Using concept mapping to develop a logic model for the prevention research centers program

Preventing Chronic Disease

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2006, Pages

  Anderson, Lynda A ^a,b   Gwaltney, Margaret K ^c,k   Sundra, Demia L ^a   Brownson, Ross C ^d   Kane, Mary ^e   Cross, Alan W ^f   Mack, Richard ^g,l   Schwartz, Randy ^h   Sims, Tom ⁱ   White, Carol R ^j  

^a CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION   (United States)

^b EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Emory University ^*  (United States)

^d SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e Department of Research   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^g Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^h American Cancer Society   (United States)

ⁱ West Virginia Bureau for Public Health   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^k ABT ASSOCIATES   (United States)

^l Abt Associates Inc ^*  (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84978372552     PISSN: 15451151     EISSN: 21665435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Framework for program evaluation in public health. MMWR Recomm Rep 1999;48 (No. RR-11):1-40.
2. Milstein B, Wetterhall S; CDC Evaluation Working Group. A framework featuring steps and standards for program evaluation. Health Promot Pract 2000;1(3):221-8.
3. WK Kellogg Foundation. Logic model development guide [Internet]. Battle Creek (MI): 2004 Jan. Available from: URL: http://www.wkkf.org/Programming/ResourceOverview.aspx?CID=281&ID=3669.
4. Patton M. Utilization-focused evaluation. 3rd edition. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications; 1997.
5. McLaughlin JA, Jordan GB. Logic models: a tool for telling your program's performance story. Eval Program Plann 1999;22:65-72.
6. Rossi PH, Freeman HF, Lipsey MW. Evaluation: a systematic approach. 6th edition. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications; 1999.
7. Gilliam A, Davis D, Barrington T, Lacson R, Uhl G, Phoenix U. The value of engaging stakeholders in planning and implementing evaluations. AIDS Educ Prev 2002; 14(3 Suppl A):5-17.
8. Cheadle A, Beery WL, Greenwald HP, Nelson GD, Pearson D, Senter S. Evaluating the California Wellness Foundation's health improvement initiative: a logic model approach. Health Promot Pract 2003; 4(2) 146-56.
9. Lafferty CK, Mahoney CA. A framework for evaluating comprehensive community initiatives. Health Promot Pract 2003;4(1):31-44.
10. Trochim WM. An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Eval Program Plann 1989;12(1):1-16.
11. Shern DL, Trochim WM, LaComb CA. The use of concept mapping for assessing fidelity of model transfer: an example from psychiatric rehabilitation. Eval Program Plann 1995;18(2):143-53.
12. Trochim WM, Cook JA, Setze RJ. Using concept mapping to develop a conceptual framework of staff's views of a supported employment program for individuals with severe mental illness. J Consult Clin Psychol 1994 Aug;62(4):766-75.
13. Trochim WM, Milstein B, Wood BJ, Jackson S, Pressler V. Setting objectives for community and systems change: an application of concept mapping for planning a statewide health improvement initiative. Health Promot Pract 2004 Jan;5(1):8-19.
14. Wheeler FC, Anderson LA, Boddie-Willis C, Price PH, Kane M. The role of state public health agencies in addressing less prevalent chronic conditions. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online] 2005 Jul [2005 Jul 7].
15. Rosas SR. Concept mapping as a technique for program theory development: an illustration using family support programs. Am J Eval 2005;26(3):389-401.
16. Yampolskaya S, Nesman TM, Hernandez M, Koch D. Using concept mapping to develop a logic model and articulate a program theory: a case example. Am J Eval 2004;25(2):191-207.
17. Prevention Research Centers Program [webpage on the Internet]. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [updated 2005 Jul 1; cited 2005 Jul 8]. Available from: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/prc.
18. Doll L, Berkelman R, Rosenfield A, Baker E. Extramural prevention research at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Public Health Rep 2001; 116 Suppl 1:10-19.
19. Stoto MA, Green LW, Bailey LA, editors; Institute of Medicine. Linking research and public health practice: a review of CDC's program of centers for research and demonstration of health promotion and disease prevention. Washington (DC): National Academy of Sciences; 1997.
20. Trochim W, Kane M. Concept mapping: an introduction to structured conceptualization in health care. Int J Qual Health Care 2005;17(3):187-91.
21. Southern DM, Batterham RW, Appleby NJ, Young D, Dunt D, Guibert R. The concept mapping method: an alternative to focus group inquiry in general practice. Aust Fam Physician 1999; 28 Suppl 1: S35-40.
22. Trochim W. Concept mapping: soft science or hard art? Eval Program Plann 1989;12:87-110.
23. University of North Carolina Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention. Prevention research centers national community committee [Internet]. Chapel Hill (NC): University of North Carolina Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention [cited 2005 Jul 8]. Available from: URL: http://www.hpdp.unc.edu/ncc/.
24. Rosenberg S, Kim MP. The method of sorting as a data gathering procedure in multivariate research. Multivariate Behav Res 1975;10:489-502.
25. Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Amendments of 1984, Pub L No. 98-551 Stat. 771 (1984 Oct 30). Available from: URL: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgibin/bdquery/z?d098:SN00771:L&summ2=m&.
26. Green JC. Stakeholder participation in evaluation design: is it worth the effort? Eval Program Plann 1987;10:379-94.
27. Springett J. Issues in participatory evaluation. In: Minkler M, Wallerstein N, editors. Community-based participatory research for health. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass; 2003. p. 263-88.