Delegation to automation: Performance and implications in non-optimal situations

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6781 LNAI, Issue , 2011, Pages 322-331

  Miller, Christopher A ^a   Shaw, Tyler H ^b   Hamell, Joshua D ^a   Emfield, Adam ^b   Musliner, David J ^a   De Visser, Ewart ^b   Parasurman, Raja ^b  

^a SMART INFORMATION FLOW TECHNOLOGIES   (United States)

^b GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive adaptable automation; automation bias; automation complacency; delegation; mixed initiative automation; playbook

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE/ADAPTABLE AUTOMATION; AUTOMATION BIAS; DELEGATION; MIXED INITIATIVE; PLAYBOOK; IS PERFORMANCE; U.S. ARMY;

ERGONOMICS; OPTIMIZATION; AUTOMATION;

AUTOMATION; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 79960079608     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-21741-8_35     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Miller, C.A., Parasuraman, R.: Designing for flexible interaction between humans and automation:Delegation interfaces for supervisory control. Human Factors 49, 57-75 (2007) (Pubitemid 46175382)
2. Parasuraman, R., Galster, S., Squire, P., Furukawa, H., Miller, C.: A flexible delegation interface enhances system performance in human supervision of multiple autonomous robots: Empirical studies with RoboFlag. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, & Cybernetics 35, 481-493 (2005) (Pubitemid 40986431)
3. Fern, L., Shively, R.J.: A comparison of varying levels of automation on the supervisory control of multiple UASs. In: Proc. AUVSI's Unmanned Systems, North America, Washington, D.C. (2009)
4. Kirwan, B., Ainsworth, L.: A Guide to Task Analysis. Taylor & Francis, London (1992)
5. Nau, D., Au, T., Ilgami, O., Kuter, U., Muñoz, H., Murdock, W., Wu, D., Yaman, F.: Applications of SHOP and SHOP2. Technical Report, University of Maryland (2004)
6. Ingrand, F., Georgeff, M., Rao, A.: An Architecture for Real-Time Reasoning and System Control. IEEE Expert, 34-44 (December 1992)
7. Parasuraman, R., Riley, V.: Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse. Human Factors 39(2), 230-253 (1997)
8. Parasuraman, R., Molloy, R., Singh, I.: Performance consequences of automation-induced complacency. Int. Journal of Aviation Psychology 3, 1-23 (1993)
9. Shaw, T., Emfield, A., Garcia, A., de Visser, E., Miller, C., Parasuraman, R., Fern, L.: Evaluating the Benefits and Potential Costs of Automation Delegation for Supervisory Control of Multiple UAVs. In: 54th Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, pp. 1498-1502. HFES Press, Santa Monica (2010)
10. Rovira, E., McGarry, K., Parasuraman, R.: Effects of imperfect automation on decision making in a simulated command and control task. Human Factors 49, 76-87 (2007) (Pubitemid 46175383)