The globalization of science education

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 48, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 567-591

  Deboer, George E ^a  

^a AAAS   (United States)

Author keywords

globalization; international standards

Indexed keywords

COMMON STANDARDS; ECONOMIC SUCCESS; EDUCATIONAL SYSTEMS; GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP; GLOBALIZATION; INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS; KEY PARTS; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; SCIENCE EDUCATION; STUDENT ASSESSMENT; TESTING PROGRAMS;

INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; STUDENTS; TESTING;

STANDARDS;

EID: 79960203731     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: 10982736     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tea.20421     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2011). Pocket guide to the 2011 annual meeting. Washington, DC: Author.
3. Achieve. (2010). Taking the lead in science education: Forging next-generation science standards. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from.
4. Apple, M. W., (1999). Power, meaning and identity. Essays in critical educational studies. New York, NY: Peter Lange.
5. Apple, M. W., (2000). The hidden costs of reform. Educational Policy, 14, 429-435.
6. Basic Education Act 628. (1998). Finland.
7. Bryce, T., (2007). Standards in science education: The situation in Scotland. In, D. Waddington, P. Nentwig, &, S. Schanze, (Eds.), Making it comparable: Standards in science education (pp. 255-262). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
8. Carter, L., (2005). Globalisation and science education: Rethinking science education reforms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42 (5), 561-580. (Pubitemid 40750382)
9. Carter, L., (2008). Globalisation and science education: The implications of science in the new economy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45 (5), 617-633. (Pubitemid 351703129)
10. Chiu, M.-H., (2007). Standards for science education in Taiwan. In, D. Waddington, P. Nentwig, &, S. Schanze, (Eds.), Making it comparable: Standards in science education (pp. 303-346). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
11. Common Core. (2010). Common core state standards initiative. Retrieved from.
12. Dolin, J., (2007). Science education standards and science assessment in Denmark. In, D. Waddington, P. Nentwig, &, S. Schanze, (Eds.), Making it comparable: Standards in science education (pp. 71-82). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
13. Driessen, H., (2007). Development and evaluation of science standards in the Netherlands. In, D. Waddington, P. Nentwig, &, S. Schanze, (Eds.), Making it comparable: Standards in science education (pp. 221-236). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
14. Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., &, Shouse, A. W., (Eds.). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
15. Exploratory Committee on Chemical Education. (2003). Building chemistry: A blueprint to initiate renewal of chemistry programme in upper secondary education in the Netherlands. Enschede, Netherlands: SLO.
16. Fensham, P. J., (1992). Science and technology. In, P. W. Jackson, (Ed.). Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 789-829). New York, NY: Macmillan.
17. Fensham, P. J., (1997). School science and its problems with scientific literacy. In, R. Levinson, &, J. Thomas, (Eds.), Science today: Problem or crisis. London, UK: Routledge.
18. Galvao, C., Reis, P., Freire, A., &, Oliveira, T., (2007). Science curriculum in Portugal: From the development to the evaluation of students' competences. In, D. Waddington, P. Nentwig, &, S. Schanze, (Eds.). Making it comparable: Standards in science education (pp. 237-254). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
19. Hurd, P., (2001). Modernizing science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39 (1), 3-9.
20. Labudde, P., (2007). How to develop, implement and assess standards in science education: 12 challenges from a Swiss perspective. In, D. Waddington, P. Nentwig, &, S. Schanze, (Eds.). Making it comparable: Standards in science education (pp. 277-302). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
21. Langlet, J., (2007). Standards for a lower secondary biology course in Germany: A contribution from MNU. In, D. Waddington, P. Nentwig, &, S. Schanze, (Eds.). Making it comparable: Standards in science education (pp. 165-172). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
22. Lavonen, J., (2007). National science education standards and assessment in Finland. In, D. Waddington, P. Nentwig, &, S. Schanze, (Eds.). Making it comparable: Standards in science education (pp. 101-126). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
23. Lederman, N. G., &, Lederman, J. S., (2007). Standards for science education in the United States: Necessary evil? In, D. Waddington, P. Nentwig, &, S. Schanze, (Eds.). Making it comparable: Standards in science education (pp. 347-371). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
24. Lord, K. M., &, Turekian, V. C., (2007, February). Time for a new era of science diplomacy. Science, 315 (5813), 769-770.
