Canopy-cover thematic-map generation for Military Map products using remote sensing data in inaccessible areas

Landscape and Ecological Engineering

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 263-274

  Chang, Anjin ^a   Eo, Yangdam ^b   Kim, Sunwoong ^b   Kim, Yongmin ^a   Kim, Yongil ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b Konkuk University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Canopy cover; Classification; Satellite image; Segmentation; Thematic map

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959681866     PISSN: 18601871     EISSN: 1860188X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11355-010-0132-1     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Bharati MH, Liu JJ, MacGregor JF (2004) Image texture analysis: methods and comparisons. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 72: 57-71.
2. Butusov OB (2003) Textural classification of forest types from Landsat 7 imagery. GISci Remote Sens 40: 91-104.
3. Castillo C, Chollett I, Klein E (2008) Enhanced duckweed detection using bootstrapped SVM classification on medium resolution RGB MODIS imagery. Int J Remote Sens 29: 5595-5604.
4. Chen DM, Stow D (2003) Strategies for integrating Information from multiple spatial resolutions into land-use/land-cover classification routines. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 69: 1279-1287.
5. Clause DA, Zhao Y (2003) Grey level co-occurrence integrated algorithm (GLCIA): a superior computational method to rapidly determine co-occurrence probability texture features. Comput Geosci 29(7): 837-850.
6. Cleve C, Kelly M, Kearns FR, Moritz M (2008) Classification of the wildland-urban interface: a comparison of pixel- and object-based classifications using high-resolution aerial photography. Comput Environ Urban 32: 317-326.
7. Davis CH, Wang X (2002) Urban land cover classification from high resolution multi-spectral IKONOS imagery. In: Geoscience and remote sensing symposium, 2002. IGARSS '02 IEEE International, pp 1204-1206.
8. Defense Mapping Agency (1989) Performance specification Vector Product Interim Terrain Data (VITD). MIL-PRF-89040A.
9. Elmqvist B, Ardo J, Olsson L (2008) Land use studies in drylands: an evaluation of object-oriented classification of very high resolution panchromatic imagery. Int J Remote Sens 29: 7129-7140.
10. Franklin SE, Peddle DR (1990) Classification of SPOT HRV imagery and texture features. Int J Remote Sens 11: 551-556.
11. Franklin SE, Hall RJ, Smith L, Gerylo GR (2003) Discrimination of conifer height, age, and crown closure classes using Landsat-5 TM imagery in the Canadian Northwest Territories. Int J Remote Sens 24: 1823-1834.
12. Friedl MA, McIve DK, Hodges JCF, Zhang XY, Muchoney D, Strahler AH, Woodcock CE, Gopal S, Schneider A, Cooper A, Baccini A, Gao F, Schaaf C (2002) Global land cover mapping from MODIS: algorithms and early results. Remote Sens Environ 83: 287-302.
13. Gerylo GR, Hall RJ, Franklin SE, Smith L (2002) Empirical relations between Landsat TM spectral response and forest stands near Fort Simpson, Northwest Territories, Canada. Can J Remote Sens 28: 68-79.
14. Gong P, Marceau DJ, Howarth PJ (1992) A comparison of spatial feature extraction algorithms for land-use classification with SPOT HRV data. Remote Sens Environ 40: 137-151.
15. Gonzalez RC, Woods RE (2002) Digital image processing, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
16. Gonzalez RC, Woods RE, Eddins SL (2003) Digital image processing using MATLAB. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
17. Guyot G (1990) Optical properties of vegetation canopies. In: Steven MD, Clark JA (eds) Applications of remote sensing in agriculture. Butterworth, London, pp 19-43.
18. Han KS, Champeaux JL, Roujean JL (2004) A land cover classification product over France at 1 km resolution using SPOT4/VEGETATION data. Remote Sens Environ 92: 52-66.
19. Hansen MC, Defries RS, Townshend JRG, Sohlberg R (2000) Global land cover classification at 1 km spatial resolution using a classification tree approach. Int J Remote Sens 21: 1331-1364.
20. Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I (1973) Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 3: 610-621.
21. Jennings SB, Brown ND, Sheil D (1999) Assessing forest canopies and understory illumination: canopy closure, canopy cover and other measures. Forestry 72: 59-74.
22. Johnson RA, Wichern DW (2002) Applied multivariate statistical analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
23. Kaichang D, Deren L, Deyi L (2000) Remote sensing image classification with GIS data based on spatial data mining techniques. Geo-Spatial Inf Sci 3(4): 30-35.
24. Keuchel J, Naumann S, Heiler M, Siegmund A (2003) Automatic land cover analysis for Tenerife by supervised classification using remotely sensed data. Remote Sens Environ 86: 530-541.
25. Kim K, Cho D (2005) Status and ecological resource value of the Republic of Korea's De-militarized Zone. Landsc Ecol Eng 1: 3-15.
