Lending an ear to feedback systems: Evaluation of recovery and non-response in psychotherapy in a German outpatient setting

Community Mental Health Journal

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 311-317

  Lutz, Wolfgang ^a   Böhnke, Jan R ^a   Köck, Katharina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRIER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMBULATORY CARE; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; EVALUATION; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; GERMANY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MENTAL DISEASE; OUTPATIENT; PSYCHOMETRY; PSYCHOTHERAPY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AMBULATORY CARE; DECISION MAKING; EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; OUTPATIENTS; PSYCHOMETRICS; PSYCHOTHERAPY; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79959761674     PISSN: 00103853     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10597-010-9307-3     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Barkham, M., Margison, F., Leach, C., Lucock, M., Mellor-Clark, J., Evans, C., et al. (2001). Service profiling and outcomes benchmarking using the CORE-OM: Toward practice-based evidence in the psychological therapies. Clinical outcomes in routine evaluation-outcome measures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 184-196. (Pubitemid 32488277)
2. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Garbin, M. G. (1988). Psychometric properties of the Beck depression inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review, 8, 77-100. (Pubitemid 18045797)
3. Beutler, L. E. (2001). Comparisons among quality assurance systems: From outcome assessment to clinical utility. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 197-204.
4. Brabec, B., & Meister, R. (2001). A nearest-neighbor model for regional avalanche forecasting. Annals of Glaciology, 32, 130-134.
5. Breslin, F. C., Sobell, M. B., Sobell, L. C., Buchan, G., & Cunningham, J. A. (1997). Towards a stepped care approach to treating problem drinkers: The predictive utility of withintreatment variables and therapist prognostic ratings. Addiction, 92, 1479-1489. (Pubitemid 27499560)
6. Derogatis, L. R. (1993). BSI. Brief symptom inventory. Administration, scoring, and precedures manual (4th ed.). Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.
7. Ehlers, A., & Margraf, J. (2001). Fragebogen zu körperbezogenen Ängsten, Kognitionen und Vermeidung (AKV) [Questionnaire on body-directed anxieties, cognitions, and avoidance] (2., überarbeitete und neunormierte Auflage). Weinheim: Beltz.
8. Endicott, J., Spitzer, R. L., Fleiss, J. L., & Cohen, J. (1976). The global assessment scale: A procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance. Archives of General Psychiatry, 33, 766-771.
9. Filzmoser, P., Maronna, R., & Werner, M. (2008). Outlier identification in high dimensions. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 52, 1694-1711. (Pubitemid 350017776)
10. Finch, A. E., Lambert, M. J., & Schaalje, B. G. (2001). Psychotherapy quality control: The statistical generation of expected recovery curves for integration into an early warning system. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 8, 231-242. (Pubitemid 33696282)
11. Fisher, D. G., Pilon, D., Hershberger, S. L., Reynolds, G. L., LaMaster, S. C., & Davis, M. (2009). Psychometric properties of an assessment for mental health recovery programs. Community Mental Health Journal, 45, 246-250.
12. Franke, G. H. (2000). Brief symptom inventory von L. R. Derogatis (Kurzform der SCL-90-R)-Deutsche version [German short version of the SCL-90-R]. Göttingen: Beltz Test GmbH.
13. Fydrich, T., Nagel, A., Lutz, W., & Richter, R. (2003). Qualitätsmonitoring in der ambulanten Psychotherapie: Modellprojekt der Techniker Krankenkasse (TK) [Quality assurance in outpatient psychotherapy: The TK Study]. Verhaltenstherapie, 13, 291-295. (Pubitemid 38067684)
14. Garner, D. M. (1991). Eating disorders inventory-2: Professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
15. Hannan, C., Lambert, M. J., Harmon, C., Nielsen, S. L., Smart, D. W., Shimokawa, K., et al. (2005). A lab test and a algorithmus for identifying patients at risk for treatment failure. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, 155-163. (Pubitemid 40289029)
16. Harmon, S. C., Lambert, M. J., Smart, D. W., Nielsen, S. L., Hawkins, E. J., & Whipple, J. (2005). Outcome enhancement for non-responding clients: A controlled test of patient and therapist feedback on weekly progress, therapeutic alliance, readiness for change, and social support on session allocation and outcome. Paper presented at the 36th International Meeting of the Society for Psychotehrapy Research, Montreal, Canada.
17. Hawkins, E. J., Lambert, M. J., Vermeersch, D. A., Slade, K. L., & Tuttle, K. C. (2004). The therapeutic effects of providing patient progress information to therapists and patients. Psychotherapy Research, 14, 308-327. (Pubitemid 39206850)
18. Horowitz, L. M., Strauss, B., & Kordy, H. (2000). Inventar zur erfassung interpersonaler probleme (IIP-D) [Inventory of Interpersonal Problems, German Version]. Göttingen: Beltz Test GmbH.
19. Howard, K. I., Kopta, M., Krause, M. S., & Orlinsky, D. E. (1986). The dose-effect relationship in psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 41, 159-164.
20. Howard, K. I., Moras, K., Brill, B. L., Martinovich, Z., & Lutz, W. (1996). Evaluation of psychotherapy. Efficacy, effectiveness and patient progress. American Psychologist, 51, 1059-1064.
21. Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12-19.
22. Klepsch, R., Zaworka, W., Hand, I., Lünenschloss, K., & Jauering, G. (1993). Hamburger Zwangsinventar-Kurzform (HZI-K). Manual [Hamburg Inventory for obsessive-compulsive disorders - short form]. Göttingen: Beltz.
23. Lambert, M. J. (2007). What we have learned from a decade of research aimed at improving psychotherapy outcome in routine care. Psychotherapy Research, 17, 1-14.
