Social gradient in initiation and transition to daily use of tobacco and cannabis during adolescence: A retrospective cohort study

Addiction

Volumn 106, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1520-1531

  Legleye, Stéphane ^a,b   Janssen, Eric ^c   Beck, François ^d,e   Chau, Nearkasen ^b   Khlat, Myriam ^a  

^a INSTITUT NATIONAL D'ÉTUDES DÉMOGRAPHIQUES   (France)

^b INSERM   (France)

^c French Monitoring Centre for Drugs   (France)

^d Institut National de Prévention et d'Education À la Santé INPES   (France)

^e CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Adolescents; Cannabis; France; Retrospective cohort; Social gradient; Time discrete analysis; Tobacco

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; AGE; ARTICLE; CANNABIS SMOKING; CHILD BEHAVIOR; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMAN; MALE; OCCUPATION; PEER GROUP; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SMOKING; SOCIAL CLASS; SOCIOECONOMICS; STUDENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; AGE FACTORS; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMANS; MALE; MARIJUANA SMOKING; OCCUPATIONS; PEER GROUP; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SMOKING; SOCIAL CLASS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; STUDENT DROPOUTS;

EID: 79960215096     PISSN: 09652140     EISSN: 13600443     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03447.x     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Mayhew K. P., Flay B. R., Mott J. A. Stages in the development of adolescent smoking. Drug Alcohol Depend 2000; 59: S61-81.
2. Becker H. S. Outsiders. Paris: Métaillé; 1985.
3. Black D., Morris N., Smith C., Townsend P. Inequalities in Health: A Report of a Research Working Group. London: Department of Health and Social Security; 1980.
4. Franks P., Jerant A., Leigh J., Lee D., Chiem A., Lewis I. etal. Cigarette prices, smoking and the poor: implications of recent trends. Am J Public Health 2007; 97: 1873-7.
5. Cavelaars A., Kunst A., Geurts J. etal. Differences in self reported morbidity by educational level: a comparison of 11 western European countries. J Epidemiol Commun Health 1998; 52: 219-27.
6. Cavelaars A., Kunst A., Guerts J. etal. Educational differences in smoking: international comparison. BMJ 2000; 320: 1102-7.
7. Compton W. M., Thomas Y. F., Stinson F. S., Grant B. F. Prevalence, correlates, disability, and comorbidity of DSM-IV drug abuse and dependence in the United States. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2007; 64: 566-76.
8. Thomson W. M., Poulton R., Broadbent J. M. etal. Cannabis smoking and periodontal disease among young adults. JAMA 2008; 299: 525-31.
9. Chabrol H., Mabila J. D., Chauchard E., Mantoulan R., Rousseau A. Contribution des influences parentales et sociales à la consommation de cannabis chez des adolescents scolarisés [Contributions of parental and social influences to cannabis use in a non-clinical sample of adolescents]. L'Encéphale [Encephale] 2008; 34: 8-16.
10. Korhonen T., Huizink A. C., Dick D. M. etal. Role of individual, peer and family factors in the use of cannabis and other illicit drugs: a longitudinal analysis among Finnish adolescent twins. Drug Alcohol Depend 2008; 97: 33-43.
11. Starfield B., Riley A. W., Witt W. P., Robertson J. Social class gradients in health during adolescence. J Epidemiol Commun Health 2002; 56: 354-61.
12. Finkelstein D. M., Kubzansky L. D., Goodman E. Social status, stress, and adolescent smoking. J Adolesc Health 2006; 39: 678-85.
13. Goodman E., Huang B. Socioeconomic status, depressive symptoms, and adolescent substance use. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002; 156: 448-53.
14. Daniel J. Z., Hickman M., Macleod J. etal. Is socioeconomic status in early life associated with drug use? A systematic review of the evidence. Drug Alcohol Rev 2009; 28: 142-53.
