A method for na-tech risk assessment as supporting tool for land use planning mitigation strategies

Natural Hazards

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 221-241

  Galderisi, Adriana ^a   Ceudech, Andrea ^a   Pistucci, Massimiliano ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

Fuzzy logic; Landuse planning; MADM; Mitigation strategies; Na tech risk; Vulnerability

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; LAND USE PLANNING; NATURAL HAZARD; RISK ASSESSMENT; URBAN AREA; VULNERABILITY;

CAMPANIA [ITALY]; EURASIA; EUROPE; ITALY; SOUTHERN EUROPE;

EID: 45949086280     PISSN: 0921030X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-008-9224-8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (59)

1. Amendola A (2001) Integrated management of technological disasters. In: First Annual IIASA-DPRI meeting Proceedings, Laxenburg, Austria, 1-4 August 2001. Available via DIALOG. http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Research/RMS/ dpri2001. Cited 30 May 2005
2. ARMONIA Project (2006) Deliverable 5.1. Available via DIALOG. http://www.armoniaproject.net. Cited 10 February 2007
3. Bankoff G, Frerks G, Hilhorst D (2004) Mapping vulnerability. Disasters, development & people. Earthscan, UK
4. Basta C, Neuvel JMM, Zlatanova S, Ale B (2007) Risk-maps informing land-use planning processes. A survey on the Netherlands and the United Kingdom recent developments. J Hazard Mater 145:241-249
5. Birkmann J (ed) (2006) Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards. Towards disaster resilient societies. United Nation University Press, Tokyo
6. Burby RJ (ed) (1998) Cooperating with nature. Joseph Henry Press, Washington DC
7. Butler SA, Fischbeck P (2002) Multi-attribute risk assessment. Available via DIALOG. http://en.scientificcommons.org/630755. Cited 20 November 2007
8. Campedel M, Spadoni G, Cozzani V (2007) Na-tech accidents induced by floods: An approach to hazard and risk assessment. In: Proceedings of the eight International Conference on Chemical & Process Engineering ICheaP8, Ischia, Italy, 24-27 June, 2007
9. Chen S, Hwang C (1992) Fuzzy multi attribute decision making. Methods and applications. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
10. Christou M, Matterelli M, Nordvik JP (1999) Land-use planning in the vicinity of chemical sites: Risk-informed decision making at a local community level. In: European Conference SEVESO 2000 documents, Athens, Greece, 10-12 November 1999. Available via DIALOG. http://mahbsrv.jrc.it/ Proceedings.html. Cited 30 May 2005
11. Clerc A, Le Claire G (1994) The environmental impacts of natural and technological (na-tech) disasters. Background discussion paper for The World Conference on Natural Disaster Reduction, Yokohama, Japan, 23-27 May 1994
12. Cruz AM (2005) Natech disasters: A review of practices, lessons learned and future research needs. In: Proceedings of the 5th Annual IIASA-DPRI Forum, Beijing, 14-18 September. Available via DIALOG. http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Research/RMS/dpri2005/proceedings.html. Cited 6 June 2006
13. Cruz AM, Okada N (2006) Diagnosis of NATECH risk in urban areas: A methodology for preliminary assessment. Geophys Res Abstr 8:10713. Available via DIALOG. http://www.cosis.net/abstracts/EGU06/10713/ EGU06-J-10713-1.pdf. Cited 26 November 2007
14. Cruz AM, Steinberg LJ, Vetere Arellano AL, Nordvik JP, Pisano F (2004) State of the art in natech risk management. European Communities Pubblications Office. Available via DIALOG. http://nedies.jrc.it. Cited 30 May 2005
15. Dandoulaki M (2006) NATECHs: A common challenge for segregated scientific, engineering and management societies. Geophys Res Abstr 8:07360. European Geosciences Union
16. EmergencyNet News Service (1994) Egypt fire disaster worst since 1942. Emergency Response & Research Institute. Available via DIALOG. http://www.emergency.com/egyptfir.htm. Cited 6 June 2006
