Full-field cardiac imaging using ultra-high resolution flat-panel volume-computed tomography

Computed Tomography of the Cardiovascular System

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 473-489

  Gupta, Rajiv ^a   Bartling, Soenke H ^b   Kalra, Mannudeep K ^a   Brady, Thomas J ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960012973     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (49)

1. American Heart Association. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics - 2003 Update. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association, 2003.
2. Chandrasekar B, Doucet S, Bilodeau L et al. Complications of cardiac catheterization in the current era: a single-center experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001; 52: 289-95.
3. Kaandorp TA, Lamb HJ, Bax JJ, van der Wall EE, de Roos A. Magnetic resonance imaging of coronary arteries, the ischemic cascade, and myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2005;149: 200-8.
4. Yeh EN, McKenzie CA, Ohliger MA, Sodickson DK. Parallel magnetic resonance imaging with adaptive radius in k-space (PARS): Constrained image reconstruction using k-space locality in radiofrequency coil encoded data. Magn Reson Med 2005; 53: 1383-92.
5. Hoffmann U, Dunn E, d'Othee BJ. Is CT angiography ready for prime time? A meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43 (Suppl A): 312A.
6. Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Lemos PA et al. Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 2002; 106: 2051-4.
7. Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation 2003; 107: 664-6.
8. Hoffmann U, Moselewski F, Cury RC et al. Predictive value of 16-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography to detect significant obstructive coronary artery disease in patients at high risk for coronary artery disease: patient-versus segment-based analysis. Circulation 2004; 110: 2638-43.
9. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Nieman K et al. Multislice spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 2265-70.
10. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Krestin GP et al. Improved diagnostic accuracy with 16-row multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 128-32.
11. Kuettner A, Trabold T, Schroeder S et al. Noninvasive detection of coronary lesions using 16-detector multislice spiral computed tomography technology: initial clinical results. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 1230-7.
12. Kuettner A, Beck T, Drosch T et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary imaging using 16-detector slice spiral computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 123-7.
13. Dewey M, Laule M, Krug L et al. Multisegment and halfscan reconstruction of 16-slice computed tomography for detection of coronary artery stenoses. Invest Radiol 2004; 39: 223-9.
14. Achenbach S, Giesler T, Ropers D et al. Comparison of image quality in contrast-enhanced coronary-artery visualization by electron beam tomography and retrospectively electrocardiogram-gated multislice spiral computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2003; 38: 119-28.
15. Achenbach S, Ulzheimer S, Baum U et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography by retrospectively ECG-gated multislice spiral CT. Circulation 2000; 102: 2823-8.
16. Nieman K, Oudkerk M, Rensing BJ et al. Coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography. Lancet 2001; 357: 599-603.
17. Achenbach S, Giesler T, Ropers D et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographically-gated, multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 2001; 103: 2535-8.
18. Gerber TC, Kuzo RS, Lane GE et al. Image quality in a standardized algorithm for minimally invasive coronary angiography with multislice spiral computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2003; 27: 62-9.
19. Giesler T, Baum U, Ropers D et al. Noninvasive visualization of coronary arteries using contrast-enhanced multidetector CT: influence of heart rate on image quality and stenosis detection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179: 911-6.
20. Morgan-Hughes GJ, Marshall AJ, Roobottom CA. Multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography: experience in a UK centre. Clin Radiol 2003; 58: 378-83.
21. Leber AW, Knez A, Becker C et al. Non-invasive intravenous coronary angiography using electron beam tomography and multislice computed tomography. Heart 2003; 89: 633-9.
22. Ferencik M, Moselewski F, Ropers D et al. Quantitative parameters of image quality in multidetector spiral computed tomographic coronary imaging with submillimeter collimation. Am J Cardiol 2003; 92: 1257-62.
