Phylogenetic analysis of the grape family (Vitaceae) based on the noncoding plastid trnC-petN, trnH-psbA, and trnL-F sequences

Taxon

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 629-637

  Ren, Hui ^a,c   Lu, Li Min ^b,c   Soejima, Akiko ^d   Luke, Quentin ^e   Zhang, Dian Xiang ^a   Chen, Zhi Duan ^b   Wen, Jun ^b,f  

^a SOUTH CHINA INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (China)

^b INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^d KUMAMOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^e INSTITUTE OF PRIMATE RESEARCH   (Kenya)

^f DEPARTMENT OF PALEOBIOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Phylogeny; TrnC petN; TrnH psbA; TrnL trnF; Vitaceae

Indexed keywords

BIOMARKER; DICOTYLEDON; NEW WORLD ORDER; PALEOBIOGEOGRAPHY; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; PLASTID; VINE;

AFRICA; ASIA;

AMPELOCISSUS; AMPELOPSIS; CAYRATIA; CISSUS; CISSUS STRIATA; CYPHOSTEMMA; LEEA; NOTHOCISSUS; PARTHENOCISSUS; PTERISANTHES; RHOICISSUS; TETRASTIGMA; VITACEAE; VITIS; YUA;

EID: 79959768281     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. APG III (Angiosperm Phylogeny Group). 2009. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 161: 105-121.
2. Arnott, H.J. & Webb, M.A. 2000. Twinned raphides of calcium oxalate in grape (Vitis): Implications for crystal stability and function. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 161: 133-142.
3. Baker, J.G. 1871. Ampelideae. Pp. 197-220 in: Martius, C.F.P. von (ed.), Flora brasiliensis, vol. 14(2). Munich, Leipzig: apud Fried. Fleischer.
4. Bernard, A.C. 1972-1973. A propos du complex axillaire chez certaines Vitacées. Naturalia Monspel., Sér. Bot. 23/24: 49-61.
5. Bouquet, A. 1983. Contribution a l'etude de l'espece Muscadinia rotundifolia et de ses hybrides avec Vitis vinifera. Applications en selection. Dissertation, University of Bordeaux, France.
6. Brizicky, G.K. 1965. The genera of Vitaceae in the southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arbor. 46: 48-67.
7. Chen, I. 2009. History of Vitaceae inferred from morphology-based phylogeny and the fossil record of seeds. Dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville, U.S.A.
8. Chen, I. & Manchester, S.R. 2007. Seed morphology of modern and fossil Ampelocissus (Vitaceae) and implications for phytogeography. Amer. J. Bot. 94: 1534-1553.
9. Chen, Z.D., Ren, H. & Wen, J. 2007. Vitaceae. Pp. 173-177 in: Wu, Z.Y. & Raven, P.H. (eds.), Flora of China, vol. 12. Beijing: Science Press; St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden.
10. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
11. Fitch, W.M. 1971. Toward defining the course of evolution: Minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst. Zool. 20: 406-416.
12. Galet, P. 1967. Recherches sur les méthodes d'identification et de classification des Vitacées temprées. Thesis, Université de Montpellier, France.
13. Gerrath, J.M. & Posluszny, U. 1988a. Comparative floral development in some members of the Vitaceae. Pp. 121-131 in: Leins, P., Tucker, S.C. & Endress, P.K. (eds.), Aspects of floral development. Berlin: Cramer.
14. Gerrath, J.M. & Posluszny, U. 1988b. Morphological and anatomical development in the Vitaceae. I. Vegetative development in Vitis riparia. Canad. J. Bot. 66: 209-224.
15. Gerrath, J.M. & Posluszny, U. 1988c. Morphological and anatomical development in the Vitaceae. II. Floral development in Vitis riparia. Canad. J. Bot. 66: 1334-1351.
16. Gerrath, J.M. & Posluszny, U. 1989. Morphological and anatomical development in the Vitaceae. V. Vegetative and floral development in Ampelopsis brevipedunculata. Canad. J. Bot. 67: 2371-2386.
17. Gerrath, J.M. & Posluszny, U. 1994. Morphological and anatomical development in the Vitaceae. VI. Cissus antarctica. Canad. J. Bot. 72: 635-643.
18. Hooker, J.D. 1862. Ampelideae. Pp. 386-388 in: Bentham G. & Hooker J.D. (eds.), Genera plantarum. London: Reeve.
