A tempest in a teapot is but a drop in the ocean: Action-objects in analogical mathematical reasoning

Learning in the Disciplines: ICLS 2010 Conference Proceedings - 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 1, Issue , 2010, Pages 492-499

  Abrahamson, Dor ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AFFORDANCES; DESIGN-BASED RESEARCH; MATHEMATICAL REASONING; MULTI-MODAL; QUANTITATIVE RELATIONS; RANDOM SAMPLE; TASK-BASED;

LITHIUM;

EID: 79960237163     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. Abrahamson, D. (2009a). Embodied design. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(1), 27-47.
2. Abrahamson, D. (2009b). Orchestrating semiotic leaps from tacit to cultural quantitative reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 27(3), 175-224.
3. Abrahamson, D. (2009). A student's synthesis of tacit and mathematical knowledge as a researcher's lens on bridging learning theory. In M. Borovcnik & R. Kapadia (Eds.), Research and developments in probability education [Special Issue]. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(3), 195-226. Accessed Jan. 1, 2010 at http://www.iejme.com/032009/main.htm.
4. Alibali, M. W., et al. (1999). Illuminating mental representations through speech and gesture. Psych Science, 10, 327-333.
5. Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. L. (1974). Working memory. In G. A. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47-89). NYC: Academic Press.
6. Bakker, A. (2007). Diagrammatic reasoning and hypostatic abstraction in stats. ed. Semiotica, 164(1/4), 9-29.
7. Bamberger, J., & Ziporyn, E. (1991). Getting it wrong. The World of Music, 34(3), 22-56.
8. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617-645.
9. Cobb, P., & Bauersfeld, H. (Eds.). (1995). The emergence of mathematical meaning. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
10. diSessa, A. A. (1983). Phenomenology and the evolution of intuition. In D. Gentner & A. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 15-33). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
11. diSessa, A. A., & Cobb, P. (2004). Ontological innovation and the role of theory in design experiments. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 77-103.
12. diSessa, A. A., & Sherin, B. (2000). Meta-representation. J. of Mathematical Behavior, 19, 385-398.
13. Dove, G. (2009). Beyond perceptual symbols. Cognition, 110(3), 412-431.
14. Edwards, L., Radford, L., & Arzarello, F. (2009). Gestures and multimodality in the construction of mathematical meaning [Special Issue]. Educational Studies of Mathematics, 70(2).
15. Gelman, R., & Williams, E. (1998). Enabling constraints for cognitive development and learning. In D. Kuhn & R. Siegler (Eds.), Cognition, perception and language (Vol. 2, pp. 575-630). NY: Wiley.
16. Ginsburg, H. P. (1997). Entering the child's mind. NYC: Cambridge University Press.
17. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
18. Halliday, M. A. K. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Ed., 5, 93-116.
19. Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and refutations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. E. (2000). Where mathematics comes from. NYC: Basic Books.
21. Lemke, J. L. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science (pp. 87-113). London: Routledge.
22. Mariotti, M. A. (2009). Artifacts and signs after a Vygotskian perspective. ZDM, 41, 427-440.
23. Nemirovsky, R., & Ferrara, F. (2009). Mathematical imagination and embodied cognition. ESM, 70(2), 159-174.
24. Ortony, A. (Ed.). (1993). Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge U. Press.
25. Piaget, J. (1952). The child's conception of number. London: Routledge.
26. Prawat, R. S. (1999). Dewey, Peirce, and the learning paradox. Amer Ed Res J, 36, 47-76.
27. Presmeg, N. (2006). Research on visualization in learning and teaching mathematics. In A. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psych. of math. ed. (pp. 205-235). Rotterdam: Sense.
28. Radford, L. (2008). Iconicity and contraction. ZDM, 40(1), 83-96.
29. Rubin, A., & Hammerman, J. (2007, Aug.). Soup or stew: Metaphors for the relationship between samples and populations. Paper presented at SRTL-5, Warwick, UK.
30. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1991). On mathematics as sense-making. In J. F. Voss, D. N. Perkins & J. Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education (pp. vii-xvii). NJ: LEA.
31. Sfard, A. (2002). The interplay of intimations and implementations. JLS, 11(2&3), 319-357.
32. Siegler, R. S., & Crowley, K. (1991). The microgenetic method. Amer Psy, 46(6), 606-620.
33. Slobin, D. I. (1996). From "thought and language" to "thinking to speaking". In J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70-96). Cambridge: Cambridge U. Press.
34. Stroup, W. M. (2002). Understanding qualitative calculus. Int J of Comp for Math Learning, 7(2), 167-215.
35. Thompson, P. W. (1993). Quantitative reasoning, complexity, and additive structures. ESM, 3, 165-208.
36. Wilensky, U. (1997). What is normal anyway?: Therapy for epistemological anxiety. ESM, 33(2), 171-202.
37. Wilensky, U. (1999). NetLogo. Northwestern U, Evanston, IL: CCL http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/.
38. Wilensky, U., & Papert, S. (2009). Restructurations. (Manuscript in preparation).