Technology usage among community college faculty

Community College Journal of Research and Practice

Volumn 34, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 624-644

  Jackowski, Melissa B ^a   Akroyd, Duane ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960077168     PISSN: 10668926     EISSN: 15210413     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10668920701831530     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Abraham, S. Y., Steiger, D. M., Montgomery, M., Kuhr, B. D., Tourangeau, R., Montgomery, B., & Chattopadhyay, M. (2002). 1999 National Study of Postsecondary Faculty (NSOPF: 99) methodology report (NCES 2002-154). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
2. Akroyd, D., Gillett-Karam, R., & Boos, D. (1999, April). Satisfaction and institutional support of full-time and part-time community college faculty: A national perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Division J), Montreal, Canada.
3. Agresti, A., & Finlay, B. (1997). Statistical methods for the social sciences (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4. American Council on Education. (2000). Developing a distance education policy for 21st century learning. Washington DC: Author.
5. Bailey, T., & Matsuzuka, Y. (2003, April). Integration of vocational and academic curricula through the NSF advanced technological education program (ATE). Paper presented at Accountability for Educational Quality: Shared Responsibility, the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Chicago, IL.
6. Beaudoin, M. (1990). The instructor's changing role in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 4(2), 21-29.
7. Berger, A., Kirshstein, R., & Rowe, E. (2001). Institutional policies and practices: Findings from the 1999 National Study of Postsecondary Faculty, Institution Survey (NCES 2001-201). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
8. Betts, K. S. (1998). Factors influencing faculty participation in distance education in postsecondary education in the United States: An institutional study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Washington, DC: The George Washington University.
9. Bower, B. L. (2001). Distance education: Facing the faculty challenge. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 4(2). Retrieved January 5, 2005, from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/summer42/bower42.html
10. Bradburn, E. M. (2002). Distance education instruction by postsecondary faculty and staff: Fall 1998 (NCES 2002-155). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
11. Clark, R. G., Soliman, M. B., & Sungaila, H. (1985). Staff perceptions of external versus internal teaching and staff development. Distance Education, 5(1), 84-92.
12. Clark, T. (1993). Attitudes of higher education faculty toward distance education: A national survey. The American Journal of Distance Education, 7(2), 19-33.
13. Crawford, C. M., & Gannon-Cook, R. (2002, March). Faculty attitudes towards distance education: Enhancing the support and rewards system for innovative integration of technology within coursework. Paper presented at the 13th International Conference of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education, Nashville, TN.
14. Dillon, C. (1989). Faculty rewards and instructional telecommunications: A view from the telecourse faculty. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 35-43.
15. Dillon, C., Hengst, H., & Zoller, D. (1991). Instructional strategies and student involvement in distance education: A study of the Oklahoma televised instruction system. Journal of Distance Education, 6(1), 28-41.
16. Dillon, C., & Walsh, S. M. (1992). Faculty: The neglected resource in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 6(3), 5-21.
17. Dooley, K. E., & Murphy, T. H. (2001). College of agriculture faculty perceptions of electronic technologies in teaching. Journal of Agricultural Education, 42(2), 1-10.
18. Dusick, D. M. (1999). Effects of administrative support policies, cognitive processes, and motivational beliefs on faculty uses of computer technology: Testing a motivational model (Unpublshed doctoral dissertation). Los Angeles, CA: University of South California.
19. Ellis, E. M. (2000). Faculty participation in the Pennsylvania State University world campus: Identifying barriers to success. Open Learning, 15(3), 233-242.
20. Ensminger, D. C., & Surry, D. W. (2002, April). Faculty perceptions of factors that facilitate the implementation of online programs. Paper presented at 7th Annual Mid-South Instructional Technology Conference. Murfreesboro, TN.
21. Farinella, J. A., Hobbs, B. K., & Weeks, H. S. (2000). Distance delivery: The faculty perspective. Financial Practice & Education, 10(1), 11.
22. Freeberg, L., Floyd, K., & Marr, B. (1995). Faculty attitudes toward distance learning. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 6(2), 145-159.
23. Gao, Y. (2000). A qualitative study of the main factors that influence university faculty's use of technology (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Waco, TX: Baylor University.
24. Gappa, J. M., & Leslie, D.W. (1993). Improving the status of part-timers in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
25. Groves, M. M., & Zernel, P. C. (2000). Instructional technology adoption in higher education: An action research case study. International Journal of Instructional Media, 27(1), 57-65.
26. Handy, J., Hunter, I., & Whiddett, R. (2001). User acceptance of interorganizational electronic medical records. Health Informatics Journal, 7, 103-107.
27. Igbaria, M, & Zinatelli, N. (1997). Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: A structural equation model. MIS Quarterly, 21(3), 279-306.
28. Jones, E. T., Lindner, J. R., Murphy, T. H., & Dooley, K. E. (2002). Faculty philosophical position towards distance education: Competency, value, and educational technology support. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 5(1). Retrieved January 6, 2005, from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring51/jones51.html
