Definition of a short-cut methodology for assessing earthquake-related Na-Tech risk

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volumn 192, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 329-339

  Busini, Valentina ^a   Marzo, Enrico ^a   Callioni, Andrea ^a   Rota, Renato ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Analytic Hierarchy Process; Earthquake; Industrial accidents; Na Tech; Natural disasters

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; COMPUTATIONAL RESULTS; HAZARD INDICATORS; INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT; INITIAL ASSESSMENT; MULTICRITERIA DECISION; NA-TECH; NATURAL DISASTERS; NATURAL EVENTS; PROCESS PLANTS; QUALITATIVE METHODOLOGIES; QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS; RISK LEVELS; SCREENING TOOL;

ACCIDENTS; DISASTERS; EARTHQUAKES; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE; OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES; RISK ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

SODIUM;

ACCIDENT; ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EARTHQUAKE EVENT; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ARTICLE; ATMOSPHERIC DISPERSION; EARTHQUAKE; EXPLOSION; FIRE AND FIRE RELATED PHENOMENA; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; KEY HAZARD INDICATOR; NATURAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL; NATURAL DISASTER; QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; TOXIC WASTE;

EARTHQUAKES; INDUSTRY;

EID: 79959768610     PISSN: 03043894     EISSN: 18733336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.05.022     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Young S., Balluz L., Malilay J. Natural and technologic hazardous material releases during and after natural disasters: a review. Science of the Total Environment 2004, 322:3-20.
2. Galderisi A., Ceudech A., Pistucci M. A method for Na-Tech risk assessment as supporting tool for land use planning mitigation strategies. Natural Hazards 2008, 46:221-241.
3. Steinberg L.J., Sengul H., Cruz A.M. Natech risk and management: an assessment of the state of the art. Natural Hazards 2008, 46:143-152.
4. Showalter P.S., Myers M.F. Natural disasters in the United-States as release agents of oil, chemicals, or radiological materials between 1980 and 1989 - analysis and recommendations. Risk Analysis 1994, 14:169-182.
5. Cruz A.M., Steinberg L.J., Vetere-Arellano L. Emerging issues for natech disaster risk management in Europe. Journal of Risk Research 2006, 9:483-501.
6. Chang J.I., Lin C.-C. A study of storage tank accidents. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2006, 19:51-59.
7. Rasmussen K. Natural events and accidents with hazardous materials. Journal of Hazardous Materials 1995, 40:43-54.
8. Picou J.S. Katrina as a Natech disaster. Toxic Contamination and Long-Term Risks for Residents of New Orleans 2009, University of South Alabama.
9. Cruz A.M., Krausmann E. Hazardous-materials releases from offshore oil and gas facilities and emergency response following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2009, 22:59-65.
10. Cruz A.M., Okada N. Methodology for preliminary assessment of Natech risk in urban areas. Natural Hazards 2008, 46:199-220.
11. Cozzani V., Campedel M., Renni E., Krausmann E. Industrial accidents triggered by flood events: analysis of past accidents. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2010, 175:501-509.
12. Fendler R. Floods and safety of establishments and installations containing hazardous substances. Natural Hazards 2008, 46:257-263.
13. Krausmann E., Mushtaq F. A qualitative Natech damage scale for the impact of floods on selected industrial facilities. Natural Hazards 2008, 46:179-197.
14. Cozzani V., Bandini R., Basta C., Christou M.D. Application of land-use planning criteria for the control of major accident hazards: a case-study. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2006, 136:170-180.
15. Campedel M., Cozzani V., Garcia-Agreda A., Salzano E. Extending the quantitative assessment of industrial risks to earthquake effects. Risk Analysis 2008, 28:1231-1246.
16. Fabbrocino G., Iervolino I., Orlando F., Salzano E. Quantitative risk analysis of oil storage facilities in seismic areas. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2005, 123:61-69.
17. Antonioni G., Bonvicini S., Spadoni G., Cozzani V. Development of a framework for the risk assessment of Na-Tech accidental events. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2009, 94:1442-1450.
18. Antonioni G., Spadoni G., Cozzani V. A methodology for the quantitative risk assessment of major accidents triggered by seismic events. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2007, 147:48-59.
19. Bell R., Glade T. Multi-hazard analysis in natural risk assessments. Risk Analysis Iv 2004, 197-206. Wit Press, Southampton. C.A. Brebbia (Ed.).
20. Saaty T. Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process. Analytic Hierarchy Process Series 2000.
21. Rota R., Caragliano S., Manca D., Brambilla S. A short cut methodology for flood-technological risk assessment. Chemical Engineering Transactions 2008, 53-60.
22. Lees F.P. Lees' Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 1996, vol.1-3. Sam © 2005 Elsevier. 3rd Ed.
23. Bommer J.J. Deterministic vs. probabilistic seismic hazard assessment: An exaggerated and obstructive dichotomy. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2002, 6:43-73.
24. Cozzani V., Tugnoli A., Salzano E. Prevention of domino effect: from active and passive strategies to inherently safer design. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2007, 139:209-219.
25. Uijt de Haag P.A.M., Ale B.J.M. Guidelines for Quantitative Risk Assessment, Purple Book 1999, Committee for the Prevention of Disasters, CPR 18E, The Hague. 1st ed.