15. Benjet C., Borges G., Medina-Mora M. E. etal. Drug use opportunities and the transition to drug use among adolescents from the Mexico City Metropolitan Area. Drug Alcohol Depend 2007; 90: 128-34.
16. Arillo-Santillan E., Lazcano-Ponce E., Hernandez-Avila M. etal. Associations between individual and contextual factors and smoking in 13293 Mexican students. Am J Prev Med 2005; 28: 41-51.
17. Humensky J. L. Are adolescents with high socioeconomic status more likely to engage in alcohol and illicit drug use in early adulthood? Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2010; 5: 19.
18. Wohlfarth T., van den Brink W. Social class and substance use disorders: the value of social class as distinct from socioeconomic status. Soc Sci Med 1998; 47: 51-8.
19. Goodman E., Adler N. E., Kawachi I. etal. Adolescents' perceptions of social status: development and evaluation of a new indicator. Pediatrics 2001; 108: E31.
20. Piko B., Fitzpatrick K. M. Does class matter? SES and psychosocial health among Hungarian adolescents. Soc Sci Med 2001; 53: 817-30.
21. Ritterman M. L., Fernald L. C., Ozer E. J. etal. Objective and subjective social class gradients for substance use among Mexican adolescents. Soc Sci Med 2009; 68: 1843-51.
22. Bellis M. A., Hughes K., Morleo M. etal. Predictors of risky alcohol consumption in schoolchildren and their implications for preventing alcohol-related harm. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2007; 2: 15.
23. Glendinning A., Shucksmith J., Hendry L. Social class and adolescent smoking behaviour. Soc Sci Med 1994; 38: 1449-60.
24. Wilkinson A. V., Waters A. J., Vasudevan V., Bondy M. L., Prokhorov A. V., Spitz M. R. Correlates of susceptibility to smoking among Mexican origin youth residing in Houston, Texas: a cross-sectional analysis. BMC Public Health 2008; 8: 337.
25. Sweeting H., West P. Social class and smoking: the effect of different definitions of smoking. Addiction 2001; 96: 1357-9.
26. Vega W. A., Gil A. G. Revisiting drug progression: long-range effects of early tobacco use. Addiction 2005; 100: 1358-69.
27. Patton G. C., Coffey C., Carlin J. B., Sawyer S. M., Lynskey M. Reverse gateways? Frequent cannabis use as a predictor of tobacco initiation and nicotine dependence. Addiction 2005; 100: 1518-25.
28. Agrawal A., Madden P. A., Bucholz K. K., Heath A. C., Lynskey M. T. Transitions to regular smoking and to nicotine dependence in women using cannabis. Drug Alcohol Depend 2008; 95: 107-14.
29. Timberlake D. S., Haberstick B. C., Hopfer C. J. etal. Progression from marijuana use to daily smoking and nicotine dependence in a national sample of U.S. adolescents. Drug Alcohol Depend 2007; 88: 272-81.
30. Palmer R. H., Young S. E., Hopfer C. J. etal. Developmental epidemiology of drug use and abuse in adolescence and young adulthood: evidence of generalized risk. Drug Alcohol Depend 2009; 102: 78-87.
31. Swift W., Coffey C., Carlin J. B., Degenhardt L., Patton G. C. Adolescent cannabis users at 24 years: trajectories to regular weekly use and dependence in young adulthood. Addiction 2008; 103: 1361-70.
32. Fergusson D. M., Boden J. M., Horwood L. J. The developmental antecedents of illicit drug use: evidence from a 25-year longitudinal study. Drug Alcohol Depend 2008; 96: 165-77.
33. Agnew R., White H. An empirical test of general strain theory. Criminology 1992; 30: 475-99.
34. Froggio G., Agnew R. The relationship between crime and 'objective' versus 'subjective' strains. J Crim Justice 2007; 35: 81-7.
35. Hoffmann J. P., Su S. S. The conditional effects of stress on delinquency and drug use: a strain theory assessment of sex differences. J Res Crime Delinq 1997; 34: 46-78.
36. Agnew R. Testing the leading crime theories: an alternative strategy focusing on motivational processes. J Res Crime Delinq 1995; 32: 363-98.
37. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Education at Glance. Paris: OECD; 2004.
