Management of common bile duct stones in cirrhotic patients with coagulopathy: A comparison of supra-papillary puncture and standard cannulation technique

Digestive Diseases and Sciences

Volumn 56, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1904-1911

  Artifon, Everson L A ^a,b   Da Silveira, Eduardo B ^c,e   Aparicio, Dayse ^a   Takada, Jonas ^b   Baracat, Renato ^b   Sakai, Christiano M ^a   Garcia, Ruel T ^c   Teich, Vanessa ^d   Couto, Decio S ^a  

^a HOSPITAL ANA COSTA   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^c San Jose Gastroenterology   (United States)

^d MedInsight   (Brazil)

^e NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

CBD (Common bile duct); Endoscopy; ERCP (Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography); Portal hypertension

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD CLOTTING DISORDER; CANNULATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMMON BILE DUCT STONE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DECOMPENSATED LIVER CIRRHOSIS; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PANCREATITIS; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SUPRAPAPILLARY PUNCTURE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ADULT; AGED; BLOOD COAGULATION DISORDERS; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GALLSTONES; GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE; HUMANS; LIVER CIRRHOSIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE;

EID: 79959728856     PISSN: 01632116     EISSN: 15732568     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-011-1593-2     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Colton JB, Curran CC. Quality indicators, including complications, of ERCP in a community setting: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:457-467.
2. Cotton PB, Garrow DA, Gallagher J, Romagnuolo J. Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12 years. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:80-88.
3. Wang P, Li ZS, Liu F, et al. Risk factors for ERCP-related complications: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:31-40.
4. Salminen P, Laine S, Gullichsen R. Severe and fatal complications after ERCP: analysis of 2555 procedures in a single experienced center. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1965-1970.
5. Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G, et al. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:1781-1788. (Pubitemid 47206695)
6. Kahaleh M, Yoshida C, Kane L, Yeaton P. Interventional EUS cholangiography: a report of five cases. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:138-142. (Pubitemid 38833721)
7. Kahaleh M, Wang P, Shami VM, Tokar J, Yeaton P. EUS-guided transhepatic cholangiography: report of 6 cases. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:307-313. (Pubitemid 40261093)
8. Rocca R, De Angelis C, Castellino F, et al. EUS diagnosis and simultaneous endoscopic retrograde cholangiography treatment of common bile duct stones by using an oblique-viewing echoendoscope. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:479-484. (Pubitemid 43261478)
9. Kahaleh M, Hernandez AJ, Tokar J, et al. Interventional EUS-guided cholangiography: evaluation of a technique in evolution. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:52-59. (Pubitemid 43927745)
10. Larghi A, Lecca PG, Mutignani M, Costamagna G. EUS-directed transpapillary self-expandable metallic stent placement after successful interventional EUS-guided cholangiography. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67:996-998.
11. Artifon EL, Kumar A, Eloubeidi MA, et al. Prospective randomized trial of EUS versus ERCP-guided common bile duct stone removal: an interim report (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:238-243.
12. Artifon EL, Sakai P, Ishioka S, Hondo FY, Raju GS. Suprapapillary puncture of the common bile duct for selective biliary access: a novel technique (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65:124-131. (Pubitemid 44932164)
13. Artifon EL, Paulo S, Cardillo GZ, Ishioka S. Suprapapillary needle puncture for common bile duct access: laboratory profile. Arq Gastroenterol. 2006;43:299-304. (Pubitemid 46556129)
14. Artifon EL, Hondo FY, Sakai P, Ishioka S. A new approach to the bile duct via needle puncture of the papillary roof. Endoscopy. 2005;37:1158. (Pubitemid 41576679)
15. Barkun AN, Barkun JS, Fried GM, et al. Useful predictors of bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. McGill Gallstone Treatment Group. Ann Surg. 1994;220:32-39.
16. Jan YY, Chen MF. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in cirrhotic patients. Hepatogastroenterology. 1997;44:1584-1587.
17. Yerdel MA, Koksoy C, Aras N, Orita K. Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in cirrhotic patients: a prospective study. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1997;7:483-486.
18. Howard TJ, Tan T, Lehman GA, et al. Classification and management of perforations complicating endoscopic sphincterotomy. Surgery. 1999;126:658-663, discussion 664-665.
19. Ferreira LE, Baron TH. Post-sphincterotomy bleeding: who, what, when, and how. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:2850-2858.
20. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;37:383-393.
21. Joseph L. Introduction to biostatistics: describing and drawing inferences from data. In: Barkun A, ed. Surgical arithmetic: epidemiological, statistical and outcome-based approach to surgical practice. Austin Texas: Landes Biosciences; 2000:14-63.
22. Heitjan DF, Moskowitz AJ, Whang W. Problems with interval estimates of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Med Decis Making. 1999;19:9-15. (Pubitemid 29031789)
23. Neoptolemos JP, Carr-Locke DL, Fossard DP. Prospective randomised study of preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987;294:470-474. (Pubitemid 17020455)
24. Lee TH, Park do H, Park JY, et al. Can wire-guided cannulation prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A prospective randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:444-449.
25. Silviera ML, Seamon MJ, Porshinsky B, et al. Complications related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a comprehensive clinical review. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2009;18:73-82.
26. Cennamo V, Fuccio L, Zagari RM, et al. Can a wire-guided cannulation technique increase bile duct cannulation rate and prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis?: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:2343-2350.
27. Siegel JH. Precut papillotomy: a method to improve success of ERCP and papillotomy. Endoscopy. 1980;12:130-133. (Pubitemid 10109614)
28. Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB, et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:425-434. (Pubitemid 33661145)
29. Lee JK, Park JK, Yoon WJ, et al. Risk for post-ERCP pancreatitis after needle knife precut sphincterotomy following repeated cannulation attempts. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2007;41:427-431. (Pubitemid 46573075)
30. Kasmin FE, Cohen D, Batra S, Cohen SA, Siegel JH. Needleknife sphincterotomy in a tertiary referral center: efficacy and complications. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;44:48-53. (Pubitemid 26268658)
31. Cotton PB. Analysis of 59 ERCP lawsuits; mainly about indications. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:378-382, quiz 464.
32. Abu-Hamda EM, Baron TH, Simmons DT, Petersen BT. A retrospective comparison of outcomes using three different precut needle knife techniques for biliary cannulation. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2005;39:717-721. (Pubitemid 41177093)
33. da Silveira EB. Outcome of cirrhotic patients undergoing cholecystectomy: applying Bayesian analysis in gastroenterology. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;21:958-962.
34. Maggi A, Solenghi D, Panzeri A, et al. Prevalence and incidence of cholelithiasis in patients with liver cirrhosis. Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1997;29:330-335. (Pubitemid 28059509)
35. Baron TH, Harewood GC. Endoscopic balloon dilation of the biliary sphincter compared to endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy for removal of common bile duct stones during ERCP: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:1455-1460. (Pubitemid 39180090)