Exposure to television, online and offline network capital and loneliness;Televisiekijken, online en offline netwerkkapitaal en eenzaamheid

Tijdschrift voor Communicatiewetenschap

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 179-196

  Vergeer, Maurice ^a   Pelzer, Ben ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Internet; Loneliness; Social capital; Social support; Television

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959625886     PISSN: 13846930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1347/tijd.37.3.179     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Beaudoin, C.E. (2007). Mass media use, neighborliness, and social support. Assessing causal links with panel data. Communication Research, 34(6), 637-664.
2. Bollen, K.A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
3. Boneva, B., R. Kraut & D. Frohlich (2001). Using e-mail for personal relationships the difference gender makes. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 530-549.
4. Boyd, D.M. & N.B. Ellison (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1). Opgehaald 18 januari 2008: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html
5. Caplan, S.E. (2007). Relations among loneliness, social anxiety, and problematic Internet use. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10(2), 234-242.
6. Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human-Capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
7. Draak, M. den (2006). Gezondheid. In A.H. de Boer (red.), Rapportage ouderen 2006. Veranderingen in de leefsituatie en levensloop (pp. 109-139). Den Haag: SCP.
8. Dykstra, P.A., T.G. van Tilburg & J.D. Gierveld (2005). Changes in older adult loneliness. Results from a seven-year longitudinal study. Research on Aging, 27(6), 725-747.
9. Haan, J. de & F. Huysmans (2006). Informatievaardigheden in een Kennis samenleving. In SCP (red.), Sociaal en cultureel rapport 2006. Investeren in vermogen (pp. 91-116). Den Haag: SCP.
10. Eastin, M.S. & R. LaRose (2005). Alt.support: modeling social support online. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(6), 977-992.
11. Eijnden, R. van den & A. Vermulst (2006). Online communicatie, compulsief internetgebruik en het psychosociale welbevinden van jongeren. In J. de Haan & C. van 't Hof (red.), Jaarboek ICT en samenleving 2006. De digitale generatie (pp. 25-46). Amsterdam: Boom.
12. Ellison, N.B., C. Steinfield & C. Lampe (2007). The benefits of Facebook 'friends': Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4). Opgehaald 23 april, 2008: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue4/ellison.html
13. Finn, S. & M.B. Gorr (1988). Social Isolation and Social Support as Correlates of Television Viewing Motivations. Communication Research, 15(2), 135-158.
14. Franzen, A. (2000). Does the Internet make us lonely? European Sociological Review, 16(4), 427-438.
15. Gerbner, G., L. Gross, M. Morgan & N. Signorielli (1980). The Mainstreaming of America. Violence Profile No 11. Journal of Communication, 30(3), 10-29.
16. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
17. Granovetter, M.S. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
18. Haythornthwaite, C. (2002). Strong, weak, and latent ties and the impact of new media. Information Society, 18(5), 385-401.
19. Huysmans, F., J. de Haan, A. van den Broek & E. van Ingen (2006). Wat we doen in de vrije tijd. In B.K.A. van den Broek, J. de Haan, L. Harms, F. Huysmans & E. van Ingen (red.), De tijd als spiegel. Hoe Nederlanders hun tijd besteden (pp. 42-55). Den Haag: SCP.
20. Jöreskog, K.G. & D. Sörbom (1999). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
21. Katz, J.E., R.E. Rice & P. Aspden (2001). The Internet, 1995-2000. Access, civic involvement, and social interaction. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 405-419.
22. Kavanaugh, A., J.M. Carroll, M.B. Rosson, T.T. Zin & D.D. Reese (2005). Community networks: Where offline communities meet online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(4). Opgehaald 22 april 2008: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue4/kavanaugh.html
23. Kavanaugh, A.L., D.D. Reese, J.M. Carroll & M.B. Rosson (2005). Weak ties in networked communities. Information Society, 21(2), 119-131.
24. Knulst, W. (1999). Media en Tijdsbesteding 1955-1995. In J. van Cuilenburg, P. Neijens & O. Scholten (red.), Media in overvloed (pp. 101-117). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
25. Kraut, R., S. Kiesler, B. Boneva, J. Cummings, V. Helgeson & A. Crawford (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 49-74.
26. Kraut, R., M. Patterson, V. Lundmark, S. Kiesler, T. Mukopadhyay & W. Scherlis (1998). Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017-1031.
27. LaRose, S., F. Guay & M. Boivin (2002). Attachment, social support, and loneliness in young adulthood: A test of two models. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(5), 684-693.
28. Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and social action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Moody, E.J. (2001). Internet use and its relationship to loneliness. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 4(3), 393-401.
30. Neustadl, A. & J.P. Robinson (2002). Social Contact Differences Among Internet Users and Nonusers in the General Social Survey. IT & Society, 1(1), 73-102.
31. Nie, N.H. & D.S. Hillygus (2002). The Impact of Internet Use on Sociability: Time-Diary Findings. IT & Society, 1(1), 1-20.
32. Nie, N.H., D.S. Hillygus & L. Erbring (2002). Internet Use, Interpersonal Relations, and Socialbility. A Time Diary Study. In B. Wellman & C. Haythorntwaite (red.), The Internet in everyday life (pp. 215-262). Malden: Blackwell.
33. Norris, P. (1996). Does television erode social capital? A reply to Putnam. Ps-Political Science & Politics, 29(3), 474-480.
34. Ofcom (2008). Social Networking. A quantitative and qualitative research report into attitudes, behaviours and use. Londen: Ofcom. Office of Communications. Opgehaald juni 2008: www.ofcom.org.uk/advice/media_literacy/medlitpub/medlitpubrss/socialnetworking/report.pdf
35. Papacharissi, Z. & A.M. Rubin (2000). Predictors of Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(2), 175-196.
36. Perse, E.M. & A.M. Rubin (1990). Chronic loneliness and television use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 34(1), 37-53.
37. Potter, W.J. (1993). Cultivation theory and research. A conceptual critique. Human Communication Research, 19(4), 564-601.
38. Putnam, R.D. (1995). Tuning In, Tuning Out. The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America. Ps-Political Science & Politics, 28(4), 664-683.
39. Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
40. Quan-Haase, A., B. Wellman, J.C. Witte & K.N. Hampton (2002). Capitalizing on the Net. Social Contact, Civic Engagement, and Sense of Community. In B. Welman & C. Haythornthwaite (red.), The Internet in everyday life (pp. 291-324). Londen: Blackwell.
41. Rice, R.E. (2002). Primary issues in Internet use: Access, civic and community involvement, and social interaction and expression. In L. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (red.), Handbook of new media. Social shapings and consequences of ICTs (pp. 105-135). Londen: SAGE.
42. Rubin, A.M. (1984). Ritualized and instrumental television viewing. Journal of Communication, 34(3), 67-77.
43. Shah, D.V., J.M. McLeod & S.H. Yoon (2001). Communication, context, and community. An exploration of print, broadcast, and Internet influences. Communication Research, 28(4), 464-506.
44. Song, I., R. LaRose, M.S. Eastin & C.A. Lin (2004). Internet gratifications and Internet addiction: On the uses and abuses of new media. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7(4), 384-394.
45. Valkenburg, P.M. & J. Peter (2007a). Internet communication and its relation to wellbeing: Identifying some underlying mechanisms. Media Psychology, 9(1), 43-58.
46. Valkenburg, P.M. & J. Peter (2007b). Online communication and adolescent well-being: Testing the stimulation versus the displacement hypothesis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4). Opgehaald 23 januari 2008: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue4/valkenburg.html
47. Weaver, J.B. (2003). Individual differences in television viewing motives. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(6), 1427-1437.
48. Weiser, E.B. (2001). The functions of Internet use and their social and psychological consequences. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 4(6), 723-743.
49. Wellman, B. & M. Gulia (1999). Virtual communities as communities: Net surfers don't ride alone. In M. Smith & K. Peter (red.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 167-194). New York: Routledge.
50. Wellman, B., A.Q. Haase, J. Witte & K. Hampton (2001). Does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation, and community commitment. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 436-455.
51. Williams, D. (2006). On and off the 'net: Scales for Social Capital in an online era. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2). Opgehaald 17 januari 2007: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue2/williams.html.
52. Williams, D. (2007). The impact of time online: Social capital and cyberbalkanization. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10(3), 398-406.
53. Wright, K. (2000). Computer-mediated social support, older adults, and coping. Journal of Communication, 50(3), 100-118.
54. Zhao, S.Y. (2006). Do Internet users have more social ties? A call for differentiated analyses of Internet use. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(3), 20. Opgehaald 20 augustus 2007: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue3/zhao.html