38. Rumberger R. W., Lamb S. P. The early employment and further education experiences of high school dropouts: a comparative study of the United States and Australia. Econ Educ Rev 2003; 22: 353-66.
39. Heckathorn J. J., Lochner L. J., Todd P. E. Earnings functions and rates of return. J Hum Cap 2008; 2: 1-31.
40. Townsend L., Flisher A. J., King G. A systematic review of the relationship between high school dropout and substance use. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 2007; 10: 295-317.
41. Ensminger M. E., Lamkin R. P., Jacobson N. School leaving: a longitudinal perspective including neighborhood effects. Child Dev 2008; 67: 2400-16.
42. Cosnefroy O., Rocher T. Le redoublement au cours de la scolarité obligatoire: nouvelles analyses, mêmes constats [Repeating school years during compulsory education: new analysis, same findings]. Educ Formations 2004; 70: 73-82.
43. Ferguson B., Tilleczek K., Boydell K., Rummens J. A. Early school leavers: understanding the lived reality of student disengagement from secondary school. 2005. Final report. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Education and Training.
44. Beck F., Legleye S., Spilka S. Les drogues à 17 ans: évolutions, contextes d'usages et prises de risqués [Drug use at 17 years old: evolutions, contexts and risk-taking]. Tendances 2006; 43.
45. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). The state of the drugs problem in Europe. Annual report 2008. Lisbon: EMCDDA; 2008.
46. Bless R., Korf D., Riper H., Diemel S. Improving the Comparability of General Population Surveys on Drug Use in the European Union. Lisbon: EMCDDA; 1997.
47. Beck F., Costes J.-M., Legleye S., Peretti-Watel P., Spilka S. L'enquête ESCAPAD sur les usages de drogues: un dispositif original de collecte sur un sujet sensible. [The ESCAPAD Survey on Drug Use: an original data collection tool on a sensitive subject]. In: Lavallée P., Rivest L.-P., editors. Méthodes D'enquêtes Et Sondages. Pratiques Européenne Et Nord-Américaine [Survey Methods: European and North American Practices], Paris: Dunod; 2006, p. 56-9.
48. Insitut national de la statistique et des études économiques [National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies] (INSEE). PCS 2003-Niveau 1-Liste des catégories socioprofessionnelles agrégée [Aggregated occupational categories]. 2009. (INSEE).
49. Derosières A., Thévenot L. Les Catégories Socio-Professionnelles. [Socio-professional categories]. Paris: La Découverte; 2002.
50. International Standard Classification of Occupations. Geneva: International Labour Organization; 1988.
51. Reif K., Marlier E. Eurobarometer 44.2bis Mega Survey: Policies and Practices In Building Europe and the European Union. January-March 1996. Köln: ICPSR; 2001.
52. Choquet M., Hassler C., Morin D., Falissard B., Chau N. Perceived parenting styles and tobacco, alcohol and cannabis use among French adolescents: gender and family structure differentials. Alcohol Alcohol 2008; 43: 73-80.
53. Hoffmann J.-P. The community context of family structure and adolescent drug use. J Marriage Fam 2002; 64: 314-30.
54. Allison P. D. Discrete-time methods for the analysis of event histories. Sociol Methodol 1982; 13: 61-98.
55. Yamaguchi K. Event History Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1991.
56. Baker D. P., Stevenson D. L. Mothers'strategies for children's school achievement: managing the transition to high school. Sociol Educ, 1986; 59: 156-66.
57. Chen C. Y., O'Brien M. S., Anthony J. C. Who becomes cannabis dependent soon after onset of use? Epidemiological evidence from the United States: 2000-2001. Drug Alcohol Depend 2005; 79: 11-22.
58. Schiffman S., Pillitteri J., Burton S., Sdi Marino M. Smoker and ex-smoker reactions to cigarettes claiming reduced risk. Tob Control 2004; 13: 78-84.
59. de Walque D. Does education affect smoking behaviors? Evidence using the Vietnam draft as an instrument for college education. J Health Econ 2007; 26: 877-95.
