Cranial shape varies along an elevation gradient in gambel's white-footed mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus gambelii) in the grinnell resurvey yosemite transect

Journal of Morphology

Volumn 271, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 897-909

  Grieco, T M ^a   Rizk, O T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinal variation; Cranial shape; Geometric morphometrics; Peromyscus maniculatus gambelii; Yosemite

Indexed keywords

ALTITUDE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; MALE; PEROMYSCUS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SKULL; UNITED STATES; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY;

ALTITUDE; ANIMALS; CALIFORNIA; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; MALE; PEROMYSCUS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SKULL; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION;

CRANIA; PEROMYSCUS; PEROMYSCUS LEUCOPUS; PEROMYSCUS MANICULATUS;

EID: 77954674434     PISSN: 03622525     EISSN: 10974687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmor.10839     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Allen JA. 1894. Cranial variations in Neotoma micropus due to growth and individual differentiation. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 6:233-246.
2. Bergmann C. 1847. Ü ber die verlhältnisse der wärmeökonomie der theire zu ihrer grösse. Göttinger Studien 3:595-708.
3. Biegert J. 1963. The evaluation of characteristics of the skull, hands and feet for primate taxonomy. In: Washburn SL, editor. Classification and Human Evolution. Chicago: Aldine. 371 p.
4. Boag PT, Grant PR. 1981. Intense natural selection in a population of Darwin's finches (Geospizinae) in the Galápagos. Science 214:82-85.
5. Carroll RL. 1988. Vertebrate Paleontology and Evolution. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company. 698 p.
6. Cole TM III. 2002. WinEDMA: Software for Euclidean distance matrix analysis. Version 1.0.1 beta. Kansas City: University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine.
7. Collins HH. 1918. Studies in normal moult and of artificially induced regeneration of pelage in Peromyscus. J Exp Zool 27:73-99.
8. Corner BD, Lele S, Richtsmeier JT. 1992. Measuring precision of three-dimensional landmark data. J Quant Anthropol 3:347-359.
9. Dagosto M, Terranova CJ. 1992. Estimating the body size of Eocene primates: A comparison of results from dental and postcranial variables. Int J Primatol 13:307-344.
10. De Esteban-Trivigno S, Mendoza M, De Renzi M. 2008. Body mass estimation in Xenarthra: A predictive equation suitable for all quadrupedal terrestrial placentals? J Morph 269:1276-1293.
11. Gardner RA, Wieslander AE. 1957. The soil-vegetation survey in California. Proc Soil Sci Soc Am 21:103-105.
12. Goswami A. 2006. Cranial modularity shifts during mammalian evolution. Am Nat 168:270-280.
13. Grinnell J, Storer TI. 1924. Animal Life in the Yosemite: An Account of the Mammals, Birds, Reptiles, and Amphibians in a Cross-Section of the Sierra Nevada. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 752 p.
14. Hall ER. 1926. Changes during growth in the skull of the rodent Otospermophilus grammurus beecheyi. Univ Calif Publ Zool 21:355-404.
15. Hallgri{dotless}́msson B, Lieberman DE. 2008. Mouse models and the evolutionary developmental biology of the skull. Integr Comp Biol 48:373-384.
16. Hallgri{dotless}́msson B, Willmore K, Dorval C, Cooper DM. 2004. Craniofacial variability and modularity in macaques and mice. J Exp Zoolog B Mol Dev Evol 302:207-225.
17. Hallgri{dotless}́msson B, Lieberman DE, Liu W, Ford-Hutchinson AF, Jirik FR. 2007. Epigenetic interactions and the structure of phenotypic variation in the cranium. Evol Dev 9:76-91.
18. Hammond KA, Roth J, Janes DN, Dohm MR. 1999. Morphological and physiological responses to altitude in deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus). Physiol Biochem Zool 75:613-622.
19. Hammond KA, Szewczak J, Krol E. 2001. Effects of altitude and temperature on organ phenotypic plasticity along an altitudinal gradient. J Exp Biol 204:1991-2000.
20. Hock RJ. 1964. Physiological responses of deer mice to various native altitudes. In: Weihe WH, editor. The Physiological Effects of High Altitude. New York: Macmillan. 351 p.
21. Hoffmeister DF. 1951. A taxonomic and evolutionary study of the Piñon Mouse, Peromyscus truei. Ill Biol Monogr 21:1-104.
22. Kiliaridis S, Engström C, Thilander B. 1985. The relationship between masticatory function and craniofacial morphology. Eur J Orthod 7:273-283.
23. Kiliaridis S, Engström C, Chávez LME. 1992. Influence of masticatory muscle function on craniofacial growth in hypocalcemic rats. Scand J Dent Res 100:330-336.
24. Klingener D. 1968. Anatomy. In: King JA, editor. Biology of Peromyscus (Rodentia). Stillwater, OK: The American Society of Mammalogists. Special Publication No. 2, 593 p.
25. Leamy LJ, Routman EJ, Cheverud JM. 1999. Quantitative trait loci for early- and late-developing skull characters in mice: A test of the genetic independence model of morphological integration. Am Nat 153:201-214.