23. Martuscelli E, Romagnoli A, D'Eliseo A et al. Accuracy of thin-slice computed tomography in the detection of coronary stenoses. Eur Heart J 2004; 25: 1043-8.
24. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Salm LP et al. Noninvasive coronary imaging and assessment of left ventricular function using 16-slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 2005; 95: 571-4.
25. Morgan-Hughes GJ, Roobottom CA, Owens PE, Marshall AJ. Highly accurate coronary angiography with submillimetre, 16 slice computed tomography. Heart 2005; 91: 308-13.
26. Kitagawa T, Fujii T, Tomohiro Y et al. Ability for visualization, reasons for nonassessable image, and diagnostic accuracy of 16-slice multidetector row helical computed tomography for the assessment of the entire coronary arteries. The American Journal of Cardiology 2005; 95: 1079.
27. Thompson BH, Stanford W. Imaging of coronary calcification by computed tomography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 19: 720-33.
28. Barrett JF, Keat N. Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. Radiographics 2004; 24: 1679-91.
29. Hsieh J. Image artifacts, causes, and correction. In: Goldman L, Fowlkes J, eds. Medical CT and Ultrasound, current technology and applications. Madison: Advanced Medical Publishing, 1995: 487-518.
30. DeMan B, Nuyts J, Dupont P, Marchal G, Suetens P. Metal Streak Artifacts in X-Ray Computed Tomography: A simulation study. IEEE Trans Nuclear Sci 1999; 46: 691-6.
31. Nikolaou K, Flohr T, Stierstorfer K, Becker CR, Reiser MF. Flat panel computed tomography of human ex vivo heart and bone specimens: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2005; 15(2): 329-33.
32. Kalender WA, The use of flat-panel detectors for CT imaging. Radiology 2003; 43: 379-87.
33. Engelke K, Karolczak M, Lutz A et al. [Micro-CT. Technology and application for assessing bone structure]. Radiology 1999; 39(3): 203-12.
34. Kalender WA. [The use of flat-panel detectors for CT imaging]. Radiology 2003; 43(5): 379-87.
35. Grasruck M, Suess C, Stierstorfer K, Popescu S, Flohr T. Evaluation of Image Quality and Dose on a Flat-Panel CT-Scanner 2005.
36. Bartling S, Gupta R, Torkos A et al. Flat-panel Volume-CT (fpVCT) for cochlear implant electrode array examination in isolated temporal bone specimens. Otology & Neurootology 2005.
37. Gupta R, Bartling SH, Basu SK et al. Experimental flat-panel high-spatial-resolution volume CT of the temporal bone. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004; 25(8): 1417-24.
38. Baba R, Ueda K, Okabe M. Using a flat-panel detector in high resolution cone beam CT for dental imaging. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33(5): 285-90.
39. Groh BA, Siewerdsen JH, Drake DG, Wong JW, Jaffray DA. A performance comparison of flat-panel image-based MV and kV cone-beam CT. Med Phys 2002; 29(6): 967-75.
40. Marten K, Funke M, Engelke C. Flat panel detector-based volumetric CT: prototype evaluation with volumetry of small artificial nodules in a pulmonary phantom. J Thorac Imaging 2004; 19(3): 156-63.
41. Marten K, Engelke C, Grabbe E, Rummeny EJ. [Flat-panel detector-based computed tomography: accuracy of experimental growth rate assessment in pulmonary nodules]. Rofo 2004; 176(5): 752-7.
42. Mahnken AH, Seyfarth T, Flohr T et al. Flat-panel detector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stents: phantom study in comparison with 16-slice spiral computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2005; 40(1): 8-13.
43. Lee SC, Kim HK, Chun IK et al. A flat-panel detector based micro-CT system: performance evaluation for small-animal imaging. Phys Med Biol 2003; 48(24): 4173-85.
44. Kiessling F, Greschus S, Lichy MP et al. Volumetric computed tomography (VCT): a new technology for noninvasive, high-resolution monitoring of tumor angiogenesis. Nat Med 2004; 10(10): 1133-8.
45. Greschus S, Kiessling F, Lichy MP et al. Potential applications of flat-panel volumetric CT in morphologic and functional small animal imaging. Neoplasia 2005; 7(8): 730-40.
46. Siewerdsen JH, Moseley DJ, Burch S et al. Volume CT with a flat-panel detector on a mobile, isocentric C-arm: pre-clinical investigation in guidance of minimally invasive surgery. Med Phys 2005; 32(1): 241-54.
47. Rafferty MA, Siewerdsen JH, Chan Y et al. Investigation of C-Arm Cone-Beam CT-Guided Surgery of the Frontal Recess. Laryngoscope 2005; 115(12): 2138-2143.
48. Dalchow CV, Weber AL, Bien S, Yanagihara N, Werner JA. Value of digital volume tomography in patients with conductive hearing loss. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2005.
49. Ross W, Cody DD, Hazle JD. Design and performance characteristics of a digital flat panel computed tomography system. Med Phys 2006 Jun; 33(6): 1888-901.