26. Korhonen L, Korhonen KT, Rautiainen M, Stenberg P (2006) Estimation of forest canopy cover: a comparison of field measurement techniques. Silva Fenn 40: 577-588.
27. Lu D, Weng Q (2005) Urban classification using full spectral information of Landsat ETM+ imagery in Marion County, Indiana. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 71: 275-1284.
28. Ma Z, Hart MM, Redmond RL (2001) Mapping vegetation across large geographic areas: integration of remote sensing and GIS to classify multisource data. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 67: 295-307.
29. Maillard P (2003) Comparing texture analysis methods through classification. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 69: 357-367.
30. Marceau DJ, Howarth PJ, Dubois JM, Gratton DJ (1990) Evaluation of the grey-level co-occurrence matrix method for land-cover classification using SPOT imagery. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 28: 513-519.
31. Maselli F, Conese C, Petkov L, Resti R (1992) Inclusion of prior probabilities derived from a nonparametric process into the maximum likelihood classifier. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 58: 201-207.
32. Mathieu R, Freeman C, Aryal J (2007) Mapping private gardens in urban areas using object-oriented techniques and very high-resolution satellite imagery. Landsc Urban Plan 81: 179-192.
33. Munroe DK, Nagendra H, Southworth J (2007) Monitoring landscape fragmentation in an inaccessible mountain area: Celaque National Park, Western Honduras. Landsc Urban Plan 83: 154-167.
34. Na X, Zhang S, Li X, Yu H, Liu C (2010) Improved land cover mapping using random forests combined with landsat thematic mapper imagery and ancillary geographic data. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 76: 833-840.
35. Niemann O (1993) Automated forest cover mapping using thematic mapper images and ancillary data. Appl Geogr 13: 86-95.
36. Nowak DJ, Rowntree RA, Mepherson EG, Sisnni SM, Kerkmann P, Stevens CJ (1996) Measuring and analyzing urban tree cover. Landsc Urban Plan 36: 49-57.
37. Okamoto K, Yamakawa S, Kawashima H (1998) Estimation of flood damage to rice production in North Korea in 1995. Int J Remote Sens 19: 365-371.
38. Ozdemir I, Norton DA, Ozkan UY, Mert A, Senturk O (2008) Estimation of tree size diversity using object oriented texture analysis and aster imagery. Sensors 8: 4709-4724.
39. Podest E, Saatchi S (2002) Application of multiscale texture in classifying JERS-1 radar data over tropical vegetation. Int J Remote Sens 23: 1487-1506.
40. Ricchetti E (2000) Multispectral satellite image and ancillary data integration for geological classification. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 66: 429-435.
41. Salvador R, Pons X (1998) On reliability of Landsat TM for estimating forest variables by regression techniques: a methodological analysis. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 36: 1888-1897.
42. Sasaki T, Imanishi J, Ioki K, Morimoto Y, Kitada K (2008) Estimation of leaf area index and canopy openness in broad-leaved forest using an airborne laser scanner in comparison with high-resolution near-infrared digital photography. Landsc Ecol Eng 4: 47-55.
43. Shaban MA, Dikshit O (2001) Evaluation of the merging of SPOT multispectral and panchromatic data for classification of an urban environment. Int J Remote Sens 23: 565-593.
44. Stewart AM, Edmisten KL, Wells R, Collins GD (2007) Measuring canopy coverage with digital imaging. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 38: 895-902.
45. Su W, Li J, Chen Y, Liu Z, Zhang J, Low TM, Suppiah I, Hashim SAM (2008) Textural and local spatial statistics for the object-oriented classification of urban areas using high resolution imagery. Int J Remote Sens 29: 3105-3117.
46. Thomas N, Hendrix C, Congalton RG (2003) A comparison of urban mapping methods using high-resolution digital imagery. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 69: 963-972.
47. Walter V (1998) Automatic classification of remote sensing data for GIS database revision. In: ISPRS commission IV symposium on GIS-between visions and applications, 1998. IAPRS, pp 641-648.
48. Xu Y, Prather JW, Hampton HM, Aumack EN, Dickson BG, Sisk TD (2006) Advanced exploratory data analysis for mapping regional canopy cover. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 72: 31-38.
49. Yan G, Mas JF, Maathuis BHP, Xiangmin Z, Dijk PMV (2006) Comparison of pixel-based and object-oriented image classification approaches-a case study in a coal fire area, Wuda, Inner Mongolia, China. Int J Remote Sens 27: 4039-4055.
50. Zhang Y (2001) Texture-integrated classification of urban treed areas in high-resolution color-infrared imagery. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 67: 1359-1365.
51. Zhou W, Huang G, Troy A, Cadenasso ML (2009) Object-based land cover classification of shaded areas in high spatial resolution imagery of urban areas: a comparison study. Remote Sens Environ 113: 1769-1777.