New approaches to visual rehabilitation for cortical blindness: Outcomes and putative mechanisms

Neuroscientist

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 374-387

  Das, Anasuya ^a   Huxlin, Krystel R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

hemianopia; perceptual learning; plasticity; visual cortex damage; visual training

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; CEREBRAL BLINDNESS; HEMISPHERE; HUMAN; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NONHUMAN; OPTIC NERVE INJURY; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; VISION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT;

BLINDNESS, CORTICAL; HUMANS; NEURONAL PLASTICITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL PATHWAYS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 77956324308     PISSN: 10738584     EISSN: 10894098     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1073858409356112     Document Type: Review

References (129)

1. Bach-Y-Rita P. 1983. Controlling variables eliminates hemianopia rehabilitation results. Behav Brain Sci 6: 448.
2. Ball K., Sekuler R. 1986. Improving visual perception in older observers. J Gerontol 41 (2). 176-182.
3. Balliet R., Blood KMT, Bach-Y-Rita P. 1985. Visual field rehabilitation in the cortically blind? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 48: 1113-1124.
4. Barbur JL, Harlow AJ, Weiskrantz L. 1994. Spatial and temporal response properties of residual vision in a case of hemianopia. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 343: 157-166.
5. Barmashenko G., Eysel UT, Mittmann T. 2003. Changes in intracellular calcium transients and LTP in the surround of visual cortex lesions in rats. Brain Res 990: 120-128.
6. Baseler HA, Morland AB, Wandell BA 1999. Topographic organization of human visual areas in the absence of input from primary cortex. J Neurosci 19 (7). 2619-2627.
7. Benevento LA, Rezak M. 1976. The cortical projections of the inferior pulvinar and adjacent lateral pulvinar in the rhesus monkey (macaca mulatta): an autoradiographic study. Brain Res 108: 1-24.
8. Benzel EC, Mirfarkhraee M. 1987. Complete homonymous hemianopia: reversal with arterial bypass. South Med J 80: 249-251.
9. Bittar RG, Ptito M., Faubert J., Dumoulin SO, Ptito A. 1999. Activation of the remaining hemisphere following stimulation of the blind hemifield in hemispherectomized subjects. Neuroimage 10 (3 Pt 1). 339-346.
10. Blythe IM, Kennard C., Ruddock KH 1987. Residual vision in patients with retro-geniculate lesions of the visual pathways. Brain 110: 887-905.
11. Bridge H., Thomas O., Jbabdi S., Cowey A. 2008. Changes in connectivity after visual cortical brain damage underlie altered visual function. Brain 131(Pt 6). 1433-1444.
12. Chedru F., Leblanc M., Lhermitte F. 1973. Visual searching in normal and brain-damaged subjects (contribution to the study of unilateral inattention). Cortex 9: 94-111.
13. Chowdhury SA, DeAngelis GC 2008. Fine discrimination training alters the causal contribution of macaque area MT to depth perception. Neuron 60: 1-11.
14. Corbetta M., Marzi CA, Tassinari G., Aglioti S. 1990. Effectiveness of different task paradigms in revealing blindsight. Brain 113(Pt 3). 603-616.
15. Cowey A., Stoerig P. 1989. Projection patterns of surviving neurons in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus following discrete lesions of striate cortex: implications for residual vision. Exp Brain Res 75 (3). 631-638.
16. Cowey A., Stoerig P. 1991. The neurobiology of blindsight. Trends Neurosci 14 (4). 140-145.
17. Cowey A., Stoerig P. 1995. Blindsight in monkeys. Nature 373: 247-249.
18. Cowey A., Walsh V. 2000. Magnetically induced phosphenes in sighted, blind and blindsighted observers. Neuroreport 11 (14). 3269-3273.
19. Cowey A., Weiskrantz L. 1963. A perimetric study of visual field defects in monkey. Q J Exp Psychol 15: 91-115.
20. Cragg BG 1969. The topography of the afferent projections in the circumstriate visual cortex of the monkey studied by the Nauta method. Vision Res 9 (7). 733-747.
