Apomictic and sexual lineages of the Potentilla argentea L. group (Rosaceae): Cytotype and molecular genetic differentiation

Taxon

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 721-732

  Paule, Juraj ^a   Sharbel, Timothy F ^b   Dobeš, Christoph ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE OF PLANT GENETICS AND CROP PLANT RESEARCH IPK   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

Apomixis; Evolution; Karyology; Polyploidy; Potentilla; Rosaceae

Indexed keywords

CHLOROPLAST; CORRELATION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; INCOMPATIBILITY; KARYOLOGY; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; OUTCROSSING; POLYMORPHISM; POLYPLOIDY; POPULATION STRUCTURE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SHRUB; SYMPATRY; TAXONOMY;

EUROPE;

POTENTILLA; POTENTILLA ARGENTEA; ROSACEAE;

EID: 79959785900     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tax.603008     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Adolfsson, S. & Bengtsson, B.O. 2007. The spread of apomixis and its effect on resident genetic variation. J. Evol. Biol. 20: 1933-1940.
2. Asker, S. 1967. Induced sexuality after chromosome doubling in an apomictic Potentilla argentea biotype. Hereditas 57: 339-342.
3. Asker, S. 1970. Apomixis and sexuality in the Potentilla argentea complex. II. Crosses within the complex. Hereditas 66: 189-204.
4. Asker, S. 1983. A monoploid of Potentilla argentea. Hereditas 99: 303-304.
5. Asker, S.E. & Jerling, L. 1992. Apomixis in plants. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
6. Ball, P.W., Pawlowski, B. & Walters, S.M. 1968. Potentilla. Pp. 36-47 in: Tutin, T.G., Heywood, V.H., Burges, N.A., Moore, D.M., Valentinem, D.H., Walters, S.M. & Webb, D.A. (eds.), Flora Europaea, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Böcher, T.W. 1951. Cytological and embryological studies in the amphiapomictic Arabis holboellii complex. Biol. Skr. 6: 1-59.
8. Bonin, A., Bellemain, E., Bronken Eidesen, P., Pompanon, F., Brochmann, C. & Taberlet, P. 2004. How to track and assess genotyping errors in population genetic studies. Molec. Ecol. 13: 3261-3273.
9. Carman, J.G. 1997. Asynchronous expression of duplicate genes in angiosperms may cause apomixis, bispory, tetraspory, and polyembryony. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 61: 51-94.
10. Clement, M., Posada, D. & Crandall, K.A. 2000. TCS: A computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Molec. Ecol. 9: 1657-1659.
11. Cosendai, A.-C., Rodewald, J. & Hörandl, E. 2011. Origin and distribution of autopolyploids via apomixis in the alpine species Ranunculus kuepferi (Ranunculaceae). Taxon 60: 355-364.
12. Coyne, J.A. & Orr, H.A. 2004. Speciation. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.
13. Dobeš, C. 1999. Die Karyogeographie des Potentilla verna agg. (Rosaceae) in Österreich-mit ergänzenden Angaben aus Slowenien, Kroatien, der Slowakei und Tschechien. Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien, B 101: 599-629.
14. Dobeš, C. & Paule, J. 2010. A comprehensive chloroplast DNA-based phylogeny of the genus Potentilla (Rosaceae): Implications for its geographic origin, phylogeography and generic circumscription. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 56: 156-175.
15. Doležel, J. & Bartoš, J. 2005. Plant DNA flow cytometry and estimation of nuclear genome size. Ann. Bot. 95: 99-110.
16. Doležel, J., Greilhuber, J. & Suda, J. 2007. Estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants using flow cytometry. Nat. Protoc. 2: 2233-2244.
17. Doyle, J.J. & Doyle, J.L. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small amounts of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 19: 11-15.
18. Ehrich, D. 2006. AFLPdat: A collection of R functions for convenient handling of AFLP data. Molec. Ecol. Notes 6: 603-604.
19. Excoffier, L., Laval, G. & Schneider, S. 2005. Arlequin (version 3.0): An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol. Bioinf. Online 1: 47-50.
20. Felber-Girard, M., Felber, F. & Buttler, A. 1996. Habitat differentiation in a narrow hybrid zone between diploid and tetraploid Anthoxanthum alpinum. New Phytol. 133: 531-540.
21. Gentscheff, G.J. 1938. Über die pseudogame Fortpflanzung bei Potentilla. Genetica 20: 398-408.
22. Gerstberger, P. 2002. Potentilla L. Pp. 109-205 in: C onert, H.J., Hamann, A., Schultze-Motel, W. & Wagenitz, G. (eds.), G. Hegi, Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa, vol. 4, part 2C. Berlin: Blackwell.
