Impact of the postpump resistance on pressure-flow waveform and hemodynamic energy level in a neonatal pulsatile centrifugal pump

ASAIO Journal

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 277-281

  Wang, Shigang ^a   Haines, Nikkole ^a   Richardson, J Scott ^b   Dasse, Kurt A ^b   Ündar, Akif ^a,c  

^a PENN STATE CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b Levitronix LLC   (United States)

^c PENN STATE COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTERIAL RESISTANCE; BACKFLOW; DATA ACQUISITION SYSTEM; EXTRACORPOREAL SYSTEMS; FLOW WAVEFORMS; HEMODYNAMIC ENERGY; PULSATILITY; PUMP FLOW; PUMP FLOW RATE; ROTATIONAL SPEED; SURPLUS HEMODYNAMIC ENERGIES; WATER MIXTURE;

CENTRIFUGAL PUMPS; FLOW RATE; GLYCEROL; HEMODYNAMICS; HYDRAULIC MACHINERY; HYDRODYNAMICS; IMPACT RESISTANCE; MAGNETIC STORAGE; MERCURY (METAL); PUMPING PLANTS;

PUMPS;

ARTERY RESISTANCE; ARTICLE; CLAMP; ENERGY; FLOW RATE; HEMODYNAMICS; NEONATAL PULSATILE CENTRIFUGAL PUMP; PRESSURE; PULSATILE FLOW; PUMP; ROTATION; VELOCITY; WAVEFORM; EXTRACORPOREAL OXYGENATION; HEART ASSIST DEVICE; INSTRUMENTATION; PHYSIOLOGY;

EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE OXYGENATION; HEART-ASSIST DEVICES; HEMODYNAMICS;

EID: 67650504991     PISSN: 10582916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e318197975e     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Alkan T, Akcevin A, Ündar A, et al: Effects of pulsatile and nonpulsatile perfusion on vital organ recovery in pediatric heart surgery: A pilot clinical study. ASAIO J 52: 530-535, 2006.
2. Alkan T, Akcevin A, Ündar A, et al: Benefits of pulsatile perfusion on vital organ recovery during and after pediatric open-heart surgery. ASAIO J 53: 651-654, 2007.
3. Rider AR, Schreiner RS, Ündar A: Pulsatile perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass procedures in neonates, infants, and small children. ASAIO J 53: 706-709, 2007.
4. Ji B, Ündar A: Impact of perfusion modes on microcirculation during acute and chronic cardiac support: Is there a difference? Perfusion 22: 115-119, 2007.
5. Ji B, Ündar A: An evaluation of the benefits of pulsatile vs. non-pulsatile perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass procedures in pediatric and adult cardiac patients. ASAIO J 52: 357-361, 2006.
6. Ündar A: Pulsatile versus non-pulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass procedures in neonates and infants: From bench to clinical practice [Invited Editorial]. ASAIO J 51: vi-x, 2005.
7. Ündar A: Myths and truths of pulsatile and non-pulsatile perfusion during acute and chronic cardiac support [Invited editorial]. Artif Organs 28: 439-443, 2004.
8. Ressler NM, Rider AR, Kunselman AR, et al: A hemodynamic evaluation of the Levitronix Pedivas centrifugal pump and Jostra HL-20 roller pump under pulsatile and non-pulsatile perfusion in an infant cpb model. ASAIO J 55: 106-110, 2009.
9. Wang S, Rider AR, Richardson JS, et al. Effects of the pulsatile flow settings on pulsatile waveforms and hemodynamic energy in a PediVAS centrifugal pump. ASAIO J 55: in press, 2009.
10. Shepard RB, Simpson DC, Sharp JF: Energy equivalent pressure. Arch Surg 93: 730-740, 1996.