21. Danckert J., Rossetti Y. 2005. Blindsight in action: what can the different sub-types of blindsight tell us about the control of visually guided actions ? Neurosci Biobehav Rev 29: 1035-1046.
22. Darian-Smith C., Gilbert CD 1994. Axonal sprouting accompanies functional reorganization in adult cat striate cortex. Nature 368 (6473). 737-740.
23. Darian-Smith C., Gilbert CD 1995. Topographic reorganisation in the striate cortex of the adult cat and monkey is cortically mediated. J Neurosci 15 (3). 1631-1647.
24. Das A., Gilbert CD 1995. Receptive field expansion in adult visual cortex is linked to dynamic changes in strength of cortical connections. J Neurophysiol 74 (2). 779-792.
25. de Gelder B., Pourtois G., van Raamsdonk M., Vroomen J., Weiskrantz L. 2001. Unseen stimuli modulate conscious visual experience: evidence from inter-hemispheric summation. Neuroreport 12 (2). 385-391.
26. De Weerd P., Gattass R., Desimone R., Ungerleider LG 1995. Responses of cells in monkey visual cortex during perceptual filling-in of an artificial scotoma. Nature 377 (6551). 731-734.
27. Dilks DD, Serences JT, Rosenau B., Yantis S., McCloskey M. 2007. Human adult cortical reorganization and consequent visual distortion. J Neurosci 27 (36). 9585-9594.
28. Dosher B., Lu Z. 1999. Mechanisms of perceptual learning. Vision Res 39: 3197-3221.
29. Dosher BA, Lu Z. 2006. Level and mechanisms of perceptual learning: learning first-order luminance and second-order texture objects. Vision Res 46: 1996-2007.
30. Dosher BA, Lu ZI 1998. Perceptual learning reflects external noise filtering and internal noise reduction through channel reweighting. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95: 13988-13993.
31. Eysel UT 1997. Perilesional cortical dysfunction and reorganization. Adv Neurol 73: 195-206.
32. Eysel UT, Schmidt-Kastner R. 1991. Neuronal dysfunction at the border of focal lesions in cat visual cortex. Neurosci Lett 131 (1). 45-48.
33. Eysel UT, Schweigart G. 1999. Increased receptive field size in the surround of chronic lesions in the adult cat visual cortex. Cereb Cortex 9 (2). 101-109.
34. Eysel UT, Schweigart G., Mittmann T., Eyding D., Qu Y., Vandesande F., and others. 1999. Reorganization in the visual cortex after retinal and cortical damage. Restor Neurol Neurosci 15: 153-164.
35. Felleman DJ, Van Essen DC 1991. Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex 1: 1-47.
36. Fendrich R., Wessinger CM, Gazzaniga MS 1992. Residual vision in a scotoma: implications for blindsight. Science 258: 1489-1491.
37. Fujino T., Kigizawa K., Yamada R. 1986. Homonymous hemianopia: a retrospective study of 140 cases. Neuroophthalmology 6: 17-21.
38. Gassel MM, Williams D. 1963. Visual function in patients with homonymous hemianopia: oculomotor mechanisms. Brain 86: 1-36.
39. Geddes JM, Fear J., Tennant A., Pickering A., Hillman M., Chamberlain MA 1996. Prevalence of self-reported stroke in a population in northern England. J Epidemiol Community Health 50: 140-143.
40. Ghose GM, Yang T., Maunsell JH 2002. Physiological correlates of perceptual learning in monkey V1 and V2. J Neurophysiol 87 (4). 1867-1888.
41. Gilhotra JS, Mitchell P., Healey PR, Cumming RC, Currie J. 2002. Homonymous visual field defects and stroke in an older population. Stroke 33: 2417-2420.
42. Girard P., Salin PA, Bullier J. 1992. Response selectivity of neurons in area MT of the macaque monkey during reversible inactivation of area V1. J Neurophysiol 67: 1437-1446.
43. Hallett M. 2001. Plasticity of the human motor cortex and recovery from stroke. Brain Res Rev 36: 169-174.
44. Hendry SH, Reid RC 2000. The koniocellular pathway in primate vision. Annu Rev Neurosci 23: 127-153.
45. Henriksson L., Raninen A., NCurrency signsCurrency signnen R., HyvCurrency signrinen L., Vanni S. 2007. Training-induced cortical representation of a hemianopic hemifield. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 78: 74-81.