23. Gornall, R.J. 1999. Population genetic structure in agamospermous plants. Pp. 118-138 in: Hollingsworth, P.M., Bateman, R.M. & Gornall, R.J. (eds.), Molecular systematics and plant evolution. London: Taylor & Francis.
24. Gustafsson, Å. 1947. Apomixis in higher plants. Part III. Biotype and species formation. Lunds Univ. Arsskr. 243: 181-320.
25. Håkansson, A. 1946. Untersuchungen über die Embryologie einiger Potentilla-Formen. Lunds Univ. Arsskr. 242: 1-70.
26. Hartl, D.L. & Clark, A.G. 1997. Principles of population genetics. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.
27. Hegarty, M.J. & Hiscock, S.J. 2008. Genomic clues to the evolutionary success of polyploid plants. Curr. Biol. 18: R435-R444.
28. Holm, S. 1995. Unexpectedly high levels of genetic variation in Potentilla argentea (s.1.). in southern Sweden. Hereditas 123: 127-139.
29. Holm, S. & Ghatnekar, L. 1996a. Apomixis and sexuality in hexaploid Potentilla argentea. Hereditas 125: 53-60.
30. Holm, S. & Ghatnekar, L. 1996b. Sexuality and no apomixis found in crossing experiments with diploid Potentilla argentea. Hereditas 125: 77-82.
31. Holm, S., Ghatnekar, L. & Bengtsson, B.O. 1997. Selfing and outcrossing but no apomixis in two natural populations of diploid Potentilla argentea. J. Evol. Biol. 10: 343-352.
32. Hörandl, E. 2010. The evolution of self-fertility in apomictic plants. Sexual Pl. Reprod. 23: 73-86.
33. Hörandl, E. & Temsch, E.M. 2009. Introgression of apomixis into sexual species is inhibited by mentor effects and ploidy barriers in the Ranunculus auricomus complex. Ann. Bot. 104: 81-89.
34. Hunzniker, R. 1954. Beitrag zur Aposporie und ihrer Genetik bei Potentilla. Arch. Julius Klaus Stiftung Vererbungsf. 29: 135-222.
35. King, L.M. & Schaal, B.A. 1990. Genotypic variation within asexual lineages of Taraxacum officinale. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87: 998-1002.
36. Kosman, E. & Leonard, K.J. 2005. Similarity coefficients for molecular markers in studies of genetic relationships between individuals for haploid, diploid, and polyploid species. Molec. Ecol. 14: 415-424.
37. Kurtto, A., Lampinen, R. & Junikka, L. 2004. Atlas florae europaeae: Distribution of vascular plants in Europe, vol. 13, Rosaceae (Spiraea to Fragaria, excl. Rubus). Helsinki: The Commitee for Mapping the Flora of Europe & Societas Biologica Fennica Vanamo.
38. Larsen, K. & Laegaard, S. 1971. Chromosome studies of the Sicilian flora. Bot. Tidsskr. 66: 249-268.
39. Leht, M. & Paal, J. 1998. Potentilla L. sect. Rivales Wolf and related taxa in the Baltic states. Folia. Geobot. 33: 171-186.
40. Levin, D.A. 1983. Polyploidy and novelty in flowering plants. Amer. Naturalist 122: 1-25.
41. Lewis, W.H. 1980. Polyploidy in species populations. Pp 103-144 in: Lewis, W.H. (ed.), Polyploidy: Biological relevance. New York: Plenum Press.
42. Mandryk, V.Y. 1994. The reproductive process and apomixis in Potentilla argentea L. (Rosaceae). Ukrayins'k. Bot. Zhurn. 51: 103-109.
43. Marklund, G. 1933. Über Potentilla argentea L. und P. impolita Wahlenb. Mem. Soc. Fauna Fl. Fenn. 9: 2-13.
44. Martelotto, L.G., Ortiz, J.P.A., Stein, J., Espinoza, F., Quarin, C.L. & Pessino, S.C. 2007. Genome rearrangements derived from autopolyploidization in Paspalum sp. Pl. Sci. 172: 970-977.
45. Meirmans, P.G. & Van Tienderen, P.H. 2004. Genotype and Genodive: Two programs for the analysis of genetic diversity of asexual organisms. Molec. Ecol. Notes 4: 792-794.
46. Mes, T.H.M. 1998. Character compatibility of molecular markers to distinguish asexual and sexual reproduction. Molec. Ecol. 7: 1719-1727.
47. Messing, J. 1983. New M13 vectors for cloning. Meth. Enzymol. 101: 20-78.
48. Meusel, H., Jäger, E. & Weinert, E. 1965. Vergleichende Chorologie der zentraleuropäischen Flora, Karten. Jena: Fischer.
49. Muller, H.J. 1964. The relation of recombination to mutational advance. Mutat. Res. 106: 2-9.
50. Müntzing, A. 1928. Pseudogamie in der Gattung Potentilla. Hereditas 11: 267-283.
51. Müntzing, A. 1931. Note on the cytology of some apomictic Potentillaspecies. Hereditas 15: 166-178.
52. Müntzing, A. 1958. Further studies on intraspecific polyploidy in Potentilla argentea (coll.). Bot. Not. 111: 209-227.
53. Müntzing, A. & Müntzing, G. 1941. Some new results concerning apomixis, sexuality and polymorphism in Potentilla. Bot. Not. 94: 237-278.
54. Müntzing, A. & Müntzing, G. 1945. The mode of reproduction of hybrids between sexual and apomictic Potentilla argentea. Bot. Not. 98: 49-71.
