An international dimension of the student's attitudes towards the use of English in Web 2.0 technology

Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 63-68

  Tilfarlioǧlu, Filiz Yalçin ^a  

^a GAZIANTEP UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

English language teaching; Foreign language learning; Web 2.0 technologies

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960098809     PISSN: None     EISSN: 13036521     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Anderson P. (2007). What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for Education. JISC Technology and Standards Watch. Retrieved from: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf
2. Brandt, R. (2000). Teaching and teacher development: A new synthesis for a new century. Education in a new era
3. Broughton, G, Brumfit, C. Flavell, R. Hill, P. Pincas, A. (2003). Teaching English as a foreign language. USA: Taylor and Faranchise e-library.
4. Boyd, D.M. and Ellison, N.B. (2008). Social Network Sites: Definition, History and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,13(1).
5. Burns, A., Richards, Jack C. (2009). The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education. Cambridge University Press. p. 102-112
6. Chun, D. M. & Plass, J.L (1996). The Modern Language Journal, Volume 80, No 2, pp. 183-198
7. Crook, C. (2008). Web 2.0 technologies for learning: The current landscape-opportunities, challenges and tensions. Learning Sciences Research Institute, University of Nottingham, 24-27.
8. Clauss-Ehlers, C. S., Yang, Y. T., & Chen, W. C. (2006). Resilience from childhood stressors: The role of cultural resilience, ethnic identity, and gender identity. Journal of Infant, Child, and Adolescent Psychotherapy, 5 (1).
9. Cooker, L. (2010). Some self-access principles. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 1(1), 5-9.
10. Çakir, Ö. & Kayri, M. (2010). An applied study on educational use of facebook as a web 2.0 tool: the sample of the lesson of computer networks and communication. 2, 48-50. DOI:10.5121/ijcsit.2010.2405
11. Deutscher, G. (August 26, 2010). Does your language shape how you think?. The New York Times.
12. Fullan, M. (1993). Why teachers must become change agents. Educational Leadership, 50,6.
13. Godwin-Jones. R. (2005). Emerging Technologies. Skype and podcasting: Disruptive technologies for language learning. Language Learning and Technology. 9(3).9-12
14. Guistini, D. (2006). How web is changing medicine. BMJ 333: 1283 doi: 10.1136/bmj.39062.555405.80 (Published 21 December 2006)
15. Işman, A. (2008). Uzaktan Eǧitim. Ankara: Pegema Yayi{dotless}nci{dotless}li{dotless}k.
16. Halvorsen, A. (2009). "Social networking sites and critical language learning ", in Thomas, M. (ed.), Handbook of research on Web 2.0 and second language learning. pp. 237-258, Hershey, PA: Information Science
17. Haythornthwaite, C. & Kazmer, M.M (Eds.) (2004). Learning, Culture and Community in online education: Research and Practice. Peter Lange, New York.
18. Hinduja, S. & Patchin, J.W. (2010). Trends in Online Social Networking: Adolescent Use of MySpace over time. New Media & Society March 1, 2010 12: 197-21, Florida Atlantic University, USA.
19. International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (1996) 2000 and beyond a strategic framework for prequalification education for the accountancy profession in the year 2000 and beyond. New York, IFAC.
20. International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). (2000). Discussion Paper on Assistance Projects in Accountancy Education and Development. New York: IFAC Education Committee. www.ifac.org
21. Jonassen, D.H., Peck, K.L., Wilson, B.G. (1999). Learning with Technology: A Constructivist Perspective Columbus, OH: Merill Prentice Hall.
22. Knobel, M. and Lankshear, C. (eds) (2007). A New Literacies Sampler. New York: Peter
23. Lam, W.S.E. (2000). L2 Literacy and the design of the self: A case study of a teenager writing on the internet. Tesol Quarterly, 34(3), 457-482.
24. Lee, L. (2005). Using Web-based Instruction to promote active learning: Learners' Perspectives. CALICO Journal 23 (1), 139-156.
25. Livingstone, S.(2002). London School of Economics and Political Science, UK.
26. Maness, J. (2006). Library 2.0 theory: Web 2.0 and its implications for libraries. Webology. 3, 2. Retrieved from http://www.webology.ir/2006/v3n2/a25.html
27. Mason, R. & Rennie, F. (2008). E-learning and social networking handbook: Resources for higher education. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.
28. McLoughlin, C. & Lee, M. J. W. (2007). Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. Proceedings ascilite, Singapore. Retrieved from: http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/mcloughlin.pdf
29. Miller, P. (2005). Web 2.0: Building New Library. Ariadne. 45/ Retrieved from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue45/miller/
30. Munoz, C.L. (2009). Opening Facebook. How to use Facebook in the college classroom. Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education Conference, Charleston, South Carolina.
31. Motteram, G., & Sharma, P. (2009). Blending Learning in a Web 2.0 World. International Journal of Emerging Technologies & Society, 7(2), 83-96
32. Nunan, D. (1997). Research Methods in Language Learning. USA: Cambridge University Press
33. Oskoz, A., Sykes, J. M. & Thorne S. L. (2008). Web 2.0, synthetic immersive environments, and mobile resources for language education. CALICO Journal, 25(3), 528-546. Retrieved from: https://calico.org/html/article_715.pdf
34. O'Reilly, T. (2005) 'What is Web 2.0: design patterns and business models for the next generation of software' [http://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web.20.html]
35. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. California: Sage Publications.
36. Pegrum, M. (2009). Communicative Networking and Linguistic Mashups on Web 2.0, in Thomas, M. (ed.) Handbook of Research on Web 2.0 and Second Language Learning. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
37. Pica, T. (1997). Second language teaching and research relationships: A North American view. Language Teaching Research, 1(1), 48-72.
38. Price, K. (2006). Web 2.0 and education: What it means for us all. Paper presented at the 2006 Australian Computers in Education Conference, Cairns, Australia.
39. Richardson, W. (2006). Blogs, Wikis, Podcasts, and other powerful tools for classrooms. Retrieved from: http://www.hbe.com.au/PUBLIC/HBEItemImages/pdf/CO2437.pdf
40. Thomas, M. (Ed).(2009) Handbook of Research on Web 2.0 and Second Language learning, (pp. xix-xx) Global.
41. Vijayakumar, S (2011). Using technology for brainstorming in a writing class: An Innovative approach. Journal of technology for E.L.T. Vol 2, No:2, 20011.
42. Warschauer, M. and Kern, R. (2000). Network-based Language Teaching: Concepts and Practice. Port Chester, NY: Cambridge University Press