A new binocular cue for absolute distance: Disparity relative to the most distant structure

Vision Research

Volumn 50, Issue 18, 2010, Pages 1786-1792

  Sousa, R ^a   Brenner, E ^a   Smeets, J B J ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

3D; Binocular disparity; Depth perception; Pointing

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BINOCULAR CONVERGENCE; BINOCULAR VISION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DARKNESS; DECISION MAKING; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION;

CUES; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; HUMANS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 77955552385     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.05.035     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Blank A.A. Analysis of experiments in binocular space perception. Journal of the Optical Society of America 1958, 48:911-925.
2. Brenner E., Smeets J.B.J. Comparing extra-retinal information about distance and direction. Vision Research 2000, 40:1649-1651.
3. Brenner E., Van Damme W. Perceived distance, shape and size. Vision Research 1999, 39:975-986.
4. Coello Y., Magne P. Determination of target distance in a structured environment: Selection of visual information for action. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2000, 12:489-519.
5. Foley J.M. Error in visually directed manual pointing. Perception & Psychophysics 1975, 17:69-74.
6. Foley J.M. Effect of distance information and range on two indices of visually perceived distance. Perception 1977, 6:449-460.
7. Foley J.M. Binocular distance perception. Psychological Review 1980, 87(5):411-434.
8. Foley J.M. Binocular distance perception: Egocentric distance tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1985, 11:133-149.
9. Glennerster A., Rogers B.J., Bradshaw M.F. Cues to viewing distance for stereoscopic depth constancy. Perception 1998, 27:1357-1365.
10. Glennerster A., Tcheang L., Gilson S.J., Fitzgibbon A.W., Parker A.J. Humans ignore motion and stereo cues in favor of a fictional stable world. Current Biology 2006, 16:428-432.
11. Gogel W. Convergence as a cue to the perceived distance of objects in a binocular configuration. The Journal of Psychology 1961, 52:303-315.
12. Gogel W. Scalar perceptions with binocular cues of distance. American Journal of Psychology 1972, 85:477-497.
13. Gogel W., Tietz J. Absolute motion parallax and the specific distance tendency. Perception & Psychophysics 1973, 13:284-292.
14. Harris J. Binocular vision: Moving closer to reality. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A 2004, 362(1825):2721-2739.
15. Hibbard P. A statistical model of binocular disparity. Visual Cognition 2007, 15:149-165.
16. Hillis J.M., Watt S.J., Landy M.S., Banks M.S. Slant from texture and disparity cues: Optimal cue combination. Journal of Vision 2004, 4:967-992.
17. Johnston E. Systematic distortions of shape from stereopsis. Vision Research 1991, 31:1351-1360.
18. Landy M.S., Maloney L.T., Johnston E., Young M. Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: In defense of weak fusion. Vision Research 1995, 35:389-412.
19. Mon-Williams M., Tresilian J.R. Some recent studies on the extraretinal contribution to distance perception. Perception 1999, 28:167-181.
20. Morrison J.D., Whiteside T.C.D. Binocular cues in the perception of distance of a point source of light. Perception 1984, 13:555-566.
21. Philbeck J., Loomis J. Comparison of two indicators of perceived egocentric distance under full-cue and reduced-cue conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1997, 1:72-85.
22. Poulton E. Human manual control. Handbook of physiology 1981, 1337-1389. American Physiological Association, Bethesda, MD. V.B. Brooks (Ed.).
23. Tresilian J.R., Mon-Williams M., Kelly B.M. Increasing confidence in vergence as a cue to distance. The Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 1999, 266:39-44.
24. Viguier A., Clément G., Trotter Y. Distance perception within near visual space. Perception 2001, 30:115-124.