Accuracy of self-reported SAT and ACT test scores: Implications for research

Research in Higher Education

Volumn 51, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 305-319

  Cole, James S ^a   Gonyea, Robert M ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive distortion; Higher education research; Motivated distortion; SAT ACT test scores; Self report accuracy

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959808198     PISSN: 03610365     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11162-009-9160-9     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2. Anaya, G. (1999). Accuracy of self-reported test scores. College & University, Fall, 13-19.
3. Bahrick, H. P., Hall, L. K., & Berger, S. A. (1996). Accuracy and distortion in memory for high school grades. Psychological Science, 7, 265-271.
4. Beretvas, S., Natasha, Meyers, J. L., & Leite, W. L. (2002). A reliability generalization study of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62, 570-589.
5. Braxton, J. M., Brier, E. M., & Hossler, D. (1988). The influence of student problems on student withdrawal decisions: An autopsy on "autopsy" studies. Research in Higher Education, 28, 241-253.
6. Cabrera, A. F., Stampen, J. O., & Hansen, W. L. (1990). Exploring the effects of ability to pay on persistence in college. The Review of Higher Education, 13, 303-336.
7. Cassady, J. C. (2001). Self-reported GPA and SAT: A methodological note. Practical Assessment, Research, & Evaluation, 7. Retrieved April 17, 2008, from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=12.
8. Cohen, B. H. (2001). Explaining psychological statistics (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
9. College Board. (2008). SAT-ACT concordance tables. Retrieved Aug 15, 2008, from http://professionals.collegeboard.com/profdownload/act-sat-concordance-tables.pdf.
10. Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
11. Dobbins, G. H., Farh, J., & Werbel, J. D. (1993). The influence of self-monitoring on inflation of grade-point averages for research and selection purposes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 321-334.
12. Frucot, V. G., & Cook, G. L. (1994). Further research on the accuracy of students' self-reported grade point averages, SAT scores, and course grades. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 743-746.
13. Gonyea, R. M. (2005). Self-reported data in institutional research: Review and recommendations. In R. K. Toutkoushian & P. D. Umbach (Eds.), Survey research: emerging issues: Vol. 127. New directions for institutional research series (pp. 73-90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
14. Gramzow, R. H., & Williard, G. (2006). Exaggerating current and past performance: Motivated selfenhancement versus reconstructive memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1114-1125.
15. Herman, W. E. (2003, August). College student awareness of current G.P.A. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American psychological association, Toronto, Ontario.
16. Kuncel, N. R., Crede, M., & Thomas, L. L. (2005). The validity of self-reported grade point averages, class ranks, and test scores: A meta-analysis and review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75, 63-82.
17. Mayer, R. E., Stull, A. T., Campbell, J., Almeroth, K., Bimber, B., Chun, D., et al. (2007). Overestimation bias in self-reported SAT scores. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 443-454.
18. Nancarrow, C., & Brace, I. (2000). Saying the "right thing:" coping with social desirability bias in marketing research. Bristol business school teaching and research review, Summer, 3.
19. Pearson, R. W., Ross, M., & Dawes, R. M. (1994). Personal recall and the limits of retrospective questions in surveys. In J. M. Tanur (Ed.), Questions about questions: Inquiries into the cognitive bases of surveys (pp. 65-94). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
20. Schmidt, F. L., Le, H., & Ilies, R. (2003). Beyond alpha: An empirical examination of the effects of different sources of measurement error on reliability estimates for measures of individual differences constructs. Psychological Methods, 8, 206-224.
21. Shepperd, J. A. (1993). Student derogation of the scholastic aptitude test: Biases in perceptions and presentations of College Board scores. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 14, 455-473.
22. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
23. Takalkar, P., Waugh, G., & Micceri, T. (1993, May). A search for truth in student responses to selected survey items. Paper presented at the AIR annual forum, Chicago, IL.
24. Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J., & Rasinski, K. A. (2000). The psychology of survey response. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Williard, G., & Gramzow, R. H. (2008). Exaggeration in memory: Systematic distortion of self-evaluative information under reduced accessibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 246-259.