17. European Commission (2006) Instructions and guidelines for ECHO potential partners wishing to submit proposals under the Fifth Dipecho Action Plan For South East Asia. Available via DIALOG. http://ec.europa.eu/echo/pdf_files/calls/dipecho_5_2006/ guidelines_en.pdf. Cited 10 June 2006
18. Fabbrocino G, Iervolino I, Orlando F, Salzano E (2005) Quantitative risk analysis of oil storage facilities in seismic areas. J Hazard Mater A123:61-69
19. Foster DH (1980) Disaster planning. The preservation of life and poverty. Springer-Verlag, New York
20. Galderisi A (2004) Città e Terremoti. Gangemi Editore, Roma
21. Galderisi A, Menoni S (2007) Risk, prevention and urban planning. Urbanistica J 134:20-23
22. Galderisi A, Ceudech A, Pistucci M (2005) Integrated vulnerability assessment: The relevance "to" and "of" urban planning. In: Proceedings (CD format) of the 1st ARMONIA Project Conference "Multi-hazards: Challenges for risk assessment, mapping and management", Barcelona, 5-6 December 2005
23. Giove S, Basta C (2003) Environmental risk and territorial compatibility: A soft computing approach. Lect Notes Comput Sci 2859:195-201
24. Godschalk DR, Beatley T, Berke P, Brower DJ, Kaiser EJ (1999) Natural hazard mitigation. Recasting disaster policy and planning. Island Press, Washington DC
25. Gunderson LH, Holling CS (2002) (eds) Panarchy: Understanding transformations. Human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington, DC
26. Karimi I, Hüllermeier E (2006) Risk assessment system of natural hazard: A new approach based on fuzzy approach. Fuzzy Sets Syst J 158:987-999
27. Lauridsen K, Kozina I, Markert F, Amendola A, Christou M, Fiori M (2002) The Assurance project - final summary report. RISØ National Laboratory, Roskilde
28. Lees FP (1996) Loss prevention in the process industries. Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd, Oxford
29. Lindell MK, Perry RW (1996) Identifying and managing conjoint threats: earthquake-induced hazardous materials releases in the US. J Hazard Mater 50:31-46
30. Lu J, Zhang G, Ruan D, Wu F (2007) Multi-objective group decision making. Methods, software and applications with fuzzy set techniques. Series in Electrical and Computer Engineering, vol 6. Imperial College Press, London
31. Major Accident Hazards Bureau (MAHB) (2003) Major accident reporting system database. Joint Research Centre, European Commission. Available via DIALOG. http://mahbsrv.jrc.it/Home.html. Cited 30 May 2005
32. Malczewski J (1999) GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York
33. Menoni S (1997) Pianificazione e incertezza. Franco Angeli, Milano
34. Menoni S (2002) Città e impianti industriali. Urbanistica J 118:63-64
35. Menoni S (2003) Come cambiano le strategie di prevenzione: Dall'analisi di un rischio per volta al riconoscimento di mutui legami sistemici tra rischi diversi e territorio. Territorio J 25:123-128
36. Menoni S (2005) Costruire la prevenzione. Pitagora Editrice, Bologna
37. Menoni S, Pergalani F (1996) An attempt to link risk assessment with land use planning: A recent experience in Italy. Disaster Prev Manage J 5:6-21
38. Neuhold C (2007) Handling of fuzzy risk in decision making. Available via DIALOG. http://iwhw.boku.ac.at/environmentalrisk/Presentations/ Handling%20of%20fuzzy%20risk%20in%20decision%20making.pdf. Cited 15 December 2007
39. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2003). Emerging risks in the 21st century. An agenda for action. Available via DIALOG. http://www.unisdr.org/eng/library/Literature/7754.pdf. Cited 15 November 2007
40. Perrow C (1984) Normal accidents. Princetown University Press, Princetown
41. Pignatta G (2002) Simulazione dell'applicazione del Decreto ad un caso reale: Il Comune di Volpino. In: Colletta P, Manzo R, Spaziante A (eds) (2002) Pianificazione del territorio e rischio tecnologico. Il D.M. 9 maggio 2001. Celid, Torino (CD-Rom attached)