24. Lambert, M. J., Hansen, N. B., & Finch, A. E. (2001a). Patient-focused research: Using patient outcome data to enhance treatment effects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 159-172. (Pubitemid 32488275)
25. Lambert, M. J., & Ogles, B. M. (2004). The efficacy and effectiveness of psychotherapy. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (5th ed., pp. 139-193). New York: Wiley.
26. Lambert, M. J., & Ogles, B. M. (2009). Using clinical significance in psychotherapy outcome research: The need for a common procedure and validity data. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 493-501.
27. Lambert, M. J., Whipple, J. L., Bishop, M. J., Vermeersch, D. A., Gray, G. V., & Finch, A. E. (2002). Comparison of empirically-derived and rationally-derived methods for identifying patients at risk for treatment failure. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 9, 149-164. (Pubitemid 40309235)
28. Lambert, M. J., Whipple, J. L., Hawkins, E. J., Vermeersch, D. A., Nielsen, S. L., & Smart, D. W. (2003). Is it time for clinicians to routinely track patient outcome? A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10, 288-301. (Pubitemid 41288824)
29. Lambert, M. J., Whipple, J. L., Smart, D. W., Vermeersch, D. A., Nielsen, S. L., & Hawkins, E. J. (2001b). The effects of providing therapists with feedback on patient progress during psychotherapy: Are outcomes enhanced? Psychotherapy Research, 11, 49-68.
30. Laynard, R., Clark, D., Knapp, M., & Mayraz, G. (2007). Cost-benefit analysis of psychological therapy. National Institute Economic Review, 202, 90-98.
31. Luborsky, L., Barber, J. P., Siqueland, L., Johnson, S., Najavits, L. M., Frank, A., et al. (1996). The revised Helping Alliance questionnaire (HAq-II): Psychometric properties. Journal of Psychotherapy, Practice and Research, 5, 260-271. (Pubitemid 26198387)
32. Lueger, R. J., Howard, K. I., Martinovich, Z., Lutz, W., Anderson, E. E., & Grissom, G. (2001). Assessing treatment progress of individual patients using expected treatment response models. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 150-158. (Pubitemid 32488274)
33. Lutz, W. (2002). Patient-focused psychotherapy research and individual treatment progress as scientific groundwork for an empirical based clinical practice. Psychotherapy Research, 12, 251-273.
34. Lutz, W., Lambert, M. J., Harmon, S. C., Tschitsaz, A., Schürch, E., & Stulz, N. (2006a). The probability of treatment success, failure and duration - What can be learned from empirical data to support decision making in clinical practice? Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 13, 223-232.
35. Lutz, W., Leach, C., Barkham, M., Lucock, M., Stiles, W. B., Evans, C., et al. (2005a). Predicting change for individual psychotherapy clients on the basis of their nearest neighbors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 904-913. (Pubitemid 41643240)
36. Lutz, W., Martinovich, Z., & Howard, K. I. (1999). Patient profiling: An application of random coefficient regression models to depicting the response of a patient to outpatient psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 571-577.
37. Lutz, W., Saunders, S. M., Leon, S. C., Martinovich, Z., Kosfelder, J., Schulte, D., et al. (2006b). Empirically and clinically useful decision making in psychotherapy: Differential predictions with treatment response models. Psychological Assessment, 18, 133-141.
38. Lutz, W., Stulz, N., & Köck, K. (2009a). Patterns of early change and their relationship to outcome and follow-up among patients with major depressive disorders. Journal of Affective Disorders, 118, 60-68.
39. Lutz, W., Stulz, N., Martinovich, Z., Leon, S., & Saunders, S. M. (2009b). Methodological background of decision rules and feedback tools for outcomes management in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 502-510.
40. Lutz, W., Tholen, S., Kosfelder, J., Tschitsaz, A., Schürch, E., & Stulz, N. (2005b). Evaluation und störungsspezifische Rückmeldung des therapeutischen Fortschritts in der Psychotherapie. [Evaluation and feedback of psychotherapeutic progress in psychotherapy]. Verhaltenstherapie, 15, 168-175.
41. Newnham, E., & Page, A. C. (2010). Bridging the gap between best evidence and best practice in mental health. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 127-142.
42. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
43. Rief, W., Hiller, W., & Heuser, J. (1997). SOMS - Das Screening für somatoforme Störungen (Manual zum Fragebogen) [Screening for somatoform disorders]. Bern: Huber.
44. Rousseeuw, P. J., & Van Zomeren, B. C. (1990). Unmasking multivariate outliers and leverage points. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 633-651.
45. Schepank, H. (1995). BSS. Der Beeinträchtigungs-Schwere-Score. Ein Instrument zur Bestimmung der Schwere einer psychogenen Erkrankung. Manual und Testmappe [The score of functional impairment: An instrument for the assessment of the severity of psychological disorders]. Göttingen: Beltz Test.
46. Sperry, L., Brill, P. L., Howard, K. I., & Grissom, G. R. (1996). Treatment outcomes in psychotherapy and psychiatric interventions. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
47. Stulz, N., Gallop, R., Lutz, W., Wrenn, G. L., & Crits-Christoph, P. (2010). Examining differential effects of psychosocial treatments for cocaine dependence: An application of latent trajectory analyses. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 106, 164-172.
48. Stulz, N., Lutz, W., Leach, C., Lucock, M., & Barkham, M. (2007). Shapes of early change in psychotherapy under routine outpatient conditions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 864-874.
49. Tasca, G. A., & Gallop, R. (2009). Multilevel modeling of longitudinal data for psychotherapy researchers: I. The basics. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 429-437.
50. Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1996). A 12-Item shortform health survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care, 34, 220-233. (Pubitemid 126433231)