In retreat from nature? Successes and concerns in Darwinian approaches to facial attractiveness

Journal of Evolutionary Psychology

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 173-193

  Penton Voak, Ian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

ecological validity; facial attractiveness; review; sexual dimorphism

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959718272     PISSN: 17892082     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1556/JEP.9.2011.2.5     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Adamo, S. A. & Spiteri, R. J. (2005): Female choice for male immunocompetence: When is it worth it? Behavioral Ecology, 16(5) 871-879. (Pubitemid 41191526)
2. Adamo, S. A. & Spiteri, R. J. (2009): He's healthy, but will he survive the plague? Possible constraints on mate choice for disease resistance. Animal Behaviour, 77(1), 67-78.
3. Berscheid, E. & Walster, E. (1974) Physical Attractiveness. In: L. Berkowitz (ed): Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 7, 157-215. New York: Academic Press.
4. Boothroyd, L. G., Jones, B. C., Burt, D. M., Cornwell R. E., Little, A. C., Tiddeman, B. P., et al. (2005): Facial masculinity is related to perceived age but not perceived health. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(5), 417-431. (Pubitemid 41149440)
5. Boothroyd L. G., Jones, B. C., Burt, D. M. & Perrett, D. I. (2007): Partner characteristics associated with masculinity, health and maturity in male faces. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(5) 1161-1173.
6. Borkenau, P. & Liebler, A. (1992): Trait inferences: Sources of validity at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(4), 645-657.
7. Brooks R., Scott I. M., Maklakov A. A., Kasumovic M. M., Clark A. P. & Penton-Voak I. S. (in press): National income inequality predicts women's preferences for masculinised faces better than health does. Proceedings of the Royal Society, B, doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.0964
8. Burton A. M., White, D. & Mcneill, A. (2010): The Glasgow face matching task. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 286-291
9. Buss D. M. (1989): Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49.
10. Carre J. M., Mccormick, C. M. & Mondloch, C. J. (2009): Facial structure is a reliable cue of aggressive behavior. Psychological Science, 20(10), 1194-1198.
11. Cash T. F. & Derlega, V. J. (1978): The matching hypothesis: Physical attractiveness among same-sexed friends. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4(2), 240-243.
12. Chen F. M. & Zhang, D. A (2010): Benchmark for geometric facial beauty study. In: D. Zhang & M. Sonka (eds): Medical Biometrics, Proceedings 6165, pp. 21-32.
13. Christiansen K. (2001): Behavioural effects of androgen in men and women. Journal of Endocrinology, 170(1), 39-48. (Pubitemid 32677564)
14. Clark, A. P. (2008): Attracting interest: Dynamic displays of proceptivity increase the attractiveness of men and women. Evolutionary Psychology, 6(4), 563-574.
15. Clark A. P., Morrison, E. R., Jack, V. & Penton-Voak, I. S. (2009): Attractiveness in flux: Female preferences for male facial motion depend on mating context and non-additive cues to prosociality and proceptivity. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 7, 99-109.
16. Darwin, C. (1871): The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.
17. Debruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Crawford, J. R., Welling, L. L. M. & Little, A. C. (2010): The health of a nation predicts their mate preferences: Cross-cultural variation in women's preferences for masculinized male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 277(1692), 2405-2410.
18. Debruine L. M., Jones B. C., Smith F. G. & Little A. C. (2010) Are attractive men's faces masculine or feminine? The importance of controlling confounds in face stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 36, 751-758.
19. Debruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C. Boothroyd, L. G., Perrett, D. I., Pentonvoak, I. S. et al. (2006): Correlated preferences for facial masculinity and ideal or actual partner's masculinity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 273(1592), 1355-1360. (Pubitemid 47308755)
20. Dickey, R. P., Olar, T. T., Taylor, S. N., Curole, D. N. & Matulich, E. M. (1993): Relationship of endometrial thickness and pattern to fecundity in ovulation induction cycles: Effect of clomiphene citrate alone and with human menopausal gonadotrophin. Fertility and Sterility, 59, 756-60. (Pubitemid 23104174)
21. Dion K. K. (1972): Physical attractiveness and evaluation of children's transgressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(2), 207-213.