19. Ingrouille, M.J., Chase, M.W., Fay, M.F., Bowman, D., Van der Bank, M. & Bruijin, A.D.E. 2002. Systematics of Vitaceae from the viewpoint of plastid rbcL sequence data. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 138: 421-432.
20. Jackes, B.R. 1984. Revision of the Australian Vitaceae, 1. Ampelocissus Planchon. Austrobaileya 2: 81-86.
21. Jackes, B.R. 1988. Revision of the Australian Vitaceae, 3. Cissus L. Austrobaileya 2: 481-505.
22. Jackes, B.R. & Rossetto, M. 2006. A new combination in Clematicissus Planch. (Vitaceae). Telopea 11: 390-391.
23. Jansen, R.K., Kaittanis, C., Saski, C., Lee, S.-B., Tomkins, J., Alverson, A.J. & Daniell, H. 2006. Phylogenetic analyses of Vitis (Vitaceae) based on complete chloroplast genome sequences: Effects of taxon sampling and phylogenetic methods on resolving relationships among rosids. BMC Evol. Biol. 6: 32. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-6-32.
24. Latiff, A. 2001. Diversity of the Vitaceae in the Malay Archipelago. Malayan Nat. J. 55: 29-42.
25. Lawson, M.A. 1875. Ampelideae. Pp. 544-588 in: Hooker J.D. (ed.), Flora of British India, vol. 1. London: Reeve.
26. Lee, C. & Wen, J. 2004. Phylogeny of Panax using chloroplast trnCtrnD intergenic region and the utility of trnC-trnD in interspecific studies of plants. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 31: 894-903.
27. Li, C.L. 1990. Yua C. L. Li-a new genus of Vitaceae. Acta Bot. Yunnan. 12: 1-10.
28. Li, C.L. 1998. Vitaceae. Pp. 1-196 in: Delectis Florae Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae Agendae Academiae Sinicae Edita (ed.), Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae, vol. 48, part 2. Beijing: Science Press.
29. Linnaeus, C. 1753. Species plantarum. Stockholm: Impensis Laurentii Salvii.
30. Lombardi, J.A. 2007. Systematics of Vitaceae in South America. Canad. J. Bot. 85: 712-721.
31. Mau, B., Newton, M. & Larget, B. 1999. Bayesian phylogenetic inference via Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Biometrics 55: 1-12.
32. Metcalfe, C.R. & Chalk, L. 1950. Anatomy of dicot leaves, stem, and wood in relation to taxonomy, with notes on economic uses, vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
33. Müller, K. 2005. SeqState-primer design and sequence statistics for phylogenetic DNA data sets. Appl. Bioinformatics 4: 65-69.
34. Nie, Z.L., Sun, H., Chen, Z.D., Meng, Y., Manchester, S.R. & Wen, J. 2010. Molecular phylogeny and biogeographic diversification of Parthenocissus (Vitaceae) disjunct between Asia and North America. Amer. J. Bot. 97: 1342-1353.
35. Péros, J.P., Berger, G., Portemont, A., Boursiquot, J.M. & Lacombe, T. 2011. Genetic variation and biogeography of the disjunct Vitis subg. Vitis (Vitaceae). J. Biogeogr. 38: 471-486.
36. Planchon, J.E. 1884. Les vignes des tropiques du genre Ampelocissus. Vigne Amér. Vitic. Eur. 8: 370-381.
37. Planchon, J.E. 1887. Monographie des Ampélidées vrais. Pp. 305-654 in: Candolle, A.F.P.P. de & Candolle, C. de (eds.), Monographiae phanaerogamarum, vol. 5. Paris: Masson.
38. Posada, D. & Crandall, K.A. 1998. Modeltest: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
39. Rambaut, A. 2002. Se-Al: Sequence alignment editor, version 2.0all. Oxford: University of Oxford. Available from http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/seal/.
40. Rannala, B. & Yang, Z.H. 1996. Probability distribution of molecular evolutionary trees: A new method of phylogenetic inference. J. Molec. Evol. 43: 304-311.
41. Ren, H., Pan, K.Y., Chen, Z.D. & Wang, R.Q. 2003. Structural characters of leaf epidermis and their systematic significance in Vitaceae. Acta Phytotax. Sin. 41: 531-544.
42. Ridsdale, C.E. 1974. A revision of the family Leeaceae. Blumea 22: 57-100.
43. Ronquist, F. & Huelsenbeck, J.P. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572-1574.
