Contrasting responses of Peromyscus mice of Yosemite National Park to recent climate change

Global Change Biology

Volumn 17, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 2559-2566

  Yang, Dou Shuan ^a   Conroy, Chris J ^b   Moritz, Craig ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Climate change; Environmental niche modeling; Peromyscus maniculatus; Peromyscus truei; Yosemite National Park

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; GENETIC VARIATION; HABITAT TYPE; MOLECULAR ECOLOGY; NICHE; SMALL MAMMAL; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

CALIFORNIA; UNITED STATES; YOSEMITE VALLEY;

MAMMALIA; MUS; PEROMYSCUS; PEROMYSCUS MANICULATUS; PEROMYSCUS TRUEI;

EID: 79959975873     PISSN: 13541013     EISSN: 13652486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02394.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Burt WH (1934) The mammals of southern Nevada. San Diego Society for Natural History, 7, 375-427.
2. Carraway LN, Yensen E, Verts BJ, Alexander LF (1993) Range extension and habitat of Peromyscus truei in eastern Oregon. Northwestern Naturalist, 74, 81-84.
3. Devictor V, Julliard R, Jiguet F (2008) Distribution of specialist and generalist species along spatial gradients of habitat disturbance and fragmentation. Oikos, 117, 507-514.
4. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) ARLEQUIN Ver 3.0: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online, 1, 47-50.
5. Geluso K, O'Connor CS, Sullivan SG, Hayes JP (1997) Elevational records for mammals in the White Mountains of California. Great Basin Naturalist, 57, 83-84.
6. Gering EJ, Opazo JC, Storz JF (2008) Molecular evolution of cytochrome b in high- and low-altitude deer mice (genus Peromyscus). Heredity, 102, 226-235.
7. Grieco TM, Rizk OT (2010) Cranial shape varies along an elevation gradient in Gambel's white-footed mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus gambeli) in the Grinnell Resurvey Yosemite transect. Journal of Morphology, 271, 897-909.
8. Grinnell J, Storer TL (1924) Animal Life in the Yosemite: An account of the Mammals, Birds, Reptiles, and Amphibians in a cross-section of the Sierra Nevada. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
9. Guindon S, Gascuel O (2003) A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Systematic Biology, 52, 696-704.
10. Hijmans RJ, Graham CH (2006) The ability of climate envelope models to predict the effect of climate change on species distributions. Global Change Biology, 12, 2272-2281.
11. Hoffmeister DF (1951) A taxonomic and evolutionary study of the Piñ on mouse, Peromyscus truei. Illinois Biological Monographs, 21, 1-104.
12. Kearney M (2006) Habitat, environment and niche: what are we modeling? Oikos, 115, 186-191.
13. Kocher TD, Conroy JA, McKaye KR, Stauffer JR (1993) Similar morphologies of Cichlid fish in Lakes Tanganyika and Malawi are due to convergence. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2, 158-165.
14. Kocher TD, Thomas WK, Meyer A, Edwards SV, Paabo S, Villablanca FX, Wilson AC (1989) Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals: amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 86, 6196-6200.
15. Moritz C, Patton JL, Conroy CJ, Parra JL, White GC, Beissinger SR (2008) Impact of a century of climate change on small-mammal communities in Yosemite National Park, USA. Science, 322, 261-264.
16. Munz P, Keck D (1963) A California Flora. University of California Press, Berkeley.
17. Myers P, Lundrigan BL, Hoffman SMG, Haraminac AP, Seto SH (2009) Climate-induced changes in the small mammal communities of the Northern Great Lakes Region. Global Change Biology, 15, 1434-1454.
18. Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature, 421, 37-42.
19. Pavlacky DC, Anderson SH (2009) habitat preferences of pinyon-juniper specialists near the limit of their geographic range. The Condor, 103, 322-331.
20. Pearson RG, Dawson TP (2003) Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Global Ecology and Biogeography, 12, 361-371.
21. Pergams ORW, Lacy RC (2008) Rapid morphological and genetic change in Chicago-area Peromyscus. Molecular Ecology, 17, 450-463.
22. Posada D, Crandall KA (1998) MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics, 14, 817-818.
23. Rickart EA, Robson SL, Heaney LR (2008) Mammals Of Great Basin National Park, Nevada: comparative field surveys and assessment of faunal change. Monographs of the Western North American Naturalist, 4, 77-114.
24. Rubidge EM, Monahan WB, Parra JL, Cameron SE, Brashares JS (2011) The role of climate, habitat, and species co-occurrence as drivers of change in small mammal distributions over the past century. Global Change Biology, 17, 696-708.
25. Schmolke A, Thorbek P, DeAngelis DL, Grimm V (2010) Ecological models supporting environmental decision making: a strategy for the future. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 25, 479-486.
26. *and Other Methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
27. Warren MS, Hill JK, Thomas JA et al. (2001) Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change. Nature, 414, 65-69.
28. Wright S (1938) Size of population and breeding structure in relation to evolution. Science, 87, 430-431.
29. Yang D-S, Kenagy GJ (2009) Nuclear and mitochondrial DNA reveal contrasting evolutionary processes in populations of deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus). Molecular Ecology, 18, 5115-5125.
30. Zheng X, Arbogast BS, Kenagy GJ (2003) Historical demography and genetic structure of sister species: deermice (Peromyscus) in the North American temperate rain forest. Molecular Ecology, 12, 711-724.