26. Lele S. 1991. Some comments on coordinate-free and scaleinvariant methods in morphometrics. Am J Phys Anthropol 85:407-417.
27. Lele S. 1993. Euclidean distance matrix analysis (EDMA): Estimation of mean form and mean form difference. Math Geol 25:573-602.
28. Lieberman DE, Pearson OM, Mowbray KM. 2000a. Basicranial influence on overall cranial shape. J Hum Evol 38:291-315.
29. Lieberman DE, Ross CF, Ravosa MJ. 2000b. The primate cranial base: ontogeny, function, and integration. Am J Phys Anthropol 31 (Suppl):117-169.
30. Lieberman DE, Hallgri{dotless}́msson B, Liu W, Parsons TE, Jamniczky HA. 2008. Spatial packing, cranial base angulation, and craniofacial shape variation in the mammalian skull: Testing a new model using mice. J Anat 212:720-735.
31. Mayr E. 1956. Geographical character gradients and climatic adaptation. Evolution 10:105-108.
32. Mayr E. 1963. Animal species and evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33. McCabe T, Blanchard B. 1950. Three species of Peromyscus. Santa Barbara, CA: Rood Associates, Publishers. 136 p.
34. Meiri S, Dayan T. 2003. On the validity of Bergmann's rule. J Biogeogr 30:331-351.
35. Monteiro LR, Bordin B, Furtado dos Reis S. 2000. Shape distances, shape spaces, and the comparison of morphometric methods. Trends Ecol Evol 15:217-220.
36. Moritz C, Patton JL, Conroy CJ, Parra JL, White GC, Beissinger SR. 2008. Impact of a century of climate change on small-mammal communities in Yosemite National Park. USA. Science 322:261-264.
37. Myers P, Lundrigan BL, Gillespie BW, Zelditch ML. 1996. Phenotypic plasticity in skull and dental morphology in the Prairie Deer Mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus bairdii). J Morph 229:229-237.
38. Myers P, Lundrigan BL, Vande Kopple B. 2005. Climate change and the distribution of Peromyscus in Michigan-is global warming already having an impact? In: Lacey EA, Myers P, editors. Mammalian Diversification: From Chromosomes to Phylogeography. Berkeley, CA: University of California Publications in Zoology. pp 101-125.
39. Osgood WH. 1909. Revision of the mice of the American genus Peromyscus. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture Bureau of Biological Survey publication No. 28, North American Fauna. 285 p.
40. Owen JG. 1989. Population and geographic variation of Peromyscus leucopus in relation to climatic factors. J Mammal 701:98-109.
41. Pergams ORW, Ashley MV. 1999. Rapid morphological change in Channel Island deer mice. Evolution 53:1573-1581.
42. Pergams ORW, Ashley MV. 2001. Microevolution in island rodents. Genetica 112-113:245-246.
43. Pergams ORW, Lacy RC. 2008. Rapid morphological and genetic change in Chicago-area Peromyscus. Mol Ecol 17: 450-463.
44. Pergams ORW, Lawler JJ. 2009. Recent and widespread rapid morphological change in rodents. PLoS ONE 4:e6452.
45. Reeve HK, Sherman PW. 1993. Adaptation and the goals of evolutionary research. Q Rev Biol 68:1-32.
46. Richtsmeier JT, Cheverud JM, Lele S. 1992. Advances in anthropological morphometrics. Annu Rev Anthropol 21:283-305.
47. Richtsmeier JT, DeLeon VB, Lele SR. 2002. The promise of geometric morphometrics. Yearbook Phys Anthropol 45:63-91.
48. Rohlf FJ. 2000. Statistical power comparisons among alternative morphometric methods. Am J Phys Anthropol 111:463-478.
49. Rohlf FJ. 2003. Bias and error in estimates of mean shape in geometric morphometrics. J Hum Evol 44:665-683.
50. Rohlf FJ. 2007. TpsRegr 1.34. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY.
51. Rohlf FJ, Slice DE. 1990. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst Zool 39:40-59.
52. Roseman CC. 2004. Detecting interregionally diversifying natural selection on modern human cranial form by using matched molecular and morphometric data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:12824-12849.
53. Ross CF, Ravosa MJ. 1993. Basicranial flexion, relative brain size, and facial kyphosis in nonhuman primates. Am J Phys Anthropol 91:305-324.
54. SAS Institute, Inc. 2004. JMP Version 5.1.2. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.
55. Sheets HD. 2001a. CoordGen6, IMP. Canisius College, Buffalo, NY.
56. Sheets HD. 2001b. PCAGen6, IMP. Canisius College, Buffalo, NY.
57. Sheets HD. 2001c. Standard6, IMP. Canisius College, Buffalo, NY.
58. Turesson G. 1922. The genotypical response of the plant species to the habitat. Hereditas 3:211-350.
59. Wasserman D, Nash DJ. 1979. Variation in body size, hair length, and hair density in the deer mouse Peromyscus maniculatus along an altitudinal gradient. Holarctic Ecol 2:115-118.
60. Willmore KE, Leamy L, Hallgri{dotless}́msson B. 2006. Effects of developmental and functional interactions on mouse cranial variability through late ontogeny. Evol Dev 8:550-567.
61. Yang DS, Moritz C, Conroy CJ. 2009. Large scale but variable responses of Peromyscus 695 mice to a century of climate change across Yosemite National Park. In press.
62. Zelditch ML, Swiderski DL, Sheets HD, Fink WL. 2004. Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A Primer. Amsterdam; Boston: Elsevier Academic Press. 443 p.