46. Holbach KH, Wassman H., Hoheluchter KL, Jain KK 1977. Differentiation between reversible and irreversible stroke changes in brain tissue: its relevance for cerebral vascular surgery. Surg Neurol 7: 325-333.
47. Holmes G. 1918. Disturbances of vision by cerebral lesions. Br J Ophthalmol 2: 353-384.
48. Horton JC 2005. Disappointing results from Nova Visiong'ss visual restoration therapy. Br J Ophthalmol 89 (1). 1-2.
49. Hubel DH 1982. Evolution of ideas on the primary visual cortex, 1955-1978: a biased historical account. Biosci Rep 2 (7). 435-469.
50. Huxlin KR 2008. Perceptual plasticity in damaged adult visual systems. Vision Res 48 (20). 2154-2166.
51. Huxlin KR, Pasternak T. 2004. Training-induced recovery of visual motion perception after extrastriate cortical damage in the adult cat. Cereb Cortex 14: 81-90.
52. Huxlin KR, Riley ME, Martin T., Kelly KN, Friedman DI, Burgin WS, Hayhoe M. 2009. Perceptual re-learning of complex visual motion after V1 damage in humans. J Neurosci 29 (13). 3981-3991.
53. Ishiai S., Furukawa T., Tsukagoshi H. 1987. Eye-fixation patterns in homonymous hemianopia and unilateral spatial neglect. Neuropsychologia 25: 675-679.
54. Kasten E., Poggel DA, Sabel BA 2000. Computer-based training of stimulus dection improves color and simple pattern recognition in the defective field of hemianopic subjects. J Cogn Neurosci 12 (6). 1001-1012.
55. Kasten E., Sabel BA 1995. Visual field enlargment after computer-training in brain-damaged patients with homonymous deficits: an open pilot trial. Restor Neurol Neurosci 8: 113-127.
56. Kasten E., Wst S., Behrens-Baumann W., Sabel BA 1998. Computer-based training for the treatment of partial blindness [see comments]. Nat Med 4 (9). 1083-1087.
57. Keck T., Mrsic-Flogel TD, Afonso MV, Eysel UT, Bonhoeffer T., Hbnener M. 2008. Massive restructuring of neuronal circuits during functional reorganization of adult visual cortex. Nat Neurosci 11: 1162-1167.
58. Kleiser R., Wittsack J., Niedeggen M., Goebel R., Stoerig P. 2001. Is V1 necessary for conscious vision in areas of relative cortical blindness ? Neuroimage 13 (4). 654-661.
59. Kononen M., Kuikka JT, Husso-Saastamoinen M., Vanninen E., Vanninen R., Soimakallio S., and others. 2005. Increased perfusion in motor areas after constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke: a single-photon emission computerized tomography study. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 25 (12). 1668-1674.
60. Law C. -T, Gold J. 2008. Neural correlates of perceptual learning in a sensory-motor, but not a sensory, cortical area. Nat Neurosci 11 (4). 505-513.
61. Lawton Smith J. 1962. Homonymous hemianopia. Am J Ophthalmol 54: 616-623.
62. Leff A., Scott S., Crewes H., Hodgson T., Cowey A., Howard D., Wise R. 2000. Impaired reading in patients with right hemianopia. Ann Neurol 47: 171-178.
63. Leh SE, Ptito A., Schonwiesner M., Chakravarty MM, Mullen KT 2009. Blindsight mediated by an S-cone-independent collicular pathway: an fMRI study in hemispherectomized subjects. J Cogn Neurosci. Mar 23 [Epub ahead of print].
64. Marigold DS, Weedersteyn V., Patla AE, Duysens J. 2007. Keep looking ahead? Re-direction of visual fixation does not always occur during an unpredictable obstacle avoidance task. Exp Brain Res 176 (1). 32-42.
65. Marrocco RT, Li RH 1977. Monkey superior colliculus: properties of single cells and their afferent inputs. J Neurophysiol 40 (4). 844-860.
