An automated calibration method for non-see-through head mounted displays

Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Volumn 199, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 328-335

  Gilson, Stuart J ^a   Fitzgibbon, Andrew W ^b   Glennerster, Andrew ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Calibration; Head mounted display; Immersive virtual reality; Non see through; Photogrammetry

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CAMERA; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEAD MOUNTED DISPLAY; HUMAN; ORIENTATION; PHOTOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISUAL SYSTEM; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS;

ANIMALS; CALIBRATION; COMPUTER TERMINALS; HUMANS; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; OPTICS AND PHOTONICS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 79960212786     PISSN: 01650270     EISSN: 1872678X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.05.011     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Azuma R., Baillot Y., Behringer R., Feiner S., Julier S., MacIntyre B. Recent advances in augmented reality. IEEE Comput Graph 2001, 21:34-47.
2. Gilson S.J., Fitzgibbon A.W., Glennerster A. Spatial calibration of an optical see-through head-mounted display. J Neurosci Methods 2008, 173(1):140-146.
3. Glennerster A., Tcheang L., Gilson S.J., Fitzgibbon A.W., Parker A.J. Humans ignore motion and stereo cues in favour of a fictional stable world. Curr Biol 2006, 16:428-443.
4. Hartley R., Zisserman A. Multiple view geometry in computer vision 2001, Cambridge University Press, UK.
5. Heikkilä J., Silvén O. A four-step camera calibration procedure with implicit image correction. IEEE Comp Vis Pat Recog 1997, 1106-1112.
6. Kuhl S.A., Thompson W.B., Creem-Regehr S.H. HMD calibration and its effects on distance judgments. ACM Trans Appl Percept 2009, 6. 19:1-19:20.
7. Lagarias J., Reeds J.A., Wright M.H., Wright P.E. Convergence properties of the Nelder-Mead simplex method in low dimensions. SIAM J Optim 1998, 9:112-147.
8. Mon-Williams M., Plooy A., Burgess-Limerick R., Wann J. Gaze angle: a possible mechanism of visual stress in virtual reality headsets. Ergonomics 1998, 41:280-285.
9. Mon-Williams M., Wann J.P., Rushton S. Binocular vision in a virtual world: visual deficits following the wearing of a head-mounted display. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1993, 13:387-391.
10. Owen C.B., Zhou J., Tang A., Xiao F. Display-relative calibration for optical see-through head-mounted displays. Proc. IEEE ACM Int. Symp. Mixed Aug Real (ISMAR) 2004.
11. Regan C. An investigation into nausea and other side-effects of head-coupled immersive virtual reality. Virt Real 1995, 1:17-31. 10.1007/BF02009710.
12. Rinalducci E., Mapes D., Cinq-Mars S.G., Higgins K.E. Determining the field of view in HMDs - a psychophysical method. Presence-Teleop Virt 1996, 5(3):353-356.
13. Sousa R., Brenner E., Smeets J.B.J. A new binocular cue for absolute distance: disparity relative to the most distant structure. Vision Res 2010, 50:1786-1792.
14. Svarverud E., Gilson S.J., Glennerster A. Cue combination for 3D location judgements. J Vis 2010, 10(1).
15. Tuceryan M., Genc Y., Navab N. Single point active alignment method (SPAAM) for optical see-through HMD calibration for augmented reality. Presence-Teleop Virt 2002, 11:259-276.
16. Tuceryan M., Greer D., Whitaker R., Breen D., Crampton C., Rose E., et al. Calibration requirements and procedures for a monitor-based augmented reality system. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 1995, 1:255-273.