Factors which motivate cancer doctors to involve their patients in reaching treatment decisions

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 84, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 229-235

  Shepherd, Heather L ^a,b   Butow, Phyllis N ^c   Tattersall, Martin H N ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cancer; Patient involvement; Patient preferences; Qualitative research; Shared decision making

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER PATIENT; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC CANCER; HEMATOLOGIC MALIGNANCY; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MOTIVATION; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; QUALITY OF LIFE; SELF CONCEPT; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; URINARY TRACT CANCER;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; AUSTRALIA; COMMUNICATION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MEDICAL ONCOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; NEOPLASMS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PATIENTS; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PHYSICIANS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; TELEPHONE;

EID: 79959941658     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: 18735134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.10.018     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Makoul G., Clayman M.L. An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns 2006, 60:301-312.
2. Thompson A.G.H. The meaning of patient involvement and participation in health care consultations: a taxonomy. Soc Sci Med 2007, 64:1297-1310.
3. Shepherd H.L., Tattersall M.H.N., Butow P.N. The context influences doctors' support of shared decision making in cancer care. Br J Cancer 2007, 97:6-13.
4. Charles C., Gafni A., Whelan T. Self-reported use of shared decision-making among breast cancer specialists and perceived barriers and facilitators to implementing this approach. Health Expect 2004, 7:338-348.
5. Gravel K., Legare F., Graham I. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions. Implement Sci 2006, 1:16.
6. Carr E.C.J., Worth A. The use of the telephone interview for research. J Res Nurs 2001, 6:511-524.
7. Llewellyn-Thomas H.A. Editorial. Health Expect 2006, 9:305-306.
8. Whitney S.N., McGuire A.L., McCullough L.B. A typology of shared decision making: informed consent, and simple consent. Ann Intern Med 2004, 140:54-59.
9. McGuire A.L., McCullough L.B., Weller S.C., Whitney S.N. Missed expectations? Physicians' views of patients' participation in medical decision-making. Med Care 2005, 43:466-470.
10. McVea K.L.S.P., Minier W.C., Palensky J.E. Low-income women with early-stage breast cancer: physician and patient decision-making styles. Psycho-Oncology 2001, 10:137-146.
11. Davison B.J., Gleave M.E., Goldenberg S.L., Degner L.F., Hoffart D., Berkowitz J. Assessing information and decision preferences of men with prostate cancer and their partners. Cancer Nurs 2002, 25:42-49.
12. Wetzels R., Geest T.A., Wensing M., Ferreira P.L., Grol R., Baker R. GPs views on involvement of older patients: an European qualitative study. Patient Educ Couns 2004, 53:183-188.
13. Blanchard C.G., Labrecque M.S., Ruckdeschel J.C., Blanchard E.B. Information and decision-making preferences of hospitalized adult cancer patients. Soc Sci Med 1988, 27:1139-1145.
14. Chouliara Z., Miller M., Stott D., Molassiotis A., Twelves C., Kearney N. Older people with cancer: perceptions and feelings about information, decision-making and treatment-a pilot study. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2004, 8:257-261.
15. Bruera E., Sweeney C., Calder K., Palmer L., Benisch-Tolley S. Patient preferences versus physician perceptions of treatment decisions in cancer care. J Clin Oncol 2001, 19:2883-2885.
16. Ford S., Schofield T., Hope T. Are patients' decision-making preferences being met?. Health Expect 2003, 6:72-80.
17. Gattellari M., Butow P.N., Tattersall M.H.N. Sharing decisions in cancer care. Soc Sci Med 2001, 52:1865-1878.
18. Street R.L., Krupat E., Bell R.A., Kravitz R.L., Haidet P. Beliefs about control in the physician-patient relationship effect on communication in medical encounters. J Gen Intern Med 2003, 18:609-616.
19. Nguyen T.T., Somkin C.P., Ma Y., Fung L.-C., Nguyen T. Participation of Asian-American women in cancer treatment research: a pilot study. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2005, 102-105.
20. Quill T., PR W. Healthy approaches to physician stress. Arch Intern Med 1990, 150:1857-1861.
21. Sibbald B., Addington-Hall J., Brenneman D., Freeling P. Telephone versus postal surveys of general practitioners: methodological considerations. Br J Gen Pract 1994, 44:297-300.
22. Bostick R., Pirie P., Luepker R., Kofron P. Using physician caller follow-ups to improve the response rate to a physician telephone survey: its impact and its implications. Eval Health Prof 1992, 15:420-433.
23. Cockburn J. Response bias in a study of general practice. Fam Pract 1988, 18-23.
24. McDonald P. Response rates in general practice studies. Br J Gen Pract 1993, 43:484.