Measuring mathematical ability needed for "non-mathematical" majors: The construction of a scale applying IRT and differential item functioning across educational contexts

Learning and Individual Differences

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 392-402

  Galli, Silvia ^a   Chiesi, Francesca ^a   Primi, Caterina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cross country invariance; Differential item functioning; Educational assessment; Item response theory; Mathematical ability

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959988606     PISSN: 10416080     EISSN: 18733425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2011.04.005     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Agresti A., Finlay B. Statistical method for the social sciences 1999, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
2. Baker F.B. The basics of the item response theory 2001, ERIC, College Park, MD.
3. Baloglu M. Individual differences in statistics anxiety among college students. Personality and Individual Differences 2003, 34(5):855-865.
4. Bock R.D., Aitkin M. Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application o fan EM algorithm. Psychometrika 1981, 46:443-458.
5. Budgell G.R., Raju N.S., Quartetti D.A. Analysis of differential item functioning in translated assessment instruments. Applied Psychological Measurement 1995, 19(4):309-321.
6. Carmona Marquez J. Una revisión de las evidencias de fiabilidad y validez de los cuestionarios de actitudes y ansiedad hacia la estadística. Statistics Education Research Journal 2004, 3(1):5-28. October 17, 2008 Retrieved from. http://http//www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/serj.
7. Carmona Marquez J., Martìnez R., Sànchez M. Mathematical background and attitudes toward statistics in a sample of Spanish College students. Psychological Reports 2005, 97:53-62.
8. Carmona Marquez J., Primi C., Chiesi F. Testing for measurement invariance of the survey of attitudes toward statistics: A comparison of Italian and Spanish students. III European Congress of Methodology, Oviedo, Spain 2008, July.
9. Chiesi F., Primi C. Un modello sul rendimento nelle materie quantitative degli studenti di psicologia. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia XXVI 2009, 1:161-184.
10. Chiesi F., Primi C. Cognitive and non-cognitive factors related to students' statistic achievement. Statistics Education Research Journal (SERJ) 2010, 9:6-26.
11. Chiesi, F., Primi, C., & Carmona Marquez, J. (in press). Measuring Statistics Anxiety: Cross-country Reliability and Validity of the Statistical Anxiety Scale (SAS). Psychoeducational Assessment. doi:10.1177/0734282911404985.
12. Dempster M., McCorrey N.K. The role of previous experience and attitudes toward statistics in statistics assessment outcomes among undergraduate psychology students. Journal of Statistics Education 2009, 17(2). Retrieved November 10, 2010 from. http://www.amstat.org/pubblication/jse/v17n2/dempster.html.
13. Embretson S.E., Reise S.P. Item response theory for psychologists 2000, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
14. Ercolani A.P., Perugini M. La misura in psicologia 1997, LED, Milano.
15. Gal I., Ginsburg L., Schau C. Monitoring attitudes and beliefs in statistics education. The assessment challenge in statistics education 1997, 37-51. IOS Press, Netherlands. I. Gal, J.B. Garfield (Eds.).
16. Galli S., Chiesi F., Primi C. The construction of a scale to measure mathematical ability in psychological students: An application of the Rasch model. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology 2008, 15(1):3-18.
17. Galli S., Ciancaleoni M., Chiesi F., Primi C. Who failed the introductory statistics examination? A study on a sample of Psychology students. 11th International Congress on Mathematical Education, Monterrey, Mexico 2008, July, Retrieved September 26, 2008 from. http://tsg.icme11.org/tsg/show/14#inner-documents.
18. Garfield J.B., Ben-Zvi D. Developing students statistical reasoning: Connecting research and teaching practice 2009, Springer Publishing, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
19. Gravetter F.J., Wallnau L.B. Statistics for the behavioural sciences: A first course for students of psychology and education 1996, West, St. Paul, MN.
20. Hambleton R.K. Adapting educational and psychological test for psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment 2004, Taylor & Francis Group, London, UK.
21. Hambleton R.K., Cook L.L. Robustness of item response models and effects of test length and sample size on the precision of ability estimates. New horizons in testing 1983, 31-49. Academic Press, New York. D. Weiss (Ed.).