66. Martin T., Das A., Huxlin KR 2009. Visual motion retraining of a cortically-blind field increases BOLD responses in perilesional cortex and MT+: a case study. Vision Sciences Society meeting ; Naples, FL.
67. Martin T., Riley ME, Kelly KN, Hayhoe M., Huxlin KR 2007. Visually-guided behavior of homonymous hemianopes in a naturalistic task. Vision Res 47: 3434-3446.
68. McDonald SA, Spitsyna G., Shillcock RC, Wise RJ, Leff AP 2006. Patients with hemianopic alexia adopt an inefficient eye movement strategy when reading text. Brain 129: 158-167.
69. Meienberg O., Zangemeister EH, Rosenberg M., Hoyt WF, Stark L. 1981. Saccadic eye movement strategies in patients with homonymous hemianopia. Ann Neurol 9: 537-544.
70. Mendola JD, Conner IP, Sharma S., Bahekar A., Lemieux S. 2006. fMRI measures of perceptual filling-in in the human visual cortex. J Cogn Neurosci 18: 363-375.
71. Mendola JD, Dale AM, Fischl B., Liu AK, Tootell RB 1999. The representation of illusory and real contours in human cortical visual areas revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 19 (19). 8560-8572.
72. Mohler CW, Wurtz RH 1977. The role of striate cortex and superior colliculus in visual guidance of saccadic eye movements. J Neurophysiol 40: 74-94.
73. Morland AB, Jones SR, Finlay AL, Deyzac E., Le S., Kemp S. 1999. Visual perception of motion, luminance and color in a human hemianope. Brain 122: 1183-1198.
74. Morland AB, Le S., Carrol E., Hoffmann MB, Pambakian A. 2004. The role of spared calcarine cortex and lateral occipital cortex in the responses of human hemianopes to visual motion. J Cogn Neurosci 16: 204-218.
75. Nelles G., Esser J., Eckstein A., Tiede A., Gerhard H., Diener HC 2001. Compensatory visual field training for patients with hemianopia after stroke. Neurosci Lett 306 (3). 189-192.
76. Nelles G., Widman G., de Greiff A., Meistrowitz A., Dimitrova A., Weber J., and others. 2002. Brain representation of hemifield stimulation in poststroke visual field defects. Stroke 33 (5). 1286-1293.
77. Pambakian ALM, Kennard C. 1997. Can visual function be restored in patients with homonymous hemianopia. Br J Ophthalmol 81: 324-328.
78. Pambakian ALM, Mannan SK, Hodgson TL, Kennard C. 2004. Saccadic visual search training: a treatment for patients with homonymous hemianopia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75: 1443-1448.
79. Pambakian ALM, Wooding DS, Patel N., Morland AB, Kennard C., Mannan SK 2000. Scanning the visual world: a study of patients with homonymous hemianopia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 69: 751-759.
80. Pasik P., Pasik T. 1982. Visual functions in monkeys after total removal of visual cerebral cortex. In: Neff WD, editor. Contributions to sensory physiology. Vol. 7. New York: Academic Press. p 147-200.
81. Poggel DA, Kasten E., M1/4ller-Oehring EM, Sabel BA, Brandt SA 2001. Unusual spontaneous and training induced visual field recovery in a patient with a gunshot lesion. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 70: 236-239.
82. Ptito A., Leh SE 2007. Neural substrates of blindsight after hemispherectomy. Neuroscientist 13 (5). 506-518.
83. Ptito A., Lepore F., Ptito M., Lassonde M. 1991. Target detection and movement discrimination in the blind field of hemispherectomized patients. Brain 114: 497-512.
84. Ptito M., Johannsen P., Faubert J., Gjedde A. 1999. Activation of human extrageniculostriate pathways after damage to area V1. Neuroimage 9: 97-107.
85. Radoeva PD, Prasad S., Brainard DH, Aguirre GK 2008. Neural activity within area V1 reflects unconscious visual performance in a case of blindsight. J Cogn Neurosci 20 (11). 1927-1939.
86. Raninen A., Vanni S., HyvCurrency signrinen L., NCurrency signsCurrency signnen R. 2006. Temporal sensitivity in a hemianopic visual field can be improved by long-term training using flicker stimulation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 78: 66-73.
