Are attractive men's faces masculine or feminine? The importance of type of facial stimuli

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 884-893

  Rennels, Jennifer L ^a   Bronstad, P Matthew ^b   Langlois, Judith H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Averaged faces; Face perception; Facial attractiveness; Femininity; Masculinity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONDITIONED REFLEX; DECISION MAKING; ESTHETICS; FACE; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; SEX DIFFERENCE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; SEXUALITY;

ADULT; BEAUTY; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; CUES; FACE; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SEX FACTORS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUALITY; SOCIAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 58149129205     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.4.884     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Alley T.R., Cunningham M.R. Averaged faces are attractive, but very attractive faces are not average. Psychological Science 1991, 2:123-125.
2. Baudouin J., Tiberghien G. Symmetry, averageness, and feature size in the facial attractiveness of women. Acta Psychologica 2004, 117:313-332.
3. Beale J.M., Keil F.C. Categorical effects in the perception of faces. Cognition 1995, 57:217-239.
4. Brown T.A., Cash T.F., Noles S.W. Perceptions of physical attractiveness among college students: Selected determinants and methodological matters. Journal of Social Psychology 1986, 126:305-316.
5. Buss D.M., Barnes M. Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986, 50:559-570.
6. Buss D.M., Schmitt D.P. Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review 1993, 100:204-232.
7. Cunningham M.R., Barbee A.P., Pike C.L. What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1990, 59:61-72.
8. Dion K.K., Berscheid E., Walster E. What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1972, 24:285-290.
9. Dunkle J.H., Francis P.L. The role of facial masculinity/femininity in the attribution of homosexuality. Sex Roles 1990, 23:157-167.
10. Dunkle J.H., Francis P.L. "Physical attractiveness stereotype" and the attribution of homosexuality revisited. Journal of Homosexuality 1996, 30:13-29.
11. Enquist M., Ghirlanda S., Lundqvist D., Wachtmeister C. An ethological theory of attractiveness. Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary, cognitive, and social perspectives 2002, 127-151. Ablex, Westport, CN. G. Rhodes, L.A. Zebrowitz (Eds.).
12. Fink B., Penton-Voak I. Evolutionary psychology of facial attractiveness. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2002, 11:154-158.
13. Grammer K., Thornhill R. Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: The role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology 1994, 108:233-242.
14. Grosse M.E., Wright B.D. Validity and reliability of true-false tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1985, 45:1-13.
15. Hanae I., Gyoba J., Kamachi M., Mukaida S., Akamatsu S. Analyses of facial attractiveness on feminised and juvenilised faces. Perception 2004, 33:135-145.
16. Ishi H., Gyoba J. Analyses of psychological aspects of attractiveness in feminized and juvenilized Japanese faces. Tohoku Psychologica Folia 2001, 60:29-34.
17. Jackson D.N., Neill J.A., Bevan A.R. An evaluation of forced-choice and true-false item formats in personality assessment. Journal of Research in Personality 1973, 7:21-30.
18. Johnston V.S., Hagel R., Franklin M., Fink B., Grammer K. Male facial attractiveness: Evidence for hormone-mediated adaptive design. Evolution & Human Behavior 2001, 22:251-267.
19. Jones B.C., Little A.C., Feinberg D.R., Penton-Voak I.S., Tiddeman B.P., Perrett D.I. The relationship between shape symmetry and perceived skin condition in male facial attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior 2004, 25:24-30.
20. Jones D., Hill K. Criteria of facial attractiveness in five populations. Human Nature 1993, 4:271-296.
21. Langlois J.H., Kalakanis L., Rubenstein A.J., Larson A., Hallam M., Smoot M. Maxims or myths of beauty?: A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin 2000, 126:390-423.
22. Langlois J.H., Roggman L.A. Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science 1990, 1:115-121.
23. Langlois J.H., Roggman L.A., Musselman L. What is average and what is not average about attractive faces?. Psychological Science 1994, 5:214-220.
24. Little A.C., Burt D.M., Penton-Voak I.S., Perrett D.I. Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 2001, 268:39-44.
