The impact of time online: Social capital and cyberbalkanization

Cyberpsychology and Behavior

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 398-406

  Williams, Dmitri ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; LONELINESS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; ONLINE SYSTEM; SOCIAL ASPECT; SOCIAL CAPITAL;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; LONELINESS; MALE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 34347266207     PISSN: 10949313     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2006.9939     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Amiel, T., & Sargent, S.L. (2004). Individual differences in Internet usage motives. Computers in Human Behavior 20:711-726.
2. Ankney, R.N. (2002). The effects of internet usage on social capital. Presented at the AEJMC Annual Conference, New Orleans.
3. Bargh, J.A., McKenna, K.Y.A., & Fitzsimmons, G.M. (2002). Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the "true self" on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues 58:33-48.
4. Bendig, A.W. (1962). The Pittsburgh scales of social extraversion- introversion and emotionality. Journal of Psychology 53:199-209.
5. Beniger, J. (1987). Personalization of mass media and the growth of pseudo-community. Communication Research 14:352-371.
6. Bimber, B. (2001). Information and political engagement in America: the search for effects of information technology at the individual level. Political Research Quarterly 54:53-68.
7. Caplan, S. (2004). Relations among loneliness, social anxiety, and problematic Internet use. Presented at the National Communication Association Conference, Chicago.
8. Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94:S95-S121.
9. Coulson, N. (2005). Receiving social support online: an analysis of a computer-mediated support group for individuals living with irritable bowel syndrome. CyberPsychology & Behavior 8:580-584.
10. Czitrom, D. (1982). Media and the American mind: from Morse to McLuhan. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
11. DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Neuman, W.R., et al. (2001). Social implications of the Internet. Annual Review of Sociology 27:307-337.
12. Galston, W. (1999). Does the Internet strengthen community? Available at: www.puaf.umd.edu/IPPP/fall1999/internet_community.htm. Accessed November 20, 2001.
13. Gershuny, J. (2002). Social leisure and home IT: a panel time-diary approach. IT & Society 1:54-72.
14. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78:1360-1380.
15. Hampton, K., & Wellman, B. (2001). Long distance community in the network society: contact and support beyond netville. American Behavioral Scientist 45:476-495.
16. Horrigan, J. B. (2001). Cities online: urban development and the internet. Available at: www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=50. Accessed December 1, 2002.
17. Horrigan, J.B. (2002). The broadband difference: how online Americans' behavior changes with high-speed Internet connections at home. Presented at the Internet Research 3.0, Maastrich, The Netherlands.
18. Howard, P.E., Rainie, L., & Jones, S. (2001). Days and nights on the Internet: The impact of a diffusing technology. American Behavioral Scientist 45:383-404.
19. Katz, J.E., & Rice, R.E. (2002). Social consequences of internet use: Access, involvement, and interaction. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
20. Kavanaugh, A.L., & Patterson, S.J. (2001). The impact of community computer networks on social capital and community involvement. American Behavioral Scientist 45:496-509.
21. Kestnbaum, M., Robinson, J.P., Neustadtl, A., et al. (2002). Information technology and social time displacement. IT & Society 1:21-37.
22. Kiesler, S., Kraut, R., Cummings, J., et al. (2002). Internet evolution and social impact. IT & Society 1:120-134.
23. Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., et al. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues 58:49-74.
24. Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., et al. (1996). Internet paradox: a social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist 53:1011-1031.
25. Lessig, L. (1999). Code and other laws of cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.
26. Markoff, J. (2002). How lonely is the life that is lived online? The New York Times, p. C3.
27. Matei, S., & Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (2001). Real and virtual social ties: connections in the everyday life of seven ethnic neighborhoods. American Behavioral Scientist 45:550-564.
28. Negroponte, N. (1995). Being digital. New York: Vintage Books.
29. Nie, N.H. (2001). Sociability, interpersonal relations, and the Internet: reconciling conflicting findings. American Behavioral Scientist 45:420-435.
30. Nie, N.H., & Erbring, L. (2002). Internet and society: a preliminary report. IT & Society 1:275-283.
31. Nie, N.H., & Hillygus, D.S. (2002). The impact of internet use on sociability: time-diary findings. IT & Society 1:1-20.
32. Preece, J. (2002). Supporting community and building social capital: introduction. Communications of the ACM 45:37-39.
33. Previte, J., Hearn, G., & Dann, S. (2001). Profiling internet users' participation in social change agendas: an application of Q-methodology. Presented at the 29th Research Conference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy, Alexandria, VA.
34. Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
35. Resnick, P. (2001). Beyond bowling together: sociotechnical capital. In: J. Carroll (ed.), HCl in the new millennium. New York: Addison-Wesley, pp. 647-672.
36. Rheingold, H. (1993). Virtual communities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
37. Russell, D., Peplau, L.A., & Cutrona, C.E. (1980). The revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39:472-480.
38. Shah, D., Kwak, N., & Holbert, R.L. (2001). "Connecting" and "disconnecting" with civic life: patterns of Internet use and the production of social capital. Political Communication 18:141-162.
39. Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1992). Connections: new ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. Sunstein, C. (2001). republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41. UCLA Center for Communication Policy. (2001). The UCLA Internet project: year two. Available at: www.ccp.ucla.edu/pages/newsTopics.asp?id=27. Accessed November 29, 2001.
42. Uslaner, E. M. (2000). Social capital and the net. Communications of the ACM 43:60-64.
43. VanAlstyne, M., & Brynjolffson, E. (2005). Global village or cyber-balkans? Modeling and measuring the integration of electronic communities. Management Science 51:851-868.
44. Walther, J. (2006). Nonverbal dynamics in computer-mediated communication, or :( and the net :('s with you, :) and you :) alone. In: V. Manusov & M. Patterson (eds.), The Sage handbook of nonverbal communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 461-480.
45. Wellman, B., Boase, J., & Chen, W. (2002). The net-worked nature of community: online and offline. IT & Society 1:151-165.
46. Wellman, B., & Gullia, M. (1999). Net surfers don't ride alone: virtual communities as communities. In: B. Wellman (ed.), Networks in the global village. Boulder, CO: Westview, pp. 331-366.
47. Williams, D. (2006). Measuring bridging and bonding online and off: the development and validation of a social capital Instrument. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11. Available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/ vol11/issue2/Williams.html. Accessed May 16, 2007.