87. Rausch M., Widdig W., Eysel UT, Penner IK, Tegenhoff M. 2000. Enhanced responsiveness of human extravisual areas to photic stimulation in patients with severely reduced vision. Exp Brain Res 135: 34-40.
88. Reinhard J., Schreiber A., Schiefer U., Sabel BA, Kenkel S., Vontheim R., Trauzettel-Klosinski S. 2005. Does visual restitution training change absolute homonymous visual field defects? A fundus controlled study. Br J Ophthalmol 89: 30-35.
89. Riley M., Kelly K., Martin T., Hayhoe MM, Huxlin KR 2007. Homonymous hemianopia alters distribution of visual fixations in 3-dimensional virtual environments. Vision Sciences Society meeting ; Sarasota, FL.
90. Roski R., Spetzler RF, Owen M. 1979. Reversal of seven-year-old visual field defect with extracranial-intracranial arterial anastomosis. Surg Neurol 10: 267-268.
91. Rumpel S., Hoffmann H., Hatt H., Gottmann K., Mittmann T., Eysel UT 2000. Lesion-induced changes in NMDA receptor subunit mRNA expression in rat visual cortex. Neuroreport 11 (18). 4021-4025.
92. Sabel BA 1997. Unrecognized potential for surviving neurons: within-systems plasticity, recovery of function, and the hypothesis of minimal residual structure. Neuroscientist 3: 366-370.
93. Sabel BA, Kasten E. 2000. Restoration of vision by training of residual functions. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 11: 430-436.
94. Sabel BA, Kenkel S., Kasten E. 2004. Vision restoration therapy (VRT) efficacy as assessed by comparative parametric analysis and subjective questionnaires. Restor Neurol Neurosci 22: 399-420.
95. Sabel BA, Kenkel S., Kasten E. 2005. Vision restoration therapy. Br J Ophthalmol 89 (5). 522-524.
96. Sahraie A., Trevethan CT, MacLeod MJ, Murray AD, Olson JA, Weiskrantz L. 2006. Increased sensitivity after repeated stimulation of residual spatial channels in blindsight. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103 (40). 14971-14976.
97. Sahraie A., Trevethan CT, Weiskrantz L., Olson JA, MacLeod MJ, Murray AD, and others. 2003. Spatial channels of visual processing in cortical blindness. Eur J Neurosci 18: 1189-1194.
98. Scharli H., Harman AM, Hogben JH 1999 a. Blindsight in subjects with homonymous visual field defects. J Cogn Neurosci 11 (1). 52-66.
99. Scharli H., Harman AM, Hogben JH 1999 b. Residual vision in a subject with damaged visual cortex. J Cogn Neurosci 11 (5). 502-510.
100. Schiller PH, Malpeli JG 1977. Properties and tectal projections of monkey retinal ganglion cells. J Neurophysiol 40 (2). 428-445.
101. Schmid MC, Panagiotaropoulos T., Augath MA, Logothetis NK, Smirnakis SM 2009. Visually driven activation in macaque areas V2 and V3 without input from the primary visual cortex. PLoS One 4 (5). e5527.
102. Schoups A., Vogels R., Qian N., Orban GA 2001. Practising orientation identification improves orientation coding in V1 neurons. Nature 412: 549-553.
103. Silvanto J., Cowey A., Lavie N., Walsh V. 2007. Making the blindsighted see. Neuropsychologia 45 (14). 3346-3350.
104. Sincich LC, Park KF, Wohlgemuth MJ, Horton JC 2004. Bypassing V1: a direct genicular input fo area MT. Nat Neurosci 7 (10). 1123-1128.
105. Slotnick SD, Moo LR 2003. Retinotopic mapping reveals extrastriate cortical basis of homonymous quadrantanopia. Neuroreport 14 (9). 1209-1213.
106. Slowik C., Somodi S., Richter A., Guthoff R. 1997. Asessment of corneal alterations following laser in situ keratomileusis by confocal slit scanning microscopy. German J Ophthalmol 5: 526-531.
