SAR/QSAR methods in public health practice

Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology

Volumn 254, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 192-197

  Demchuk, Eugene ^a   Ruiz, Patricia ^a   Chou, Selene ^a   Fowler, Bruce A ^a  

^a AGENCY FOR TOXIC SUBSTANCES AND DISEASE REGISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

Computational toxicology; Modeling; Public health practice; SAR QSAR; Structure activity relationships

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE OUTCOME; BIOAVAILABILITY; CHEMICAL WASTE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONSULTATION; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH; GOVERNMENT; HAZARDOUS WASTE; HEALTH GUIDANCE VALUE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; HURRICANE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MOLECULAR EPIDEMIOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PHARMACOKINETICS; PRIORITY DATA NEED; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; TOXICOLOGY;

ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH; HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES; HUMANS; PUBLIC HEALTH PRACTICE; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; SOFTWARE; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 79959998762     PISSN: 0041008X     EISSN: 10960333     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2010.10.017     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Accelrys TOPKAT user guide 6.2 2004, Accelrys, Inc., Burlington, MA.
2. ATSDR Toxicological profile for chlorobenzene 1990, U.S. DHHS PHS ATSDR, Atlanta GA, Available: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp131.pdf.
3. ATSDR Toxicological profile for hexachlorobenzene 2002, U.S. DHHS PHS ATSDR, Atlanta GA, Available: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp90-p.pdf.
4. ATSDR Hazardous Substance Release and Health Effects (HazDat) Database 2008, U.S. DHHS PHS ATSDR, Atlanta GA, Available: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/hazdat.html.
5. ATSDR Availability of Draft Toxicological Profiles. Fed. Regist. 2009, 74:66978-66979.
6. Auer C.M., Nabholz J.V., Baetcke K.P. Mode of action and the assessment of chemical hazards in the presence of limited data: Use of structure-activity relationships (SAR) under TSCA, section 5. Environ. Health Perspect. 1990, 87:183-197.
7. CDC Third National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals 2005, U.S. DHHS PHS CDC, Atlanta GA, Available: http://www.cdc.gov/exposurereport/3rd.
8. Chou C.-H.S.J., Holler J., DeRosa C.T. Minimal risk levels (MRLs) for hazardous substances. J. Clean Technol. Environ. Toxicol. Occup. Med. 1998, 7:1-24.
9. Contreras J.F., Matthews E.J., Kulak N.L., Benz R.D. Estimating the safe starting dose in phase I clinical trials and No Observed Effect Level based on QSAR modeling of the human maximum recommended daily dose. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2004, 40:185-206.
10. Demchuk E., Albin B.C., Fay M., Garrett R.M., Hansen H. Structure-activity analysis of chemical health guidance values. Toxicologist (Suppl. to Toxicol. Sci.) 2006, 90:186.
11. Demchuk E., Ruiz P., Wilson J.D., Scinicariello F., Pohl H.R., Fay M., Mumtaz M.M., Hansen H., De Rosa C.T. Computational toxicology methods in public health practice. Toxicol. Mech. Methods 2008, 18:119-135.
12. Dix D.J., Houck K.A., Martin M.T., Richard A.M., Setzer R.W., Kavlock R.J. The ToxCast program for prioritizing toxicity testing of environmental chemicals. Toxicol. Sci. 2007, 95:5-12.
13. El-Masri H.A., Mumtaz M.M., Choudhary G., Cibulas W., De Rosa C.T. Applications of computational toxicology methods at the agency for toxic substances and disease registry. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2002, 205:63-69.
14. Focardi S., Lari L., Marsili L. PCB congeners, DDTs and hexachlorobenzene in Antarctic fish from Terra Nova Bay (Ross Sea). Antarct. Sci. 1992, 4:151-154.
15. Geisz H.N., Dickhut R.M., Cochran M.A., Fraser W.R., Ducklow H.W. Melting glaciers: a probable source of DDT to the Antarctic marine ecosystem. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42:3958-3962.
16. HDI (Health Designs Inc.) TOPKAT 5.0 Reference Manual 1997, Rochester, NY.
17. Hu H., Shine J., Wright R.O. The challenge posed to children's health by mixtures of toxic waste: The Tar Creek superfund site as a case-study. Pediatr. Clin. N. Am. 2007, 54:155-175.