22. Eissa M., Obhrai, M., Docker, M., Lynch, S., Sawers, R. & Newton, R. (1986): Follicular growth and endocrine profiles in spontaneous and induced conception cycles. Fertility and Sterility, 45, 191-95. (Pubitemid 16127132)
23. Ewing, L., Rhodes, G. & Pellicano, E. (2010): Have you got the look? Gaze direction affects judgements of facial attractiveness. Visual Cognition, 18(3), 321-330.
24. Feingold A (1988): Matching for attractiveness in romantic partners and same-sex friends: A meta-analysis and theoretical critique. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 226-235.
25. Feingold, A. (1992): Good-looking people are not what we think. Psychological Bulletin, 111(2), 304-341.
26. Fink, B. & Penton-Voak, I. S. (2002): Evolutionary psychology of facial attractiveness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 154-158.
27. Folstad, I. & Karter, A. J. (1992): Parasites, bright males and the immunocompetence handicap. American Naturalist, 139, 603-622.
28. Gangestad, S. W. & Thornhill, R. (1997): The evolutionary psychology of extrapair sex: The role of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution and Human Behaviour, 18(2), 69-88. (Pubitemid 127165576)
29. Gangestad S. W. & Scheyd, G. J. (2005): The evolution of human physical attractiveness. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 523-548. (Pubitemid 41638319)
30. Getty T. (2002): Signaling health versus pararsites. The American Naturalist, 159, 363-371.
31. Hancock, P. J. B., Bruce, V. & Burton, A. M. (2000): Recognition of unfamiliar faces. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 330-337.
32. Honekopp, J. (2006): Once more: Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Relative contributions of private and shared taste to judgments of facial attractiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception And Performance, 32(2) 199-209. (Pubitemid 44228473)
33. Hosoda M., Stone-Romero, E. F. and Coats, G. (2003): The effects of physical attractiveness on job-related outcomes: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Personnel Psychology, 56, 431-62. (Pubitemid 36803054)
34. James, W. (1890): The Principles of Psychology. New York: Holt.
35. Jennions, M. D. & Petrie, M. (2000): Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biological Reviews, 75, 21-64. (Pubitemid 30135849)
36. Johannson, P., Hall, L., Sikstrüm, S. & Olsson, A. (2005): Failure to detect mismatches between intention and outcome in a simple decision task. Science, 310, 116-119. (Pubitemid 41434549)
37. Johnston, V. S., Hagel, R., Franklin, M., Fink, B. & Grammer, K. (2001): Male facial attractiveness: Evidence for hormone mediated adaptive design. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(4), 251-267. (Pubitemid 33626501)
38. Jokela, M. (2009): Physical attractiveness and reproductive success in humans: Evidence from the late 20th century United States. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30(5), 342-350.
39. Jones B. C., Debruine, L. M., Little, A. C., Conway, C. A. & Feinberg, D. R. (2006): Integrating gaze direction and expression in preferences for attractive faces. Psychological Science, 17(7), 588-591. (Pubitemid 43992622)
40. Jones, B. C., Debruine, L. M., Little, A. C., Burriss, R. P. & Feinberg, D. R. (2007): Social transmission of face preferences among humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 274(1611), 899-903. (Pubitemid 47056773)
41. Kampe, K. K. W., Frith, C. D., Dolan, R. J. & Frith, U. (2001): Reward value of attractiveness and gaze. Nature, 413, 589.
42. Kingstone, A., Smilek, D. & Eastwood, J. D. (2008): Cognitive Ethology: A new approach for studying human cognition. British Journal of Psychology, 99, 317-340.
43. Komori, M., Kawamura, S. & Ishihara S. (2009): Averageness or symmetry: Which is more important for facial attractiveness? Acta Psychologica, 131(2), 136-142.
