A cognitive-consistency based model of population wide attitude change

AAAI Fall Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn FS-10-03, Issue , 2010, Pages 76-85

  Lakkaraju, Kiran ^a   Speed, Ann ^a  

^a SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS;

ATTITUDE CHANGE; COGNITIVE ASPECTS; COGNITIVE LEVELS; COMPUTATIONAL MODEL; CONSTRAINT SATISFACTION; PROCESS INFORMATION;

ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS;

EID: 79960145237     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. Bednar, J.; Bramson, A.; Jones-Rooy, A.; and Page, S. 2006. Conformity, consistency, and cultural heterogeneity. Mimeo, University of Michigan.
2. Castellano, C.; Fortunato, S.; and Loreto, V. 2009. Statistical physics of social dynamics. Reviews of Modern Physics 81.
3. Castellano, C.; Vilone, D.; and Vespignani, A. 2003. Incomplete ordering of the voter model on small-world networks. Europhysics Letters 63(1):153-158. (Pubitemid 36837180)
4. Change, Y. P. O. C. 2009. Climate change in the american mind: Americans' climate change beliefs, attitudes, policy preferences, and actions. Technical report, George Mason University.
5. Chen, P., and Redner, S. 2005. Majority rule dynamics in finite dimensions. Physical Review E 71.
6. Delgado, J. 2002. Emergence of social conventions in complex networks. Artificial Intelligence 141(1-2):171-185.
7. Dovidio, J. F.; Kawakami, K.; and Gaertner, S. L. 2002. Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82(1):62-68.
8. Fazio, R. H., and Olson, M. A. 2003. Attitudes: Foundations, functions, and consequences. In Hogg, M. A., and Cooper, J., eds., The Sage Handbook of Social Psychology. Sage.
9. Gawronski, B., and Bodenhausen, G. 2006. Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin 132:692-731. (Pubitemid 44306752)
10. Gawronski, B., and Strack, F. 2004. On the propositional nature of cognitive consistency: Dissonance changes explicit but not implicit attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 40:535-542. (Pubitemid 38956052)
11. Goldstone, R. L., and Janssen, M. 2005. Computational models of collective behavior. Trends in Cognitive Science 9(9).
12. Hopfield, J. J. 1982. Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 79:2554-2558.
13. Jones, C. R. M., and Fazio, R. H. 2008. Associative strength and consumer choice behavior. In Haugtvedt, C. P.; Herr, P. M.; and Kardes, F. R., eds., Handbook of Consumer Psychology. Psychology Press. 437-459.
14. Krosnick, J. A. 1988. The role of attitude importance in social evaluation: A study of policy preferences, presidential candidate evaluation, and voting behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55(2):196-210.
15. Kunda, Z., and Thagard, P. 1996a. Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits, and behaviors: A parallel-constraint-satisfaction theory. Psychological Review 103(2):284-308.
16. Kunda, Z., and Thagard, P. 1996b. Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits, and behaviors: A parallel-constraint-satisfaction theory. Psychological Review 103(2):284-308.
17. Lakkaraju, K. 2009. Agreement, Information and Time in Multiagent Systems. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
18. Lima, F.; Sousa, A.; and Sumour, M. 2008. Majority-vote on directed erdos-renyi random graphs. Physica A 387:3503-3510.
19. Mason, W. A.; Conrey, F. R.; and Smith, E. R. 2007. Situating social influence processes: Dynamic, multidirectional flows of influence within social networks. Personality and Social Psychology Review 11.
20. Page, S. E.; Sander, L. M.; and Schneider-Mizell, C. M. 2007. Conformity and dissonance in generalized voter model. Journal of Statistical Physics 128(6):1279-1287.
21. Pereira, L. F. C., and Moreira, F. G. B. 2005. Majority-vote model on random graphs. Physical Review E 71(016123).
22. Read, S. J.; Vanman, E. J.; and Miller, L. C. 1997. Connectionism, parallel constraint satisfaction processes, and gestalt principles: (re)introducing cognitive dynamics to social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review 1(1):26-53.
23. Russo, J. E.; Carlson, K. A.; Meloy, M. G.; and Yong, K. 2008. The goal of consistency as a cause of information distortion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
24. Rydell, R. J., and McConnell, A. R. 2006. Understanding implicit and explicit attitude change: A systems of reasoning analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91(6):995-1008.
25. Shoda, Y., and Mischel, W. 1998. Personality as a stable cognitive-affective activation network: characteristic patterns of behavior variation emerge from a stable personality structure. In Read, S. J., and Miller, L. C., eds., Connectionist Models of Social Reasoning and Social Behavior. Lawrence Erlbaum.
26. Simon, D., and Holyoak, K. J. 2002. Structural dynamics of cognition: From consistency theories to constraint satisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Review 6(6):283-294.
27. Simon, D.; Krawczyk, D. C.; Bleicher, A.; and Holyoak, K. J. 2008. The transience of constructed preferences. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 21:1-14.
28. Simon, D.; Krawczyk, D. C.; and Holyoak, K. J. 2004. Construction of preferences by constraint satisfaction. Psychological Science 15(5):331.
29. Simon, D.; Snow, C. J.; and Read, S. J. 2004. The redux of cognitive consistency theories: Evidence judgments by constraint satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 86(6):814-837. (Pubitemid 38707124)
30. Simon, D. 2004. A third view of the black box: Cognitive coherence in legal decision making. University of Chicago Law Review 71.
31. Sood, V.; Antal, T.; and Redner, S. 2008. Voter models on heterogenous networks. Physical Review E 77.
32. Spellman, B. A.; Ullman, J. B.; and Holyoak, K. J. 1993. A coherence model of cognitive consistency: Dynamics of attitude change during the persian gulf war. Journal of Social Issues 49(4):147-165.
33. Strogatz, S. H. 2001. Exploring complex networks. Nature 410(6825):268-276. (Pubitemid 32216604)
34. Suchecki, K.; Eguiluz, V. M.; and Miguel, M. S. 2008. Voter model dynamics in complex networks: Role of dimensionality, disorder and degree distribution. ArXiv. condmat/0504482v1.
35. Thagard, P. 2000. Coherence in Thought and Action. Life and Mind: Philosophical Issues in Biology and Psychology. MIT Press.
36. Visser, P. S., and Clark, L. M. 2003. Attitudes. In Kuper, A., and Kuper, J., eds., Social Science Encyclopedia. Routledge.
37. Visser, P. S., and Cooper, J. 2003. Attitude change. In Hogg, M., and Cooper, J., eds., Sage Handbook of Social Psychology. Sage Publications.
38. Visser, P. S., and Mirabile, R. R. 2004. Attitudes in the social contex: The impact of social network composition on individual-level attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87(6):779-795.
39. Watts, D. J., and Strogatz, S. H. 1998. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature 393(6684):440-442.
40. Wilson, T. D.; Lindsey, S.; and Schooler, T. Y. 2000. A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review 107(1):101-126.