55. Murín, A. 1960. Substitution of cellophane for glass covers to facilitate preparation of permanent squashes and smears. Stain Technol. 35: 351-353.
56. Nei, M. 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics. New York: Columbia University Press.
57. Nicholas, K.B., Nicholas, H.B. & Deerfield, D.W. 1997. GeneDoc: Analysis and visualization of genetic variation. EMBnet News 4: 14. http://www.es.embnet.org/embnet_common/embnet.news/vol4_2/genedoc.html.
58. Nosrati, H., Price, A. & Wilcock, C.C. 2010. No evidence of apomixis in matroclinal progeny from experimental crosses in the genus Fragaria (strawberry) based on RAPDs. Euphytica 171: 193-202.
59. Noyes, R.D. 2007. Apomixis in the Asteraceae: Diamonds in the rough. Funct. Pl. Sci Biotechol. 1: 207-222.
60. Nyléhn, J., Hamre, E. & Nordal, I. 2003. Facultative apomixis and hybridization in arctic Potentilla section Niveae (Rosaceae) from Svalbard. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 142: 373-381.
61. Osborn, T.C., Pires, J.C., Birchler, J.A., Auger, D.L., Chen, Z.J., Lee, H.S., Comai, L., Madlung, A., Doerge, R.W., Colot, V. & Martienssen, R.A. 2003. Understanding mechanisms of novel gene expression in polyploids. Trends Genet. 19: 141-147.
62. Otto, S.P. & Whitton, J. 2000. Polyploid incidence and evolution. Annual Rev. Genet. 34: 401-437.
63. Peşmen, H. 1972. Potentilla L. Pp. 41-68 in: Davis, P.H. (ed.), Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, vol. 4. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
64. R Development Core Team. 2009. A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org.
65. Rutishauser, A. 1943. Untersuchungen über die Fortpflanzung und Bastardbildung apomiktischer Potentillen. Ber. Schweiz. Bot. Ges. 53: 5-83.
66. Rutishauser, A. 1949. Untersuchungen über Pseudogamie und Sexualität einiger Potentillen. Berichte Ber. Schweiz. Bot. Ges. 59: 409-420.
67. Scherbantin, A. 2009. Methodenentwicklung zur durchflusszytometrischen Bestimmung der Chromosomenzahlen in der Gattung Potentilla (Rosaceae). Diploma thesis, Department of Pharmacognosy, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
68. Scherbantin, A., Paule, J. & Dobeš, C. 2009. Karyogeography and hybrid origin of European Potentilla species (Rosaceae). Sci. Pharm. 77: 264.
69. Schwendener, J. 1969. Experimente zur Evolution von Potentilla procumbens Sibth. Ber. Schweiz. Bot. Ges. 79: 49-92.
70. Shaw, J., Lickey, E.B., Beck, J.T., Farmer, S.B., Liu, W., Miller, J., Siripun, K.C., Winder, C.T., Schilling, E.E. & Small, R. 2005. The tortoise and the hare II: Relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis. Amer. J. Bot. 92: 142-166.
71. Siena, L.A., Sartor, M.E., Espinoza, F., Quarin, C.L. & Ortiz, J.P.A. 2008. Genetic and embryological evidences of apomixis at the diploid level in Paspalum rufum support recurrent autopolyploidization in the species. Sexual Pl. Reprod. 21: 205-215.
72. Suda, J., Weiss-Schneeweiss, H., Tribsch, A., Schneeweiss, G., Trávníček, P. & Schönswetter, P. 2007. Complex distribution patterns of di-, tetra-and hexaploid cytotypes in the European high mountain plant Senecio carniolicus Willd. (Asteraceae). Amer. J. Bot. 94: 1391-1401.
73. Thompson, J.D., Gibson, T.J., Plewniak F., Jeanmougin, F. & Higgins, D.G. 1997. The ClustalX windows interface: Flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 4876-4882.
74. Van Dijk, P. & Vijverberg, K. 2005. The significance of apomixis in the evolution of the angiosperms: A reappraisal. Pp. 101-116 in: Bakker, F., Chatrou, L., Gravendeel, B. & Pelser, P.B. (eds.), Plant species-level systematics: New perspectives on pattern and process. Regnum Vegetabile 143. Ruggell, Liechtenstein: Gantner.
75. Vinkenoog, R., Bushell, C., Spielman, M., Adams, S., Dickinson, H.G. & Scott, R.J. 2003. Genomic imprinting and endosperm development in flowering plants. Molec. Biotechnol. 25: 149-184.
76. Vos, P., Hogers, R., Bleeker, M., Reijans, M., Van de Lee, T., Hornes, M., Frijters, A., Pot, J., Peleman, J., Kuiper, M. & Zabeau, M. 1995. AFLP: A new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 23: 4407-4414.
77. Wilkinson, M. 2001. PICA 4.0: Software and documentation. London: The Natural History Museum.
78. Wolf, T. 1908. Monographie der Gattung Potentilla. Biblioth. Bot. 16, 71: 1-715.
79. Zangheri, P. 1976. Genere Potentílla L. Pp. 259-264 in: Zangheri, P. (ed.), Flora Italica, vol. 1. Padova: CEDAM.