44. Kurzban R. & Weeden, J. (2005): HurryDate: Mate preferences in action. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(3), 227-244. (Pubitemid 40587390)
45. Lander K. (2008): Relating visual and vocal attractiveness for moving and static faces. Animal Behaviour, 75, 817-822. (Pubitemid 351273136)
46. Law-Smith M. J., Perrett, D. I., Jones, B. C., Cornwell, R. E., Moore, F. R., Feinberg, D. R. et al. (2006): Facial appearance is a cue to oestrogen levels in women. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 273(1583), 135-140. (Pubitemid 46768085)
47. Lavater, J. C. (1772/1880): Essays on physiognomy; for the promotion of the knowledge and the love of mankind. Abridged from Mr. Holcrofts translation. London. Eighteenth Century Collections Online. Gale Group.
48. Lie, H. C., Rhodes, G. & Simmons, L. W. (2008): Genetic diversity revealed in human faces. Evolution, 62(10), 2473-2486.
49. Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Penton-Voak, I. S., Burt, D. M. & Perrett D. I. (2002): Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 269(1496), 1095-1100. (Pubitemid 34628251)
50. Little, A. C., Jonesc, B. C., Burt, D. M. & Perrett, D. I. (2007): Preferences for symmetry in faces change across the menstrual cycle. Biological Psychology, 76(3), 209-216. (Pubitemid 47575795)
51. Little, A. C., Jones, B. C. & Debruine, L. M. (2008): Preferences for variation in masculinity in real male faces change across the menstrual cycle: Women prefer more masculine faces when they are more fertile. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(6), 478-482.
52. Little, A. C. Debruine, L. M. & Jones, B. C. (epub ahead of print): Exposure to visual cues of pathogen contagion changes preferences for masculinity and symmetry in opposite-sex faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.1925
53. Mason M. F., Tatkow, E. P. & Macrae, C. N. (2005): The look of love, Gaze shifts and person perception. Psychological Science, 16(3), 236-239. (Pubitemid 40447726)
54. Mazur A. & Booth, A. (1998): Testosterone & dominance in men. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 353-371.
55. Mccoun R.J. (1990): The emergence of extralegal bias during jury deliberation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 303-314.
56. Megreya A. M. & Burton, A. M. (2006): Unfamiliar faces are not faces: Evidence from a matching task. Memory & Cognition, 34(4), 865-876. (Pubitemid 44543078)
57. Moore F. R., Cornwell, R. E., Law Smith, M. J., Al Dujaili, E. A., Sharp, M., Perrett, D. I. (epub ahead of print): Evidence for the stress-linked immunocompetence handicap hypothesis in human male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series BBiological Sciences, doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1678
58. Morrison, E. R., Clark, A. P., Tiddeman, B. P. & Penton-Voak I. S. (2010). Manipulating sexually dimorphic cues in dynamic human faces. Ethology, 116, 1234-1243.
59. Morrison, E., Clark A. P., Gralewski, L., Campbell, N. & Penton-Voak, I. S. (2010): Women's probability of conception is associated with their preference for flirtatious but not masculine facial movement. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1297-1304.
60. Morrison, E., Gralewski, L., Campbell, N. & Penton-Voak, I. S. (2007): Facial movement varies by sex and is related to attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 186-192. (Pubitemid 46593899)
61. Muehlenbein, M. P., Bribiescas, R. G. (2005): Testosterone-mediated immune functions and male life histories. American Journal of Human Biology, 17, 527-558. (Pubitemid 41684269)
62. Mueller, U. & Mazur A. (1997): Facial dominance in Homo sapiens as honest signaling of male quality. Behavioral Ecology, 8(5), 569-579. (Pubitemid 28060775)
63. Nunn C., Lindenfors, P., Pursall, E. & Rolff, J. (2009): On sexual dimorphism in immune function Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, Biological Sciences, 364(1513), 61-69.
64. Penton-Voak, I. S. & Chang, H. Y. (2008): Attractiveness judgements of individuals vary across emotional expression and movement conditions. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 89-100.
65. Penton-Voak, I. S., Perrett, D., Castles, D., Burt, M., Koyabashi, T. & Murray, L. K. (1999): Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature, 399, 741-742. (Pubitemid 29293161)
66. Penton-Voak, I. S. & Perrett, D. I. (2000): Female preference for male faces changes cyclically, further evidence. Evolution and Human Behaviour, 21, 39-48.