42. Pistucci M (2006) Sistemi urbani ed eventi na-tech. Un contributo urbanistico alla messa a punto di metodi e tecniche per la conoscenza, la prevenzione e la mitigazione. PhD Thesis, Università di Napoli "Federico II"
43. Quarantelli EL (1993) Technological and natural disasters and ecological problems: Similarities and differences in planning for and managing them. Background discussion paper for the Colloquium on Challenges of Technological and Ecological Disasters on May 11, 1993 in Mexico City, Mexico
44. Rashed T, Weeks J (2003) Assessing vulnerability to earthquake hazards through spatial multicriteria analysis of urban areas. Int J Geogr Inf Sci. Available via DIALOG. http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals. Cited 20 November 2007
45. Salzano E, Iervolino I, Fabbrocino G (2003) Seismic risk of atmospheric storage tanks in the framework of quantitative risk analysis. J Loss Prev Process Ind 16:403-409
46. Schmidt-Thomé P (ed) (2006) The spatial effects and management of natural and technological hazards in Europe - ESPON 1.3.1. Geologian Tutkimuskeskus, Finland
47. Showalter PS, Myers MF (1992) Natural disasters as the cause of technological emergencies: A review of a decade 1980-1989. Working paper 78, Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center, University of Colorado
48. Steinberg L J, Cruz AM (2004) When natural and technological disasters collide: Lessons from the Turkey earthquake of August 1999. Nat Hazards Rev J 5(3):121-130
49. Steinberg LJ, Cruz AM, Vardar-Sukan F, Ersoz Y (2001) Risk management practices at industrial facilities during the Turkey earthquake of August 17, 1999: Case study report. In: First Annual IIASA-DPRI meeting Proceedings, Laxenburg, Austria, 1-4 August 2001. Available via DIALOG. http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Research/RMS/dpri2001. Cited 30 May 2005
50. Steinberg LJ, Basolo B, Burby R, Levine J, Cruz AM (2002) Earthquake-induced technological disasters: A case study of possible effects and emergency response in the urban environment. In: Proceedings of the national conference in earthquake engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Boston, July 2002
51. United Nations (UN) (1994) Report of the world conference on natural disaster reduction. 23-27 May 1994, Yokohama
52. Villagràn De Leon, JC (2006) Vulnerability, a conceptual and methodological review. SOURCE 4/2006, UNU-EHS
53. Veronesi M, Visioli A (2003) Logica fuzzy. Fondamenti teorici e applicazioni pratiche. Franco Angeli, Milano
54. Vetere Arellano AL, Cruz AM, Nordvik JP, Pisano F (eds) (2004) Analysis of natech (natural hazard triggering technological disaster) disaster management. In: Proceedings of NEDIES Workshop, Ispra, Italy, 20-21 October 2003. Available via DIALOG. http://nedies.jrc.it/ index.asp?ID=77. Cited 20 November 2007
55. Waugh WL (2000) Living with hazards dealing with disasters. An introduction to emergency management. M.E. Sharpe Inc., Armonk
56. Wisner B (2001) Vulnerability in disaster theory and practice: From soup to taxonomy, then to analysis and finally tool. In: International Work-Conference Disaster Studies, Wageningen University and Research Centre. Available via DIALOG. http://faculty.kssp.upd.edu.ph/geog/ gaillard_jean-christophe/syllabi/geog255/Wisner_Vuln_Concept.pdf. Cited 10 May 2006
57. Young S (2002) Natural-technologic events: The frequency and severity of toxic releases during and after natural disasters with emphasis on wind and seismic events. UJNR 34th joint meeting panel on wind and seismic effects, 13-18 May 2002
58. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control J 8:338-353
59. Zerger A (2002) Examining GIS decision utility for natural hazard risk modelling. Environ Model Softw J 17:287-294