60. Spilka S., Tribess A., Le Nézet O., Beck F., Legleye S. Les usages de drogues des adolescents Parisiens. Etude qualitative [Drug Use of Parisian Adolescents. A Qualitative Study]. Saint-Denis: L'Observatoire français des drogues et des toxicomanies (OFDT); 2010.
61. Peretti-Watel P., Beck F., Legleye S., Moatti J. P. Becoming a smoker: adapting Becker's model of deviance for adolescent smoking. Health Sociol Rev 2007; 16: 53-67.
62. Kandel D. B., Yamaguchi K., Chen K. Stages of progression in drug involvement from adolescence to adulthood: further evidence for the gateway theory. J Stud Alcohol 1992; 53: 447-57.
63. Sadiq M. A., Chaix B., Merlo J. etal. Gender differences in daily smoking prevalence in different age strata: a population-based study in southern Sweden. Scand J Public Health 2009; 39: 146-52.
64. Hibell B., Guttormsson U., Ahlström S. etal. The 2007 ESPAD Report-Substance Use Among Students in 35 European Countries. p. 408.Stockholm: The Swedish Council for Information on Alcohol and Other Drugs (CAN); 2009.
65. Barnett T., Whiteside A., Khodakevich L., Kruglov Y., Steshenko V. The HIV/AIDS epidemic in Ukraine: its potential social and economic impact. Soc Sci Med 2000; 51: 1387-403.
66. Frohlich K., Potvin L. The inequality paradox: the population approach and vulnerable populations. Am J Public Health 2008; 98: 216-21.
67. Lombrail P. Health care and secondary access to care inequalities. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 2007; 55: 23-30.
68. Beck F., Legleye S. Measuring cannabis related problems and dependence at the population level. In: Rödner Sznitman S., Olsson B., Room R., editors. A Cannabis Reader: Global Issues and Local Experiences. Lisbon: European Monitoring Center on Drug and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA); 2008, p. 29-57.
69. Johnson T. P., Mott J. A. The reliability of self-reported age of onset of tobacco, alcohol and illicit drug use. Addiction 2001; 96: 1187-98.
70. Rosenbaum J. R. Truth or consequences: the intertemporal consistency of adolescent self-report on the youth risk behavior survey. Am J Epidemiol 2009; 169: 1388-97.
71. Chauvel L. Existe-t-il un modèle européen de structure sociale? [Is there a European social structure model?]. Revue l'OFCE 1999; 71: 283-98.
72. Lien N., Friedstad C., Klepp K. I. Adolescents' proxy reports of parents' socioeconomic status: how valid are they? J Epidemiol Commun Health 2001; 55: 731-7.
73. Chen C. Y., Storr C. L., Anthony J. C. Influences of parenting practices on the risk of having a chance to try cannabis. Pediatrics 2005; 115: 1631-9.
74. Kuntsche E., Jordan M. D. Adolescent alcohol and cannabis use in relation to peer and school factors: results of multilevel analyses. Drug Alcohol Depend 2006; 84: 167-74.
75. Galea S., Ahern J., Tracy M., Rudenstine S., Vlahov D. Education inequality and use of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. Drug Alcohol Depend 2007; 90: S4-15.
76. Prescott C. A., Kendler K. S. Age at first drink and risk for alcoholism: a non causal association. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1999; 23: 101-7.
77. Fergusson D. M., Horwood L. J. Early onset cannabis use and psychosocial adjustment in young adults. Addiction 2006; 92: 279-96.
78. Wunsch G., Russo F., Mouchart M. Do we necessarily need longitudinal data to infer causal relations? Bulletin méthodologie sociologique [Bulletin Sociol Methodol] 2010; 106: 5-19.
79. Russo F. Causality and Causal Modelling in Social Sciences. Measuring Variations. Amsterdam: Springer; 2008.
80. Allison P. D. Event history analysis. Regression for longitudinal event data. In: Paper S. U., editor. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Beverly Hills: Sage; 1984, p. 85.
81. Wittchen H. U., Behrendt S., Hofler M. etal. What are the high risk periods for incident substance use and transitions to abuse and dependence? Implications for early intervention and prevention. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2008; 17: S16-29.