortikale Herde 1914, J.F. Bergmann, Wiesbaden.
293. Von Noorden G.K. New clinical aspects of stimulus deprivation amblyopia. American Journal of Ophthalmology 1981, 92:416-421.
294. Voronin L., Byzov A., Kleschevnikov A., Kozhemyakin M., Kuhnt U., Volgushev M. Neurophysiological analysis of long-term potentiation in mammalian brain. Behavioural Brain Research 1995, 66:45-52.
295. Waleszczyk W.J., Wang C., Young J.M., Burke W., Calford M.B., Dreher B. Laminar differences in plasticity in area 17 following retinal lesions in kittens or adult cats. The European Journal of Neuroscience 2003, 17:2351-2368.
296. Wallace S.F., Rosenquist A.C., Sprague J.M. Recovery from cortical blindness mediated by destruction of nontectal fibers in the commissure of the superior colliculus in the cat. The Journal of Comparative Neurology 1989, 284:429-450.
297. Watson G.R., Schuchard R.A., De l'Aune W.R., Watkins E. Effects of preferred retinal locus placement on text navigation and development of advantageous trained retinal locus. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 2006, 43:761-770.
298. Weiskrantz L. Blindsight revisited. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 1996, 6:215-220.
299. Weiskrantz L. Is blindsight just degraded normal vision?. Experimental Brain Research 2009, 192:413-416.
300. Weiskrantz L., Warrington E.K., Sanders M.D., Marshall J. Visual capacity in the hemianopic field following a restricted occipital ablation. Brain 1974, 97:709-728.
301. Werring D.J., Bullmore E.T., Toosy A.T., Miller D.H., Barker G.J., MacManus D.G., et al. Recovery from optic neuritis is associated with a change in the distribution of cerebral response to visual stimulation: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2000, 68:441-449.
302. Werth R. Cerebral blindness and plasticity of the visual system in children. A review of visual capacities in patients with occipital lesions, hemispherectomy or hydranencephaly. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 2008, 26:377-389.
303. Werth R., Moehrenschlager M. The development of visual functions in cerebrally blind children during a systematic visual field training. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 1999, 15:229-241.
304. Werth R., Seelos K. Restitution of visual functions in cerebrally blind children. Neuropsychologia 2005, 43:2011-2023.
305. Wessinger C.M., Fendrich R., Gazzaniga M.S. Islands of residual vision in hemianopic patients. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1997, 9:203-221.
306. Wick B., Wingard M., Cotter S., Scheiman M. Anisometropic amblyopia: Is the patient ever too old to treat?. Optometry and Vision Science 1992, 69:866-878.
307. Widdig W., Pleger B., Rommel O., Malin J.P., Tegenthoff M. Repetitive visual stimulation: A neuropsychological approach to the treatment of cortical blindness. NeuroRehabilitation 2003, 18:227-237.
308. Wiesel T.N., Hubel D.H. Extent of recovery from the effects of visual deprivation in kittens. Journal of Neurophysiology 1965, 28:1060-1072.
309. Wolford G., Marchak F., Hughes H. Practice effects in backward masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 1988, 14:101-112.
310. Wood C.C., Spear P.D., Braun J.J. Effects of sequential lesions of suprasylvian gyri and visual cortex on pattern discrimination in the cat. Brain Research 1974, 66:443-466.
311. Wörgötter F., Suder K., Zhao Y., Kerscher N., Eysel U.T., Funke K. State-dependent receptive-field restructuring in the visual cortex. Nature 1998, 396:165-168.
312. Wüst S., Kasten E., Sabel B.A. Blindsight after optic nerve injury indicates functionality of spared fibers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2002, 14:243-253.
313. Young J.M., Waleszczyk W.J., Burke W., Calford M.B., Dreher B. Topographic reorganization in area 18 of adult cats following circumscribed monocular retinal lesions in adolescence. Journal of Physiology, London 2002, 541:601-612.
314. Young J.M., Waleszczyk W.J., Wang C., Calford M.B., Dreher B., Obermayer K. Cortical reorganization consistent with spike timing-but not correlation-dependent plasticity. Nature Neuroscience 2007, 10:887-895.
315. Zaehle T., Rach S., Herrmann C.S. Transcranial alternating current stimulation enhances individual alpha activity in human EEG. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e13766.
316. Zee D.S., Butler P.H., Optican L.M., Tusa R.J., Gücer G. Effects of bilateral occipital lobectomies on eye movements in monkeys: Preliminary observations. Physiological and pathological aspects of eye movements 1983, 225-232. Junk, Boston. A. Roucoux, M. Crommelink (Eds.).
317. Zeki S., Ffytche D.H. The Riddoch syndrome: Insights into the neurobiology of conscious vision. Brain 1998, 121:24-45.
318. Zhang X., Kedar S., Lynn M.J., Newman N.J., Biousse V. Natural history of homonymous hemianopia. Neurology 2006, 66:901-905.
319. Zihl J., Pöppel E., von Cramon D. Diurnal variation of visual field size in patients with postretinal lesions. Experimental Brain Research 1977, 27:245-249.
320. Zihl J., von Cramon D. Restitution of visual function in patients with cerebral blindness. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1979, 42:312-322.
321. Zihl J., von Cramon D. Visual field recovery from scotoma in patients with postgeniculate damage. A review of 55 cases. Brain 1985, 108:335-365.
322. Zur D., Ullman S. Filling-in of retinal scotomas. Vision Research 2003, 43:971-982.