29. Kagima, L. K. (1998). Faculty computer self-efficacy and integration of electronic communication in teaching college courses (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ames, IA: Iowa State University of Science and Technology.
30. Kagima, L. K., & Hausafus, C. O. (2001). Faculty: The central element in instructional technology integration. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences: From Research to Practice, 93(4), 33-36.
31. Kirk, J. J., & Shoemaker, H. (1999). Motivating community college instructors to teach online: An exploration of selected motivators. In T. J. Bastiaens, J. N. Streumer, & Y. Krul (Eds.), Performance and learning support with on-line help systems: An effectiveness study (pp. 15-22). Academy of Human Resource Development (AHRD) Conference Proceeding, CE 078 963.
32. Leslie, D. W., Kellams, S. E., & Gunne, G. M. (1982). Part-time faculty in American higher education. New York: Praeger.
33. McGuire, J. (1993). Part-time faculty: Partners in excellence. Leadership Abstracts, 6 (6), 103.
34. Mitchell, M. R. (1999). Effects of faculty motivation in distributive education environments at institutions of higher education. Proceedings at the 21st National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (Houston, TX, February) (pp. 269-274).
35. Mitra, A., Steffensmeier, T., Lenzmeier, S., & Massoni, A. (1999). Changes in attitudes toward computers and use of computers by university faculty. Journal of Research and Computing in Education, 32(1), 189-202.
36. Monroe, C., & Denman, S. (1991). Assimilating adjunct faculty: Problems and opportunities. ACA Bulletin, 77, 56-62.
37. Montgomery, C. J. (1999). Faculty attitudes toward technology-based distance education at the university of Nevada, Las Vegas (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).
38. National Education Association (NEA). (2000). A survey of traditional and distance education learning higher education members. Washigton, DC: Author.
39. Ndahi, H. B. (1999). Utilization of distance learning technology among industrial and technical teacher education faculty. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 34(4), 21-37.
40. Olcott, D., & Wright, S. J. (1995). An institutional support framework for increasing faculty participation in postsecondary distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 9(3), 5-17.
41. Outcalt, C. (Ed.). (2002). Community college faculty: Characteristics, practices, and challenges. New Directions for Community Colleges, 118. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
42. Pedersen, R. P. (2001, April 2). It's time to clean up higher education' dirtiest little secret. Community College Week, 13, 4-5.
43. Richard, W. (1999). Framing the issues: What's next on the NLII's Agenda? Educom Review, 34(4), 34-37.
44. Roueche, J., Roueche, S., & Milliron, M. (1996). Identifying the strangers: Exploring part-time faculty integration in American community colleges. Community College Review, 23, 33-48.
45. Schauer, J., Rockwell, S. K., Fritz, S., & Marx, D. (1998). Education, assistance, and support needed for distance delivery: Faculty and administrators' perception. In Distance Learning '98. Proceedings of the 14th annual conference on distance teaching & learning (Madison, WI, August 5-7).
46. Schifter, C. (2002). Perception differences about participating in distance education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 5(1), EJ649247.
47. Schifter, C. (2000, March-April). Faculty motivators and inhibitors for participation in distance education. Educational Technology, 43-46.
48. Surry, D. W., & Land, S. M. (2000). Strategies for motivating higher education faculty to use technology. Innovations in Education and Training International. ISSN 1355-8005.
49. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics. New York, NY: HarperCollins
50. Taylor, J. C., & White, J. V. (1991). Faculty attitudes toward teaching in the distance education mode: An exploratory investigation. Research in Distance Education, 3(3), 7-11.
51. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (1997). Instructional faculty and staff in higher educational institutions: Fall 1987 and Fall 1992. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
52. Valadez, J. R., & Anthony, J. S. (2001). Job satisfaction and commitment of two-year college part-time faculty. Community College Journal of Research & Practice, 25(2), 97-108.
53. Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M. G. (2000). Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 115-139.
54. Waits, T., & Lewis, L. (2003). Distance education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions: 2000-2001 (NCES 2003-017). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
55. Walker, C. J., & Quinn, J. W. (1996). Fostering instructional vitality and motivation. In R. Menges & M. Weimer (Eds.), Teaching on solid ground: Using scholarship to improve practice (pp. 315-336). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
56. Warburton, E. C., Chen, X., & Bradburn, E. M. (2002). Teaching with technology: Use of telecommunications technology by post secondary instructional faculty and staff in Fall 1998 (NCES 2002-161). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
57. Wilson, C. (2001). Faculty Attitudes about distance learning. Educause Quarterly, 2, 70-71.
58. Wolcott, L. L., & Betts, K. S. (1999). What's in it for me? Incentives for faculty participation in distance education. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 34-49.
59. Wolski, S., & Jackson, S. (1999, February-March). Technological diffusion within educational institutions: Applying the technology acceptance model. Paper presented at SITE 99: The 10th international conference of the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, San Antonio, TX.