25. Little A.C., DeBruine L.M., Jones B.C. Sex-contingent face aftereffects suggest distinct neural populations code male and female faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 2005, 272:2283-2287.
26. Little A.C., Hancock P.J.B. The role of masculinity and distinctiveness in judgments of human male facial attractiveness. British Journal of Psychology 2002, 93:451-464.
27. Little A.C., Penton-Voak I.S., Burt D.M., Perrett D.I. Evolution and individual differences in the perception of attractiveness: How cyclic hormonal changes and self-perceived attractiveness influence female preferences for male faces. Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary, cognitive, and social perspectives 2002, 59-90. Ablex Publishing, Westport, CT. G. Rhodes, L.A. Zebrowitz (Eds.).
28. Morph (Version 2.5) [Computer software] 1992-1994, Gryphon, San Diego, CA.
29. Nederhof A.J. Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. European Journal of Social Psychology 1985, 15:263-280.
30. O'Toole A.J., Deffenbacher K.A., Valentin D., McKee K., Huff D., Abdi H. The perception of face gender: The role of stimulus structure in recognition and classification. Memory & Cognition 1998, 26:146-160.
31. Penton-Voak I.S., Jacobson A., Trivers R. Populational differences in attractiveness judgements of male and female faces: Comparing British and Jamaican samples. Evolution and Human Behavior 2004, 25:355-370.
32. Penton-Voak I.S., Jones B.C., Little A.C., Baker S., Tiddeman B., Burt D.M., Perrett D.I. Symmetry, sexual dimorphism in facial proportions and male facial attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 2001, 1617-1623.
33. Penton-Voak I.S., Little A.C., Jones B.C., Burt D.M., Tiddeman B.P., Perrett D.I. Female condition influences preferences for sexual dimorphism in faces of male humans (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology 2003, 117(268):264-271.
34. Penton-Voak I.S., Perrett D.I. Female preference for male faces changes cyclically: Further evidence. Evolution & Human Behavior 2000, 21:39-48.
35. Penton-Voak I.S., Perrett D.I., Castles D.L., Kobayashi T., Burt D.M., Murray L.K., Minamisawa R. Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature 1999, June 24, 399:741-742.
36. Perrett D.I., Burt D.M., Penton-Voak I.S., Lee K.J., Rowland D.A., Edwards R. Symmetry and human facial attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior 1999, 20:295-307.
37. Perrett D.I., Lee K.J., Penton-Voak I., Rowland D., Yoshikawa S., Burt D.M., et al. Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature 1998, August 27, 394:884-887.
38. Ray J.J. The comparative validity of Likert, projective, and forced-choice indices of achievement motivation. Journal of Social Psychology 1980, 111:63-72.
39. Ray J.J. Machiavellianism, forced-choice formats and the validity of the F scale: A rejoinder to Bloom. Journal of Clinical Psychology 1982, 38:779-782.
40. Rhodes G. Evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology 2006, 57:199-226.
41. Rhodes G., Hickford C., Jeffery L. Sex-typicality and attractiveness: Are supermale and superfemale faces super-attractive. British Journal of Psychology 2000, 91:125-140.
42. Rhodes G., Sumich A., Byatt G. Are average facial configurations attractive only because of their symmetry?. Psychological Science 1999, 10:52-58.
43. Rhodes G., Tremewan T. Averageness, exaggeration, and facial attractiveness. Psychological Science 1996, 7:105-110.
44. Rubenstein A.J., Kalakanis L., Langlois J.H. Infant preferences for attractive faces: A cognitive explanation. Developmental Psychology 1999, 35:848-855.
45. Scarr S., McCartney K. How people make their own environments: A theory of genotype→environment effects. Child Development 1983, 54:424-435.
46. Scheib J.E., Gangestad S.W., Thornhill R. Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 1999, 266:1913-1917.
47. Snyder M., Tanke E.D., Berscheid E. Social perception and interpersonal behavior: On the self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1977, 35:656-666.
48. Thornhill R., Gangestad S.W. Human facial beauty: Averageness, symmetry, and parasite resistance. Human Nature 1993, 4:237-269.
49. Thornhill R., Gangestad S.W. Facial attractiveness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1999, 3:452-460.
50. Townsend J., Wasserman T. The perception of sexual attractiveness: Sex differences in variability. Archives of Sexual Behavior 1997, 26:243-268.
51. Travers R.M.W. A critical review of the validity and rationale of the forced-choice technique. Psychological Bulletin 1951, 48:62-70.
52. Wiederman M.W., Dubois S.L. Evolution and sex differences in preferences for short-term mates: Results from a policy capturing study. Evolution and Human Behavior 1998, 19:153-170.