18. Kier L.B., Hall L.H. Molecular Connectivity in Structure-Activity Analysis 1986, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
19. Klopman G. Artificial intelligence approach to structure-activity studies. Computer automated structure evaluation of biological activity of organic molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106:7315-7320.
20. Klopman G., Ivanov J., Saiakhov R., Chakravarti S. MC4PC - an artificial intelligence approach to the discovery of Quantitative Structure Toxic Activity Relationships (QSTAR). Predictive Toxicology 2005, 423-458. CRC Press, Boca Raton. C. Helma (Ed.).
21. Lanevskij K., Japertas P., Didziapetris R., Petrauskas A. Ionization-specific prediction of blood-brain permeability. J. Pharm. Sci. 2009, 98:122-134.
22. Martin Y.C., Kofron J.L., Traphagen L.M. Do structurally similar molecules have similar biological activity?. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45:4350-4358.
23. Moudgal C., Tunkel J., Lockwood L. QSARs to predict the chronic Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Level for a variety of chemicals 2007, International Science Forum on Computational Toxicology, Research Triangle Park, NC.
24. Mumtaz M.M., Knauf L.A., Reisman D.J., Peirano W.B., DeRosa C.T., Gombar V.K., Enslein K., Carter J.R., Blake B.W., Huque K.I., Ramanujam V.M.S. Assessment of effect levels of chemicals from quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models. I. Chronic lowest-observed-adverse-effect level (LOAEL). Toxicol. Lett. 1995, 79:131-143.
25. Nabholz J.V., Clements R.G., Zeeman M.G. Information needs for risk assessment in EPA's office of pollution prevention and toxics. Ecol. Appl. 1997, 7:1094-1098.
26. NRC Human Biomonitoring for Environmental Chemicals 2006, National Academy Press, Washington D.C.
27. NTP National Toxicology Program 2007, Department of Health and Human Services, Available: http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov.
28. OECD Report on the Regulatory Uses and Applications in OECD Member Countries of (Quantitative) Structure-Activity Relationship [(Q)SAR] Models in the Assessment of New and Existing Chemicals 2006, OECD, Paris France.
29. Oprea T.I., Gottfries J. Chemography: The art of navigating in chemical space. J. Comb. Chem. 2001, 3:157-166.
30. Sander T., Freyss J., von Korff M., Reich J.R., Rufener C. OSIRIS, an entirely in-house developed drug discovery informatics system. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49:232-246.
31. Sanderson D.M., Earnshaw C.G. Computer prediction of possible toxic action from chemical structure; the DEREK system. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 1991, 10:261-273.
32. Spjuth O., Helmus T., Willighagen E.L., Kuhn S., Eklund M., Wagener J., Murray-Rust P., Steinbeck C., Wikberg J.E.S. Bioclipse: an open source workbench for chemo- and bioinformatics. BMC Bioinform. 2007, 8:59.
33. Steffen A., Kogej T., Tyrchan C., Engkvist O. Comparison of molecular fingerprint methods on the basis of biological profile data. J. Chem. Inform. Model. 2009, 49:338-347.
34. Venkatapathy R., Moudgal C.J., Bruce R.M. Assessment of the oral rat Chronic lowest observed adverse effect level model in TOPKAT, a QSAR software package for toxicity prediction. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44:1623-1629.
35. Venkatapathy R., Wang C.Y., Bruce R.M., Moudgal C. Development of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models to predict the carcinogenic potency of chemicals: I. Alternative toxicity measures as an estimator of carcinogenic potency. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2009, 234:209-221.
36. Villoutreix B.O., Renault N., Lagorce D., Sperandio O., Montes M., Miteva M.A. Free resources to assist structure-based virtual ligand screening experiments. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2007, 8:381-411.
37. Woo Y.T., Lai D.Y. OncoLogic: a mechanism-based expert system for predicting the carcinogenic potential of chemicals. Predictive Toxicology 2005, 385-414. CRC Press, Boca Raton. C. Helma (Ed.).
38. Zeeman M., Auer C.M., Clements R.G., Nabholz J.V., Boethling R.S. U.S. EPA regulatory perspectives on the use of QSAR for new and existing chemical evaluations. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 1995, 3:179-201.