22. Hambleton R.K., de Jong J. Advances in translating and adapting tests into multiple languages. Language Testing 2003, 20(2):127-134.
23. Harlow L.L., Burkholder G.J., Morrow J.A. Evaluating attitudes, skill, and performance in a learning-enhanced quantitative methods course: A structural modeling approach. Structural Equation Modeling 2002, 9(3):413-430.
24. Hong E., Karstensson L. Antecedents of state test anxiety. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2002, 27(2):348-367.
25. Lord F.M. Practical application of item characteristic curve theory. Journal of Educational Measurement 1977, 14(4):117-138.
26. Lord F.M. Application of item response theory to practical testing problems 1980, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
27. Muthén L.K., Muthén B.O. Mplus: The comprehensive modeling program for applied researchers. User's guide 2004, Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles. 3rd ed.
28. Nasser F. Structural Model of the effects of cognitive and affective factors on the achievement of Arabic-speaking pre-service teachers in introductory statistics. Journal of Statistics Education 2004, 12(1). Retrieved October 15, 2005 from. http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v12n1/nasser.html.
29. Onwuegbuzie A.J. Modeling statistics achievement among graduate students. Educational and Psychological Measurement 2003, 63(6):1020-1038.
30. Orlando, M. (1997). Item fit in the context of item response theory (Doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina. Dissertation Abstracts International, 58/04-B, 2175.
31. Primi C., Chiesi F. Introduzione alla Psicometria 2005, Laterza, Bari.
32. Raju N.S. Some notes on the DFIT framework 1999, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago.
33. Rasch G. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment test 1960, Danish Institute for Educational Research, Copenhagen.
34. Reidy J. Increasing mathematical ability through online guidance and activities Retrieved August 20, 2009 from. http://extra.shu.ac.uk/celt/cpla/project/complete%202006/confmaths.pdf.
35. Schau C., Stevens J.J., Dauphinee T.L., Del Vecchio A. The developmental validation of the survey of attitudes toward statistics. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1995, 55:868-875.
36. Schutz P.A., Drogosz L.M., White V.E., Distefano C. Prior knowledge, attitude and strategy use in an introduction to statistic course. Learning and Individual Differences 1998, 10(4):291-308.
37. Sorge C., Schau C. Impact of engineering students' attitudes on achievement in statistics: A structural model. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans 2002, April.
38. Thissen D. MULTILOG user's guide 1991, SSI, Chicago.
39. Thissen D. IRTLRDIF v 2.0b software. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 2001.
40. Thissen D., Steinberg L. A response model for multiple-choice items. Handbook of modern item response theory 1997, 51-65. Springer, New York. W.J. van der Linden, R.K. Hambleton (Eds.).
41. Thissen D., Steinberg L., Wainer H. Use of item response theory in the study of group differences in trance lines. Test validity 1988, 147-169. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. H. Wainer, H.I. Braun (Eds.).
42. Thissen D., Steinberg L., Wainer H. Detection of differential item functioning using the parameters of item response models. Differential item functioning 1993, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdate, NJ. P.W. Holland, H. Wainer (Eds.).
43. Tremblay P.F., Gardner R.C., Heipel G. A model of the relationships among measures of affect, aptitude, and performance in introductory statistics. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science 2000, 321:40-48.
44. Vigil-Colet A., Lorenzo-Seva U., Condon L. Development and validation of the statistical anxiety scale. Psichotema 2008, 20(1):174-180.
45. Welkowitz J., Cohen B.H., Ewen R.B. Introductory statistics for the behavioral sciences 2006, John Wiley & Sons, New York. 6th ed.
46. Wright B.D., Stone M.H. Best test design 1979, MESA Press, Chicago.
47. Zeidner M. Statistics and mathematics anxiety in social science students: some interesting parallels. The British Journal of Educational Psychology 1991, 61:319-328.
48. Zieffler A., Garfield J., Alt S., Dupuis D., Holleque K., Chang B. What does research suggest about the teaching and learning of introductory statistics at the college level? A review of literature. Journal of Statistics Education 2008, 16(2). Retrieved July 3, 2010 from. http://http//www.amstat.org/publication/jse/v16n2/zieffler.html.