Comparison of molecular fingerprint methods on the basis of biological profile data

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 338-347

  Steffen, Andreas ^a   Kogej, Thierry ^a   Tyrchan, Christian ^a   Engkvist, Ola ^a  

^a ASTRAZENECA R AND D   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MOLECULES; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES; QUERY PROCESSING;

ACTIVE COMPOUNDS; BIOLOGICAL ASSAYS; BIOLOGICAL-ACTIVITY SPACE; FINGERPRINT METHOD; MOLECULAR FINGERPRINT; PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY; PHARMACOPHORES; QUERY STRUCTURES;

BIOACTIVITY;

ARTICLE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DRUG SCREENING;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DRUG EVALUATION, PRECLINICAL;

EID: 65249180145     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci800326z     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Martin, Y. C.; Kofron, J. L.; Traphagen, L. M. Do structurally similar molecules have similar biological activity. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45 (19), 4350-4358.
2. Bender, A.; Glen, R. C. Molecular similarity: a key technique in molecular informatics. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2 (22), 3204-3218.
3. Sheridan, R. P.; Kearsley, S. K. Why do we need so many chemical similarity search methods. Drug Discovery Today 2002, 7 (17), 903-911.
4. Hert, J.; Willett, P.; Wilton, D. J.; Acklin, P.; Azzaoui, K.; Jacoby, E.; Schuffenhauer, A. Comparison of fingerprint-based methods for virtual screening using multiple bioactive reference structures. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44 (3), 1177-1185.
5. Gillet, V. J.; Willett, P.; Bradshaw, J. Similarity searching using reduced graphs. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43 (2), 338-345.
6. Rarey, M.; Dixon, J. S. Feature trees: a new molecular similarity measure based on tree matching. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1998, 12 (5), 471-490.
7. Grant, J. A.; Pickup, B. T. A Gaussian Description of Molecular Shape. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99 (11), 3503-3510.
8. McGaughey, G. B.; Sheridan, R. P.; Bayly, C. I.; Culberson, J. C.; Kreatsoulas, C.; Lindsley, S.; Maiorov, V.; Truchon, J.-F.; Cornell, W. D. Comparison of topological, shape, and docking methods in virtual screening. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2007, 47 (4), 1504-1519.
9. Mason, J. S.; Morize, I.; Menard, P. R.; Cheney, D. L.; Hulme, C.; Labaudiniere, R. F. New 4-Point Pharmacophore Method for Molecular Similarity and Diversity Applications: Overview of the Method and Applications, Including a Novel Approach to the Design of Combinatorial Libraries Containing Privileged Substructures. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42 (17), 3251-3264.
10. Oprea, T. I.; Gottfries, J. Chemography: the art of navigating in chemical space. J. Comb. Chem. 2001, 3 (2), 157-166.
11. Schneider, G.; Schneider, P.; Renner, S. Scaffold-Hopping: How Far Can You Jump. QSAR Comb. Sci. 2006, 25 (12), 1162.
12. Kogej, T.; Engkvist, O.; Blomberg, N.; Muresan, S. Multifingerprint based similarity searches for targeted class compound selection. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46 (3), 1201-1213.
13. Krejsa, C. M.; Horvath, D.; Rogalski, S. L.; Penzotti, J. E.; Mao, B.; Barbosa, F.; Migeon, J. C. Predicting ADME properties and side effects: the BioPrint approach. Curr. Opin. Drug Discovery Dev. 2003, 6 (4), 470-480.
14. Strausberg, R. L.; Schreiber, S. L. From knowing to controlling: a path from genomics to drugs using small molecule probes. Science 2003, 300 (5617), 294-295.
15. Schuffenhauer, A.; Brown, N.; Ertl, P.; Jenkins, J. L.; Selzer, P.; Hamon, J. Clustering and rule-based classifications of chemical structures evaluated in the biological activity space. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2007, 47 (2), 325-336.
16. Fliri, A. F.; Loging, W. T.; Thadeio, P. F.; Volkmann, R. A. Analysis of drug-induced effect patterns to link structure and side effects of medicines. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2005, 1 (7), 389-397.
17. Fliri, A. F.; Loging, W. T.; Volkmann, R. A. Analysis of system structure-function relationships. ChemMedChem 2007, 2 (12), 1774-1782.
18. Horvath, D.; Jeandenans, C. Neighborhood behavior of in silico structural spaces with respect to in vitro activity spaces-a benchmark for neighborhood behavior assessment of different in silico similarity metrics. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43 (2), 691-698.
19. Ghose, A. K.; Viswanadhan, V. N.; Wendoloski, J. J. Prediction of Hydrophobic (Lipophilic) Properties of Small Organic Molecules Using Fragmental Methods: An Analysis of ALOGP and CLOGP Methods. J. Phys. Chem. 1998, 102 (21), 3762-3772.
20. Vidal, D.; Thormann, M.; Pons, M. LINGO, an efficient holographic text based method to calculate biophysical properties and intermo-lecular similarities. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2005, 45 (2), 386-393.
21. Grant, J. A.; Haigh, J. A.; Pickup, B. T.; Nicholls, A.; Sayle, R. A. Lingos, finite state machines, and fast similarity searching. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46 (5), 1912-1918.
22. Schneider, G.; Neidhart, W.; Giller, T.; Schmid, G. "Scaffold- Hopping" by Topological Pharmacophore Search: A Contribution to Virtual Screening. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1999, 38 (19), 2894-2896.
23. Willett, P.; Barnard, J. M.; Downs, G. M. Chemical Similarity Searching. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38 (6), 983-996.
24. Guha, R.; Howard, M. T.; Hutchison, G. R.; Murray-Rust, P.; Rzepa, H.; Steinbeck, C.; Wegner, J.; Willighagen, E. L. The Blue Obelisk-interoperability in chemical informatics. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46 (3), 991-998.
25. Bender, A.; Mussa, H. Y.; Glen, R. C.; Reiling, S. Similarity searching of chemical databases using atom environment descriptors (MOL-PRINT 2D): evaluation of performance. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44 (5), 1708-1718.
26. Pipeline Pilot. In Basic Chemistry User Guide; Scitegic Inc.: San Diego, 2007.
27. Kogej, T. Manuscript to be published.
28. Miller, I.; Miller, M. John E. Freund's Mathematical Statistics, 6th ed.; Prentice-Hall, Inc.: Upper Saddle River, 1999.
29. R Development Core Team. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R package version 2.5.0; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2007.
30. Hubert, L.; Arabie, P. Comparing partitions. J. Classif 1985, 2 (1), 193-218.
31. Davis, A. M.; Keeling, D. J.; Steele, J.; Tomkinson, N. P.; Tinker, A. C. Components of successful lead generation. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2005, 5 (4), 421-439.