107. Tamietto M., Cauda F., Corazzini LL, Savazzi S., Marzi CA, Goebel R., and others. 2009. Collicular vision guides nonconscious behavior. J Cogn Neurosci. Mar 25 [Epub ahead of print].
108. Taub E., Uswatte G., Elbert T. 2002. New treatments in neuro-rehabilitation founded on basic research. Nat Rev Neurosci 3: 228-236.
109. Taylor HR, Livingston PM, Stanislavsky YL, McCarty CA 1997. Visual impairment in Australia: distance visual acuity, near vision, and visual field findings of the Melbourne Visual Impairment Project. Am J Ophthalmol 123: 328-337.
110. Teuber H. -L, Battersby WS, Bender MB 1960. Visual field defects after penetrating missile wounds of the brain. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
111. Tootell RBH, Dale AM, Sereno MI, Malach R. 1996. New images from human visual cortex [review]. Trends Neurosci 19 (11). 481-489.
112. Trobe JD, Lorber ML, Schlezinger NS 1973. Isolated homonymous hemianopia: a review of 104 cases. Arch Ophthalmol 89: 377-381.
113. Turano KA, Broman AT, Bandeen-Roche K., Munoz B., Rubin GS, West SK, Team SP 2004. Association of visual field loss and mobility performance in older adults: Salisbury Eye Evaluation Study. Optom Vis Sci 81 (5). 298-307.
114. Vanni S., Raninen A., NCurrency signsCurrency signnen R., Tanskanen T., HyvCurrency signrinen L. 2001. Dynamics of cortical activation in a hemianopic patient. Neuroreport 12: 861-865.
115. Weiskrantz L. 1986. Blindsight: a case study and implications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
116. Weiskrantz L., Harlow A., Barbur JL 1991. Factors affecting visual sensitivity in a hemianopic subject. Brain 114: 2269-2282.
117. Weiskrantz L., Warrington EK, Sanders MD, Marshall J. 1974. Visual capacity in the hemianopic field following a restricted occipital ablation. Brain 97: 709-728.
118. Wessinger CM, Fendrich R., Gazzaniga MS 1997. Islands of residual vision in hemianopic patients. J Cogn Neurosci 9 (2). 203-221.
119. Wessinger CM, Fendrich R., Gazzaniga MS 1999. Variability of residual vision in hemianopic subjects. Restor Neurol Neurosci 15 (2-3). 243-253.
120. Wessinger CM, Fendrich R., Gazzaniga MS, Ptito A., Villemure JG 1996. Extrageniculostriate vision in humans: investigations with hemispherectomy patients. Prog Brain Res 112: 405-413.
121. Yamasaki DS, Wurtz RH 1991. Recovery of function after lesions in the superior temporal sulcus in the monkey. J Neurophysiol 66: 651-673.
122. Yang T., Maunsell JHR 2004. The effect of perceptual learning on neuronal responses in monkey visual area V4. J Neurosci 24 (7). 1617-1626.
123. Zangemeister WH, Oechsner U., Freksa C. 1995. Short-term adaptation of eye movements in patients with visual hemifield defects indicates high level control of human scanpath. Optom Vis Sci 72 (7). 467-477.
124. Zeki S., Ffytche DH 1998. The Riddoch syndrome: insights into the neurobiology of conscious vision. Brain 121: 25-45.
125. Zhang X., Kedar S., Lynn MJ, Newman NJ, Biousse V. 2006 a. Homonymous hemianopias: clinical-anatomic correlations in 904 cases. Neurology 66: 906-910.
126. Zhang X., Kedar S., Lynn MJ, Newman NJ, Biousse V. 2006 b. Natural history of homonymous hemianopia. Neurology 66: 901-905.
127. Zihl J. 1981. Recovery of visual functions in patients with cerebral blindness: effect of specific practice with saccadic localization. Exp Brain Res 44: 159-169.
128. Zihl J. 1995. Visual scanning behavior in patients with homonymous hemianopia. Neuropsychologia 33 (3). 287-303.
129. Zihl J., von Cramon D. 1985. Visual field recovery from scotoma in patients with postgeniculate damage. Brain 108: 335-365.