Use of Autoassociative Neural Networks for Signal Validation

Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems: Theory and Applications

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 143-154

  Hines, J Wesley ^a   Uhrig, Robert E ^a   Wrest, Darryl J ^b  

^a University of Tennessee   (United States)

^b HONEYWELL TECHNOLOGY CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Fault detection and isolation; Neural networks; Sensor calibration

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CALIBRATION; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; ONLINE SYSTEMS; SENSORS;

AUTOASSOCIATIVE NEURAL NETWORKS (AANN); FAULT DETECTION;

NEURAL NETWORKS;

EID: 0031996958     PISSN: 09210296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1007981322574     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Dong, D. and McAvoy, T. J.: Sensor data analysis using autoassociative neural nets, in: Proceedings of World Congress on Neural Networks, San Diego, June 5-9, 1994, Vol. 1, pp. 161-166.
2. Hines, J. W., Wrest, D. J., and Uhrig, R. E.: Plant wide sensor calibration monitoring, in: Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control, Sept. 15-18, 1996, pp. 378-383.
3. Lo, J. T.: Adaptive system identification by non-adaptively trained neural networks, in: Proceedings of the 1996 International Conference on Neural Networks, Washington DC, June 3-6, 1996, pp. 2066-2071.
4. Kramer, M. A.: Nonlinear principal component analysis using autoassociative neural networks, AIChE Journal 37(2) (1991), 233-243.
5. Kramer, M. A.: Autoassociative neural networks, Computers in Chemical Engineering 16(4) (1992), 313-328.
6. Masters, T.: Practical Neural Network Recipes in C++, Academic Press, San Diego, 1993.
7. Mills, P., Zomaya, A. Y., and Tade, M.: Neuro-Adaptive Process Control: A Practical Approach, John Wiley, Chichester, England, 1996.
8. Nabeshima, K., Susuki, K., and Turkan, T.: Real-time nuclear power plant monitoring with hybrid artificial intelligence systems, in: Proceedings of the 9th Power Plant Dynamics, Control & Testing Symposium, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, May 24-26, 1995.
9. NeuralWorks Predict, Neural Ware, Pittsburgh, PA, 1995.
10. SIMULINK Dynamic System Simulation Software, The Math Works, Natick, MA, 1993.
11. Uhrig, R. E., Hines, J. W., Black, C., Wrest, D. J., and Xu, X.: Instrument surveillance and calibration verification system, Sandia National Laboratory contract AQ-6982 Final Report by The University of Tennessee, March 1996.
12. Upadhyaya, B. R., Wolvaardt, F. P., and Glockler, O.: An integrated approach for sensor failure detection in dynamic systems, Research Report prepared for the Measurement & Control Engineering Center, Report No. NE-MCEC-BRU-87-01, 1987.
13. Upadhyaya, B. R. and Eryurek, E.: Application of neural networks for sensor validation and plant monitoring, Nuclear Technology 97 (1992), 170-176.
14. Wald, A.: Sequential tests of statistical hypothesis, Ann. Math. Statist. 16 (1945), 117-186.
15. Wrest, D. J., Hines, J. W., and Uhrig, R. E.: Instrument surveillance and calibration verification through plant wide monitoring using autoassociative neural networks, in: Proceedings of the 1996 American Nuclear Society International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control and Human Machine Interface Technologies, University Park, PA, 1996.
16. Wrest, D. J., Hines, J. W., and Uhrig, R. E.: Instrument surveillance and calibration verification to improve nuclear power plant reliability and safety using autoassociative neural networks, in: Proceedings of the International Atomic Energy Specialist Meeting on Monitoring and Diagnosis Systems to Improve Nuclear Power Plant Reliability and Safely, Barnwood, Glouster, United Kingdom, May 14-17, 1996.