An updated estimate of intergeneric phylogenetic relationships in the Australian Vitaceae

Canadian Journal of Botany

Volumn 85, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 722-730

  Rossetto, Maurizio ^a,b   Crayn, Darren M ^a,b   Jackes, Betsy R ^c   Porter, Carolyn ^a  

^a ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS AND DOMAIN TRUST   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND   (Australia)

^c JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cayratia; Cissus; Clematicissus; DNA; Phylogeny

Indexed keywords

DNA; GENETIC ENGINEERING; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

CAYRATIA; CISSUS; CLEMATICISSUS; PHYLOGENY;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; CLADISTICS; DICOTYLEDON; DNA; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; PLASTID;

CAYRATIA; CISSUS; CISSUS ANTARCTICA; CISSUS HYPOGLAUCA; CISSUS OBLONGA; CISSUS OPACA; CISSUS STERCULIIFOLIA; CISSUS STRIATA; CLEMATICISSUS; NOTHOCISSUS; VITACEAE;

EID: 36149000182     PISSN: 00084026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/B07-022     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Carpenter, R.J., Hill, R.S., Greenwood, D.R., Partridge, A.D., and Banks, M.A. 2004. No snow in the mountains: early Eocene plant fossils from Hotham Heights, Victoria, Australia. Aust. J. Bot. 52: 685-718. doi:10.1071/BT04032.
2. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution, 39: 783-791. doi:10.2307/2408678.
3. Fitch, W.M. 1971. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specified tree topology. Syst. Zool. 20: 406-416. doi:10.2307/2412116.
4. Gerrath, J.M., and Posluszny, U. 1994. Morphological and anatomical development in the Vitaceae. VI. Floral development in Cissus antarctica. Can. J. Bot. 72: 635-643.
5. Golenberg, E.M., Clegg, M.T., Durbin, M.L., Doebley, J., and Ma, D.P. 1993. Evolution of a noncoding region of the chloroplast genome. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2: 52-64. doi:10.1006/mpev.1993.1006.
6. Hall, T.A. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 41: 95-98.
7. Huelsenbeck, J.P., and Ronquist, F. 2001. Mr BAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics, 17: 754-755. doi:10.1093/ bioinformatics/17.8.754.
8. Ingrouille, M.J., Chase, M.W., Fay, M.F., Bowman, D., Van der Bank, M., and Bruijn, A.D.E. 2002. Systematics of Vitaceae from a viewpoint of plastid rbcL DNA sequence data. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 138: 421-432. doi:10.1046/j.1095-8339.2002.00028.x.
9. Jackes, B.R. 1984. Revision of the Australian Vitaceae, 1. Ampelocissus Planchon. Austrobaileya, 2: 81-86.
10. Jackes, B.R. 1987. Revision of the Australian Vitaceae, 2. Cayratia Juss. Austrobaileya, 2: 365-379.
11. Jackes, B.R. 1988. Revision of the Australian Vitaceae, 3. Cissus L. Austrobaileya, 2: 481-505.
12. Jackes, B.R. 1989a. Revision of the Australian Vitaceae, 4. Clematicissus Planchon. Austrobaileya, 3: 11-102.
13. Jackes, B.R. 1989b. Revision of the Australian Vitaceae, 5. Tetrastigma (Miq.) Planchon. Austrobaileya, 3: 149-158.
14. Jackes, B.R., and Rossetto, M. 2006. A new combination in Clematicissus Planch. (Vitaceae). Telopea, 11(3): 390-391.
15. Latiff, A. 1983. Numerical analysis and classification of Malesian Vitaceae. Malays. 12: 7-13.
16. Latiff, A. 2001. Studies in Malesian Vitaceae XII: Taxonomic notes on Cissus, Ampelocissus, Nothocissus and Tetrastigma and other genera. Folia Malaysiana, 2: 179-189.
17. Rossetto, M., Jackes, B., Scott, K.D., and Henry, R.J. 2001a. Intergeneric relationship in the Australian Vitaceae: new evidence from cpDNA analysis. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 48: 307-314. doi:10.1023/A: 1011225319360.
18. Rossetto, M., McNally, J., and Henry, R.J. 2001b. Evaluating the potential of SSR flanking regions for examining taxonomic relationships in Vitaceae. Theor. Appl. Genet. 103: 61-66.
19. Rossetto, M., Jackes, B., Scott, K.D., and Henry, R.J. 2002. Is the genus Cissus (Vitaceae) monophyletic: evidence from plastid and nuclear ribosomal DNA. Syst. Bot. 27: 522-533.
20. Simmons, M.P., and Ochoterena, H. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst. Biol. 49: 369-381.
21. Simmons, M.P., Pickett, K.M., and Miya, M. 2004. How meaningful are Bayesian support values? Mol. Biol. Evol. 21: 188-199.
22. Soejima, A., and Wen, J. 2006. Phylogenetic analysis of the grape family (Vitaceae) based on three chloroplast markers. Am. J. Bot. 93: 278-287.
23. Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S., Chase, M.W., Mort, M.E., Albach, D.C., Zanis, M., Savolainen, V., Hahn, W.H., Hoot, S.B., Fay, M.F., Axtell, M., Swensen, S.M., Prince, L.M., Kress, W.J., Nixon, K.C., and Farris, J.S. 2000. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 133: 381-461. doi:10.1006/boj1.2000.0380.
24. Suzuki, Y., Glazko, G.V., and Nei, M. 2002. Overcredibility of molecular phylogenies obtained by Bayesian phylogenetics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99: 16138-16143. doi:10.1073/pnas.212646199.
25. Swofford, D.L. 2000. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, Mass.
26. Taberlet, P., Gielly, L., Pautou, G., and Bouvet, J. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant. Mol. Biol. 17: 1105-1110. doi:10.1007/BF00037152.
27. Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G., and Gibson, T.J. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22: 4673-4680. doi:10.1093/nar/22.22.4673.
28. White, T.J., Bruns, T.D., Lee, S., and Taylor, J. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR protocols, a guide to methods and applications. Edited by M.A. Innis, D.H. Gelfand, J.J. Sninsky, and T.J. White. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif. pp. 315-322.