25. Malleus, P., (2007). Science education standards in France. In, D. Waddington, P. Nentwig, &, S. Schanze, (Eds.). Making it comparable: Standards in science education (pp. 127-146). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
26. Millar, R., (2007). How standards in science education are set and monitored in the English education system. In, D. Waddington, P. Nentwig, &, S. Schanze, (Eds.). Making it comparable: Standards in science education (pp. 83-100). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
27. Ministry of Education, Republic of China (Taiwan). (1998). Grade 1-9 curriculum guidelines. Taipei: Author.
28. Ministry of Education, Republic of China (Taiwan). (2003). Grade 1-9 curriculum guidelines: Science and technology learning area. Taipei: Author.
29. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
30. National Assessment Governing Board. (2008). Science framework for the 2009 national assessment of educational progress. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. Retrieved from.
31. National Board of Education. (2004). National core curriculum for basic education 2004. Helsinki, Finland: National Board of Education. Retrieved from.
32. National Science Foundation, (2010). Globalization of science and engineering research: A companion to science and engineering indicators 2010. Retrieved from.
33. Nentwig, P., &, Waddington, D., (2007). Standards: An international comparison. In, D. Waddington, P. Nentwig, &, S. Schanze, (Eds.). Making it comparable: Standards in science education (pp. 375-403). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
34. OECD. (2004). Denmark: Lessons from PISA 2000. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
35. OECD. (2006). Assessing scientific, reading, and mathematical literacy: A framework for PISA 2006. Paris, France: Author. Retrieved from.
36. Perrenoud, P., (1997). Construire des compétences des l'école (building school competence). Paris, France: ESF Ãditeur.
37. Qualifications and Curriculum Development Agency. (2005). National curriculum. Science. Key Stage 4. Retrieved from.
38. Rupp, A., &, Vock, M., (2007). National educational standards in Germany: Methodological challenges for developing and calibrating standards-based tests. In, D. Waddington, P. Nentwig, &, S. Schanze, (Eds.). Making it comparable: Standards in science education (pp. 173-198). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
39. Sadler, T., &, Zeidler, D., (2009). Scientific literacy, PISA, and socioscientific discourse; Assessment for progressive aims of science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46 (8), 909-921.
40. Schecker, H., &, Parchmann, I., (2007). Standards and competence models: The German situation. In, D. Waddington, P. Nentwig, &, S. Schanze, (Eds.). Making it comparable: Standards in science education (pp. 147-164). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
41. Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., &, Raizen, S. A., (1997). A splintered vision: An investigation of U.S. science and mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
42. Scottish Executive. (2006). A curriculum for excellence: Progress and proposals. A paper from the curriculum review board. Edinburgh, UK: Author. Retrieved from.
43. Stromdahl, H., (2007). On standards in science education in the contemporary Swedish school system. In, D. Waddington, P. Nentwig, &, S. Schanze, (Eds.). Making it comparable: Standards in science education (pp. 263-276). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
44. Tyler, R., (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
45. U.S. Department of Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. A report of the national commission on excellence in education. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
46. U.S. Department of Education Institute for Education Sciences. (n.d.). TIMSS eighth-grade released items from 1999 and 2003. Retrieved from.
47. Waddington, D., Nentwig, P., &, Schanze, S., (Eds.). (2007). Making it comparable: Standards in science education. Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
48. Weiglhofer, H., (2007). Austria at the beginning of the way to standards in science. In, D. Waddington, P. Nentwig, &, S. Schanze, (Eds.). Making it comparable: Standards in science education (pp. 61-70). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
49. Weinert F. E., (Ed.). (2001). Vergleichende Leistungsmessung in schuler-eine umstrittene selbstverstandlichkeit (comparative assessment in schools-A natural controversy). In Leistungsmessungen in schulen (assessment in schools) (pp. 17-31). Weinheim and Basel: Belz, Verlag.
50. Westbury, I., (1995). Didaktik and curriculum theory: Are they the two sides of the same coin? In, S. Hopmann, &, K. Riquarts, (Eds.). Didaktik and/or curriculum (pp. 233-263). Kiel, Germany: IPN.
51. Westbury, I., (1999). Teaching as a reflective practice: What might didaktik teach curriculum? In, I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, &, K. Riquartrs, (Eds.). Teaching as a reflective practice. The German didaktik tradition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.