Isolability of faults in sensor fault diagnosis

Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing

Volumn 25, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 2733-2744

  Sharifi, Reza ^a   Langari, Reza ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

Fault detection and isolation; Fault diagnosis; Principal component analysis; Sensor fault detection; Structured residuals

Indexed keywords

FAILURE ANALYSIS; GAUSSIAN NOISE (ELECTRONIC); LINEAR SYSTEMS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

FAULT DETECTION AND ISOLATION; GEOMETRIC APPROACHES; MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; MODEL UNCERTAINTIES; RESIDUAL GENERATOR; SENSOR FAULT DETECTION; SENSOR FAULT DIAGNOSIS; STRUCTURED RESIDUALS;

FAULT DETECTION;

EID: 79960047127     PISSN: 08883270     EISSN: 10961216     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.02.015     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. J. Gertler, and D. Singer A new structural framework for parity equation-based failure detection and isolation (*) 1 Automatica 26 2 1990 381 388
2. P. Frank Fault diagnosis in dynamic systems using analytical and knowledge-based redundancy:: a survey and some new results Automatica 26 3 1990 459 474 (Pubitemid 21672291)
3. P. Frank, and X. Ding Survey of robust residual generation and evaluation methods in observer-based fault detection systems Journal of Process Control 7 6 1997 403 424 (Pubitemid 127400666)
4. R. Isermann Supervision, fault-detection and fault-diagnosis methods - an introduction Control Engineering Practice 5 5 1997 639 652 (Pubitemid 27414356)
5. S. Bersimis, S. Psarakis, and J. Panaretos Multivariate statistical process control charts: an overview Quality and Reliability Engineering International 23 5 2007 517 543 (Pubitemid 47245685)
6. V. Venkatasubramanian A review of process fault detection and diagnosis Part I: quantitative model-based methods Computers and Chemical Engineering 27 3 2003 293 311 (Pubitemid 36285962)
7. A. Satin, R. Gates, Evaluation of Parity Equations for Gyro Failure Detection and Isolation, 1978.
8. J. Gertler Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Engineering Systems 1998 CRC
9. J. MacGregor, and T. Kourti Statistical process control of multivariate processes Control Engineering Practice 3 3 1995 403 414
10. P. Miller, R. Swanson, and C. Heckler Contribution plots: a missing link in multivariate quality control Applied Mathematics and Computer Science 8 1998 775 792
11. R. Dunia Identification of faulty sensors using principal component analysis AIChE Journal 42 10 1996 2797 2812
12. J. Gertler Isolation enhanced principal component analysis AIChE Journal 45 2 1999 323 334 (Pubitemid 29136617)
13. S. Qin, and W. Li Detection, identification, and reconstruction of faulty sensors with maximized sensitivity AIChE Journal 45 9 1999 1963 1976 (Pubitemid 29446531)
14. J. Gertler, and J. Cao Design of optimal structured residuals from partial principal component models for fault diagnosis in linear systems Journal of Process Control 15 5 2005 585 603 (Pubitemid 40206607)
15. J. Kualla, Three models for sensor validation, in: The 7th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring 2009, Stanford, CA.
16. M. Hernandez-Garcia, and S. Masri Multivariate statistical analysis for detection and identification of faulty sensors using latent variable methods Advances in Science and Technology 56 2009 501 507
17. J. Kullaa, Sensor fault identification and correction in structural health monitoring, in: Proceedings of the ISMA2006, International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering, 2006, Leuven, Belgium.
18. J. Kullaa Sensor validation using minimum mean square error estimation Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 24 5 2010 1444 1457
19. J. Hines, R. Uhrig, and D. Wrest Use of autoassociative neural networks for signal validation Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems 21 2 1998 143 154 (Pubitemid 128509481)
20. M. Kramer Nonlinear principal component analysis using autoassociative neural networks AIChE Journal 37 2 1991 233 243
21. D. Mattern, et al., Using neural networks for sensor validation. NASA Report (Number: NASA TM-1998-208484), National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC, 1998, p. 20546-0001.
22. J. Hoffman, et al., Development of Real-Time Engine Diagnostics Tools at the Arnold Engineering Development Center Engine Test Facility, 2005.
23. E. Malthouse Limitations of nonlinear PCA as performed with generic neural networks IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 9 1 1998 165 173 (Pubitemid 128743622)
24. M. Najafi, C. Gulp, R. Langari, Enhanced Auto-associative Neural Networks for Sensor Diagnostics (E-AANN), 2004.
25. L. Chiang, E. Russell, and R. Braatz Fault diagnosis in chemical processes using Fisher discriminant analysis, discriminant partial least squares, and principal component analysis Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 50 2 2000 243 252 (Pubitemid 30136027)
26. M. Friswell, and D. Inman Sensor validation for smart structures Journal of intelligent material systems and structures 10 12 1999 973 982 (Pubitemid 32023039)
27. M. Abdelghani, and M. Friswell Sensor validation for structural systems with multiplicative sensor faults Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 21 1 2007 270 279 (Pubitemid 44528234)
28. F. Schweppe Uncertain dynamic systems 1973 Prentice Hall