44. Rossetto, M., Crayn, D.M., Jackes, B.R. & Porter, C. 2007. An updated estimate of intergeneric phylogenetic relationships in the Australian Vitaceae. Canad. J. Bot. 85: 722-730.
45. Rossetto, M., Jackes, B.R., Scott, K.D. & Henry, R.J. 2001. Intergeneric relationships in the Australian Vitaceae: New evidence from cpDNA analysis. Genet. Res. Crop Evol. 48: 307-341.
46. Rossetto, M., Jackes, B.R., Scott, K.D. & Henry, R.J. 2002. Is the genus Cissus (Vitaceae) monophyletic? Evidence from plastid and nuclear ribosomal DNA. Syst. Bot. 27: 522-533.
47. Shaw, J., Lickey, E.B., Beck, J.T., Farmer, S.S., Liu, W., Miller, J., Chaw, S.K., Winder, C.T., Schilling, E.E. & Small, R.L. 2005. The tortoise and the hare: Relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis. Amer. J. Bot. 92: 142-166.
48. Shetty, B.V. & Singh, P. 2000. Vitaceae. Pp. 246-324 in: Singh, N.P., Vohra, J.N., Hajra, P.K. & Singh, D.K. (eds.), Flora of India, vol. 5. Calcutta: Botanical Survey of India.
49. Simmons, M.P. & Ochoterena, H. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst. Biol. 49: 369-381.
50. Soejima, A. & Wen, J. 2006. Phylogenetic analysis of the grape family (Vitaceae) based on three chloroplast markers. Amer. J. Bot. 93: 278-287.
51. Soltis, D.E., Gitzendanner, M.A. & Soltis, P.S. 2007. A 567-taxon data set for angiosperms: The challenges posed by Bayesian analyses of large data sets. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 168: 137-157.
52. Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S., Chase, M.W., Mort, M.E., Albach, D.C., Zanis, M., Savolainen, V., Hahn, W.H., Hoot, S.B., Fay, M.F., Axtell, M., Swensen, S.M., Prince, L.M., Kress, W.J., Nixon, K.C. & Farris, J.S. 2000. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 133: 381-461.
53. Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S., Endress, P.K. & Chase, M.W. 2005. Phylogeny and evolution of angiosperms. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.
54. Suessenguth, K. 1953. Vitaceae. Pp. 174-333 in: Engler A. & Prantl K. (eds.), Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, vol. 20. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
55. Swofford, D.L. 2003. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.0b10. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.
56. Takhtajan, A. 1997. Diversity and classification of flowering plants. New York: Columbia University Press.
57. Thompson, J.D., Gibson, T.J., Plewniak, F., Jeanmougin, F. & Higgins, D.G. 1997. The Clustal X windows interface: Flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucl. Acids Res. 25: 4876-4882.
58. Timmons, S.A., Posluszny, U. & Gerrath, J.M. 2007a. Morphological and anatomical development in the Vitaceae IX. Comparative ontogeny and phylogenetic implications of Vitis rotundifolia Michx. Canad. J. Bot. 85: 850-859.
59. Timmons, S.A., Posluszny, U. & Gerrath, J.M. 2007b. Morphological and anatomical development in the Vitaceae. X. Comparative ontogeny and phylogenetic implications of Cissus quadrangularis L. Canad. J. Bot. 85: 860-872.
60. Tröndle, D., Schröder, S., Kassemeyer, H.H., Kiefer, C., Koch, M.A. & Nick, P. 2010. Molecular phylogeny of the genus Vitis (Vitaceae) based on plastid markers. Amer. J. Bot. 97: 1168-1178.
61. Wang, H., Moore, M.J., Soltis, P.S., Bell, C.D., Brockington, S.F., Alexandre, R., Davis, C.C., Latvis, M., Manchester, S.R. & Soltis, D.E. 2009. Rosid radiation and the rapid rise of angiospermdominated forests. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106: 3853-3858.
62. Wen, J. 2007a. Vitaceae. Pp. 466-478 in: Kubitzki, K. (ed.), The families and genera of vascular plants, vol. 9. Berlin: Springer.
63. Wen, J. 2007b. Leeaceae. Pp. 220-224 in: Kubitzki, K. (ed.), The families and genera of vascular plants, vol. 9. Berlin: Springer.
64. Wen, J., Nie, Z.L., Soejima, A. & Meng, Y. 2007. Phylogeny of Vitaceae based on the nuclear GAI1 gene sequences. Canad. J. Bot. 85: 731-745.