67. Penton-Voak, I. S., Pound N., Little, A. C. & Perrett, D. I. (2006): Personality judgments from natural and composite facial images: More evidence for a "kernel of truth" in social perception. Social Cognition, 24(5) 490-524.
68. Penton-Voak, I. S. & Chen, J. Y. (2004): High salivary testosterone is linked to masculine male facial appearance in humans. Evolution And Human Behavior, 25(4), 229-241. (Pubitemid 38982401)
69. Pound, N., Penton-Voak, I. S. & Surridge, A. K. (2009): Testosterone responses to competition in men are related to facial masculinity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, Biological Sciences, 276(1654), 153-159.
70. Rennels J. L., Bronstad P. M. & Langlois J. H. (2008): Are attractive men's faces masculine or feminine? The importance of type of facial stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance 34, 884-893.
71. Rhodes, G., Chan, J., Zebrowitz, L. A. & Simmons, L. W. (2003): Does sexual dimorphism in human faces signal health? Proceedings of The Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences, 270, S93-S95. (Pubitemid 36960324)
72. Rhodes, G. (2006): The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 199-226. (Pubitemid 43237232)
73. Roberts, S. C., Little, A. C., Gosling, L. M., Perrett, D. I., Carter, V., Jones, B. C. et al. (2005): MHC-heterozygosity and human facial attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(3), 213-226. (Pubitemid 40587389)
74. Roberts S. C., Saxton, T. K., Murray, A. K., Burriss, R. P., Rowland, H. M. & Little, A. C. (2009): Static and dynamic facial images cue similar attractiveness judgements. Ethology, 115(6), 588-595.
75. Roumen, F. J. M. E., Doesburg, W. H. & Rolland, R. (1982) Hormonal patterns in infertile women with a deficient postcoital test. Fertility and Sterility, 38, 24-47.
76. Rubenstein, A. J. (2005): Variation in perceived attractiveness, Differences between dynamic and static faces. Psychological Science, 16(10), 759-762. (Pubitemid 41597885)
77. Saxton, T. K., Lyndon, A., Little, A. C. & Roberts, S. C. (2008): Evidence that androstadienone, a putative human chemosignal, modulates women's attributions of men's attractiveness. Hormones and Behavior, 54, 597-601.
78. Scott I. M. L. & Penton-Voak, I. S. (in press): The validity of composite photographs for assessing masculinity preferences. Perception.
79. Scott I. M. L., Pound, N., Stephen, I. D., Clark, A. P. & Penton-Voak, I. S. (2010): Does masculinity matter? The contribution of masculine face shape to male attractiveness in humans. PLoS ONE, 5(10).
80. Scott, I., Swami, V., Josephson, S. C. & Penton-Voak, I. S. (2008): Context-dependent preferences for facial dimorphism in a rural Malaysian population. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(4), 289-296.
81. Stephen, I. D., Smith, M. J. L., Stirrat, M. R. & Perrett, D. I. (2009a): Facial skin coloration affects perceived health of human faces. International Journal of Primatology, 30(6), 845-857.
82. Stephen, I. D. Coetzee, V., Smith, M. L. & Perrett, D. I. (2009b): Skin blood perfusion and oxygenation colour affect perceived human health. PLoS ONE, 4(4).
83. Symons D. (1979): The Evolution of Human Sexuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
84. Thornhill, R. & Gangestad, S. W. (1999): Facial attractiveness. Trends in Cognitive Science, 3, 452-460.
85. Todd, P. M., Penke, L., Fasolo, B. & Lenton, A. P. (2007): Different cognitive processes underlie human mate choices and mate preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(38), 15011-15016. (Pubitemid 47619584)
86. Walster E., Aronson, V., Abrahams, D & Rottmann, L. (1966): Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 508-516.
87. Williams G. C. (1966): Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton University Press.
88. Zebrowitz, L. A. & Rhodes, G. (2004): Sensitivity to "bad genes" and the anomalous face overgeneralization effect: Cue validity, cue utilization, and accuracy in judging intelligence and health. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 28(3), 167-185. (Pubitemid 39187417)