The impact of pump settings on the quality of pulsatility

ASAIO Journal

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 100-105

  Rider, Alan R ^a   Ressler, Noel M ^a   Karkhanis, Tushar R ^a   Kunselman, Allen R ^a   Wang, Shigang ^a   Ündar, Akif ^a,b  

^a PENN STATE CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b PENN STATE COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BASEFLOW; BASEFLOWS; BYPASS CIRCUITS; CIRCUIT COMPONENTS; ENERGY VALUE; FLOW WAVEFORMS; HEMODYNAMIC ENERGY; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; PULSATILITY; PUMP FLOW RATE; PUMP HEAD; ROLLER PUMPS; START POINT; SURPLUS HEMODYNAMIC ENERGIES;

ELECTRIC NETWORK ANALYSIS; EXPERIMENTS; HYDRODYNAMICS; MERCURY (METAL); PULSATILE FLOW; ROLLERS (MACHINE COMPONENTS);

PUMPS;

ARTICLE; CANNULA; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CLINICAL EVALUATION; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIALYSIS PUMP; ENERGY; EXTRACORPOREAL CIRCULATION; EXTRACORPOREAL OXYGENATION; FLOW RATE; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HEART PERFUSION; HUMAN; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; MICROEMBOLISM; OXYGENATOR; PULSATILE FLOW; PUMP; PUMP SETTING; QUALITY CONTROL; SURPLUS HEMODYNAMIC ENERGY; WAVEFORM; CHILD; HEART ASSIST DEVICE; INSTRUMENTATION; PHYSIOLOGY;

CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CHILD; EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE OXYGENATION; HEART-ASSIST DEVICES; HUMANS; PULSATILE FLOW;

EID: 62449157970     PISSN: 10582916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e3181914e91     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Ü ndar A: Pulsatile versus nonpulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass procedures in neonates and infants: From bench to clinical practice. ASAIO J 51: vi-x, 2005.
2. Ji B, Ü ndar A: An evaluation of the benefits of pulsatile versus nonpulsatile perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass procedures in pediatric and adult cardiac patients. ASAIO J 52: 357-361, 2006.
3. Alkan T, Akçevin A, Ü ndar A, et al: Benefits of pulsatile perfusion on vital organ recovery during and after pediatric open heart surgery. ASAIO J 53: 651-654, 2007.
4. Ü ndar A: The ABCs of research on pulsatile versus nonpulsatile perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass. Med Sci Monit 8: 21-24, 2002.
5. Ü ndar A, Owens WR, McGarry MC, et al: Comparison of hollow-fiber membrane oxygenators in terms of pressure drop of the membranes during normothermic and hypothermic cardiopul-monary bypass in neonates. Perfusion 20: 135-138, 2005.
6. Ü ndar A, Eichstaedt HC, Masia T, et al: Comparisons of six pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass pumps during pulsatile and nonpulsatile perfusion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 122: 827-829, 2001.
7. Rider AR, Ji B, Kunselman AR, et al: A performance evaluation of eight geometrically different 10 Fr pediatric arterial cannulae under pulsatile and nonpulsatile perfusion conditions in an infant cardiopulmonary bypass model. ASAIO J 54: 306-315, 2008.
8. Ü ndar A, Ji B, Rider A, et al: Comparison of four different pediatric 10F aortic cannulae during pulsatile versus nonpulsatile perfusion in a simulated neonatal model of cardiopulmonary bypass. ASAIO J 53: 778-784, 2007.
9. Jostra HL-20 Heart-Lung Machine User Manual. Hirrlingen, Germany, Maquet Cardiopulmonary AG, 2000, pp. 3-24.
10. Shepard RB, Simpson DC, Sharp JF: Energy equivalent pressure. Arch Surg 93: 730-740, 1966.
11. Little RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, et al: SAS for Mixed Models, 2nd Ed. Cary, NC, SAS Institute Inc., 2006.
12. Ü ndar A, Ji B, Lukic B, et al: Quantification of perfusion modes in terms of surplus hemodynamic energy levels in a simulated pediatric CPB model. ASAIO J 52: 712-717, 2006.
13. Ü ndar A, Eichstaedt HC, Masai T, et al: Precise quantification of pulsatility is a necessity for direct comparisons of six different pediatric heart-lung machines in a neonatal CPB model. ASAIO J 51: 600-603, 2005.