Evaluation of two pediatric polymethyl pentene membrane oxygenators with pulsatile and non-pulsatile perfusion

Perfusion

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 229-237

  Qiu, Feng ^a   Khan, Sameer ^a   Talor, Jonathan ^a   Kunselman, Allan ^b   Ündar, Akif ^a,c  

^a PENN STATE CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b PENN STATE MILTON S HERSHEY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c PENN STATE COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Extracorporeal life support; Pediatric; Polymethyl pentene membrane oxygenator; Pulsatile perfusion

Indexed keywords

RINGER LACTATE SOLUTION;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENERGY; ERYTHROCYTE; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; EXTRACORPOREAL OXYGENATION; FLOW RATE; HEMATOCRIT; HEMODYNAMICS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; OXYGENATOR; PEDIATRICS; PERFUSION; PRESSURE GRADIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSATILE FLOW; TEMPERATURE; TRANSDUCER;

CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE OXYGENATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; OXYGENATORS, MEMBRANE; PULSATILE FLOW;

EID: 79960160252     PISSN: 02676591     EISSN: 1477111X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0267659110396116     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Haines N, Rycus P, Zwischenberger K, Bartlett R, Ündar A. Extracorporeal Life Support Registry Report 2008: neonatal and pediatric cardiac cases. ASAIO J 2009; 55: 111-116.
2. Palanzo D, Qiu F, Baer L, Clark JB, Myers JL, Undar A. Guest Editorial: Evolution of the ECLS circuitry. Artif Organs 2010 Nov; 34(11): 869-873.
3. Khoshbin E, Westrope C, Pooboni S, et al. Performance of polymethyl pentene oxygenators for neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a comparison with silicone membrane oxygenators. Perfusion 2005; 20(3): 129-134. (Pubitemid 40975729)
4. Haines N, Wang SG, Myers JL, Ündar A. Comparison of two types of neonatal extracorporeal life support systems with pulsatile and non-pulsatile flow. Artif Organs 2009; 33(11): 958-966.
5. Voss B, Krane M, Jung C, et al. Cardiopulmonary bypass with physiological flow and pressure curves: pulse is unnecessary! Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010; 37(1): 223-232.
6. Qiu F, Uluer MC, Kunselman A, Clark JB, Myers JL, Ündar A. Impact of the length of the tubing on hemodynamics in a simulated neonatal ECLS circuit. Artif Organs 2010 Nov;34(11):1003-1009.
7. Undar A, Rosenberg G, Myers JL. Major factors in the controversy of pulsatile versus non-pulsatile flow during acute and chronic cardiac support. ASAIO J. 2005; 51 (3): 173-175. (Pubitemid 40677123)
8. Yu JJ, Son HS, Lin CH, et al. Comparison of myocardial loading between asynchronous pulsatile and non-pulsatile percutaneous extracorporeal life support. ASAIO J 2008; 54: 177-180. (Pubitemid 351450762)
9. Kim HK, Son HS, Fang YH, Park SY, Hwang CM, Sun K. The effects of pulsatile flow upon renal tissue perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass: a comparative study of pulsatile and non-pulsatile flow. ASAIO J 2005; 51:30-36. (Pubitemid 40165248)
10. Khoshbin E, Dux AE, Killer H, Sosnowski AW, Firmin RK, Peek GJ. A comparison of radiographic signs of pulmonary inflammation during ECMO between silicon and poly-methyl pentene oxygenators. Perfusion 2007; 22(1): 15-21. (Pubitemid 47018357)
11. Fitzmaurice GM, Laird NM, Ware JH. Applied Longitudinal Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2004.
12. Talor J, Yee S, Rider A, Kunselman AR, Guan Y, Ündar A. Comparison of perfusion quality in hollow-fiber membrane oxygenators for neonatal extracorporeal life support. Artif Organs 2010; 34(4): E110-116.
13. Rider AR, Ressler NM, Karkhanis TR, Kunselman AR, Wang S, Ündar A. The impact of pump settings on the quality of pulsatility. ASAIO J 2009; 55(1): 100-105.
14. Wang S, Haines N, Richardson JS, Dasse KA, Ündar A. Impact of the postpump resistance on pressure-flow waveform and hemodynamic energy level in a neonatal pulsatile centrifugal pump. ASAIO J 2009; 55(3): 277-281.